Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987

The legislative history of the Act reflects this view through the comments of the Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare which in part state: The general duty clause in this bill would not be … While the Secretary con- cedes a ventilating device (air mover)* was employed by Paling during the assumed period of exposure, it is asserted the location rendered it essentially ineffective.

Opposition Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004

The Clean Air Act establishes a comprehensive program for controlling and improving the nation’s air quality. … ogy and, therefore, did not act in compliance with the Clean Air Act in issuing the PSD permit.

Amicus Brief — Train v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975

States and local governments had strongly pro- tested against the congressional imposition upon them of rigorous air quality standards under the Clean Air Act and Amendments of 1970 because the federal … Lockheed Air Terminal, 411 U.S. 624, 637 (1973).

Reply Brief — National Parks Conservation Association v. Tennessee Valley Authority (No. 07-867)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2008

Brief at 30-32, stressed that the language and structure of the Clean Air Act’s NSR’s provisions unambiguously apply on an ongoing basis — the same point now made at length by the Government. … By way of comparison, the Clean Air Act defines a “major source” as one emitting at least 100 tons a year, 42 U.S.C. § 7479.

Reply Brief — Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v. Mexichem Fluor, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 11, 2018

Air Act provisions or the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). … As we have already explained, many Clean Air Act provisions operate indefinitely, and there is no evidence Congress intended Section 612 authority to sunset. NRDC Pet. 28.

Supplemental Memorandum — Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Memorandum · 1978

Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. … (1) 2 Section 112 of the Clean Air Act is amended by adding the following new subsection at the end thereof: “(eX 1) For purposes of this section, if in the judg- ment of the Administrator, it

Respondents Brief — Air and Liquid Systems Corp., et al., Petitioners v. Roberta G. DeVries, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John B. DeVries, Deceased, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Aug 20, 2018

Pet.App. 8a (citing Id. § 29, Comment. … Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 388, Comment (a).

Petitioners Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Dec 13, 2021

STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED The Clean Air Act’s relevant provisions appear at No. 20-1530 Pet.App.204a-209a. STATEMENT 1. … The Clean Air Act targets air pollution “at the source.” 42 U.S.C. § 7401(a)(3). Sources can be mobile, like cars, or stationary. Id. § 7602(z).

Reply Brief — Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 24, 2021

This “no gap” quote did not concern Section 111(d), but only former Sections 114 and 115 of the 1970 Clean Air Act. … By contrast, during the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, Section 111(d) was considered “some obscure, neverused section of the law.” Pet.8–9. B.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Orjias

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

In the Arraj decision, the Environmental Protection Agency sued L-P under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7401 et. seg. on the grounds that L-P should have obtained a Prevention of Significant Deterioration … In the Arraj decision, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sued L-P under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seg. and its regulations alleging violations of its prevention of significant deterioration

Petitioners Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Dec 13, 2021

The CPP purported to find this authority in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. “The Clean Air Act establishes a series of regulatory programs to control air pollution from stationary sources[.]” … The Clean Air Act defines “standard of performance” in two places.

Application — Louisiana, et al., Applicants v. American Rivers, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Application · Mar 21, 2022

the goals of the Clean 25 Air Act); W. … Air Act 2 in the State of California”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Elec. Power Supply Ass'n, 135 S. Ct. 2049 (2015) (No. 14-840)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

or water heaters during peak periods, rarely run those more at non-peak times), which itself reduces power plants’ emissions of air pollutants and attendant public health harms. … air, clean transportation and clean energy policies at the regional and national levels.

Petition — Romero-Barcelo v. Weinberger

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

(g)(1); Section 7002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §6972; and Section 304 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7604. … Claims under the Federal Clean Air Act Plaintiffs Romero Barcelé, et. al., Medina, et al., and Zenon, et al., claim that Defendant Navy’s activities violate the Federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7401

Opposition Brief — Work v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

The action was brought pursuant to the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. … In their brief, the peti- tioners focus on the role which they contend a citizen may take when the government fails to act within the sixty day period after notice of intent to sue is given pursuant

Joint Appendix — Watt v. California

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1983

As you are undoubtedly aware, the federal Environmental Protection agency has imposed sanctions on California under the Clean Air Act. … , the Endangered Species Act, the Coastal Zone Management Act, the Clean Air Act, and the National En- vironmental Policy Act.

Joint Appendix — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2000

Carey, 535 F.2d 165, 172 (2d Cir. 1976) (referring to citizen suit provision of the Clean Air Act’. … Any person who comments on the proposed 9 The citizen-suit provision in the CWA was modeled after the provision in the Clean Air Act. S. Rep.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Environmental Protection Agency must lead the way, and not shirk its responsibilities as set forth in the federal Clean Air Act. … Second, an unduly constrained reading of the federal Clean Air Act would curtail the regulatory authority of every State.

Reply Brief — Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch Three, LLC, Petitioner v. Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch Two, LLC, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 30, 2025

Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch Two, LLC., et al., Respondents. … Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch Two, LLC, et al., Respondents.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hanna v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

Air Act. … Air Act.