Documents

Record and brief — American Elec. Power Co. v. Connecticut

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2011

The Clean Air Act a. Overview: the Clean Air Act b. … The Clean Air Act a.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

REQUIRING EPA TO IDENTIFY “INTELLI- GIBLE PRINCIPLES” DERIVED FROM THE CLEAN AIR ACT IS CONSISTENT WITH ESTABLISHED PRECEDENTS ........................ A. … Rusk, 381 U.S. 1 (1965) .2.0..... eee eee 11 I eee 16 26 U.S.C. § 501(c) (3) .... . 1 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Clean Air Act § 109(b) (1), 42 U.S.C. § 7409(b) (1) Clean Air Act § 307(d

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Growth Energy, et al., Petitioners v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 20, 2024

Circuit of any Clean Air Act action that is nationally significant. … Air] Act.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. Thomas

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

Moreover, under the Clean Air Act (hereinafter “the Act” or “CAA”), importers are considered to be man- ufacturers and must comply with the duties and respon- sibilities imposed on manufacturers by … Air Act, as amended. 42 U.S.C

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Valero Energy Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 30, 2019

The Act requires annual consideration Under the Clean Air Act, EPA must annually determine a renewable fuel obligation, a “[r]equired element[]” of which is that the obligation “shall be applicable to … Third, the RFS program is not the only environmental scheme within the Clean Air Act that requires EPA to consider, at a specific time, whether to adjust requirements.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. American Trucking Assns.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

.- 5 III, REQUIRING EPA TO IDENTIFY “INTELLI- GIBLE PRINCIPLES” DERIVED FROM THE CLEAN AIR ACT IS CONSISTENT WITH ESTABLISHED PRECEDENTS ........................ 8 A. … § 109(b) (1), 42 U.S.C. § 7409(b) (1) 3,8 Clean Air Act § 807(d), 42 U.S.C. § 7607 (d)........ 12 Miscellaneous : U.S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

Rather, the court infers Congress intended to allow such suits when it amended the Clean Air Act. 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq. … Air Act.

Amicus Brief — Train v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975

Johnson boldly announced in 1966 that ‘‘the promise is clean rivers, tall forests, and clean air — a sane environment for man,”*!! … Milliken of the State of Michigan has commented on this executive impoundment: “This action represents a serious blow to our efforts aimed at achieving clean-water goals in Michigan and throughout

Opposition Brief — American Air Filter Co. v. Continental Air Filters, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1966

In thé period prior to 1954, the glass fiber filter, “15. Among these relatively thick pads of filamentous | ~ IZ « “27. … ”’ “45. * * * The patentee’s invention brings no. im- . proved result.insofar as the cleaning of the air is.con- ’ cerned,,. because the old and well recognized class of filter media,,which is'‘subjected

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hallstrom v. Tillamook County

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989

The question presented also involves citizen enforcement of the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Noise Control Act of 1972, the Deepwater … Train, 510 F.2d 692, 699-700 (D.C.Cir.1974) (construing amendments to the Clean Air Act). I agree.

Opposition Brief — Utility Air Regulatory Group v. New York (No. 06-750)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2006

Air Act. … The NSR Program Congress enacted the 1970 amendments to the Clean Air Act “to speed up, expand, and intensify the war against air pollution in the United States with a view to assuring that the air

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

This Court should interpret the Clean Air Act to avoid this potential constitutional difficulty. … Circuit has applied this presumption to a different provision of the Clean Air Act.

Emergency Application — Electric Generators for a Sensible Transition, Applicant v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Jul 26, 2024

July 14, 1955, the Clean Air Act, as in effect immediately prior to the enactment of Pub. … July 14, 1955, the Clean Air Act, as in effect immediately prior to the enactment of Pub.

Appendix — Missouri v. Continental Insurance Cos.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1988

Stat. § 260.435-.550 (Vernon Supp. 1986) (state’s interest in preventing harm to property and people by abandoned hazardous waste dumps); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 7401-7642 (1982) (protection of … Act, the Court stated, “While the Federal Act determines damages measured by the cost to the United States for cleaning up oil spills, the damages specified in the Florida Act relate in part to the

Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 24, 2022

Jorling is a leading expert on the drafting, implementation, and evolution of the Clean Air Act. Mr. … Congress contemplated that the Clean Air Act’s social and economic impact could—and likely would— be significant.

Respondents Brief — Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1978

United States, 321 U.S. 414_ 8, 18, 19, 24 * Statutes and regulations: Clean Air Act, as added and amended, 84 Stat. 176, 42 U.S.C. (and Supp. … To carry out his duties under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as added, 84 Stat. 1685, 42 U.S.C. 1857¢-7, to protect the public health from hazardous 3 air pollutants, the Administrator of the Environ

Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Courts Deciding Clean Air Act § 113 Civil Judicial Enforcement Actions Must Give The Regulations At Issue Meaning Consis- tent With the Clean Air Act, Regardless Of Clean Air Act § 307(b). … respects to Clean Air Act § 307.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gateway Center Corp. v. Merriam

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Where hot air furnaces are used, they shall be operated in accordance with local and 156a national codes that apply and shall be periodically cleaned and serviced so as to provide an adequate flow … Air filters shall be provided and serviced, as required, to maintain adequate flow of clean cooled air to the office space. 157a (2) Airconditioning Servicing.

Opposition Brief — Landry v. Air Line Pilots Association (No. 90-189)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990

National Cleaning Co., 736 F. Supp. 177, 179 (N.D. … Committee Comment (West Supp. 1989); Cal. Proc. § 343 (West 1981); 3 years: Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-80- 101(f) (Branford 1987); Wash. Rev.

Reply Brief — Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1980

Although the Noise Control Act. 42 U.S.C. 4915(a). has a preclusive review provision like that in the Clean Air Act. only specific enumerated sections in the Noise Act are subject to preenforcement … The pre-amended version of the Clean Air Act. the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. 33 U.S.C. 1369(b,(1). and the Noise Act, 42 U.S.C. 4915(a). authorize original preenforcement review in the courts