Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.45s
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief for the United States · 1984
Ignoring our discussion of the legislative history, ap- pellees (Br. 21-24; see also CBS Br. 28-29) respond that Section 399 was enacted solely for the “illegitimate pur- pose” of protecting incumbents … We do not suppose that the existence of government “support” history of Section 399 shows that this was a clear congressional concern (see Gov't Br. 24-25 & n.53).
468 U.S. 364Supplemental Brief — Charles Russell Rhines, Petitioner v. South Dakota
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · May 29, 2018
Norris, 336 F.3d 648, 649 (8th Cir. 2003) (per 20 Case 5:00-cv-05020-KES Document 399 Filed 05/25/18 Page 21 of 24 PageID #: 7987 curiam). But in Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. … Martell is denied. 23 Case 5:00-cv-05020-KES Document 399 Filed 05/25/18 Page 24 of 24 PageID #: 7990 CONCLUSION Rhines has appealed this court’s final judgment to the Eighth Circuit, and that appeal
Amicus Brief — Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
Reg. 3348 (Jan. 24, 1983). … Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 19, 24-25 (1976).
468 U.S. 364Appellees Brief — Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of California
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1984
The Interests Asserted by the Govern- ment Cannot Justify Section 399’s Ban OE) BID cn cccccccoccesocccsesennnans 24 Page a. … Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448 (1980) ........... 24 Gambino v.
468 U.S. 364Joint Appendix — Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of California
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1984
Fld US Senate’s note of app of Michael Davidson & Charles Tiefer as ens] for US Senate in case 24. … MIN ORD: plitf motnfr S/J cont to 9-28-81 10am pitf supplemtnal motn before 8-24-81 opp NLT 2wks 63.
468 U.S. 364Respondents Brief — National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1970
(5th Cir, wasp EET SERN T OT ee 4,12 4. 115 NLRB 388 (1956), enf’d 245 F, 24 594 (Sth Cir, copa ERT ee 4, 5-12, 13 qr 158 NLRB 388 (1956), enf’d in part and reversed in part, 399 F. 2d 396 (Sth Cir … The record in that earlier case, said the court below, was ‘‘ permeated throughout with cogent testimony of company antipathy toward the union’’ (A. 958; 399 F. 2d 397, citing 229 F. 24 819).
396 U.S. 258motion to affirm — Tucker v. Salera
Supreme Court brief · motion to affirm · 1976
process from the independent one." 399 venience, the court below found that the F. Supp. at 1267, App. 23-24. … Supp. at 1268, App. 24-25.
424 U.S. 959Opposition Brief — Pennzoil Co. v. Associated Gas Distributors
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
In fact, a certificate appli- cation filed by Tennessee on May 24, 1984 (Docket No. … A copy of Order No. 399 is attached as Appendix D. 9. On October 24, 1984, FERC issued its “Order Granting Stay and Rehearing for the Purpose of Further Consideration” in Docket No.
474 U.S. 847Amicus Brief — Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
OC Oe. 6:6 @ 12, 24 Muir v, Alabama Educational Television Commission, 656 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1981), aff'd on rehearing, 688 F.2d 1033 pi Cir. catia cert, denied, 103 S.Ct. 1274 (1983). … U.S.C. §399 (Supp. 1983) (amending 47 U.S.C. §399 23 process is inherently subjective . . .
468 U.S. 364Amicus Brief — Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
Rec. (1962) : ER a EEE ead Ome ae OTN 12, 24 TEE 2 AES Rae Pe SAO 12, 24 Nt ee Rs RA 7S Relea 12, 24 EE Rae SE A eerie, rn See RL 12, 24 Es ECR a seer ae Pate? … House Hearings at 24.
468 U.S. 364Joint Appendix — McCrory v. Harris, 136 S. Ct. 2512 (2016) (No. 15-1262)
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2016
Block [5] 395/17 399/15 399/16 401/7 403/3 Dr. Block’s [5] 381/1 399/18 401/25 402/3 403/7 Dr. Brunell [18] 328/13 328/16 374/20 374/24 376/2 377/25 380/7 380/9 385/4 385/24 385/25 Dr. … /3 399/6 399/9 399/16 399/22 400/13 403/11 406/8 407/13 412/22 432/1 ' operated [1] 240/23 = [20] 241/25 279/23 290/15 293/24 294/4 294/19 332/12 332/18 332/18 332/20 333/1 333/5 333/24 334/6
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Dec 8, 2025
Williams, 399 U.S. at 90. … Williams, 399 U.S. at 90.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kottaram v. Bank Leumi, USA
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
Law 96-399, as a whole, is INVALID AND NEGLIGIBLE. … The amount spent on repairs was included in the common charges. 24.
544 U.S. 1060Reply Brief — Jermaine Anderson, Jr., Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 21, 2024
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). … Econ. & Org. 24, 27-43 (2003); Parisi & Luppi, Jury Size and the Hung-Jury Paradox, 42 J. Legal Stud. 399, 408 (2013); Guerra et al., Accuracy of Verdicts, 28 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 221, 232 (2020).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamed Kian, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 13, 2026
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) .................................... 10, 15 Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978)....................... 5, 19, 20, 24 Blakely v. … Williams, 399 U.S. at 93-96.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 7, 2023
Nos. 387-1, 387-2, 389-1, 389-2, 389-4, 398-2, 398-3, 398-8, 399-10, 399-11, 399-25, 400-6, 400-12, 400-13, 401-13, 401-15, 401-18, 401-20, 401-24, and 401-26. … to -9, 399-12 to -21, 399-23, 399-24, 400, 400-1 to -5, 400-7 to -11, 400-14 to -16, 400-18 to -25, 401, 401-1 to -12, 401-14, 401-16, 401-17, 401-21 to -23, 401-25, 401-27 to -29, 401-31, 401-32.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Solem v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004
sec. 19.2-393, 3, 24 V.C. sec. 19.2-394, 3, 24 V.C. sec. 19.2-395, 3, 24 V.C. sec. 19.2-396, 3, V.C. sec. 19.2-397, 4, 24 V.C. sec. 19.2-52, 3 V.C. sec. 19.2-53, 3 V.C. sec. 19.2-54, 3, 6 V.C. … (Pet. 24).
542 U.S. 920Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brian William Schumaker, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 7, 2025
Thus, this Court may not consider the motion, and the motion is subject to dismissal 2 Case l:07-cr-00289-JPB-CMS Document 399 Filed 09/19/24 Page 3 of 4 for lack of jurisdiction.1 Because this case … Movant must present his alleged newly discovered evidence to the Eleventh Circuit for authorization to proceed. 3 Case l:07-cr-00289-JPB-CMS Document 399 Filed 09/19/24 Page 4 of 4 right and that
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 8, 2025
New York, 399 U.S. 117 (1970) .................................... 7, 22, 29 Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978) .................................. 24, 25, 32 Blakely v. … Ct. at 24 (quoting Patton v.
Opposition Brief — Cody Enrriquez, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Feb 7, 2024
See 399 U.S. at 100–02. … Econ. & Org. 24, 24 (2003). Smaller juries are preferable to larger ones in several ways.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.