Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
60 results
1.09s
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 2, 2008
The Department initially provided for a 45 day comment period ending April 18, 2008. 73 FR at 11754. … Several commenters stated that section 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act (Taft-Hartley Act) contains structural requirements designed to avoid any possibility of labor organization dominance, including
73 FR 57412Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeLabor Organization Annual Financial Reports
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 1, 2026
The comment period was open through July 31, 2025. … the close of the comment period, and the original record remains fresh.
91 FR 32556Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeFederal Register · Rule · Dec 30, 2009
Two additional comments addressed only the adequacy of the ten day comment period. One comment was received after the comment period closed and was not considered. … The Department finds that the commenters have not established grounds to extend the comment period.
74 FR 69023Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeStandards of Conduct for Federal Sector Labor Organizations
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 3, 2004
The purpose of this revision is to require labor organizations subject to the Acts to periodically inform members of their democratic rights as set forth in the standards of conduct provisions of the Acts … the deadline for submitting comments.
69 FR 64226Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeFederal Register · Rule · Dec 1, 2010
District Court for the District of Columbia vacated this rule due to a failure to provide a new notice and comment period. AFL-CIO v. Chao, 496 F.Supp. 76 (DC 2007). … under the Act.
75 FR 74936Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeLabor Organization Annual Financial Reports
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 4, 2008
For example, comments are requested on whether all transactions greater than $10,000 should be identified by amount and date on the report, permitting, however, labor organizations, where acting in good … Paperwork Reduction Act This statement is prepared in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 (“PRA”). See 5 CFR 1320.9.
73 FR 11754Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeFederal Register · Rule · Sep 29, 2006
When the comment period closed, on March 27, 2003, the Department had received over 35,000 comments. Id. … Section 201 of the Act requires unions to file annual, public reports with the Department, detailing the union's cash flow during the reporting period, and identifying its assets and liabilities, receipts
71 FR 57716Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeLabor Organization Annual Financial Reports
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 19, 2009
The comment period for the proposed delay of the effective date and applicability date will close on April 7, 2009. … The period for public comment on the proposed extension closed on February 13, 2009, and the comment period on the merits of the rule closed on March 5, 2009.
74 FR 11700Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeDiscretionary Review by the Secretary
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 6, 2020
The comment period for this proposed rule runs concurrently with the comment period for the direct final rule. … All interested parties should comment at this time because the Department will not initiate an additional comment period on the proposed rule even if it withdraws the direct final rule. II.
85 FR 13086Labor DepartmentEmployment and Training AdministrationLabor Organization Annual Financial Reports
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 13, 2009
The Department initially published the NPRM with a 30-day comment period to expire on May 21, 2009. … However, in response to comments requesting extension of the comment period, the Department extended the comment period to June 22, 2009. 74 FR 23811.
74 FR 52401Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 2, 2010
District Court for the District of Columbia vacated this rule due to a failure to provide a new notice and comment period. AFL-CIO v. Chao, 496 F. Supp. 76 (D.C. 2007). … The district court did not engage in a substantive review of the 2006 rule, but the court noted that the AFL-CIO demonstrated that “the absence of a fresh comment period constituted prejudicial error”
75 FR 5456Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 30, 2019
In addition to filing comments on any aspect of this proposed rule directly with the agency, interested parties may submit comments under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) regarding the information collections … parties may also submit comments on the ICR directly with OMB for a period of 30 days after publication of this proposed rule.
84 FR 25130Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 27, 2021
District Court for the District of Columbia vacated this rule due to a failure to provide a new notice and comment period. AFL-CIO v. Chao, 496 F. Supp. 2d 76 (D.D.C. 2007). … The district court did not engage in a substantive review of the 2006 rule, but the court noted that the AFL-CIO demonstrated that “the absence of a fresh comment period. . .constituted prejudicial error
86 FR 28505Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeLabor Organization Annual Financial Reports
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 21, 2009
Public comment on the proposed extension was invited, with the comment period ending on February 13, 2009. … Public comment was also invited generally on the regulations, including the merits of rescinding or retaining them, with this comment period ending on March 5, 2009.
74 FR 18132Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 11, 2021
In direct final rulemaking, an agency publishes a final rule with a statement that the rule will go into effect unless the agency receives significant adverse comment within a specified period. … The comment period for this proposed rule runs concurrently with the comment period for the direct final rule.
86 FR 1834Labor DepartmentEmployment and Training AdministrationLabor Organization Annual Financial Reports: LM Form Revisions
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 13, 2020
period, along with the comments that will be filed by the public. … of 1959 (LMRDA or Act).
85 FR 64726Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeFederal Register · Rule · Jan 11, 2021
In direct final rulemaking, an agency publishes a final rule with a statement that the rule will go into effect unless the agency receives significant adverse comment within a specified period. … The comment period for this direct final rule runs concurrently with the comment period for the proposed rule.
86 FR 1772Labor DepartmentEmployment and Training AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Dec 30, 2021
District Court for the District of Columbia vacated this rule due to a failure to provide a new notice and comment period. AFL-CIO v. Chao, 496 F. Supp. 2d 76 (D.D.C. 2007). … The district court did not engage in a substantive review of the 2006 rule, but the court noted that the AFL-CIO demonstrated that “the absence of a fresh comment period . . . constituted prejudicial error
86 FR 74356Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards OfficeDiscretionary Review by the Secretary
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 6, 2020
within a specified period. … The comment period for the NPRM runs concurrently with that of the DFR. The Department will treat comments received on the companion NPRM as comments also regarding the DFR.
85 FR 13024Labor DepartmentEmployment and Training AdministrationInformation Collection Request; comment request
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 23, 2019
LMRDA Election Recordkeeping Requirements In addition to the LMRDA's reporting and disclosure requirements, the Act requires covered labor organizations to hold periodic elections for their officers. … distorted and defeated the policies of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 1947, as amended, and the Railway Labor Act, as amended.
84 FR 70567Labor DepartmentLabor-Management Standards Office
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.