Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.33s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 5, 2024
EPA Misinterpreted its Authority Under Clean Air Act Section 111. … The most common definitions at the time of the Clean Air Act’s enactment required far more than what EPA suggests.
Opposition Brief — Kelly Colvard Parsons, Petitioner v. Richard Jearl Parsons
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Nov 4, 2020
During the marriage have there been periods of time that you and she have had a housekeeper or a service to assist in cleaning the home? A. Yes. Q. … for some period of months?
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 30, 2021
That decision held that greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, can be “air pollutants” subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act. … public comments.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Beamer v. Virginian Railway Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1944
The plaintiff has been denied her rights under the Federal Employers Liability Act. … Beamer and no other person had ever done this kind of work for a period of two hours at this particular place.
321 U.S. 763Opposition Brief — Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
DELAWARE VALLEY CITIZENS‘ COUNCIL FOR CLEAN AIR, et al. … Air Act, P.L. 95-95, 91 Stat.
474 U.S. 819Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Apr 25, 2018
After protests by ASPs and airlines, a two-week “extension” to the comment period, until April 25, 2014, was granted. 17. … Count One Violation of the National Labor Relations Act and the Railway Labor Act (Preemption) (Against all Defendants) 48.
Prologue — Shaw v. United States (No. 05-1220)
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
The Clean Air Act is found at 42 U.S.C. § § 7401-7642. These statutes were enacted to encourage and to assist the States in curtailing air pollution. See generally Train v. … The Clean Air Act sets the parameters of Environmental . Protection Agency authority regarding air pollutants such as asbestos.
Appendix A — Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix A · 1973
black walnut shells,’ and a product, ‘an abrasive material for use in air blasts for cleaning metal comprising BA PIRI tS Sky = pelletized black wainut shells.” … Although the trial judge commented that the “Statement of Policy” pertained to the intent issue under section 2.
414 U.S. 1022Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Thomas F. Sweeney, Petitioner v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 11, 2019
After completing an initial training period, in December 2009 Appellant reported to the Washington Air Route Traffic Control Center in Leesburg, Virginia (the “Washington Center”). … He was informed that, if no response was received within the response period, it would be considered that there were no comments and the appropriate action, either position change or separation, would
Amicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Congress established under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, ef seq. (“CAA”), a umique federal-state partnership for controlling air pollution. … EPA’s Interpretation of § 109 of the Clean Air Act Leads to Absurd and Unjust Results.
530 U.S. 1202Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
8-hour period. … EPA’s Interpretation of § 109 of the Clean Air Act Leads to Absurd and Unjust Results.
531 U.S. 457Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Sues Electric Utilities in Unprecedented Action to Enforce the Clean Air Act,” press release, November 3, 1999.’ … Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”), 42 U.S.C
549 U.S. 561Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 8, 2021
by or resulting from acts or decisions, including the failure to act or decide, of any person, group, organization or government body.” … of restoration definition to have some effect in this case, Bel Air would seemingly need to argue that cleaning surfaces of a property constitutes repair or replacement.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Air Act, 42 U.S.C … The Clean Air Act (“Clean Air Act” or “CAA”) grants the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) broad powers over states not attaining these standards.
531 U.S. 457Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Many states, in implementing Federal Clean Air Act requirements,'! … The unit could be permitted in an expedited process as a Clean Air Act minor source and built in only 18 months.
549 U.S. 561Respondents Brief — Dow Chemical Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1986
Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seg. … Nothing in the Clean Air Act gives any reason to doubt the correctness of this assumption.
476 U.S. 227Opposition Brief — PPG Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7411). … In con trast to the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act contains no general Variance provision (see note 4, supra), so Section 111 standards must account for “all variations of operating conditions being
495 U.S. 910Memorandum — Kawasaki Motors Corp. v. Train
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1975
Under Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 84 Stat. 1708 (42 U.S.C. 1857h-5(b)(1)), petitions for review of such a regula- 'The regulation appears at 40 C.F.R. 52.243, 38 Fed. … Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act confers jurisdiction upon courts of appeals to review implementation plans only upon petitions for review filed within 30 days from the date of promul- gation
420 U.S. 926Opposition — Romero-Barcelo v. Weinberger
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. (& Supp. IIT) 4321 et seq.; the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. (& Supp. III) 1251 et seq.; the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U.S.C. (Supp. … Therefore, questions relating to enforcement of the federal facilities compliance provision of the Noise Control Act are not identical to those concerning the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act,
454 U.S. 816Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cavanaugh v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
The Air Force had a duty to act and failed to do so. … Sa to mandamus relief for the failure of the Air Force to act.
483 U.S. 1007
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.