Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.11s
Opposition Brief — Contessa Premium Foods, Inc. v. Berdex Seafood, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005
Writ Cert. 24. The opinion in Grokster was handed down on June 27, 2005, but Contessa never supplemented its petition. … Writ Cert. 24. The opinion in Grokster was handed down on June 27, 2005, but Contessa has yet to file any supplemental briefing.
546 U.S. 957Petition — MacKenzie v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975
On June 24, 1974 the jury returned a verdict of guilty on both counts against both appellants (C.T. 86). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42: 90 S.
423 U.S. 827Opposition Brief — New Mexico v. Hensel
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
App. 1974) 97 N.M. 73, 636 P.24 892 (Ct. App. 1981) v 397 N.E.2d 1319 (Ct. App. N.¥. 1979) og Ee 609 P.2d 631 (Or. App. 380 U.S. 400 (1965). ........ iii ’ “SF AB Be! … Johnson, 85 N.M. 465, 513 P.2d 399 (Ct. App. 1973). The case at bar is almost identical to Stoner and Chapman.
484 U.S. 958Petition — Bagnell v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 26 L. … Louisiana, 399 U.S. at 33-34.
446 U.S. 937Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 19, 2024
United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998) ............................................ 10 Taylor v. City of Milford, 10 F.4th 800 (7th Cir. 2021) ........................ 24, 25 Taylor v. … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 409 (1997).
Opposition — Watts v. Bayou Landing, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
TWA, 233 Ga. 885, 214 S.E.24 370 (1975), the Georgia argument the prior restraint issue. … Georgia, 399 U.S. 557 (1969), and while for sale such presumptively protected material.
439 U.S. 818Amicus Curiae Brief — Troxel v. Granville
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923); Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 533 (1925). … Troxel Br. at 24-25. Petitioners’ argument reveals a cramped and highly compartmentalized view of child-rearing.
530 U.S. 57Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Isaiah Glenndell Tryon, Petitioner v. Christe Quick, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 25, 2024
Texas, 581 U.S. 1 (2017) ............................................................................ 23, 24, 27, 31 Stewart v. … Thaler, 389 F.App’x 399 (5th Cir. 2010) ....................................................................... 30 McGowen v.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Apr 11, 2025
Perry 548 U.S. 399 (2006) .............................................. 13 Mandel v. … City of Oakland, 24 F.4th 1287, 1295 (9th Cir. 2022).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Felix Pusey, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 13, 2025
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970)……………………….………………24-37 United States v. … Lyle, 854 N.W.2d at 399.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 24, 2026
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923)—also encompasses the fundamental right not to be forced into an occupation of the government’s choosing? … On February 5, 2026, this Court granted an application for an extension of time to file a petition for writ of certiorari, to and including April 24, 2026.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arca v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
A) Section 241(b), 8S USC 1251(f).......... 3, 5,6, 10-12, 24 Section 241(a)(1), S USC 1251(a)(1)..........3, 10, 24 Section 241(a)(2), 8 USC 1251(a)(2)....... 3, 10, 11, 24 Section 212(a)(19), 8 USC … Immigration & Naturalization Service, 399 F. 2d 98, 104 (6th Cir. 1968); Tsaconas v.
414 U.S. 873Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Parness v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
P. 24(c) seems to require the dismissal of alternate jurors once deliberations have be- gun. United States v. … Id., 399 U.S. at 100.
477 U.S. 906Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Patch v. Solar Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1945
W. 205. 23, 24 Columbus Railway & Power Company v. Columbus, 249 U. S. 399....8, 13, 18, 27 District Township of Union v. Smith, 39 Iowa 9, 18 Am. … S. 24; Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co., 256 U. S. 619; Columbus Railway & Power Company v. Columbus, 249 U. S. 399.
326 U.S. 741Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Laron Darrell Carter, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 29, 2024
Green, 399 U.S. at 156–57. … Green, 399 U.S. at 189 n.22 (Harlan, J., concurring).
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Murray v. Owens
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1973
IIlinois, 399 U.S. 235 Winship, In Re, 397 U.S. 358 Statutes: N. Y. Correction Law: Sec. 2 Sec. 23 N. Y. … places of maxi- mum or medium security, differing according to the age ranges of the persons confined therein, ranging from 16 upwards; and places of minimum security, for those be- tween 16 and 24
409 U.S. 1117Reply Brief — Cornell Thomas, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 13, 2025
BIO 8, Vincent, No. 24-1155. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 238–40 (1970).
Opposition — National Labor Relations Board v. Electro Vector, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
(Tr. 24). … Pistoresi, Nello & Son, Inc., 500 F.2d 399 (9th Cir. 1974). ©.
434 U.S. 821Reply Brief — Gardner v. Evans
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1986
Wechsler, 263 U.S. 22, 24 (1923). … King County, 264 U.S, 22, 24-25 (1924).
479 U.S. 1007Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lowen v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
| Supreme Court, U.S, _ FILED OCT 24 1988 JOSEPH F. SPANIOL, JR, CLERK em IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT OCTOBER TERM, 1988 DARRELL LAMONT LOWEN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, ) VS. … OREGON, 106 S.CT. 1973. 90 L.ED. 2D 399 (1985) ps TES OG aR ty» ee 12 618 P2D 423, 289 OR 845, CERT.
489 U.S. 1012
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.