Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
664 results
2.24s
Changes To Implement the Patent Business Goals
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 5, 1998
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). … Comments on the Following Questions Are Solicited 1. Should a maximum period for suspension be set for a period of other than three years? 2.
63 FR 53498Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeTrademark Law Treaty Implementation Act Changes
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 8, 1999
period surcharge required by section 8(c)(1) of the Act and Sec. 2.6. … Vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air, or water. 13. Firearms; ammunition and projectiles; explosives; fireworks. 14.
64 FR 48900Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeRules of Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 12, 2004
Comment 109: Section 41.110(a) requires each party to file a clean copy of its involved claims. … (a) Clean copy of claims.
69 FR 49960Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeTrademark Law Treaty Implementation Act Changes
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 11, 1999
DATES: Comments must be received by June 25, 1999 to ensure consideration. … or email comments to [email protected].
64 FR 25223Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeRules of Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Ex Parte Appeals
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 10, 2008
Bd.R. 41.37(p) Comment 64. A comment suggested clarification of the meaning of a “clean” copy of the claims. … A comment asked: What is the difference between “clean” and “readable”? Answer.
73 FR 32938Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeThe Article of Manufacture Requirement
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 21, 2020
Find a reference to this notice and click on the “Comment Now!” icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. … Topics for Public Comment The public is invited to submit comments on any topics related to 35 U.S.C. 171 that they deem relevant.
85 FR 83063Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeWaiver of Pixel Requirement for Drawings Filed Electronically
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 6, 2004
All lines must be clean, sharp and solid, not fine or crowded, and produce a high quality image when copied. … All lines must be clean, sharp and solid, not fine or crowded, and produce a high quality image when copied.
69 FR 59809Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeRules of Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 26, 2003
Proposed § 41.110(a) would require a single clean set of the claims, analogous to the requirement for amendments “in clean form” in Rule 121. … (a) Clean copy of claims.
68 FR 66648Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark Office1996 Changes to Patent Practice and Procedure
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 23, 1996
The Sec. 1.137(b) portion of the preamble requests comments on alternatives as to the time period for submitting a petition thereunder. … Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
61 FR 49820Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeRules of Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Ex Parte Appeals
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 30, 2007
Procedure Act apply)); Fressola v. … Because prior notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required for the changes in the proposed rules, a final Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis is also not required for the changes in the
72 FR 41472Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 22, 2009
of Roundtable During Comment Period AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. … Following the public comment period, if the Office determines further action is necessary, a subsequent notice of proposed rule making would be issued to solicit additional comments on specific proposals
74 FR 67987Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeRules of Practice for Trademark-Related Filings Under the Madrid Protocol Implementation Act
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 26, 2003
Comment: Two comments stated that the grace period for affidavits of use under § 7.36 should be changed from three months to six months. … Comment: Six comments opposed the proposed amendment of § 2.66(a), to limit the time period for filing a petition to revive to two months from the mailing date of the notice of abandonment.
68 FR 55748Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeRules of Practice for Trademark-Related Filings Under the Madrid Protocol Implementation Act
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 28, 2003
DATES: Comments must be received by May 27, 2003 to ensure consideration. … after the date of registration, or the three-month grace period immediately following, with payment of the grace period surcharge required by section 71(a)(2)(B) of the Act and § 7.6
68 FR 15119Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeFederal Register · Notice · Jun 5, 2001
Paperwork Reduction Act This notice involves information collection requirements which are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 … Godici, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
66 FR 30167Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeFederal Register · Notice · Mar 15, 2019
Commenters noted that the proposed short time periods between due dates would make it difficult to adequately draft and respond to papers. … Commenters were also concerned that the short time periods between due dates would hinder the parties' ability to discover and gather evidence.
84 FR 9497Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeFederal Register · Notice · Jun 5, 2000
Kelly); and the Under Secretary of Commerce for International Trade (Acting Under Secretary Robert S. LaRussa). … This forum is not intended to serve as an opportunity for the public to air individual case-related complaints unless they are relevant to broader law enforcement policy issues.
65 FR 35611Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeFederal Register · Rule · Jul 17, 2012
Statutory Time Periods Comment 32: One comment questioned whether the filing of a request for continued examination (RCE) resets the time period for filing a third-party submission under proposed … The Office received no comments on the Regulatory Flexibility Act certification. B.
77 FR 42150Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeChanges to Patent Practice and Procedure
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 10, 1997
in clean form without markings. … Comment 100: Several comments opposed the change to Sec. 1.196(d) on the basis that it places the Board in the position of acting as an examiner in the first instance.
62 FR 53132Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeChanges to Implement 18-Month Publication of Patent Applications
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 15, 1995
period beginning on the date a reply under Sec. 1.111 was filed and ending on the mailing date of an action in response thereto, (2) where there was a failure to act on an appeal brief under Sec. 1.192 … Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
60 FR 42352Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark OfficeTrademarks for Humanity Awards Competition Program
Federal Register · Notice · Apr 11, 2023
Examples of humanitarian, environmental problems include: air, land, and water pollution; greenhouse gas emissions; climate change; deforestation; water shortages; industrial and household waste; and the … The goal is to complete this recommendation process within 90 days of the close of the application period.
88 FR 21650Commerce DepartmentPatent and Trademark Office
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.