Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,645 results
0.37s
Agency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
One of the proposals was to acquire Russian airplanes, immediately sell them at a substantial profit, and lease them back for use in an air freight and mail service business. … Legally, this money was not to fund your personal schemes. * * * None of my money was ever to be at risk and for a two year period every, repeat, every transaction was to be approved by me.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1231(e)(1), 100 Stat. 2085, 2562-2563. … Goldscheider offered expert testimony on the subject of what a reasonable royalty would be and the judge in that case commented that Mr.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1231(e)(1), 100 Stat. 2085, 2562-2563. … Goldscheider offered expert testimony on the subject of what a reasonable royalty would be and the judge in that case commented that Mr.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1231(e)(1), 100 Stat. 2085, 2562-2563. … Goldscheider offered expert testimony on the subject of what a reasonable royalty would be and the judge in that case commented that Mr.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1231(e)(1), 100 Stat. 2085, 2562-2563. … Goldscheider offered expert testimony on the subject of what a reasonable royalty would be and the judge in that case commented that Mr.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
ATV spent at least $60,000 to renovate Landmark Hall, including painting the main house, installing central heating and air conditioning, and rebuilding the carriage house. … For authoritative guidance to support our holding, we turned to the conference report to the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
The preamble notes that 42 no comments on the temporary regulations were received during the comment period and only two comments were received after the period. 10 Id. at 467. … Rather, commenters requested that Treasury provide by regulation a specific period within which the IRS would allow a timely filed request to be perfected. Id. at 60,836. C.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
All other members of the family resided in the United States throughout the period at issue. … Memo. 1993-281, that “when - 35 raising a substance over form argument, the taxpayer must have ‘clean hands’ before he is allowed to present strong proof that the form chosen does not reflect the true
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
All other members of the family resided in the United States throughout the period at issue. … Memo. 1993-281, that “when - 35 raising a substance over form argument, the taxpayer must have ‘clean hands’ before he is allowed to present strong proof that the form chosen does not reflect the true
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
All other members of the family resided in the United States throughout the period at issue. … Memo. 1993-281, that “when - 35 raising a substance over form argument, the taxpayer must have ‘clean hands’ before he is allowed to present strong proof that the form chosen does not reflect the true
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
All other members of the family resided in the United States throughout the period at issue. … Memo. 1993-281, that “when - 35 raising a substance over form argument, the taxpayer must have ‘clean hands’ before he is allowed to present strong proof that the form chosen does not reflect the true
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
and Reform Act of 1998 and the Community Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000. … The Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Pub.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
All other members of the family resided in the United States throughout the period at issue. … Memo. 1993-281, that “when - 35 raising a substance over form argument, the taxpayer must have ‘clean hands’ before he is allowed to present strong proof that the form chosen does not reflect the true
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
All other members of the family resided in the United States throughout the period at issue. … Memo. 1993-281, that “when - 35 raising a substance over form argument, the taxpayer must have ‘clean hands’ before he is allowed to present strong proof that the form chosen does not reflect the true
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
All other members of the family resided in the United States throughout the period at issue. … Memo. 1993-281, that “when - 35 raising a substance over form argument, the taxpayer must have ‘clean hands’ before he is allowed to present strong proof that the form chosen does not reflect the true
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
He had neither the motive, intent or history or dishonest acts needed to commit such a fruad [sic] . … Petitioner ask[s] the court to review the entire 1995 to 1999 time period in relation to the issues raised in this matter .
United States Tax Court
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.