Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.62s
Opposition Brief — Utility Air Regulatory Group v. New Jersey (No. 08-352)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009
Specifically, they argue that Congress’s intent in the relevant statutory provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) is not clear and that the EPA’s interpretation of those provisions should have … Bryner, Blue Skies, Green Politics: The Clean Air Act of 1990 and Its Implementation 148-49 (2d ed. 1995).
Appendix — Util. Air Regulatory Grp. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-47)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2014
Put simply: Allowing competitor suits in Clean 10la Air Act cases will mean cleaner air. Excluding com- petitor suits in Clean Air Act cases will mean dirtier air. … See, e.g., National Association of Clean Air Act Agencies v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
B FGER vices 14-15, 20-22 Clean Air Act Section 112 Ris Fee) | ere, 2, 5, 7, 12—15, 22 Clean Air Act Section 307 42 U.S.C. § 7607(d)(9)(A) iv 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments Section 108g) Pub. … As an alternative, Congress provided Section 111 of the Clean Air Act.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jack Cody, Petitioner v. California Air Resources Board, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 9, 2018
Air Act. … Air Act.
Petition — St. Joe Minerals Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency (Nos. 80-483, 80-482)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
United States, 295 U.S. 495. 8 STATUTES: Be ao ne 006 5 0:0:n bs bad ANE KORTE REO | Air Quality Act: Pe A UTD oo cb cca v ote ticecovcneewanas 9 Clean Air Act: 42 U.S.C. §7401(b)(1), Section … of Section 109(b) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. §7409(b)) (Act) which limits public exposure to lead in the ambient air to 1.5 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (ug Pb/m’).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Vista Paint Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seg., gives the States primary responsibility for regulating air pollution. … The Clean Air Act is one such statute.
525 U.S. 816Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
23 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. … Under the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2 $ 7401 et seg. (1982 & Supp.
496 U.S. 530Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ohio Power Co. v. Thomas
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
Clean Air Act §§ 110(a) (1)-(a) (2) (K), 123, 42 U.S.C. §$ 7410(a) (1)-(a) (2) (K), 7423 (1982), App. 172a-177a. 2. 49 Fed. … THE STATUTORY CONTEXT OF THIS CASE The Clean Air Act?
488 U.S. 901Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
The Clean Air Act... contains a notice provision just like the one in the Clean Water Act. … absolutely no effect on EPCRA or any statute other than the Clean Air Act.
523 U.S. 83Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2014
Environmental Protection Agency, The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020, Final Report—Rev. … Air Act?
intervenors brief — Train v. District of Columbia
Supreme Court brief · intervenors brief · 1976
The Clean Air Act Does Not Displace State EROS eee orIa CELE DONE The Clean Air Act Does Not Affect Integral Operations of Traditional State Govern- Ie ND iiinitscsiccniiniicerniticntisiacencbnesistindiann … The Clean Air Act Does Not Displace State Choices Unlike the FLSA, the Clean Air Act does not impose specific substantive rules of conduct on the States.
426 U.S. 904Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Congress chose not to follow this pattern, however, with the Clean Air Act. … Section 109 of the Clean Air Act Does Not Provide a General Rule Controlling EPA Discretion.
531 U.S. 457Opposition Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
The issue the State Respondents addressed before the Court of Appeals was whether EPA lacks the authority under the Clean Air Act ("CAA" or "Act") to regulate the emission of carb n dioxide and other … quality standard within the period permitted in this section.
549 U.S. 497Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Plan for Arcadia, Inc. v. Anita Associates
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Does the Clean Air Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. … THE CLEAN AIR ACT OF 1970 11.
419 U.S. 1034Respondents Brief — Hancock v. Train
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1976
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, Pub. … .” * The Conference Commit- tee * eliminated this subsection without comment but retained in its stead the provision from the Clean Air Act of 1963 defining ‘‘person”’ to inelude a state * and added
426 U.S. 167Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
(c) Cleaning. (1) Initial cleaning. … (2) Additional cleaning.
488 U.S. 942Petition — OIL, CHEMICAL & ATOMIC WORKERS UNION v. DUNLOP (No. 74-1443)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1974
Clean makeup air shall be introduced in sufficient volume to maintain the correct operation of the local exhaust system. … Clean makeup air in equal volume shall replace air removed. — (ii) Any equipment, material, or other item taken into or removed from a regulated area shall be done so in a manner that does not cause
Petition — American Petroleum Institute v. Gorsuch
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982
Air Act, in pertinent part provides: Clean Air Act § 108, 42 U.S.C. § 7408 Air quality criteria and control techniques (a) (2) The Administrator shall issue air quality criteria for an air pollutant … the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.
455 U.S. 1034Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2024
Air Act. … Delay in resolving challenges to EPA’s actions in administering the Clean Air Act can harm all stakeholders, increasing transition and compliance costs for regulated parties, and extending periods of uncertainty
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Train
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1976
Air Act. … App. lla-1l2a), it is at odds with the policy of nondegradation in the Clean Air Act.’
425 U.S. 935
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.