Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
135 results
0.53s
Changes To Implement Electronic Maintenance of Official Patent Application Records
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 25, 2003
Although comments may be submitted by mail or facsimile, the Office prefers to receive comments via the Internet. … Regulatory Flexibility Act: As prior notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 (or any other law), an initial regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory
68 FR 14365Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeChanges To Implement the Patent Business Goals
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 4, 1999
While some comments supported this proposed change, a majority of comments opposed permitting delayed submission of an oath or declaration; and changing the time period for submission of the basic filing … A clean copy of each drawing sheet of the printed patent must also be furnished.
64 FR 53772Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeChanges To Implement the Patent Business Goals
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 5, 1998
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). … Comments on the Following Questions Are Solicited 1. Should a maximum period for suspension be set for a period of other than three years? 2.
63 FR 53498Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeTrademark Law Treaty Implementation Act Changes
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 11, 1999
DATES: Comments must be received by June 25, 1999 to ensure consideration. … or email comments to [email protected].
64 FR 25223Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeRules of Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 26, 2003
Proposed § 41.110(a) would require a single clean set of the claims, analogous to the requirement for amendments “in clean form” in Rule 121. … (a) Clean copy of claims.
68 FR 66648Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark Office1996 Changes to Patent Practice and Procedure
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 23, 1996
The Sec. 1.137(b) portion of the preamble requests comments on alternatives as to the time period for submitting a petition thereunder. … Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
61 FR 49820Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeRules of Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Ex Parte Appeals
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 30, 2007
Procedure Act apply)); Fressola v. … Because prior notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required for the changes in the proposed rules, a final Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis is also not required for the changes in the
72 FR 41472Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 22, 2009
of Roundtable During Comment Period AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. … Following the public comment period, if the Office determines further action is necessary, a subsequent notice of proposed rule making would be issued to solicit additional comments on specific proposals
74 FR 67987Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeRules of Practice for Trademark-Related Filings Under the Madrid Protocol Implementation Act
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 28, 2003
DATES: Comments must be received by May 27, 2003 to ensure consideration. … after the date of registration, or the three-month grace period immediately following, with payment of the grace period surcharge required by section 71(a)(2)(B) of the Act and § 7.6
68 FR 15119Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeChanges to Implement 18-Month Publication of Patent Applications
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 15, 1995
period beginning on the date a reply under Sec. 1.111 was filed and ending on the mailing date of an action in response thereto, (2) where there was a failure to act on an appeal brief under Sec. 1.192 … Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
60 FR 42352Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeChanges To Implement Eighteen-Month Publication of Patent Applications
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 5, 2000
Although comments may be submitted by mail or facsimile, the Office prefers to receive comments via the Internet. … Lines, numbers, and letters must be clean, dark (not of poor line quality), uniformly thick, and well defined.
65 FR 17946Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeMiscellaneous Changes to Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Rules of Practice
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 4, 2016
DATES: Comments must be received by June 3, 2016 to ensure consideration. ADDRESSES: The Office prefers that comments be submitted via electronic mail message to TTABFRNotices@uspto.gov. … Cold War Air Museum Inc., 586 F.3d 1352, 92 USPQ2d 1626, 1629 (Fed.
81 FR 19296Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 4, 2019
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent by electronic mail message over the internet addressed to: AD38.comments@uspto.gov. … Comments also may be submitted by postal mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments-Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O.
84 FR 53090Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeChanges to Patent Term Adjustment in View of the Federal Circuit Decision in Novartis v. Lee
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 18, 2014
DATES: Comment Deadline Date: Written comments must be received on or before August 18, 2014. … Congressional Review Act: Under the Congressional Review Act provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801-808), the United States Patent and Trademark Office
79 FR 34681Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeWithdrawal of Changes to Post Registration Response Deadlines
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 19, 2024
Commenters can find a reference to this document and select the “Comment” button, complete the required fields, and enter or attach their comments. … If no response is received within that time, the registration will be canceled, unless time remains in the six-month grace period under Trademark Act (Act) section 8(a)(3), 15 U.S.C. 1058(a)(3).
89 FR 58660Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 14, 2007
ADDRESSES: The Office prefers that comments be submitted via electronic mail message to TM RECON COMMENTS@USPTO.GOV. … Nonetheless, the USPTO anticipates that an examining attorney will continue to act promptly on such requests, and in any event, before the end of the six-month period to petition or appeal.
72 FR 6984Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeRevision of Patent Term Adjustment Provisions Relating to Appellate Review
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 28, 2011
Although comments may be submitted by mail, the Office prefers to receive comments via the Internet. … Congressional Review Act: Under the Congressional Review Act provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq. ), prior to issuing any final rule,
76 FR 81432Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 11, 2012
Period for Comments AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. … ACTION: Request for comments; reopening of the comment period.
77 FR 61735Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 28, 2003
Regulatory Flexibility Act: As prior notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 (or any other law), an initial regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory … Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. ) is not required.
68 FR 22343Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 5, 2001
Although comments may be submitted by mail or facsimile, the Office prefers to receive comments via the Internet. … Regulatory Flexibility Act As prior notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 (or any other law), an initial regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory
66 FR 46409Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark Office
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.