Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.20s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300(gX2)a), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6947(a), and the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7410(k\(3). 5 185 (2005) (“Fischman”). … As one scholar explains: [U]Jnder the foundational pollution laws, the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) and the [CWA], cooperative federalism involves programs where federal monies are made available to each
556 U.S. 208Reply Brief — W.R. Grace & Co. v. United States (No. 07-1287)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007
under the Clean Air Act. … Government itself has excluded the substances at issue from the definition of “Asbestos” under the Clean Air Act.
Respondents Brief — Chevron Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. San Mateo County, California, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jan 27, 2023
Air Act. … Air Act.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jack Cody, Petitioner v. California Air Resources Board, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 9, 2018
The Clean Air Act......................................... 9 REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION ..... 10 I. … Air Act—until now.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
STATEMENT The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 ef segq.., established aj program under which EPA may make grants to a_ state,’ municipality, interstate agency or inter- municipal agency for the construction … Following issuance of the negative declarations and EIA, public comments were solicited. No significant environmental issues were raised during the comment period.
449 U.S. 822Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 8, 2025
But Congress later enacted comprehensive legislation governing interstate air and water pollution—the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. … But it reasoned that the Clean Air Act displaced the federal common law of nuisance, and it thus “look[ed] to whether the [Clean Air Act] preempts [respondents’] claims.” Id. at 11a.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
The pertinent parts of said statutes provide as follows: Section 211(cX1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … Section 211(f)(4) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.
474 U.S. 1082Respondents Brief — Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v. Mexichem Fluor, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Aug 27, 2018
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-549, tit. VI, 104 Stat. 2399. … of Significant Deterioration program); id. § 7521 (Section 202 of Clean Air Act).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992
On June 9, 1992 the court of appeals denied El Paso’s petition without comment. … These courts have held that the pollution exclusion eliminates intentional acts of pollution, but does not eliminate unintentional pollution even where it is gradual or occurs over a long period of
506 U.S. 955Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Christopher, In re (No. 08-835)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
CAMPUS VISIT AND TOUR Interview Comments Mission. … Although not recommended, if insulation inside air ducts is to be retained, it should be commercially cleaned.
Opposition Brief — Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Sims
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
Air Act.” ... … Air Act.
493 U.S. 815Appendix — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1992
Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7642, which prohibits “sig- nificant deterioration” of air quality in “clean air areas,” and quantities “significant” in terms of “maximum allowable increases” in the … 'A major objective of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 was to deal with the problem of interstate air pollution. Air Pollu- tion Control District of Jefferson, Kentucky v.
503 U.S. 91Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Horn v. Cia de Navegacion Fruco, S. A.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1969
The case involves the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, found in Title 46 of the United States Code, Sections 1300 to 1315. This Act is set out in full in Appendix D to this Petition. … The only evidence showing the condition of the bananas on loading is the clean bill of lading signed by the Master.
394 U.S. 943Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
For instance, in the Clean Air Act of 1970, Pub. L. … To the extent the comments appear to be inconsistent, the view of Senator Muskie—a principal Senate sponsor of the Clean Water Act—have long been read as authoritative.
556 U.S. 208Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Section 202(a)(1) and other provisions in the Clean Air Act require EPA to regulate air pollutants that endanger public health or welfare. 42 U.S.C. § 7521(a)(1) (EPA shall regulate air pollutants from … Clean Air Act § 302(g), 42 U.S.C. § 7602(g).
549 U.S. 497Reply Brief — Production Plated Plastics, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992
During this two year period a sewer construction project was underway, with sewer hook-up achieved in December of 1987. … Suite 500 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 459-1171 3 See the Clean Water Act, 33 USC § 1348(4)(B) and the Clean Air Act, 42 USC § 7413(h) which qualify these terms and provide standards for personal
506 U.S. 820Joint Appendix — Key Tronic Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1994
Prior to that time, I held the position of Acting General Counsel and Assistant Secretary. … the other party to act on his behalf and subject to his control.”
511 U.S. 809Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Reilly
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
may not be raised on review,” because Seabrook did not involve the Clean Air Act as did Portland Cement. … Portland Cement involved the propriety of proposed EPA regulations under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7642 (1982 & Supp.
489 U.S. 1078Reply Brief — Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency (Nos. 75-7787, 75-7744)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1975
The Clean Air Act clearly recognizes the difference be- tween new sources and existing sources and treats new sources in a more restrictive manner. … The separate treatment of these existing sources is expressly limited by the Clean Air Act to meeting and maintaining the ambient standards.
Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
The Clean Air Act gives States the first crack at setting standards for existing sources. … In the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act, Congress provided billions in funding for “clean coal technology.” 42 U.S.C. § 7651n.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.