Documents

Respondents Brief — Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Dep't of Def., 137 S. Ct. 811 (2017) (No. 16-299)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2017

A comparison of that provision to its counterpart in the Clean Air Act il- lustrates why. … And, unlike the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1), the Clean Water Act unambigu- ously divides jurisdiction between circuit courts and district courts.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Aaron Abadi, et al., Petitioners v. Transportation Security Administration

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 5, 2023

Code § 44903 - Air transportation security Appendix Page 36a 14 CFR § 382 Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA)..... … That case involved the EPA's claim that the Clean Air Act authorized it to impose a nationwide cap on carbon dioxide emissions.

Application — In Re United States, et al., Applicants

Supreme Court brief · Application · Oct 18, 2018

Air Act, Fed. … Fact EPA 7/30/2008 Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act, 73 Fed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Carpenter v. Murphy, 139 S. Ct. 626 (2018) (No. 17-1107)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Rev. 1141, 1174 (1995) (explaining that many environmental statutes, including “the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, RCRA, and the Safe Drinking Water Act” allow for states to implement and administer … The Clean Air Act (“CAA”) similarly allows the EPA to “delegate[| to tribes the authority to regulate air quality in areas within the exterior boundaries of a reservation.” Arizona Pub. Serv. Co.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of the Air Force, et al., Petitioners v. Prutehi Guahan, fka Prutehi Litekyan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 27, 2026

No. 87-788, 76 Stat. 806 1963 Clean Air Act Pub. L. No. 88-206, (amending the Air 77 Stat. 392 Pollution Control Act of 1955) 1964 Land and Water Pub. L. … L. 89-688, 80 Stat. 998 1966 National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act Pub. L. 89-669, 80 Stat. 927 1967 Air Quality Act (amending the Clean Air Act of 1963) Pub. L.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of Auburn v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999

§ 1531), National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. § 4321) or the federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7401). … For example, the Clean Air Act requires states to implement plans to protect and enhance air quality so as to promote the public health and welfare. See 42 U.S.C. 7401 ef seq.

Respondents Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1992

Clean Air Act. … The legal memo- randum drew a distinction between the Clean Air Act, which prohibited only “significant” deterioration, and the Clean Water Act, where no degradation meant no new point source discharges

Amicus Curiae Brief — Clemente Avelino Pereida, Petitioner v. Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2020

Like the Clean Air Act in then-judge Kavanaugh’s decision, the INA precludes systemic review and channels it to the federal courts in the District of Columbia Circuit. … As with the Clean Air Act, the INA requires that all challenges to systemic INA rules be brought in the District of Columbia, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(e)(3)(A), within 60 days of a rule’s promulgation.

Emergency Application — North Dakota, et al., Applicants v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Aug 16, 2024

For startup of a unit, you must use clean fuels as defined in § 63.10042 for ignition. … Air Act (CAA), Section 111(d) of the CAA, Section 111(b) of the CAA, and the Regional Haze program, etc.

Reply Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 24, 2022

In addition, the upshot of respondents’ argument is that the Clean Air Act’s displacement of a remedy under federal common law somehow revives otherwise inoperable state law. … Air Act.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — North Dakota, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 22, 2021

With this recently discovered power, EPA is now authorized to set regulations far out of the bounds set by Congress in the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), imposing tremendous expense and undue uncertainty on rural … Instead, “the Clean Air Act displaces federal common law” and “when Congress addresses a question . . . the need for such an unusual exercise of law-making by federal courts disappears.”

Appendix — Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983

NHTSA is not writing on a clean slate; it cannot suggest that the congressiona! actions and failures to act described above have no bear- ing on the agency’s freedom to regulate on this question. … Air Act.

Opposition Brief — Curtis v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993

I, § 6, Cl. 1 (Speech or Debate cs cannevenbinnanine Act of July 14, 1955, ch. 360, 69 Stat. 322 .............. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1963, Pub. L. … No. 88-206, § 9(e), 77 Stat. 400 (42 U.S.C. 1857h (e) a acs shonuh mannaneaticinnns Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L.

Response to application from respondent Myra Brown, et al. — Department of Education, et al., Petitioners v. Myra Brown, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondent Myra Brown, et al. · Dec 7, 2022

period.” … But that provision similarly excuses notice-and15 comment only for the actions “authorized” in the prior section. Id. §1098bb(a)(1)-(2); see Utility Air Reg. Grp. v.

Appendix — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2009

Petitioners here challenge a rule promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (“the EPA” or “the Agency”) pursuant to section 3i6(b) of the Clean Water Act (““CWA” or “the Act”), 33 U.S.C. § … Nonattainment areas are identified for “criteria pollutants” established under the 1970 Amendments to the Clean Air Act that do not meet standards set by EPA.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hercules Inc. Inc. v. United States (Nos. 06-865, 06-1014, 06-853)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

That potency factor, however, has never been subjected to notice-and-comment rulemaking. … the update period.

Opposition — Portland Cement Ass'n v. Train

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975

Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857c-6. 2. … STATEMENT Section 111(b) of the Clean Air Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. 1857c-6(b), re- quires the EPA Administrator to publish a list of categories of significant stationary

Appendix — Portnoy v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1963

. | Disconnect air pumps, governors, shutter cylinders, ‘air magnet valves and anything to whick a pipe is con- nected. . Remove and replace all coverings over pulleys ahd © - belts. my . … Section 3 First (p) of the Railway Labor Act provides (45 U.S.C. § 153 First (p)): !

Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

Senator Muskie at that time was Chairman of the Senate Subcom- mittee on Air and Water Pollution, which reported out the Senate version of the Act. … Senator Muskie asked the Senate the following crucial questions regarding the high costs of attain- ing clean water and then gave the following answers: Can we afford clean water?

Opposition — Lead Industries Ass'n v. Donovan

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

Did OSHA’s promulgation of a workplace health standard, pursuant to the notice and comment rulemak- ing requirement of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, deny due process to affected parties: … It also provides employers an incentive to clean up the air which is independent of the citation and penalty procedures. 29 U.S.C. § 659-660.