Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.39s
Petition — Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
When cleaning the area, he would use an air hose to blow the glass dust off the overhead ‘pipes and it would fall down on his head as he worked. … The dust was suspend- ed in the air and would accumulate in the plant requiring continual clean-up.
445 U.S. 905Opposition Brief — Jasinski v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976
buildings, hangars, and related equipment; cleaning and maintaining the interior and exterior of aircraft; servicing and control of cabin service equipment; air conditioning of aircratt; cleaning of … The carriers—Eastern Air Lines, United Air Lines, and Seaboard World Airlines—are carriers as defined in Section 201, Title II and Section 2, Ninth of the Railway Labor Act. 3.
424 U.S. 909Opposition Brief — SC Testing Technology, Inc. v. Maine Department of Environmental Protection
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
Air Act. … Air Act.
520 U.S. 1264Petition — TENNESSEE V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (No. 75-787)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975
At issue is the interpretation of a critical portion (§ 110) of the Clean Air Act. … ent air standards to be attained within a specific period of time. . . .
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 16, 2022
of the Texas Clean Air Act, and the Texas Clean Air Act itself, which is to “safeguard the state’s air resources from pollution by controlling or abating air pollution and emissions of air contaminants … And because the Clean Air Act not only authorizes the particular TCEQ decision but also specifically provides for its judicial review, the court concluded that the Clean Air Act controls over the more
Opposition Brief — Wilder v. New York State Urban Development Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
BOOS) «ce eo ts es 6 6 vi Statutes and Regulations: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 Se ee a eal 40 Code of Federal Regulations § 50.8 (1988). . 8n New York State Air Quality Implementation Plan … (“NAAQS”) promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) under the Clean Air Act (the “Act”).
489 U.S. 1053Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
III Act of Nov. 15, 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. … Works, 93d Cong., 2d Sess., A Legislative History of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, at 410 (Comm. Print 1974).
531 U.S. 457Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
The Clean Air Act Requires Consideration Of Costs And Risk Trade-Offs. The Clean Air Act provides clear indications that implementing regulations should not ignore costs. … The Clean Air Act Mandates Economic Impact And Employment Analyses.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 28, 2026
Air Act. … Legislative Requirements Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA) govern the establishment and revision of the NAAQS.
Respondents Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. New York, 127 S. Ct. 2127 (2007) (No. 06-736)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2007
Circuit would effectively undo these determinations, of which Congress was clearly aware when it amended the Clean Air Act. See Hall v. EPA, 273 F.3d 1146, 1158 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing Bragdon v. … Yet, all of these exclusions were in place when Congress amended the Clean Air Act, and Congress must be presumed to have known this fact. The D.C.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
contaminant under the Clean Air Act. … pollutant” under the Clean Air Act.
549 U.S. 497Opposition Brief — Pure Waters, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
No contract work has taken place this period, as the contractor has been pumping water, cleaning the Tunnel and repairing equipment damaged by the flood. … No contract work has taken place this period, as the contractor has been pumping water, cleaning the Tunnel and repairing equipment damaged by the flood.
519 U.S. 864Jurisdictional Statement — Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1981
l Clean Air Act of 1970, Pub. L. … Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857 et seq.) includes the Clean Air Act of 1963—P.L. 88-206, and amendments made by the Motor Vehicle Air Pollution Control Act—P.L. 89-272 (October 20, 1965), the Clean Air Act
453 U.S. 609Amicus Curiae Brief — Air Pollution Variance Bd. of Colo. v. Western Alfalfa Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
The legislative history of the Clean Air Act sheds little light-on the entry provisions in that Act, but the Senate report on the Water Act con- tains the following comment: As under the Clean Air … Section 107(a) of the Clean Air Act provides (42 U.S.C. 1857¢e-2(a) ): Each State shall have the primary responsibility for assuring air quality within the entire geographic area comprising such State
416 U.S. 861Opposition Brief — Pure Waters, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
No contract work has taken place this period, as the contractor has been pumping water, cleaning the Tunnel and repairing equipment damaged by the flood. … No contract work has taken place this period, as the contractor has been pumping water, cleaning the Tunnel and repairing equipment damaged by the flood.
519 U.S. 864Respondents Brief — Utility Air Regulatory Group v. New York (No. 06-750)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2006
Circuit would effectively undo these determinations, of which Congress was clearly aware when it amended the Clean Air Act. See Hall v. EPA, 273 F.3d 1146, 1158 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing Bragdon v. … Yet, all of these exclusions were in place when Congress amended the Clean Air Act, and Congress must be presumed to have known this fact. The D.C.
Reply Brief — Alabama Power Co. v. Environmental Defense Fund
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1989
.......... * The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … quality standards for sulfur oxides under the Clean Air Act,' and that a district court has jurisdiction to enforce that purported duty under § 304(a) (2) of the Act.?
493 U.S. 991Amicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Although there now exists in the Clean-Air Act a federal mandate to the states to maintain minimum levels of air quality, the Act retains, through the use of State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”), the … The amicus supports EPA’s selection of the eight hour standard as a legally permissible implementation of the Clean Air Act.
530 U.S. 1202Opposition Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2014
STATEMENT Congress first regulated hazardous air pollutants in the 1970 Clean Air Act, which directed EPA to conduct individual! … It was not known, in 1990, whether that would be the case after implementation of other Clean Air Act requirements.
Amicus Brief — Lead Industries Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1980
It cannot be disputed that protection of the public health is the major goal of the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act is based on the assumption, although we knew at the time it was inaccurate, that there is a threshold.
449 U.S. 1042
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.