Documents

Reply Brief — Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1988

FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1968) ..........ccccccccsccccccccccccccccccccesssnssccccossoees Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. … FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1968), because subsequently the Eighth Circuit “cast doubt’-on its Black Hills decision. May 1988 Memorandum, p. 5, n.5.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lilly v. Virginia

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

Green, 399 U. S. 149, 155 (1970), and have such similar roots, see Dutton, supra, 400 U. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 184-185 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring) (footnote omitted). Lee v. lilinois, 476 U.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Goldbaum v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1955

C., Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule UP cian vi 3, 21, 24, 25, 26 18 U.S. C., Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 52(b) aes 3, 24, 25, 26 26 U.S. … A. 8) 174 F. 2d 397, 399. In other words, no proof was made that the increases were income.

Opposition Brief — Cone v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1966

New Eng- land Electric System, 346 F. 2d 399 (1st Cir. - 1965), cert. granted, 382 U. S. 953 8 Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. TVA, 306 U. S. 118 12 United Gas Co. v. Callery Properties, 382 U. … Neu .England Electric System, 346 F. 2d 399 (1st Cir. 1965), cert. granted, 382 U. S. 963. Peti-.

Supplemental Brief — Herrera v. Wyoming, 138 S. Ct. 720 (2018) (No. 17-532)

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 2018

Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994), demonstrates why this is so. … (Pet’r’s App. at 24- 25). Article IV of the Treaty with the Crows recognizes a conditional right that expires upon the happening of certain events.

Respondents Brief in Opposition — Morgan v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief in Opposition · 1940

PN as: , * ‘* * . . : a - @ eo ee | Treasury Regulattoris 80 (1934 Ed.) : ART.. 24. Property passing under general power of appointment. … _ 24... Under this test the Circuit Court of Appeals ¥ 1The Revenue Act does not define “general powers of appointment.”

Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Gardner v. Broderick

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1968

S. 399 (1958)... 8 tia: v. Murphy, Matter of, 24 A D 2d 737,. 263 -N.Y.S. 2d 360 (1965) Re isso adapivaisasadamea eae ek ied ', Gardner v. … He recommended that appellant’s employment be termi-, nated and his office vacated (RA 24). .

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Cibolo, Texas, Petitioner v. Green Valley Special Utility District

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 29, 2018

No. 75-399, 50 Stat. 869 (repealed by Act of August 8, 1961, Pub. L. … node=17044620011 (last visited Jan. 24, 2018).

Reply Brief — Sandoz Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Immunex Corporation, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 26, 2021

Ct. 399 (2018) ............................................ 10 Statutes: 35 U.S.C. § 102 ............................................................ 8 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) (2006) ....................... … Ct. 399, 407 (2018). The fact that Immunex might press alternative bases for affirmance on a future remand from this Court is irrelevant. In any event, Immunex’s arguments are wrong.

Reply Brief — Renado Smith and Richard Delancy, Petitioners v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 23, 2019

Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970)................................................. 11 Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)..................................................... 1 Motes v. … Pet. 22-24. The Government again does not dispute that this split exists, Opp. 25, nor that it “mistakenly released” Vixama from its custody, id. at 14.

Reply Brief — Alaska, et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 19, 2025

Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) ...............................................5 INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983) ...............................................2 James v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 409 (1994) (reviewing a “direct conflict between th[e] decisions of the Tenth Circuit and the Utah Supreme Court”).

Motion — Nathaniel K. Hooker, Petitioner v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Motion · Oct 26, 2020

S. 387, 398-399, and McNeil v. … Abernathy, 399 Ill. App. 3d 420, 426 (2010).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Guggenheim v. City of Goleta

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011

, 24 Urs. Law. 157 (1992); Werner Z. Hirsch and Joel G. Hirsch, Legal-Economic Analysis of Rent Controls ; in a Mobile Home Context: Placement Values and Vacancy Decontrol, 35 UCLA L. … Rev. 399 (1988 ne legal stream of nt income would yield theory that rent control might someday id, either because of a change of mind by the munic ipality or court action.” Guggenheim v.

Reply Brief — Standard Oil Co. of Ind. v. Missouri

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1912

Nincannon, 7 Pet., 399; Wilson «s. Life Insurance Co., 12 Pet., 140; Masterson vs. How- ard, 10 Wal., 416: Hardee vs. Wilson, 146 U. S., 179.) … Filed May 24, 1909. [14158] 5 NR PBI ITE GRE 4

Emergency Application — Edward J. Zakrzewski, II, Applicant v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Jul 24, 2025

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (“Execution is the most irremediable and unfathomable of penalties; . . . death is different.”). … After this Court’s decision in Hurst1, Florida courts arbitrarily decided death sentences which became final prior to June 24, 2002 were not entitled to relief. Thus, Mr.

Brief for the United States — United States v. Matlock

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1974

Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30_---.---------- 18 Walder v. … United States, 399 F. 2d 753, 756-757 (C.A. 10)), is unsound.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Blum v. Crowe

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2011

LEXIS 18836 (9% Cir. 2010).... 24 Vi Franklin v. Fox 312 F.3d 423, 440 (9th Cir. 2002) 6, 24 Gonzales v. Spencer 336 F.3d 832, 835 (9th Cir. 2003) 4 Harrison v. … David Park Estates, Inc. 323 F.3d 178 (24 Cir. 2003). In Malinowski v.

Opposition Brief — Bradley Dale Hull, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Dec 6, 2024

App. 12, 24; C.A. E.R. 57-58. … Pet. 24-25. That contention lacks merit.

Reply Brief — Jose Antonio Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 5, 2025

Cole, No. 24-10877, 2025 WL 339894 (11th Cir. Jan. 30, 2025) ........... 4 iii United States v. … BIO 8, Vincent, supra (No. 24-1155).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dennis DeCiancio, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 13, 2018

Witnesses similarly described Jackson’s convictions as felonies, see App. 23–24, and a “ponzi scheme.” App. 99–100. … App. 7–24. The Sixth Circuit affirmed, sharing the district court’s reasoning that Jackson’s convictions were “direct proof” of the charged scheme. App. 10–12.