Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.54s
Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 17, 2021
Circuit’s Interpretation of the Clean Air Act ........... 23 A. … CIRCUIT’S INTERPRETATION OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT. As explained above, the plain text of the Clean Air Act unambiguously forecloses the D.C. Circuit’s interpretation of section 7411(d). The D.C.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — New York State Department of Transportation v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
NYC Clean Air Campaign, Inc. … Air Campaign, Inc., West 12th Street Block Association, Hudson River Fishermen’s Asso- ciation, Hudson County Citizens For Clean Air, Seymour Durst, Otis Burger, Mary Rowe, and Howard Singer, Plaintiffs
475 U.S. 1084Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 7, 2024
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Section 209(a) of the Clean Air Act generally preempts States from setting their own emission standards for new motor vehicles. 42 U.S.C. § 7543(a). … Separately, Amici assert that EPA’s underlying action raises the major question doctrine and the EPA’s assertion of authority under Section 209(b) of the Clean Air Act to allow the deliberate and directed
Amicus Brief — Mont. Power Co. v. U.S.E.P.A.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1977
The provisions of the Clean Air Act effecting the present allocation of pollution-control functions as be- tween the State and Federal Governments were adopted as part of the Clean Air Amendments of … Congress did not intend that the States be thus hobbled in carrying out their air quality management responsibilities under the Clean Air Act.
430 U.S. 953Appendix — City of Loveland v. Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2011
Water Act and the federal Clean Air Act in 10a United States v. … After the Court reviewed all comments, it conducted a hearing on the Consent Decrees, finding them fair, adequate, and _ in complhiance with the Clean Water Act (Id.).
563 U.S. 974Reply Brief — North Dakota, et al., Applicants v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 18, 2024
The Rule Is Contrary to Clean Air Act Section 112(d)(6) ..................... 11 1. The Rule Is Not “Necessary” ....................................................... 11 2. … The Rule Is Contrary to Clean Air Act Section 112(d)(6) 1.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 28, 2024
The court below held that the Clean Air Act did not preempt plaintiffs’ statelaw claims because the Clean Air Act does not occupy the field of “emissions.” App.61a. … policy in question would be less stringent than the [Clean Air Act].”
Memorandum — Clean Air Coordinating Committee v. Roth Adam Fuel Co.
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1973
*It is clear that the Clean Air Act does not itself provide for a private suit of this nature. As pointed out by the court below (Pet. … In the present context, there is, as we have indi- eated, no need for such a stay to carry out the ob- jectives of the Clean Air Act as Congress intended.
409 U.S. 1117Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Const.: Bat, TE ccocnsynessceseqeemaenseeneieeen 17 gh, TE. csusewsnenasemeseainn 8, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Tit. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 560 (1986).
523 U.S. 83Slip Opinion — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Slip Opinion · 2007
Argued November 1, 2006-—Decided April 2, 2007 In the 1970s, Congress added two air pollution control schemes to the Clean Air Act (Act): New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Prevention of Significant … Belden, Clean Air Act 7 (2001) (hereinafter Belden), and the Clean Air Act Amend- ments of 1977, 91 Stat. 685, included the PSD provisions, which aimed at giving added protection to air quality in
549 U.S. 561Opposition Brief — United States v. Colorado
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
"Senate Report No. 94-988 further states that section 6961 parallels the waiver provision of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7418, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1323... … Courts reviewing the waiver provisions of the Clean Air Act, the FWPA [Federal Water Pollution Act], and the Noise Control Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4903(b), the language of which, ..-, directly parallels section
510 U.S. 1092Transcript of Record — El Dorado Oil Works v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1946
= aired =. … Tohavé nothing to de with the cleaning of the cars. . (). You don’t know how they are cleaned? A. No air. (). Now, then, what is your information about requests, cleaning requests?
328 U.S. 12Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 2, 2022
And the Act has two “savings clauses” that expressly preserve non-Clean Air Act claims. … At least some of it, though, has been displaced by the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). See Am. Elec.
Appendix — Shell Oil Co. v. United States (Nos. 07-1607, 07-1601)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2009
Anthony Dell’Aquilla Enterprises is not a CERCLA case; it arose under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seg. … The contractor’s liability as an “operator” under the Clean Air Act was estab- lished through its direct control and supervision over demolition and project development activities at a site.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
Pursuant to the Clean Air Act, the EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). … After considering both comments, EPA rejected the (Footnote continued on following page. ) D-6 95th Cong., Ist Sess 76 reprinted in 4 A LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1977
490 U.S. 1039Petition — West Virginia ex rel. Air Pollution Control Commission v. Gorsuch
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982
Review of the Decision Below by This Honorable Court Is Necessary To Clarify Federal-State Relationships Under the Clean Air Act The statutory scheme in the Clean Air Act for the control of air pollution … Clean Air Act requires an explicit determination of compliance with the interstate pollution abatement provisions.
456 U.S. 972Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
If you have any questions of comments, please don't hesitate to cootact me. … Thus, CO: is not a pollutant, and is not, and should not, be regulated under any part of the Clean Air Act nor under any air pollution section of 40 CFR.
549 U.S. 497Appendix for Appellee — Parks-Cramer Co. v. American Monorail Co. (No. 533)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix for Appellee · 1957
Mills, of Spray and ‘Leaksville, North Carolina, for a period ‘of approximately five years. … Thereafter, I was em- + ployed by the Dan River Mills, of Danville; Virginia, for a period of approximately a year and a half.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 11, 2025
Air Act. … the savings clauses— were modeled on the Clean Air Act, so that the two acts are often in pari materia.”).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of New York v. Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2011
. § 32919(a), and the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7543(a). … Air Act (“CAA”).
562 U.S. 1264
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.