Documents

Petition — Mann v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976

The Clean Air Act Mandates State Control of Air Quality Within the Entire Geographic Area of the State, Subject Only to EPA Supervision The Clean Air Act expressly grants primary responsibility over … . 107(a) of the Clean Air Act, as added, 84 Stat. 1678, 42 U.S.C. § 1857¢-2(a).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Byrd v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Wass cuuees Bi oy ths 39 Mm. 10 Statutes Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§7401-7671q .............. 2 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, 42 U.S.C. §7412(b)(2) and 42 U.S.C. §7412(d) ... 3fn.4 Federal Advisory … Air Act regulations.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hong v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001

L.J. 2407 Hare, Comment, Reluctant Soldiers: The Criminal Liability of Corporate Officers for Negligent Violations of the Clean Water Act, 138 U. Pa. L. … ® See Hare, Comment, Reluctant Soldiers: The Criminal Liability of Corporate Officers for Negligent Violations of the Clean Water Act, 138 U. Pa. L.

Opposition — White v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

EEE I BURP OT basse bccccscsccccccccceess 8 Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972, | SO U.S.C. G01 68 80g. cccccccccccccccccsccces 5 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. (Supp. … The indus- try presently is regulated by the following additional federal statutes: the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.

Joint Appendix — Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al., Petitioners v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · Aug 28, 2024

Visibility • Under the Clean Air Act, visibility is an AQRV of concern for Class I areas (Section 3.7, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases). … Acidic Deposition • Under the Clean Air Act, acidic deposition is an AQRV of concern for Class I areas.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Reilly

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989

may not be raised on review,” because Seabrook did not involve the Clean Air Act as did Portland Cement. … Portland Cement involved the propriety of proposed EPA regulations under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7642 (1982 & Supp.

Memorandum — Pacific Legal Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1976

STATEMENT The Clean Air Act, 77 Stat. 392, as amended, 42 U.S.C. (and Supp. … (Sections 110 and 301 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1857c-5, 1857g.)

Amicus Brief — Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1976

The decision below thus involves a question of continuing importance under the Clean Air Act which should be reviewed by this Court. II. … The second, ‘emission limitations’ [as defined in Section 110(a) (2)(B) of the Clean Air Act], is an inclusive term referring to any type of control to reduce the amount of emissions into the air.

Appendix — Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Train

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1976

The decision below thus involves a question of continuing importance under the Clean Air Act which should be reviewed by this Court. Il. … The second, ‘emission limitations’ [as defined in Section 110(a)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act], is an inclusive term referring to any type of control to reduce the amount of emissions into the air.

Petitioners Brief — Gundy v. United States (No. 17-6086)

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2019

American Trucking Associations, 531 U.S. 457 (2001), a section of the Clean Air Act directed the Environmental Protection Agency to promulgate ambient air quality standards “the attainment and maintenance … (b) Reduced period for clean record (1) Clean record The full registration period shall be reduced as described in paragraph (3) for a offender who maintains a clean record for the period described

Amicus Curiae Brief — Engine Mfrs. Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Air Act, 42 U.S.C … § 41713(b)(1)), to Section 209(a) of the Clean Air Act.

Opposition Brief — Wells v. City of Alexandria

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004

for air leaks in the condenser units. … The District Court noted that the three specific cleaning and maintenance assignments about which WELLS complained occurred during periods where his doctor’s treatment/restriction reports state that

Petition — New York v. Warner-Lambert Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

During August of 1976, it appears that the quantity of MS in use at the plant was reduced, and that the plant itself was closed for a period of thorough cleaning. … Justice Leany at Criminal Term, with the following additional comments.

Brief in Opposition to Motion to Affirm — National Industrial Traffic League v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Motion to Affirm · 1969

They speak of the status of the suspen- sion order during that period as not “formally” vacated . … The argument made at page 3 merits special comment, .

Amicus Brief — St. Joe Minerals Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency (Nos. 80-483, 80-482)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1980

See Clean Air Act §§ 171-178. … Clean Air Act § 163.

Appendix — CleanCOALition v. TXU Power (No. 08-533)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2009

DENNIS, Circuit Judge: This case of first impression involves the scope of citizen-suit jurisdiction under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). See 42 U.S.C. § 7604(a). … the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) Program of the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”).!

Opposition — Davis v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984

V) 2671 et seq., for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. (& Supp. V) 1251 et seq., by the United States Air Force at Langley Air Force Base in Virginia. … ” provision in Section 505 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1365.

Opposition — Chrysler Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

SID cidsbsicssadicrubidstibicemceselinebsentee 8 PRECEDING PAGE WAS BLANK i lV Page Statutes and regulations—Continued: Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. … The plan shall 'The recall order under review was first issued on December 8, 1976, pursuant to the 1970 Clean Air Act and before the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L.

Respondents Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Dec 19, 2022

Air Act. … Water Act and Clean Air Act and could not support arising-under jurisdiction for that reason as well. 19 1.

Appendix E — Tsuji v. Hawaii

Supreme Court brief · Appendix E · 1999

be clean. … A letter dated April 19, 1992 from the employer’s administrator to DPS indicates that a DOSH investigator inspected all buildings at HCCC on March 29, 1992 and “verbally indicated the air appeared clean