Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Brief for Respondent — Neil v. Biggers
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1972
This evidence was not controverted by the state (A. 24-25). … Bank of the United States, 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 59 (1826).
409 U.S. 188Petition for Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Nachtigal
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
New York, 399 U.S. 66, 68-74 (1970) (plurality opinion) ; compare Frank v. … Craner, 652 F.2d 23, 24 (9th Cir. 1981) (citations omitted). Sev- eral Supreme Court cases, culminating in Blanton v.
507 U.S. 1Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Yanopoulos v. Department of the Navy
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
Tex. 1985) STATUTES: United States Code, Title 5, Section 7701 (a) United States Code, Title 5, Section 7703 Page 24,26 24 36 37 25,26 24 24 5,23,37 : vi REGULATIONS: Code of Federal … Harris, 652 F. 2d 399, 402-404 (5th Gae. ages). See also Smith v.
479 U.S. 824Petition — Hernandez v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) .............. 6 ee a People v. Dalton, 24 Cal.8d 850, 598 P.2d 467, 157 Cal. Rptr. 497 (1979) (en banc) ..................-.----- 7,9 People v. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970); Carroll Vv. United States, 267 U.S. 1382 (1925). 7 their search and which do not.
446 U.S. 951Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2023
Br. 24. … Id. at 399.
Petitioners Brief — Patch v. Solar Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1945
S. 24; Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co., 256 U. S. 619; Columbus Railway & Power Company v. Columbus, 249 U. S. 399. 3. … S. 24; Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co., 256 U. S. 619; Columbus Railway & Power Com- pany v. Columbus, 249 U. S. 399.
326 U.S. 741Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Patrick Cook, et al., Petitioners v. Melissa Mays, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 13, 2018
Laws § 325.1003 .................................. 10 Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act, Act 399 of 1976 .............................................................6 Removal Clarification Act of 2011, … The EPA granted Michigan primary enforcement authority following the enactment of the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act, Act 399 of 1976 (Act 399).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Daugaard
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2011
Act of February 13, 1929, ch. 1 45 Stat. 1167 General Allotment Act of 1887 24 Stat. 388 Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 48 Stat. 984 Pub. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411 (1994)).
564 U.S. 1019Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Edward E. Morgan Co. v. United States ex rel. Pelphrey
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1956
Stansell, 106 U. s. 399, 1s. Ct. 473 . 11 hesnpaney Co. of North fp ere Vv. : ee atin Co. of New Orleans, 140 U. S. 565, 11 S. Ct. 909, 911 12 J. Kahn & Co., Inc., v. … (4) The court on this special verdict of the jury awarded respondent a judgment for $30,325.33 with six percent interest thereon after July 24, 1953, to the date of judgment on March 24, 1955 (R.
351 U.S. 965Amicus Curiae Brief — EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20, 24 (1991). … S. at 24.
534 U.S. 279Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Motto v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969
Supp. 24. It is, reprinted as Appendix B (pp. 57a-69a) of the petition in No. 578; portions of it are repri ted as. … Code of Crimi- nal Procedure, § 399; People v. O’Farrell, 175 N.Y. 823, 67 N.E. 588 (1903) ; People v. Negrin, 24 Mise. 2d 181, 301_N.Y.S. 2d 59 (1960).
396 U.S. 963Opposition — California v. West Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
Ed. 24 80, 74 S. Ct. 109 (1953). … West Virginia chose to invoke the escape clause upon the determination that in the six-year 24.
454 U.S. 1027Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Moore v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
Moore, 5 Cir. (1970), _ 427 F. 24 38. … United States, 399 F.2d 642 (Sth Cir. 1968).
400 U.S. 965Opposition Brief — Matthew Clark, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 6, 2025
See Pet. 22-24 (citation omitted). But that is not an argument that the statute is “void for vagueness,” for preservation purposes. See Plea Agreement 1-2. … See Pet. 24 (arguing that the case should be remanded to the court of appeals for a further explanation for rejecting petitioner’s claim).
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Feb 27, 2023
Id. at 398-399 (emphases added). … Chattanooga Foundry, 203 U.S. at 397, 399. 2.
Supreme Court brief · Motion to affirm · Oct 3, 2025
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ............................................ 24 vi Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1 (1980) .................................................. 5 Mandel v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 437 (2006).
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Tilney v. Chicago
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1943
Holten, 304 Ill. 394, 399................. 23-24 Price v. City of Mattoon, 364 Ill. 512, 515......... 12-13 Root v. City of Saratoga Springs, 218 N. Y. … Holten, 304 Ill. 394, 399. Buell v. Kanawha Lumber Corp., 201 Fed. 762, 769. Blacker v. Kitchen Brothers Hotel Company, 133 Neb. 66, 273 N. W. 838.
320 U.S. 759Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Berkeley v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
-at: 765, 2804.S.B.24 at 816. … App. at 548, 399 S.E.2d at 830-31.
516 U.S. 865Petitioners Brief — FCC v. Midwest Video Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1979
i i aa a ac le 24 B. … FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1968) (406 U.S. at 659 n.17); 49 and Black Hills Video Corp. expressly rejected First Amendment challenges to those rules. 399 F.2d at 69.° For First Amendment purposes,
440 U.S. 689Opinion — United States v. Vuitch
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1971
Sisson, 399 U. S. 267 (1970). … Weller, No. 77, October Term 1970 (decided February 24, 1971).
402 U.S. 62
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.