Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.49s

  • Oral argument — United States v. Marcelino Martinez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2019

    It's not like that just wipes the slate clean of the judge's prior comments to what he had been saying. … And see, I think that only reinforces the notion that you're not really starting on a clean slate by just wiping it clean and now we're set for trial again.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — WATERKEEPERS NO. CA v. AG INDUSTRIAL

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2004

    And that, under the terms of the Clean Water Act and the general permit, that's a stormwater discharge, not a non-stormwater. Okay. … Water Act.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sierra Club v. State Water Control Board

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2023

    And this Court has recognized that such an alternatives analysis flows from the Clean Water Act, because the Clean Water Act is replete with such requirements, such as in the 404B1 guidelines. … And as my friend recognized, it's long been the rule under the Clean Water Act that a Clean Water Act certification that's challenged on state law grounds is considered in state court.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Steven Adams

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2019

    We look at it as an issue of first impression on a clean slate. … period rather than through the actual guideline process.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Sepulveda

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022

    And he just said, you know, no comment, no comment. And the judge said, you know, something for the victims. Anyhow, you're saying that the court did draw an adverse inference from silence. … But then, if you agree and they agree, everyone agrees that we're reviewing for clean air for plain air. The first question is, was there error?

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Monica Ramos Lara v. Loretta Lynch

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2016

    plenty to do where the parties where's before so we pretty steadfast at not grasping for these circuit split issues if they're not prominently before as you heard in the other case I mean you know plain air … Once again this is a woman that's had previous serious immigration encounters prior to coming here in 2009 she doesn't come to you with a clean slate.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Vinales v. AETC II

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2025

    by the Buck Act. … The comment was this house smells musty, and the agent said, well, it's an old house. It smells like Grandma's house.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dichter-Mad Family Partners v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2013

    When I made that investment I relied on the Clean Bill of Health that Mr. Madoff and his industry had been given by the SEC. Several years later Mr. … And I haven't made this allegation up out of thin air. This is in the report of the Office of Inspector General when he takes a look at the allegation.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Chronister Oil Co. v. Illinois Pollution Control Board

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2026

    The idea is, for the most part, this is going to be not lawyers deciding how or when stuff is cleaned up. It even goes so far in, I believe, 57.8L of the Environmental Protection Act. … They let the appeal period close. Their door to appeal this under Section 40 of the Act was 35 days, plus potentially 90.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Stephen Hard

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2012

    Lee lasted a short period of time. So he did not have the luxury of a long period of time to discover the fraudulent intent of what Mr. Lee was saying. … And I think because of the players that were involved, no one really came with clean hands and totaled believability. Mr. Lee did not.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Smith

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2021

    First, again, Smith entered Whittington's apartment on the day in question with permission with the intent to clean it. Your time has expired, unfortunately. … That's a little different than saying the state can edit out dead air because the defendant sees it, too. In this case, that didn't happen.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — NRDC v. County of Los Angeles

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2016

    What I'm talking about is when you look at the actual act, the Clean Water Act. Correct. And you talk about the permit provisions. Right. … Well, then how do you satisfy the Clean Water Act? I mean, as great as you folks all are, there is a federal piece of legislation here. You have to comply with it. Correct, Your Honor.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Reyna Cruz v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2024

    Before I hit on the two points, I wanted to comment about a couple things. The plaintiff never testified there was a puddle. She made it very clear. … Because what you look at is for a constructive notice perspective, was the defendant doing what they should have done to ensure it wasn't there over a significant period of time?

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Re Grant

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2019

    How do I clean up the ground? And so the invention says, OK, into the ground, blow some oxygen, generate some heat, and get smoldering combustion going. … Although eight patent offices around the world have allowed claims to this technology, leading to patent grants in 31 countries, the board has acted otherwise.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bettis v. Wade

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2011

    At that point she is shipped off to Springfield by air ambulance. Dr. Pensick operates on her and in his deposition he said, I would have liked to have gotten to her sooner. … There were requests of the court to extend time to me to do a particular act. Thank you. Thanks to both of you. The case is submitted and the court will stand recessed.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Chiang v. Kamehameha Schools

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2003

    It probably was in headlines for two years during this time period. And it starts basically with the Internal Revenue and the courts wanting to take micromanagement away from the trustees. … Aloa Air Service, forgive me, in terms of dishonesty of the employer believing they had the right to do this, he only said in his deposition they couldn't do it.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. RaPower-3

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2019

    So although the bank deposits were lower, they did not contain the full period. … Is there such a thing as a clean-hands doctrine that applies here? I don't think so. Not in a disgorgement case. It's equitable. Well, that's when clean-hands doctrine comes in, right? We have not...

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Murdock v. Mingus Union High Sc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2008

    We have a sort of a basic rule that except in highly unusual circumstances where it's plain air, I mean, there are very limited circumstances, matters not fairly raised to the trial court aren't the proper … And so it is distinct from Lamas in the sense that that was a personnel file that could be cleaned out.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Darby v. Greenman

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2020

    Greenman acted with the necessary mental state. … Greenman acted with deliberate indifference. And what about Dr. Hamilton proposing a cleaning to deal with an abscess? Yeah. And Dr.

    61 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Haswood

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003

    And we have no insight into what the defendant's perception of those words or decision to use those words, whether that was at all based on coercion or a volitional act on his part. … The facts for clear air, but the totality is de novo. Well, I do think that it's a factual finding the court made that the agent put words in Mr. Haswood's mouth.

    21 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.