Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.13s
Opposition Brief — Horn v. Chicago
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1950
W. (24) 697, 234 Mo. App. 16 McCammon & Lang Lumber Co. v. Trinity é BLY. Ry. Co., 133 8. W. 247, 104 Tex. 8 Monarch Refrig. Co. v. City of Chicago, 328 Ill. App. 540 15, 16 O'Neil v. … Rosenfield, 399 Ill. 247, 251; County of Mercer v. Wolff, 237 Ill. 74, 76; Parker v.
338 U.S. 940Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 20, 2024
United States, No. 24-5453; Lindsey v. United States, No. 24-5328; Mayfield v. United States, No. 24-5488; Pierre v. United States, No. 24-37; Borne v. United States, No. 23-7293; Willis v. … In re Grand Jury, 399 F.3d at 528 n.1; Perez-Garcia, 96 F.4th at 1173.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 176-177 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring); Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1972) cf. Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78, N.14 at 83 (1970); Wardius v. … Plrida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), no court has ever sanctioned uncontrolled and =~ * nonreciprocal prosecution discovery. In Wardius v.
421 U.S. 519Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
App. 653, 399 SE2d 226 PRs i been ed eae kone & © o @ 24 Asahi Metal Industry Co., Ltd. v. … -24- O.C.G.A. §9-2-61.
501 U.S. 1232Reply Brief — McGautha v. California
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1971
California, 386 U.S. 18, 21-24.] … Pennsylvania, supra, 382 U.S. 399, in which the question was not involved. a knowledge of the jury.
402 U.S. 183Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Ed. 399 (1994) City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 437 US. 617; 98 S. Ct. 2531; 57 L. Ed. 475 (1978) Halle Cos. v. Crofton Civic Ass'n, 339 Md 131, 661 A.2d 682 (1994) Hughes v. … Ed. 399 (1994) may be is helpful.
Appellants Brief — Palmer v. City of Euclid
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1971
S. 399 (1966). … Pennsylvama, 382 U.S. 399 (1966); Shuttlesworth v.
402 U.S. 544Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bolton v. City of Dallas, Texas (No. 08-704)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008
(See pp. 15- 24, infra). … See id. at 399-400.
Amicus Brief — Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1979
NLRB, 399 F.2d 455, 457 (6th Cir. 1968). … NLRB, 399 F.2d 455, 457 (6th Cir. 1968).
440 U.S. 301Opposition Brief — Donnelly v. Eklutna, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
In 1950, PSC 399 also withdrew the land. Pet. App. E at 60a. … Petition at 23-24.
488 U.S. 1046Petition — Vinson v. Richmond Police Department
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Kroger Co., 399 F. Supp. 725 (W. … Kroger Co., 399 F. Supp. 724 (W.D.
438 U.S. 903Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. Cleveland
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972
Eastern Airlines, Inc., 399 F. 2d 14 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 979 (1968) ............ 10, 19, 22 Smith & Son v. Taylor, 276 U.S. 179 (1928) ......... 24, 25 Stiles v. … Dicken joined in P the motion (R. 24).
409 U.S. 249Amicus Curiae Brief — National Credit Union Admin. v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399-400 (citing Invest- ment Co. Institute v. Camp, 401 U.S, 617 (1971)). … See Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399 (quoting Block, 467 U.S. at 347).
522 U.S. 479Amicus Curiae Brief — Gerstein v. Pugh
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Alabama, : 399 UsSs 1 (1970). scccvccnccvee 71°58 Cooltdge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1970)...sce00- << 9 Sage APS gh ii Dresner v. … The Court's conclusion that "...an eight day (24 hours for initial ap- pearance plus seven days) deprivation of liberty is not reasonable..." (App. 111) is clearly erroneous under Rule 5(c).
420 U.S. 103Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — United States v. John Barth Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1929
¢ “Matutes Revenue Act of 918 Act of Peh 24 1s 18 40 Seat t Sex ‘a s 4 a t 4 jt Sec. 2M id 18 Revenue Act af 192), Act of Nev 24, 192) i%¢, 42 Stat Sex 2M d 14 Revenue Act of 1924, Act of June 2 … Act of Feb. 24, 1919. (40 Btat. L. 1057-96, C. 18.)
279 U.S. 370Brief for the United States in Opposition — Morgan v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1969
On the basis of those supplement- ed findings and its own review of the record, the court of apneals th¥n affirmed. 399 F. 2d 93 (Pet. App. 13- 24). No further review is warranted. … App. 23 n. 2, 24).
393 U.S. 1025Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
The United States Court of Appeals. for the First Circuit affirmed said judgment by Opinion dated June 24, 1993 (3a). … P. 24.’ 3. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 provides, in relevant part: (a) Intervention of Right. Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to, intervene in an action: ...
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976
Computing Scale Co., 261 US. 399, 43 S.Ct. 458 (1923) United States v. … The Petition seeks review of an Order of the Fifth Circuit filed May 24, 1976, denying a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (Apx. 56).
429 U.S. 1023Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Zemler v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
U: Sy 399. ALAS 377. (1968), si * aan BOs . : pte 4 ? ‘ Statutes, Féderal Rules and Regulations Invaved . ISU. C. <1 Ses \ eS aw scene 659." pe ok. … For’ falsely makhig and” forging - ‘twenty of testi American E xpress Travelers A ‘hee ks" in, violation of U.S «©. 24s Re gike i> eos .
400 U.S. 820Amicus Curiae Brief — United Water Conservation District, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 28, 2025
App. 38a). 20 Int’l Paper, 282 U.S. 399. 21 Gerlach, 339 U.S. 725. 22 Dugan, 372 U.S. 609. 23 Pet. App. 11a. 24 See id. at 13a. 25 Penn Central, 438 U.S. 104. 26 Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. … Water Code § 1610. 24 II.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.