Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.08s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Joshua Chiazor Ezeka, Petitioner v. Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 13, 2020
E.g., Ezeka, 946 N.W.2d at 399. … See Ezeka, 946 N.W.2d at 399.
Respondents Brief — Day v. McDonough
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2006
June 24, 2005) (No. 05-3); Hill v. … J.A. 24 (emphasis added).
547 U.S. 198Opposition Brief — Lipsey v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1971
certificates would be sent to Miami (T. 20-21, 24). * Darnall obtained a two day extension of this dead- line and notified Lipsey on September 29 that he had found a buyer (T. 2 24-27). … Osterburg, 423 F, 2d 704 (C.A. 9), certiorari denied, 399 U.S, 914; . United States v. Hayes, 385 F. 2d 375, 377 (C.A. 4), .
404 U.S. 824Amicus Brief — Gerstein v. Pugh
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975
Dwyer, 143 Iowa 502 (1909) 24 Ocampo v. United States, 234 U.S. 91 (1914) 22 People ex rel. Lyman v. Smith, 352 III. 496 (1933) 24 People v. Stockwell, 135 Mich. 341 (1904) 24 Perez v. … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 23-24 (1969) : Constitutional interpretation is not an easy mat- ter, but we should be especially cautious about sub- * See In re Rule 3: 131(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
420 U.S. 103Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Panetti v. Quarterman
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) . 0.0... ccc cc eee eee eee 3] Vargas v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409 (1986) (majority opinion).
551 U.S. 930Opposition — Mount Wilson F. M. Broadcasters, Inc. v. Fox
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
Wilson (1898) 120 Cal. 643, 53 Pac. 24 ee ee ee ge eee New Haven Inclusion Cases (1970) 399 U.S. 392, 26 L.Ed.2d 691, 90 S.Ct. 2054 00. Shepherd v. … (New Haven Inclusion Cases (1970) 399 U.S. 392, 450, fn. 66, 26 L.Ed.2d 691, 90 S.Ct. 2054.)’
434 U.S. 826Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dossett v. Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992
App. 746, 399 S.E.2d 554 SUP RS sca Choe a es eee a eras 5 Dossett v. State, 197 Ga. App. 139, 398 S.E.2d 24...... 2 Dossett v. State, 261 Ga. 362, __—« S.E.2d ___ (1991)..... 2 Fortson v. … State, 197 Ga. 139(2) (398 SE2d 24) (1990).
502 U.S. 1057Reply Brief — Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2002
Op. 20-21, 24-25. … YALOWITZ 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Attorneys for Petitioner, Sacramento Municipal Utility District
535 U.S. 1095Petitioner for ReHearing — Roesch v. Roesch
Supreme Court brief · Petitioner for ReHearing · 1979
Addison, 62 Cal.2d 558, 399 P.2d 897, 43 Cal. Rptr. 97, 14 A.L.R.3d 404 (1965) . 12, 13, 14, 15 Hughes v. Hughes, 573 P.2d 1194, 91 N.M. 399 Sai Mex. Sup. … Hughes, supra, 573 P.2d 1194 at p. 1201, 91 N.M. 399, at p. 406.
440 U.S. 915Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Deshawn Legrier, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 30, 2020
Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir.), rehearing en banc granted, 2020 WL 6689728 (4th Cir. 2020) …………….……………………….. 6, 9-10 United States v. … See Medley, 972 F.3d 399.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 8, 2023
Salim, 399 Mass. 227, 239 (1987). … Aug. 24, 2016). Cf, e.g., Jahagirdar v. United States, No. 07-CV-10923-MLW, 2010 WL 2595564, at *3 (D. Mass. June 24, 2010) (under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)).
Reply Brief Petitioner — Illinois ex rel. Woods v. Tuohy
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief Petitioner · 1950
Keeney, 399 Ill. 611........ 15 People ex rel. Mike Magloie v. Joseph Siman, 284 Il. 28 17 People ex rel. Modern Woodmen of America v. … Keeney, 399 Mil. 611.
340 U.S. 830Petitioners Brief — Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (No. 604)
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1961
D.C. 308 ~ 6,8 Bellair Estate (1937), 293 N.Y.S. 31 2000000000000... 15 Buxtons Estate, 1944, 16 N.W. 2d 399, 246 Wis. … Moore, 95 U.S. 760, 763, 24 L.
Respondents Brief — Manhattan Properties, Inc. v. Irving Trust Co.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1934
S. 399, 57 L. Ed. 273; Oakes v. Lake, 78 L. Ed. 15 (Adv. Op.) (Nov. 6, 1933). … S. 399, 57 L. Ed. 273. Neither the reason for the rule of Booth v.
291 U.S. 320Opposition — DiPalermo v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
Green, 399 U.S. 149 oo. 11 Cronnon v. Alabama, 587 F. 2d 246, cert. Gemied, 440 U.S. 974 .o.sii....cccccccssssssccnccoccsscseneee 7 Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 ......... Mattox y. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 165-168 (1970).
445 U.S. 915Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 12, 2019
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) ......................... 6 DOCKETED CASES ODonnell v. … Oct. 24, 2018). And as explained, Fifth Circuit precedent is clear that when two panel decisions conflict, the prior one controls.
Petitioners Reply Brief — United States v. Nobles
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1975
Nixon, No. 73-1766, de- cided July 24, 1974, slip op. 24. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78.
422 U.S. 225Petition — Gonzales v. Fairfax-Brewster School, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Standard Oil Co., 399 U.S. 222 (1970) Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976) Sampeyreac v. United States, 7 Pet. 222 (1833) Simpson v. Weeks, 570 F.2d 240 (C.A. 8, 1978) . Sprague v. … Standard Oil Co., 399 U.S. 222 (1970)) this Court has decided virtually the identical issue that is involved here.
439 U.S. 927Amicus Curiae Brief — Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 137 S. Ct. 30 (2016) (No. 15-1391)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
LAW § 399-zzz (McKinney 2016)............... 18 NYLS’ Governor’s Bill Jacket to ch. 160, S. 8367, Assemb. Sey G0 te iv Other Authorities Adam J. Levitin, Priceless? … The constitutionality of section 399-zzz has never been challenged. Any such challenge would surely fail, because it is a valid regulation of economic conduct. .
Amicus Curiae Brief — 303 Creative LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Aubrey Elenis, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 2, 2022
Cohen, 402 U.S., at 24. … Id., at 24.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.