Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

1,645 results

0.12s

  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    [Jay Hoyt’s comment]: percent - etc. What percentage? 100 [Mr. … Might explain why he acts so nervousspooky. 26 See supra note 16, describing how they wound up (continued...

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    [Jay Hoyt’s comment]: percent - etc. What percentage? 100 [Mr. … Might explain why he acts so nervousspooky. 26 See supra note 16, describing how they wound up (continued...

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    [Jay Hoyt’s comment]: percent - etc. What percentage? 100 [Mr. … Might explain why he acts so nervousspooky. 26 See supra note 16, describing how they wound up (continued...

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The court reasoned that it had difficulty with the notion that the mere act of abandoning burdensome property creates tax liability for the trustee. … Respondent referenced a few commentators’ prognoses of how losses from a bankruptcy would be treated.

    United States Tax Court
  • T .C . .Memo . 200 9

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    2001 Foxworthy claimed deductions for janitorial and cleaning expenses relating to Northside . Foxworthy also claimed deductions for payments to Mr . Graham . Mr . … Period of Limitation s The Bells argue that respondent cannot assess the ;;tax deficiencies respondent determined against them for taxable years 1 ;996 through 199 .because 8 the statutory periods of

    United States Tax Court
  • T .C . .Memo . 200 9

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    2001 Foxworthy claimed deductions for janitorial and cleaning expenses relating to Northside . Foxworthy also claimed deductions for payments to Mr . Graham . Mr . … Period of Limitation s The Bells argue that respondent cannot assess the ;;tax deficiencies respondent determined against them for taxable years 1 ;996 through 199 .because 8 the statutory periods of

    United States Tax Court
  • T.C. Memo. 201 8-136

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    They also argue that they shouldn't have to pay penalties because they had reasonable cause, acted in good faith, and relied on substantial authority. … Memo. 2004-222, 2004 WL 2244500, at *4 (owner of hotel rooms didn't materially participate where someone else cleaned and checked people in).

    United States Tax Court
  • T.C. Memo. 201 8-136

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    They also argue that they shouldn't have to pay penalties because they had reasonable cause, acted in good faith, and relied on substantial authority. … Memo. 2004-222, 2004 WL 2244500, at *4 (owner of hotel rooms didn't materially participate where someone else cleaned and checked people in).

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    section 274(g) of the Revenue Act of 1926; no reference to section 512(g) appears in - 9 - the committee reports accompanying the 1932 Act. … The only legislative history in respect of this action is the identical comment in the committee reports that "This section represents no change in existing law". H.

    United States Tax Court
  • T .C . .Memo . 200 9

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    2001 Foxworthy claimed deductions for janitorial and cleaning expenses relating to Northside . Foxworthy also claimed deductions for payments to Mr . Graham . Mr . … Period of Limitation s The Bells argue that respondent cannot assess the ;;tax deficiencies respondent determined against them for taxable years 1 ;996 through 199 .because 8 the statutory periods of

    United States Tax Court
  • T .C . .Memo . 200 9

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    2001 Foxworthy claimed deductions for janitorial and cleaning expenses relating to Northside . Foxworthy also claimed deductions for payments to Mr . Graham . Mr . … Period of Limitation s The Bells argue that respondent cannot assess the ;;tax deficiencies respondent determined against them for taxable years 1 ;996 through 199 .because 8 the statutory periods of

    United States Tax Court
  • CORDED

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Only in response to further questions directed to paragraph 4.0 did decedent's parents make comments that reverted to the idea of some degree of control over the annuities. … The record indicates that his parents and the conservator acted jointly in deciding upon a trust as a vehicle for managing the funds they anticipated as a result of the settlement.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    While there petitioner "sat around" at the bar and sometimes acted as a "gofer" for Mr. Roberts and Carlos. … Before we address these elements,¹² we will comment on the testimony of petitioner. "As a trier of fact, it is our duty to listen to the testimony, observe the "(...continued) Golsen v.

    United States Tax Court
  • United States Tax Court

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Washington’s failure to undertake a ministerial act on her own. D.C. … Washington acts to designate the Estate as beneficiary, and therefore that the United States’ tax lien cannot attach to the proceeds.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Any financing (including conventional mortgages) was permissible. 5(_continued) set forth in the National Housing Act. 12 U.S.C. sec. 1709. … The Commissioner argues that section 7491 does not apply in a declaratory judgment act on brought under section 7428.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    During the relevant periods CMS specialized in subservicing poorly performing loans for other financial institutions. … Rather than a check the box rating with respect to an area of performance designated "Knowledge", the following comments were made on the evaluation: It has been determined that you meet requirements

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Comment B.2. See Pa. R. Civ. … L. 98-378, sec. 18(a), 98 Stat. 1305, 1321, amended by the Family Support Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-485, tit. I, sec. 103(a) and (b), 102 Stat. 2346.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Sec. 6503(a). ¹°The Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (HIRE Act), Pub. L. … Consequently, the period of limitations was open for all three years as of March 18, 2010, so that the HIRE Act changes described above are effective for all of the returns at issue.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    -9[*9] On February 3, 2014, an IRS acting group manager, T. … As pertinent here, section 6501(b)(2) provides that where a return for a period ending with or within a calendar year with respect to tax under chapter 21, Federal Insurance Contributions Act, or chapter

    United States Tax Court
  • T.C. Memo. 2019-1 16

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    In the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. … While RO Wagner did make comments regarding Mr. Johnson's generally "uncooperative" nature, these comments were made contemporaneously as a part of his job function as a revenue officer. M id.

    United States Tax Court

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.