Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.29s

  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Lefors v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1955

    Crim. 399, 208 S.W. 2d 643 (1948) _... 7 Hooker v. Los Angeles, 188 U.S. 314 (1903)... 14 Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 535 (1884) 13 Leeper v. … Crim. 399, 208 S.W. 2d 643 (1948).

    349 U.S. 929
  • Reply Brief — Tonahill v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1970

    ‘OCT 24 2970 E. ROBERT SEAVER “CLERK Simin Court of the United States a OCTOBER m™u 1970 Sean Se 672 .. JOE H. … ‘den... 399 U.S. 910 © 4 ‘United States v. Neves, 269 F.Supp. 159 (S.D. N.Y. 1967) : United States v. Remolif, 227 F.Supp. 420 (D.C. Nev. 1964) . Rayrts 1 Aaae — United States v.

    400 U.S. 943
  • Reply Brief — M2 Software, Inc. v. Viacom, Inc. (No. 07-202)

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007

    Renosky, 399 F.3d FO Es ITED wecniecienntivecicovbistinrtternrcssvensevceoes 9 Blau v. YMI Jeanswear, Inc., No. CV 02- 09551 FMC (SHSx), 2004 WL 5313967 CET EF. … See Pet. 5 n.2, 24-25.

  • Opposition Brief — Duffy v. City of Long Beach

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985

    Los Angeles (1959) 170 Cal.App. 2d 399 + a a a e = o 16 Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & W.Co. (1919) ana Wels 246, 164 id. 394) 2 2 2 es 6 Kent Island Joint Venture v. … City of Los 16 ‘ Angeles [1959] 170 Cal.App.2d 399.)

    471 U.S. 1102
  • Amicus Brief — Quaglino v. California

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1978

    Kelly, 17 C.3d 24, 130 Cal.Rptr. 144, 549 P.2d tee eee Ula ok aU Soh deen bay Gk bat 7,10 Pointer v. … Kelly, 17 C.3d 24, 35, 190 Cal. Rptr, 144, 549 P.2d 1240 ( 076); United States vu.

    439 U.S. 875
  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Patch v. Solar Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1945

    S. 399 10 Critcher v. Linker, 169 Fed. 653 (C. C., W. D., Wis., 1909) ..-ccssvesssessneeneesneenes 9 Denecke v. Henry F. Miller & Son, 142 Iowa 486, lly N. W. 380 (1909)...... 9 Erdreich v. … S. 399, and Ohio Citizens Trust Co. v. Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. (D. C., Ohio), 56 F.

    326 U.S. 741
  • Petition for Rehearing — Johnston v. McIntee

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1950

    Hall, 75 F. 2d 399, where the transferee became sole party plaintiff. … Both ‘‘Plaintiff’s Amended and Supplemented Complaint, as Further Amended and Supplemented’’ (Tr. 24-5) and plaintiff’s affidavit in support of his motion to be substituted (Tr. 17-24) state flatly

    340 U.S. 817
  • Opposition Brief — Dennis Morgan Hicks, Petitioner v. Alabama

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 22, 2023

    Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970)........................................................................... 13 Crawford v. … Pet. 24), and that the nonverbal responses from Jo.N. and Ja.N.

  • Reply Brief — Center for Medical Progress, et al., Petitioners v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 6, 2023

    South Suite 250 Austin, TX 78746 (512) 399-3022 Harmeet K. Dhillon Mark P. Meuser DHILLON LAW GROUP 177 Post Street, Ste. 700 San Francisco, CA 94108 (415) 577-2850 Jeffrey M. … BIO.24. It instead tries to sweep this all away by focusing on differences between the laws at issue in each case. BIO.24. But the divergence is unmistakable.

  • Reply Brief — Michigan, Petitioner v. Floyd Russell Galloway, Jr.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 27, 2024

    No. 24-198 In the Supreme Court of the United States PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, PETITIONER v. FLOYD RUSSELL GALLOWAY, JR. … United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998) .......................................... 5, 9 United States ex rel. Shiflet v.

