Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.56s
Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
that the SIPs met the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … The State’s primary role under the Clean Air Act becomes a charade.
496 U.S. 530Appendix — New Jersey Citizens for Clean Air, Inc. v. New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1973
of any plan or portion thereof which implements RTM SAONG AIR DAE LM ORE VEE Ie ORL AEE eet 18a Clean Air Act a@ national secondary ambient air quality standard for a period not to exceed 18 months … to the Clean Air Act. 17.
414 U.S. 989Petition for Rehearing — Peter Williams, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Jul 17, 2024
of Circuit precedent.1 Because the Clean Air Act confines judicial review of most major Clean Air Act issues to the D.C. … applies to the Clean Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Thus, for the period from 1970 to 1990, the benefits of the Clean Air Act exceeded its costs by more than 42 times. … ” under the Clean Air Act.
549 U.S. 497Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975
The pertinent provisions of the Clean Air Act (42 U. S. C. §§ 1857c-3, 1857f-1 and 1857f-6c), the Administrative Proce- dure Act (5 U. S. … No comment period was allowed on the final regulations. Petitioner filed its petition to review these regulations on De- cember 27, 1973, pursuant to Section 307 of the Clean Air Act (42 U. S.
Petition — Timken Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Clean Air Act §§ 109 (a), 110(a), 42 U.S.C. §§$ 1857c-4(a), 5(a) (1970 & Supp. V 1975). … Clean Air Act §110(c)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 1857¢-5(c) (1) (Supp. V 1975).
439 U.S. 910Petitioners Reply Brief — American Iron & Steel Institute v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1983
Circuit has addressed the plantwide source issue' in the context of three different Clean Air Act programs with confusing, contradictory results. … Air Act amend that Act, review by this Court is unnecessary.
461 U.S. 956Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 25, 2024
For Clean Air Act proceedings outside § 307(d), the Clean Air Act remains “silent on the scope of judicial review” and thus the APA still governs those Clean Air Act actions.6 For statutes—such as the … available for public comment (hereinafter referred to as the “comment period”).
Opposition — Shell Oil Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
The State of Ohio, however, failed to develop ‘The Clean Air Act (formerly 42 U.S.C. (1970 ed.) 1857 et seq.) is now 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. See Clean Air Act Amend- ments of 1977, Pub. L. … Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. No. 95-95, Sec. 305(a), 91 Stat. 775 * * *.
439 U.S. 1114Opposition — Timken Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub.L. No. 95-95, § 305(a), 91 Stat. 775 * * *. … It held that the notice and comment rulemaking procedures fol- lowed by EPA and supplemented with the court- ordered additional comment opportunity met the re- quirements of the Clean Air Act, the
439 U.S. 910Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Environmental Protection Agency v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004
The Relevant Provisions Of The Clean Air Act The Clean Air Act establishes a comprehensive pro- gram, based on principles of cooperative federalism, for controlling air pollution. … time for EPA to respond to comments raised during the afore- mentioned 90-day comment period; (iv) for those deficiencies identified during the 90- day comment period with which EPA agrees, EPA intends
540 U.S. 1104Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondent EPA · Oct 30, 2023
OAR is the EPA headquarters-based unit with primary responsibility for administration of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … (“NAAQS”) under the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or the “Act”). 3.
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Aug 21, 2024
July 14, 1955, the Clean Air Act, as in effect immediately prior to the enactment of Pub. … This rule, issued after careful consideration of public comments, prescribes standards under section 112 of the Clean Air Act to control emissions of mercury and other toxic air pollutants from power plants
Joint Appendix — General Motors Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1990
Section 109%a) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … For an indefinite period, the state would be unable to act to balance dictated national priorities with the interests of its citizens and in- dustries as the Clean Air Act intended.
496 U.S. 530Opposition Brief — E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976
ae ee 14 ciding to regulate lead additives under Section 211- (c)(1)(A) rather than to adopt alternative control strategies authorized by the Clean Air Act. 1. … received during the two previous comment periods.
426 U.S. 941Opposition Brief — Alabama Power Co. v. Environmental Defense Fund
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. … Moreover, Congress is presently considering legislation to amend the Clean Air Act by specifically addressing the issue of acid rain.
493 U.S. 991Motion — Mont. Power Co. v. U.S.E.P.A.
Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1977
already is cleaner than the national ambient air quality stand- ards” (A. 48a) are authorized by the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857 et seq. … On August 7, 1977, the President approved the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. 95-95, 91 Stat. 685.
430 U.S. 953Petitioners Brief — Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1983
With respect to written comments received after the close of the comment period, the court held that noth- ing on the face of the Clean Air Act prohibited the Agency from receiving and considering such … (d) of the Clean Air Act.
463 U.S. 680Appendix — Central Arizona Water Conservation District v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1993
The Clean Air Act, Visibility Impairment, and the Grand Canyon In 1977, Congress substantially amended the Clean Air Act (the “Act™). … Air Act.
510 U.S. 828Appendix — Ohio Power Co. v. Thomas
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1988
The court found this period to be contrary to sec- tion 406(d) (2) of the Clean Air Act and reversed it. … Cir. 1983), page 28. 5 Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857 et seq.). Park C.
488 U.S. 901
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.