Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell Oil Co. v. United States (Nos. 07-1607, 07-1601)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

‘CERCLA borrows its definition of “disposal” and “treatment” from “section 1004 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act” (“SWDA”) (codified, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 … Some commentators estimate that the average cost to clean up a hazardous waste site ranges “be- tween $25 million and $50 million.” Michael L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kay v. Ehrler

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

§ 7604(d)(Clean Air Act); 43 U.S.C. § 1349(a)(5)(Outer Con- tinental Shelf Lands Act). … Jd. 9 In Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air v.

Reply Brief — Stroh Die Casting Co. v. Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1997

In fact, as the Court noted in Hallstrom, the notice provisions in each of these environmental laws were based upon the 60-day notice provision of the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §7604. … Government agencies, rather than private plaintiffs, are the primary enforcers of the Clean Water Act.

Appendix — Our Children's Earth Foundation Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency (No. 08-225)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2008

Works, 99th Cong., Report to Accompany S. 1128 (1985 Clean Water Act Amendments) 25 (Comm. Print 1985). … ' Sections of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.

Reply Brief — R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al., Petitioners v. County of Los Angeles, California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 7, 2023

Both the Clean Air Act (Engine Manufacturers) and the TCA preempt “standards.” And both statutes require looking to the plain meaning of the word “standard.” 541 U.S. at 253. … The Clean Air Act’s preemption clause had “categorical” sweep. Id. at 256.

Petitioners Brief — Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1981

(Refuse Act): spetaesbtaraie Re OT see 5 42 U.S.C. (Clean Air Act): sag) Rhee ee oe A LETT AS 13, 14 PN ili a A 32 42 U.S.C. … IT); the Noise Control Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. §4911 (e); and the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. $7604(e) (Supp. IT).

Opposition Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

Whether the Environmental Protection Agency, in promulgating a final rule respecting implementation of a National Ambient Air Quality Standard under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., reasonably … STATEMENT Petitioners seek review of a decision of the court of appeals arising from an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rulemaking under the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seg.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hanousek v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION REACH BEYOND THE CLEAN WATER ACT A. The Clean Air Act Has A Similar Criminal Provision The implications of United Stated v. … Hanousek are not limited to the Clean Water Act. The Clean Air Act also contains criminal enforcement provisions, which punish individuals for negligent conduct.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Borden Ranch Partnership v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

Fish & Wildlife Service, Memorandum of Agreement Concerning Wetland Determinations for _——y Purposes of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Subtitle B of the Food Security Act (1994)........... … Fish & Wildlife Service, Memorandum of Agreement Concerning Wetlands Determinations for Purposes of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Subtitle B of the Food Security Act (1994) (stating that “agricultural

Opposition Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

Whether the Environmental Protection Agency, in promulgating a final rule respecting implementation of a National Ambient Air Quality Standard under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., reasonably … STATEMENT Petitioners seek review of a decision of the court of appeals arising from an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rulemaking under the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lucas v. United States (No. 07-1512)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987) .... 13 lv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page Planned Parenthood v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987), to determine the controlling opinion.

Appendix — Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1976

Because sulphur oxides are a prin- cipal source of air pollution, low sulphur oil is an essential determinant of Plaintiff States’ ability to com- ply with clean air standards under the Clean Air Act … CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENTS Will the Clean Fuels Deficit be eliminated by your proposed energy actions? Yes.

Respondents Brief — IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2005

Air knife users retrieved their air knives from the knife room and wiped and washed grease from the air knives prior to use. See Pet. App. 40a. … For example, a rest period or a lunch period is part of the “workday”, and section 4 of the Portal Act therefore plays no part in determining whether such a period, under the particular circumstances

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Riceland Foods, Inc. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 2381

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

Training shall provide the men an opportunity to handle the respirator, have it fitted properly, test its face-piece-to-face seal, wear it in normal air for a long familiarity period, and, finally, … The worker’s dili- gence in observing these factors shall be evaluated by periodic check.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alliant Energy Corp. v. Bridge

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

For example, in United Air Lines, Inc. v. … As one commentator has noted, “what we know about extraterritoriality is much less than what we have still to work out.”’

Appendix — Shen Manufacturing Co. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2005

However, having said the foregoing, three objections raised by applicant deserve special comment. … Accordingly, applicant’s motion to take the testimony deposition of applicant’s president outside applicant’s testimony period, or to extend applicant’s testimony period, is denied.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

This conclusion was based upon Section 306 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, which provides that: For a period of 2 years after the date of the enact- ment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of … Clean Air Amendments, Pub.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

Failure to comply with the sixty-day limit in the Clean Air Act was the subject of Riverside v. Ruckelshaus, 4 ERC 1728 (C. D. … In Riverside, the plaintiffs had the benefit of the regulations promulgated by the Administrator in December 1971 regarding the Clean Air Act. See 40 C.F.R. §54.3 (a) (1972).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 17, 2022

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. … There is no dispute that at least some wetlands fall within the Act’s jurisdiction. See Clean Water Act of 1977, Pub. L.

Amicus Brief — American Textile Mfrs. Institute, Inc. v. Donovan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

Aug. 15, 1980) ....6, 7, 8, 10,1 Statutes anp Rutss: Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seg... 4 Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq. 4 Occupational Safety and Health … At the same time the industry is subjected to these heavy expenses of compliance with OSHA regulations, it is subject to the burdensome costs of complying with the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et