  • Reply Brief — Benancio Garcia, III, Petitioner v. Steven Hobbs, Secretary of State of Washington, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 10, 2026

    Reeves, 961 F.3d 800, 801 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc) (emphasis added); see also Pet. 24 n.1 (collecting analogous cases from other circuits). … Pet. 25 (quoting Appellee State of Washington’s Answering Brief at 21, Garcia, No. 24-2603 (9th Cir. Oct. 16, 2024), DE 23.1).

  • Petitioners Brief — Crawford v. Washington

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2004

    United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968)......... 22, 24, 45, 46 California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970)..........00++ 13, 14, 23, 34 Campbell v. … Green, 399 U.S. at 157 n.10.

    541 U.S. 36
  • Motion to Dismiss — Ludwig v. Massachusetts

    Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1976

    Ludwig, was charged in the District Court, District of Northern Norfolk, with viola- tion of G.L. e. 90, § 24(2)(a) (driving to endanger). … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970), requires trial by jury in the first instance, is not substantial.

    427 U.S. 618
  • Card — Berry v. State Tax Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Card · 1965

    .: Sh. 179, 399 P.2d 164 (1965) 207. 2, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20 Goodwin v. State Tax Commission,’ 286. App: Div. — 694, 146 N.Y.S.2d 172 (1955), 1. … Ed. 458 (1952) pecsnssecessezsenes hy 22, 13, 24, 16, 17 Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S..37, 40 S. Ct. 221, 64.L: Ed. 445° (1920) ........... ial edaiacwten eta 3, 18, 19, : State v.

    382 U.S. 16
  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — O'Bryan v. Chandler

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1969

    It is reported in 399 F.2d 916 and is set out as Appendix B to the Pe- tition. The Petition is incorrectly entitled in this Court O’Bryan v. Chandler, Chief Judge. … C. 20004 Counsel for Respondent of Counsel: SHIPLEY, ACKERMAN & PICKETT February 24, 1969

    394 U.S. 906
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Pierre v. Jordan

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1965

    On June 24, 1963. petitioner commenced serving the sentence imposed pursuant to the income tax conviction. … Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399. Yet no ac- tion has even been brought against petitioner under 2 U.S.C. 192 for raising such an objection.

    379 U.S. 974
  • Reply Brief — Smith v. New Jersey

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1970

    TEXAS, 399 U. S. 282. 105. Ct 629 CR os eet, ee COLEMAN v. ALABAMA, 389 U.S. 2 88S. Ct. . Slt MORE ES EEL Isa aa ce ea DOW v. … CARNEGIE-ILL INOIS STEE L CORP. 24 .F 2d 414, 424 (3€ WA eh fal pene JONES v. STATE OF GEORG 1A,.389 US. 24, 88S. OE WE es a ee _LEBAT v.

    400 U.S. 949
  • Reply Brief — Crosetto v. Wisconsin State Bar

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1997

    State Bar of Wisconsin, 94 F.3d. 399 (7th Cir. | PPPET re eriit ee ci cre ) re Lye 6 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS US. Comet. SOME AE cocncivcrswscevccauaee passim RULES Ped, R.. Cin. F.. 85. … State Bar of Wisconsin, 94 F.3d. 399 (7th Cir. 1996). Opp. 16-19.

    519 U.S. 1116
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Robert Louis Brandon, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 25, 2020

    Hicks, 958 F.3d 399 (5th Cir. 2020) ............................................................................... 8 United States v. … Petitioner’s Felon-in-Possession Conviction On October 24, 2018, the government filed in the U.S.

  • Opposition Brief — Montez v. Lavine (Nos. 1037-74, 1088-74)

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974

    As a result of this review aid was again terminated on March 24, 1969. … Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co., 147 F. 2d 399 (2nd Cir., 1945), cert. den. 325 U.S. 861 (1945) (exhibits—letter).

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.