Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.56s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
The EIS Would Assist States in Meeting Their Obligations Under the Clean Air ACt .........ecceeeeee 24 IV. … Environmental Defense has helped design such landmark clean air programs as the market-based pollution cap and allowance trading program adopted in the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments to abate acid deposition
541 U.S. 752Amicus Curiae Brief — Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Congress responded in a highly detailed manner to the potential problems created by the warranties mandated by the Clean Air Act . … Congress also established a requirement in the 1990 amend- ments to the Clean Air Act that motor vehicles be equipped with electronic diagnostic devices.
504 U.S. 451Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Alaska, 540 U.S. at 485 n.12 (discussing similar Clean Air Act provisions); David M. … This Court has implicitly held that Congress made such value choices in the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act. See TVA v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Although § 1988 authorizes fees in “any action or proceeding” - brought to enforce the Civil Rights Acts, and § 304(d) applies only to “any action” brought under the Clean Air Act, this distinction … This Court did not address, however, the | - propriety of a fee award under the Clean Air Act, or any other statute, for a prevailing defendant.
532 U.S. 994Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 18, 2021
Volkswagen moved to dismiss based on preemption under the Clean Air Act (the “Act”). … See EPA, Derive Systems Clean Air Act Settlement (Sept. 24, 2018), https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/derive-systems-clean-air-act-settlement. 276878.1 31 it.” Dep’t of Homeland Sec. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
States and local governments had strongly pro- tested against the congressional imposition upon them of rigorous air quality standards under the Clean Air Act and Amendments of 1970 because the federal … Lockheed Air Terminal, 411 U.S. 624, 637 (1973).
420 U.S. 35Reply Brief — Eschenbach v. United States (Nos. 07-1287, 07-1286)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007
Air Act and minerals not covered,” Pet. … The government’s current assertion also conflicts with the district court’s observation that its rulings “will likely render inadmissible much of the government’s proof relating to the Clean Air Act
Joint Appendix — Rockwell Intern. Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2007
$5801, et seq., the Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act at 33 U.S.C. $1251, et seq., the Clean Air Act at 42 U.S.C. §7401, et seq., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act at 42 U.S.C-$6961 … (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9603, the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seg., or the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq.
549 U.S. 457Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1984
S. 16-17), because the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 expressly permit state regulation of radiation emissions under certain specific and limited circumstances. … Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908( 1), Comment a (1979); Comment, Jmplied Preemption of Punitive Damages for Nuclear Accidents, 29 American U. L. Rev. 741, 756 (1980).
464 U.S. 238Amicus Curiae Brief — Engine Mfrs. Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
ACT’S UNAMBIGUOUS Clean Air Act of 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 1. … 15-16 Clean Air Act, Subchapter II, Part C, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7581- a 23, 25 iv Clean Air Act § 241(2), 42 U.S.C. § 7581(2) ....ccccccccescseseee 25 Clean Air Act § 243(e)(2), 42 U.S.C. § 7583(e)(2) .
541 U.S. 246Transcript of Record — United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1963
With reference to the comments made by Mr. … cleaning operations?
373 U.S. 709Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Beverly Zylstra, et vir, Petitioners v. DRV, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 5, 2021
Yeah, that wouldn’t—that they couldn’t get it cleaned up. He didn’t say biohazard, but couldn’t get it cleaned up. Q. … (b) PROHIBITED ACTS.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 23, 2026
Interested parties have the opportunity to participate in these deliberative processes via mandated notice and comment periods. … The only permissible applications of state law, this Court further explained, are those “specifically preserved” by the savings clauses of the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act.
Appellants Brief — Philadelphia v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1978
(Clean Air Act): See. 1857 .............. ‘ . siberian .24, 48 42 U.S.C. … voluntary planning provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act are dramatically different from the mandatory planning provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1970.
437 U.S. 617Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Election Commission, Appellant v. Ted Cruz for Senate, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2021
. § 30116(j) . . . . . passim Clean Air Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) . . . . . 18 Miscellaneous: Charles Alan Wright, … Petitioners in those cases argue that EPA regulations issued in 2015 exceeded the scope of its delegated authority under the Clean Air Act; and if the Clean Air Act really does grant EPA its claimed sweeping
Appendix — Dairy Products Co. v. Sleeth
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1956
ive hundred cubic fect of air space per cow is considered satisfactory. 6. … Milk stools shall be clean and stored in a clean place. 18.
351 U.S. 966Amicus Brief — Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1978
See, ¢.g., Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1857e-9; 1857f-5; Federal Water Pollu- tion Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1318; Toxie Substances Con- trol Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2610. … E.g., Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1857; Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251; Toxie Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. ~ § 2601.
436 U.S. 307Respondents Brief — Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries, 139 S. Ct. 986 (2019) (No. 17-1104)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2019
Pet.App. 8a (citing Jd. § 29, Comment. … Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 388, Comment (a).
Opposition — Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
The government maintains that the meaning of Clean Air Act section 307(f) (added in 1977) “can only be deter- mined by tracing its origins in the Clean Air Act of 1970.” Petition, p. 16. … There, the Ninth Cireuit awarded fees to a losing party under section 307 (f) of the Clean Air Act.
463 U.S. 680Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 23, 2023
[formulate , implement, publish and regularly update national... programmes containing measures to mitigate climate change .... “) • Statutory authorities include, e.g., the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 7401 … Section 2904 (d); the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC Sections 1442 (a) and (b); Section 103 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, and Section 102(2)(F) of the National Environmental
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.