Documents

Opposition Brief — Bersani v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989

(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act. … NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 (1984) (certiorari granted to review validity of EPA’s "bubble concept" under the Clean Air Act).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Bankers Ass'n v. Kelley

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

Finance Auth. of Maine, oof Fo gs ie | ea ll STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7601(a), § 7604 ...... 14 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1361, 1365 ...... 14 Comprehensive Environmental … suit); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C

Amicus Curiae Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 9, 2025

Under our federal structure and the Clean Air Act, state law may not impose liability for the global climate effects of emissions that originate all over the world. … health or welfare within the meaning of section 202 of the Clean Air Act.

Memorandum — Seeber v. Alabama

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1975

The Fifth Circuit held that Section 118 of the Clean Air Act of 1970, 84 Stat. 1678. 1689, as renumbered and amended, 42 U.S.C. 1857f, requires chat TVA and the Army comply with the Alabama Air Pollution … The complaint alleged, first, that TVA and the Army were required by Section 118 of the Clean Air Act of 1970 to obtain written permits from the director of the Alabama Air Pollution Control Commission

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 4, 2020

., the Clean Air Act spoke directly “to emissions of carbon dioxide from the defendants’ plants.” … It stated that those “foreign emissions are outside of the EPA and Clean Air Acts’ reach.” Id.

Record and brief — Burlington N. & S. F. R. Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2009

Anthony Dell’Aquilla Enterprises is not a CERCLA case; it arose under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seg. … The contractor’s liability as an “operator” under the Clean Air Act was established through its direct control and supervision over demolition and project development activities at a site.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Marcia L. Fudge, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 19, 2023

CODE ANN. §§20-7-109(a)(1), 20-27-1801 to -1809 (Clean Indoor Air Act); CAL. LAB. CODE §6404.5; FLA. STAT. … . § 20-7109(a)(1)) and Act 8 of the First Extraordinary Session of 2006 (Ark. Code Ann. § 20-27- 1801-1809) (Clean Indoor Air Act); California: Labor Code, Division 5.

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — United States Steel Corp. v. Peck

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1972

As the attempted lift was being made and when the tug was about twelve feet in the air, the entire tower collapsed. … An air compressor used in the operation of small power tools was also not affixed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 21, 2023

Because Congress displaced federal common law with the Clean Air Act, see Am. Elec. Power Co. v. … This case is not about the Clean Air Act’s preemptive scope.

Amicus Curiae Brief — U.S. Army Corp of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 615 (2015) (No. 15-290)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Congress did not include any similar limitation in the Clean Water Act. … The Clean Water Act offers no “meaningful” review of Jurisdictional Determinations.

Amicus Curiae Brief — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Clean Water Act (CWA) section 401(a)(1), 33 U.S.C. … WARREN EFFECTIVELY SEEKS TO EXEMPT EXISTING HYDROPOWER PROJECTS FROM MANDATORY REGULATION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al., Petitioners v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2024

Before our barrel may be refined, the Clean Air Act imposes a mind-numbing array of standards and obligations on refineries. … The concept is uniquely apt in environmental law—and in particular, in the Clean Air Act.

Reply Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2000

EPA, RSE IRE EE ORR ee ne Serge 7 Statutes: Clean Air Act § 108(a)(2), ER a ees ee 7 Clean Air Act § 109(b)(1), I ie ln 2,3 Clean Air Act § 110(a)(2), Ee one eee 7 Clean Air Act § 110(aX(2 … Yet, it cannot sustain EPA’s interpretation of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”), or the regulations based on it, without considering Lead Industries and holding that it was correctly decided.

Reply Brief — Gustafson v. City of Lake Angelus

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

Lockheed Air Terminal, 411 U.S. 624 (1973) (See Petition at Pages 18, 19). … the air space above all inland waters.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Forest Service, et al., Petitioners v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2020

Clean Air Task Force & NAACP, Fumes Across the FenceLine 4 (Nov. 2017) (hereinafter, “Fumes Across the Fence-Line”). … In one recent study, the Clean Air Task Force and NAACP found that “[p]eople of color and low-income communities are disproportionately affected by exposure to air pollution” and that “African Americans

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — FMC Corporation, Petitioner v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 16, 2020

Under the Guidelines, the FHBC grants to the LUPC the authority to “act on its own initiative to amend the Guidelines after allowing for a reasonable public comment period or, if deemed necessary by the … Air Act, and that the plant is now closed with no further emissions.

Opposition Brief — PPG Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990

During the rulemaking, NRDC commented that this technique was overly conservative and indeed contrary to the Clean Water Act. NRDC Comments at 21 (Dec. 1985), J.A. at 1961. … Train, 430 U.S. 112 (1977), which charted the course of Clean Water Act implementation.

Reply Brief — Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Carson-Truckee Water Conservancy District

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1985

Ge, BESS CESSES 6H SESE eecceceeseseese 43 Metropolitan Washington Coalition for Clean Air v. District of Columbia, 639 F.2d Dee Cee Che SOE ceccccccccecccesess SF Cases (cont.) … Cir. 1982); and Metropolitan Washington Coalition for Clean Air v. District of Columbia, 639 F.2d 802 (D.C. Cir. 1981).

Brief for the United States in Opposition — Horn v. Cia de Navegacion Fruco, S. A.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1969

The charter party and the particular shipment of bananas were subject to the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 46 U.S.C. 1301 et seq. … Furthermore, it was decided in 1931 under the Harter Act, 46 U.S.C. 190, et seq. and not under COGSA which was enacted in 1936.

Reply Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2004

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit REPLY BRIEF FOR PETITIONER The Solicitor General acknowledges (Opp. 5) that the Clean Air Act (“CAA … But apart from the requirement that no major emitting facility may be con- structed or modified in a clean air area unless “the proposed facility is subject to [BACT],” 42 U.S.C. § 7475(a)(4), the