Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.30s
Opposition — West Virginia ex rel. Air Pollution Control Commission v. Gorsuch
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1982
effects and to make findings required by the Clean Air Act. … Air Act and 40 CFR Part 51.” 45 Fed.
456 U.S. 972Amicus Curiae Brief — Sunoco LP, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 10, 2024
pollution or preempted by the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. … In Cooper, the Fourth Circuit held that the suit was preempted by the Clean Air Act. 615 F.3d at 301-306.
Appendix — Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Train
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1976
The decision below thus involves a question of continuing importance under the Clean Air Act which should be reviewed by this Court. Il. … The second, ‘emission limitations’ [as defined in Section 110(a)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act], is an inclusive term referring to any type of control to reduce the amount of emissions into the air.
425 U.S. 935Amicus Brief — Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1976
The decision below thus involves a question of continuing importance under the Clean Air Act which should be reviewed by this Court. II. … The second, ‘emission limitations’ [as defined in Section 110(a) (2)(B) of the Clean Air Act], is an inclusive term referring to any type of control to reduce the amount of emissions into the air.
425 U.S. 934Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1989
Air Act noncompliance proceedings. … Air Act.
490 U.S. 1039Amicus Curiae Brief — Engine Mfrs. Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Air Act, 42 U.S.C … § 41713(b)(1)), to Section 209(a) of the Clean Air Act.
541 U.S. 246Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Rec. 17,150 (Oct. 7, 1992) .........ccesescerereeeeseesees 13 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act, Pub. L. … . © Ge cotecscstsscstsininiataritsiinsessipensintanientiaioimaiaal 6 Clean Air Act § 103, 42 U.S.C. § 7403 .......... pacctinapiipiiiaial 19 Clean Air Act § 202(a)(1), G2 UBL. § TIS TIE Sp cccccssicectosssonesncestveien
549 U.S. 497Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
The CWA contains even less legislative guidance to the implementing agencies with respect to defining the reach of “waters of the United States” than the Clean Air Act provisions found to constitute … American Trucking Association, Inc., No. 99-1257 (Jan. 2000) at 14), relies upon the availability of the Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking process to save portions of the Clean Air Act from being
531 U.S. 159Amicus Brief — St. Joe Minerals Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency (Nos. 80-483, 80-482)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1980
See Clean Air Act §§ 171-178. … Clean Air Act § 163.
Opposition — Chrysler Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
SID cidsbsicssadicrubidstibicemceselinebsentee 8 PRECEDING PAGE WAS BLANK i lV Page Statutes and regulations—Continued: Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. … The plan shall 'The recall order under review was first issued on December 8, 1976, pursuant to the 1970 Clean Air Act and before the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L.
449 U.S. 1021Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Clean Air Coordinating Committee v. Roth Adam Fuel Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1973
Does the Federal Clean Air Act contain an express authorization’ within the meaning of 28 U. S. … No such express authoriza- tion can be found in the Federal Clean Air Act.
409 U.S. 1117Petition — Committee for Auto Responsibility v. Freeman
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Air, Inc. … The Metropolitan Washington Coalition for Clean Air is a nonprofit corporation devoted to the preservation and enhancement of environmental values in the District of Columbia metropolitan area.
445 U.S. 915Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Smith v. Fruin
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
Some three years earlier the City of Chicago had enacted its Clean Indoor Air Ordinance that stated in part (Chicago Mun. … Clean Indoor Air Ordinance §$7-32-030. (192-20.)
513 U.S. 1083Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
a ee ee 8 deterioration of the air quality in any clean air area. … Res. 733 reprinted in LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT OF 1977, Vol. 3 at 326 (Aug. 4, 1977) (emphasis added).
532 U.S. 970Reply Brief — Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 703 (2014) (No. 14-49)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2014
SEED peiocticient sci duidl cade had idiebaeniiasnait 10, 12 Statutes: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§7401, et seq. … Reg. 38,044 (Sept. 14, 1989) ............0.000...... 12 INTRODUCTION Section §112(n)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §7412(n)(1)(A), requires the U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Failure to comply with the sixty-day limit in the Clean Air Act was the subject of Riverside v. Ruckelshaus, 4 ERC 1728 (C.D. … Air Act.
420 U.S. 35Reply Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. New York, 127 S. Ct. 2127 (2007) (No. 06-736)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007
The Clean Air Act’s definition of “modification” does not unambiguously require the broadest meaning of “physical change” ...............-+65- 5 C. … There, this Court held that the Clean Air Act’s def- inition of “stationary source,” which included “any build- ing,” was ambiguous. 467 U.S. at 859-862 (quoting 42 U.S.C. 7411(a)(3)).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — North Carolina v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
Water Act or the Clean Air Act: and (4) there are no reasonable alternatives available which would permit the project to be conducted in a manner consistent with the State of North Carolina's coastal … In order to make that determination, the Secretary first determined that the water supply project met the requirements of the Clean Air Act and the CWA.
522 U.S. 1108Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 17, 2023
Rep. 1167; 5 B. & Ald. 204).3 Similarly, commentator John Kelly’s 3 Wood’s analysis was supported by a discussion of cases in nu- merous different areas of law. … Some purport to forever foreclose challenge after the window for preenforcement review closes, e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b) (Clean Air Act); 33 U.S.C. § 1369(b)(1) (Clean Water legally sue.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2022
costs to acquire a Clean Water Act § 404 permit from the Federal agencies. … The 2015 Clean Water Rule used the Significant Nexus Test to Assume Jurisdiction over Wetlands not Traditionally Regulated by the Clean Water Act.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.