Documents

Memorandum — Washington v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1971

Health & Safety Code, §§ 426.1, 426.5. 18 Act of October 20, 1965, Pub. L. No. 89-272, 79 Stat. 992; Air Quality Act of 1967, Pub. L. No. 90-148, 81 Stat. 485; Clean Air Amendments of 1970, Pub. … Air Act.

Joint Appendix — Utility Water Water Act Group Group v. Riverkeeper, Inc. (Nos. 07-597, 07-588, 07-589)

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2009

Indeed, EPA has issued Clean Air Act regulations for the electric industry that caused similar efficiency penalties in order to reduce the air pollutants NOx and SOQ2. 90. … Is there a groundswell of popular demand to save money by eliminating the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, protection for endangered species, and all the rest? Of course not.

Opposition Brief — American Methyl Corp. v. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass'n of the United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

NTS es ee 6 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. : CE SI, TEED wv ces cccsescens 2 ee SE, FE Wit bees ccescenncvass | POL Oe Rn FIRIUE) voc cncccvcns 2, 4, 6 $ 211(ch(2)(B), 42 U.S.C. … In 1977, Congress amended the Clean Air Act to afford the Administrator additional power over the introduction of new fuels or additives that might damage emission con- trol systems.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, et al., Petitioners v. Ohio, ex rel. Dave Yost, Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 27, 2021

The Federal Clean Air Act and Ohio’s Air Pollution Control Act 1. … to the EPA’s effective execution of the purposes and objectives of the Clean Air Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alliance for California Business, Petitioner v. California Air Resources Board

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 13, 2018

After cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court dismissed the lawsuit, holding that it lacked “subject matter jurisdiction under § 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b) … We consolidated these cases to address a novel question regarding jurisdiction under the unique and complex cooperative federalism scheme of the federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.)

Opposition Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998

In 1990, Congress enacted the Clean Air Act Amendments, which indeed (1) require a 60 day notice period, but (2) at the same time allow a citizen suit for past violations. … Jd., citing The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq.* Since the 1987 Gwaltney decision, Congress has spoken: a notice period is consistent with a suit for past violations.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Robert Bartlett, et al., Petitioners v. Honeywell International, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 23, 2018

. ____________ d IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ROBERT and COLLEEN BARTLETT, ET AL., Petitioners, CAMILLUS CLEAN AIR COALITION, Camillus Clean Air Coalition, —v.— HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, … See Camillus Clean Air Coal., 2013 WL 4774507, at *1–2.

Petition — Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982

.; the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U.S.C. (Supp. … Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6972; and Section 304 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604.

Opposition Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Whitman

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

Niewa SBS. occ. cs0a0s004s0)sse le 17, 18 1970 Clean Air Act § 110, 1970 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News YS08. . 6.065 sccceeasddswekene ean 15 1970 Clean Air Act § 111, 1970 U.S. Code Cong. & : Ad. … News WGS. so ocscacdecéanestie eee 15 1970 Clean Air Act § 113, 1970 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News 9906... 6.0 ccccsctancecaste suena eases 20 1970 Clean Air Act § 231, 1970 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad.

Respondents Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2007

Sues Electric Utilities in Unprecedented Action to Enforce the Clean Air Act (Nov. 3, 1999) (Duke Mot. Summ. J. Ex.7). … And Congress imposed rigorous new permitting requirements—including extensive air quality modeling, a public hearing, and a public comment period. 42 U.S.C § 7475(a).

Petition — Brown Insulating Systems, Inc. v. Donovan

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

The ambient air around where the employees were working was not tested for an eight (8) hour period, nor were area ambient air samples taken over an eight (8) hour period. 6 No tests of the air the … The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 is a Congressional statute that designates the stringent “sub- stantial evidence” test for judicial review of notice-and- comment rulemaking.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

In so doing, ' Parts C and D were added to the Clean Air Act by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977. … See Conference Report on Clean Air Amendments of 1977, H.R. Rep.

Amicus Brief — Hancock v. Train

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1976

Congress has consented to suit in § 118 of the Clean Air Act. … See- tion 118 of the Clean Air Act constitutes such consent.

Emergency Application — North Dakota, et al., Applicants v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Aug 16, 2024

This Proposed Rule concerns the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (the MATS Rule) under Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 112. … Steam Generating Units Review of the Residual Risk and Technology Review” (the Proposed Rule).1 This Proposed Rule concerns the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (the MATS Rule) under Clean Air Act (CAA

Amicus Curiae Brief — Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. The Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County, Florida, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 16, 2021

So when it came to the Clean Air Act, Congress provided a waiver process for California. See 42 U.S.C. § 7543(b)(1). … Restricting the Act’s preemption provision to the pre-sale period would be “an obvious circumvention of the Clean Air Act and would defeat the congressional purpose of preventing obstruction to interstate

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al., Petitioners v. Jane O’Keeffe, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 7, 2019

I, § 8, cl. 3, or is preempted by § 211(c) of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, 7545. The district court dismissed a complaint challenging the Oregon program. We affirm. I. Background A. … Program violates the United States Constitution and is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act and other federal statutes. 3.

Appendix — ASARCO Inc. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1995

trioxide under Clean Water Act § 311) … Air Act [42 U.S.C.A

Memorandum — Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Train

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1976

The structure of the Clean Air Act recognizes that the inter- state nature of free-flowing air warrants the imposition of national ambient air quality standards. … in the Clean Air Act.

Amicus Brief — Milwaukee v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

Hist. at 1706; see also, Clean Air Act of 1970, §304(e), 42 U.S.C. §$7604(e). … Like the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act addresses the issue of control of pollution of interstate or ambient air.

Memorandum — Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Train

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1976

The structure of the Clean Air Act recognizes that the inter- state nature of free-flowing air warrants the imposition of national ambient air quality standards. … in the Clean Air Acct.