Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
128 results
1.48s
Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, PWC Use
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 26, 2003
the potential to violate, State-adopted, EPA-approved water quality standards under the Federal Clean Water Act. … Comments Related to Air Quality 43.
68 FR 55448Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceSpecial Regulations; Areas of the National Park System
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 20, 2009
Comment: While the NPS claims to have independent “authority and jurisdiction to administer some provisions of the Clean Air Act” in the 2008 EA, the State of Wyoming has primacy under the Clean Air … Comment: NPS misinterprets the Organic Act, Yellowstone Park Act, Clean Air Act, General Authorities Act, the NPS Management Policies, Executive Orders, and the Park's Master Plan.
74 FR 60159Interior DepartmentNational Park ServicePersonal Watercraft Use at Lake Mead National Recreation Area
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 9, 2003
During a 60-day comment period, the NPS received nearly 20,000 comments. … Comments Related to Air Quality 23.
68 FR 17292Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceSpecial Regulations; Areas of the National Park System
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 11, 2003
NPS Response: The parks are designated as Class I airsheds under the Clean Air Act, which requires that their air quality be the most pristine in the nation. … Laws, Policies, Executive Orders Issue: Many commentors believe the rule is inconsistent with the NPS Organic Act, the General Authorities Act as amended by the Redwood Act, the Clean Air Act, the
68 FR 69268Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceSpecial Regulations; Areas of the National Park System
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 13, 2007
authority is not an effort by NPS to regulate manufacturers and is consistent with Section 310 of the Clean Air Act. … Comment: The Clean Air Act and NPS Management Policies 2006 require the National Park Service to maintain the best possible air quality in the parks.
72 FR 70781Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceSpecial Regulations; Areas of the National Park System; Yellowstone National Park; Winter Use
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 23, 2013
standards for snowmobiles and snowcoaches will further improve air quality in the world's first national park (a designated Class I area under the Clean Air Act), and will help ensure that a snowmobile … The exercise of the NPS Organic Act authority is not an effort by NPS to regulate manufacturers and is consistent with Section 310 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7610).
78 FR 63069Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceFire Island National Seashore, Personal Watercraft Use
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 6, 2005
Summary of Comments A proposed rule was published for public comment on August 23, 2004, with the comment period lasting until October 22, 2004. … Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Clean Air Act, and on criteria pollutant annual emission levels.
70 FR 38759Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceAmistad National Recreation Area, Personal Watercraft Use
Federal Register · Rule · May 27, 2004
Summary of Comments A proposed rule was published for public comment on October 22, 2003, with the comment period lasting until December 22, 2003. … Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Clean Air Act, and on criteria pollutant annual emission levels.
69 FR 30206Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceChickasaw National Recreation Area, Personal Watercraft Use
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 2, 2004
Comments Regarding Air Quality 10. … Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Clean Air Act, and on criteria pollutant annual emission levels.
69 FR 53630Interior DepartmentNational Park ServicePictured Rocks National Lakeshore, Personal Watercraft Use
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 27, 2005
Comments Regarding Air Quality 16. … EPA under the Clean Air Act, and on criteria pollutant annual emission levels.
70 FR 61893Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceSpecial Regulations, Areas of the National Park System
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 22, 2001
Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA has the authority to establish emission standards for snowmobiles, and it is at least two or three years away from setting any such standards, which then would not take … Issue 15—Some comments suggested letting snowmobiles in the parks only during certain designated periods of the winter, so that snowmobilers during those periods and other users during other periods could
66 FR 7260Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceGulf Islands National Seashore, Personal Watercraft Use
Federal Register · Rule · May 4, 2006
Comments Regarding Air Quality 20. … NPS Response: The criteria for analysis of impacts from PWC to human health are based on the NAAQSs for criteria pollutants, as established by the USEPA under the Clean Air Act (CAA), and on criteria
71 FR 26232Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceCape Lookout National Seashore, Personal Watercraft Use
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 8, 2006
Comments Regarding Air Quality 34. … Clean Air Act, and on criteria pollutant annual emission levels.
71 FR 53020Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceCurecanti National Recreation Area, Personal Watercraft Use
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 21, 2006
Summary of Comments A proposed rule on PWC use in the Curecanti National Recreation Area was published in the Federal Register for public comment on March 17, 2006, with the comment period lasting … Comments Regarding Air Quality 14. One commenter stated that the analysis failed to mention the impact of PWC permeation losses on local air quality.
71 FR 55111Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceGeneral Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 4, 2016
of 1969, the Endangered Species Act, the National Historic Preservation Act, and the Clean Water Act. … The NPS's service-wide rule incorporates the 30-day initial review period from the Addition Act.
81 FR 77972Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceCape Cod National Seashore; Off-Road Vehicle Use
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 24, 1998
Comments Received on Proposed ORV Regulation During the public review period for the proposed Off-Road Vehicle Regulation for Cape Cod National Seashore, 15 written comments were received. … Because of the concurrent comment period for the Environmental Assessment (EA) and the proposed regulation, some of these letters dealt partially or totally with comments on the EA.
63 FR 9143Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceSpecial Regulations; Areas of the National Park System
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 20, 2009
The comment period was reopened on July 24, 2009, and comments were accepted through September 8, 2009. … Comment: The comment period on the EA was too short.
74 FR 60183Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceLake Meredith National Recreation Area, Personal Watercraft Use
Federal Register · Rule · May 27, 2004
Summary of Comments The proposed rule was published for public comment on December 12, 2003 (68 FR 69358), with the comment period lasting until February 10, 2004. … Comments Related to Air Quality 9. One commenter stated that the analysis failed to mention the impact of PWC permeation losses on local air quality.
69 FR 30216Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceBighorn Canyon National Recreation Area, Personal Watercraft Use
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 1, 2005
Summary of Comments A proposed rule was published for public comment on May 5, 2004, with the comment period lasting until July 6, 2004. … PWC use at Bighorn Canyon is small, and limiting the use to only 4-stroke engines would not appreciably affect air, water or soundscape resources. Comments Regarding Air Quality 7.
70 FR 31345Interior DepartmentNational Park ServiceSpecial Regulations; Areas of the National Park System
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 10, 2004
Comment: Publishing a proposed rule before the EA's public comment period was completed demonstrates that the NPS predetermined the outcome of this process. … Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. ).
69 FR 65348Interior DepartmentNational Park Service
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.