Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
5,874 results
0.81s
Department of the Navy; Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division China Lake
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 17, 2014
Approval of the request would extend the time period for the Navy to submit a decommissioning plan and initiate decommissioning activities at China Lake. … Approval of the request would extend the time period for the Navy to submit a decommissioning plan and initiate decommissioning activities at China Lake.
79 FR 14753Nuclear Regulatory CommissionLicense Renewal for the Dow Chemical TRIGA Research Reactor
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 20, 2012
R-108 for a period of 20 years from the date of issuance of the renewed license. … Zone Management Act (CZMA), National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA), and Executive Order 12898 Environmental Justice.
77 FR 42771Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWestinghouse Electric Company, LLC; Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 31, 2020
The NRC staff plans to have a public comment period for the draft EIS. … Availability of the draft EIS and the dates of the public comment period will be announced in a future Federal Register notice.
85 FR 46193Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Nov 8, 1995
provision of section 189 of the Act. … However, should circumstances change during the notice period such that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, the Commission may issue the license
60 FR 56361Nuclear Regulatory CommissionBiweekly NoticeFederal Register · Notice · Jul 25, 1996
Consistent with its past commitments, NRC is extending the comment period 45 days beyond the required minimum of 45 days. … NRC is also arranging a public meeting on the DEIS to be held in the vicinity of Cambridge, Ohio, during the public comment period in the early Fall of 1996.
61 FR 38789Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 5, 2008
• Periodic audit by NRC and CNSC of each other's review process. • Periodic full review by both NRC and CNSC of packages that are part of the bi-lateral agreement. … Edwin Hackett, Acting Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc.
73 FR 31946Nuclear Regulatory CommissionRequirements for Distribution of Byproduct Material
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 25, 2012
The comment period ended on September 7, 2010. Ten comment letters were received. … Two commenters requested an extension to the comment period. Although an extension was not granted, all comments were considered.
77 FR 43666Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 21, 2023
In addition, the Commission may issue any of these amendments prior to the expiration of the 30-day comment period if circumstances change during the 30-day comment period such that failure to act in a … If the Commission takes action on any of these amendments prior to the expiration of either the comment period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a notice of issuance.
88 FR 10552Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Apr 19, 2011
Zone Management Act (CZMA), National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA), and Executive Order 12898 Environmental Justice. … The State officials stated that they understood the NRC review and had no comments regarding the proposed action. III.
76 FR 21928Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jul 30, 2013
The Commission has determined for these amendments that the application complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and … The March 29, 2013 supplement had no effect on the no significant hazards consideration determination, and no comments were received during the 60-day comment period.
78 FR 45987Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jul 30, 2013
The Commission has determined for these amendments that the application complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and … The March 29, 2013 supplement had no effect on the no significant hazards consideration determination, and no comments were received during the 60-day comment period.
78 FR 45989Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 17, 2000
These criteria were expressed in terms of an integrated air dose that could be received by an individual over a 24-hour period in excess of 10 rads, or radioactive contamination levels offsite at which … For example, one of the thresholds in Option 3 is that if the integrated air dose to an individual over any 24-hour period exceeds 10 rads, the Commission would find that “substantial releases” and “substantial
65 FR 61283Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Dec 21, 2004
In addition, the Commission may issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-day comment period should circumstances change during the 30-day comment period such that failure to act in a timely … Should the Commission take action prior to the expiration of either the comment period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a notice of issuance.
69 FR 76486Nuclear Regulatory CommissionBiweekly NoticeFederal Register · Notice · May 12, 2008
The drums were placed in the trenches in a two-foot layer with approximately 3-4 feet of clean cover consisting of compact soil. 4.4 Areas To Be Remediated As stated above, Mallinckrodt and USACE have … Mallinckrodt does not anticipate the need for effluent air monitoring since there will likely be no point sources of effluent air.
73 FR 27007Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Nov 30, 2007
STC-133 was issued on February 14, 1957, pursuant to 10 CFR part 40, and has been amended periodically since that time. … The State agreed with the conclusions of the EA and otherwise had no comments. III. Finding of No Significant Impact The NRC staff has prepared this EA in support of the proposed action.
72 FR 67761Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jun 22, 2007
STC-133 was issued on February 14, 1957, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 40, and has been amended periodically since that time. … The State agreed with the conclusions of the Environmental Assessment and otherwise had no comments. III.
72 FR 34486Nuclear Regulatory CommissionDraft Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual
Federal Register · Notice · Jan 6, 1997
ADDRESSES: Members of the public are invited to submit written comments to EITHER the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ATTN: Air and Radiation Docket, Mail Stop 6102, Air Docket No. … Copies of all comments received by one agency will be periodically copied and sent to the others.
62 FR 736Defense DepartmentEnergy DepartmentFederal Register · Notice · Jun 9, 1995
(b)(ii) of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, requires licensees to perform an overall air lock leak test at Pa at the end of periods during which the air lock has been opened when containment integrity was not … The State official had no comments.
60 FR 30611Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Nov 30, 2010
In addition, the Commission may issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-day comment period should circumstances change during the 30-day comment period such that failure to act in a timely … Should the Commission take action prior to the expiration of either the comment period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a notice of issuance.
75 FR 74091Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 23, 2000
provision of section 189 of the Act. … However, should circumstances change during the notice period such that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, the Commission may issue the license
65 FR 9000Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.