Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.53s
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Democratic Organization of Cook County v. Shakman
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1971
The case, as previously stated, is also brought on behalf of classes of present and future candidates and voters as well as taxpayers [24, 28]. See Brockington v, Rhodes, 396 U. 8S. 41 (1969). … Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party of Minnesota, 399 F. 2d 119 (8th Cir. 1968).
402 U.S. 909Motion to Affirm — Millis v. High Drive Water District
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1978
Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970); Cipriano v. City of Houma, 395 U.S. 701 (1969). … Appellants’ Jurisdictional Statement, Appendix A at Page 24."
439 U.S. 802Opposition Brief — Rye v. Seattle Times Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1984
Cowles Publishing Co., 76 Wash.2d 707, 459 P.2d 8 (1969), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 927 (1970)... … Rye petitioned the state Supreme Court for discretionary review, which petition was denied on July 24, 1984. Pet. App. at A-i. Rye then filed this petition for certiorari.
469 U.S. 1087Opposition — Griffin v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
App. 20-24). 7 met no passengers, entered the restroom simultane- ously. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 48-52.
435 U.S. 1007Petitioners Reply Brief — American Cyanamid Co. v. Melamine Chemicals, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1984
Atlantic Refining Co., 360 US. 19, 23-24 (1959), where it Stated: We ... hold that where the language of a consent decree in its normal meaning supports an interpretation; where that interpretation … Brandman Iron Co., 368 U.S. 399 (1962) and N.L.R.B. v.
465 U.S. 1101Reply Brief — Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1986
April 22, 1986) Coe, SE v0.60 00006000005505nsi eee | New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (1969) ....... Philadelphia Gear Corp v. … Kremlin, Inc., 101 F.R.D. 503, 520- 24 (N.D. Ill. 1984); International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee, 105 F.R.D. 435, 443-44 (S.D.N.Y. 1984); Lasky v.
476 U.S. 1168Reply Brief — Robinson v. Kusper
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1978
S. 399 (1902) ............ 11 Worthy v. Bush, 262 Ill. 560 (1914) ................ 9 Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad Co. v. … S. 399, 411, 412 (1902); and Mobile & Ohio R. Co. v. State of Tennessee, 153 U. S. 486, 492, 493 (1894).
439 U.S. 825Opposition — Sierra Club v. Watt
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
No. 399, 86th Cong.. Ist Sess. … On February 24, 1947, the Secretary of the Interior forwarded to Congress a Finding of Feasibility pursuant to the 1939 Reclamation Act. H.R. Doc.
451 U.S. 965Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 399 (3d Cir. 1991), cert. denied, No. 91-298 (Dec. 2, 1991). … I 1989). 3 The court of appeals correctly rejected petitioner’s cursory constitutional objections (Pet. 24-25) as ‘‘meritless.” Pet. App. 10.
502 U.S. 1057Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 27, 2019
Thaler, 399 F. … Thaler, 399 F.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kenny Eugene Smart, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 22, 2023
Kaipat Pelisamen, 641 F.3d 399 (9th Cir. 2011)……………………..14 United States v. Pang, 362 F.3d 1187 (9th Cir. 2004)…………………………………...13 United States v. Ray, 549 F3d. … Kaipat Pelisamen, 641 F.3d 399, 408 (9th Cir. 2011); United States v. Reese, 745 F.3d 1075, 1083 (10th Cir. 2014).
Opposition Brief — United Mine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1953
(R. 75, 80, 83, 90, 94; 214, 227, 327, 336, 358-359, 375-376, 399, 409, 448, 461). At this point, Suver and Chaney took complete control of the situation in the mine Toeee ee pre a: © 6 yard. … Questions 1 and 2 (Pet. 17-21, 21-24) were presented in the almost identical case of United Mine Workers of America, District 31 et al. v.
344 U.S. 920Supplemental Brief — Osage Nation v. Irby
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 2011
Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994 UcClanahan v. Ariz. Tax 411 U.S. 164 (1973) Vurphy v. Oklahoma 511 U.S. 1102 (200 lem v. Bartlett 165 U.S. 463 (1984 uth Dakota v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411 (1994)).
562 U.S. 1214Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis — Robert Antwain Stanback, Petitioner v. Faye Daniels
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis · Dec 20, 2017
Florida, 399 US. 78,90 S.Ct. 1893, 26 L.Ed 2d 446 (1970)..................7 Justices Of Boston Municipal Court vs. … Art. 1 24.................................................................................7 N.C. GEN.
Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Knost v. MacMillan
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1942
and writing for both herself and her husband, giving Don- ald motherly advice on business and on his marriage and divorce (R. 325-399). … Mace- Millan’s office to have him help her make a will with Donald the sole beneficiary (R. 23, 24, 30). They mod- eled it after the Doctor’s will, and Mrs.
317 U.S. 641Amicus Curiae Brief — Rogers v. Cortes (No. 06-1721)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Comm. 2007) (unreported order approving bill of costs entered January 24, 2007). … Tucker, 399 F. Supp. 1258 (E.D. PA 1975), aff'd, 424 U.S. 959 (1976) (affirming U.S.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dominguez v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
Marzano, 160 F.3d 399 (7 Cir. 1998), cert. denied. 349 U.S. 1175 (1999) ......... iis aces ee United States v. … Marzano, 160 F.3d 399, 401 (7 Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1171 (1999); United States v. Rawley, 152 F.3d 83 1, 848 (8 Cir. 1998); United States v.
532 U.S. 1039Appendix O — Giampa v. Giampa (No. 09-502)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix O · 2009
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 401, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923), “the right of parents to “bring up children,” 262 U.S., at 399, 43 S.Ct. 625, and to control the education of their own” is protected … VICTORIA contends that the following phrase is a non sequitur [the 24 sentence does not logically follow the 1**].
Reply Brief — Super Duper, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2011
Renosky, 399 F.3d 168 (38d Cir. 2005)). … Banjo Buddies, 399 F.3d at 174.
562 U.S. 1179Reply Brief — Federal Trade Commission, Petitioner v. Credit Bureau Center, LLC, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 28, 2020
See Pet. 24. … As the Court explained in Porter, the return of illegally acquired funds is “clearly a part of the subject matter of a suit for an injunction.” 328 U.S. at 399.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.