Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
6,060 results
0.28s
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 25, 2002
for a period of 30 days. … DATES: Written comments must be received by August 26, 2002. ADDRESSES: Any comments are to be submitted to Michael F.
67 FR 48675Labor DepartmentEmployment and Training AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Nov 12, 2003
The petitioner proposes to use an alternative method to examine the air in certain areas of the return air course. … Request for Comments Persons interested in these petitions are encouraged to submit comments via e-mail to comments@msha.gov, or on a computer disk along with an original hard copy to the Office
68 FR 64129Labor DepartmentMine Safety and Health AdministrationFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Feb 14, 1994
and quality of air at the intake air split locations off the slope in the gangway portion of the working section. … Request for Comments Persons interested in these petitions may furnish written comments.
Labor DepartmentMine Safety and Health AdministrationRegulations Implementing the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: Recreational Vessels
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 30, 2011
The comment period closed on November 17, 2010. … law provides ample tools for handling claims involving exposure over periods of time.
76 FR 82117Labor DepartmentWorkers' Compensation Programs OfficePetition for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory Safety Standards
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 4, 2025
Background Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file a petition to modify the application of any mandatory … (b) Battery inspections and replacements shall be conducted in intake air, either on the surface or underground.
90 FR 11189Labor DepartmentMine Safety and Health AdministrationPetition for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory Safety Standards
Federal Register · Notice · Apr 25, 2025
Background Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file a petition to modify the application of any mandatory … (d) PAPRs provide a constant flow of filtered air, which offers respiratory protection and comfort in hot working environments.
90 FR 17455Labor DepartmentMine Safety and Health AdministrationSubmission for OMB review; comment request
Federal Register · Notice · Aug 27, 1999
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Submission for OMB review; comment request August 23, 1999. … Description: The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the Act) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for enforcement of the Act or for developing information
64 FR 46956Labor DepartmentOffice of the SecretarySubmission for OMB Review: Comment Request
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 4, 2005
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request February 25, 2005. … Developing and maintaining records for air-quality tests.
70 FR 10686Labor DepartmentOffice of the SecretaryNotice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 30, 2012
described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). … I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of July 9, 2012 through July 13, 2012.
77 FR 44679Labor DepartmentEmployment and Training AdministrationPetitions for Modification of Existing Mandatory Safety Standards
Federal Register · Notice · Jan 14, 2011
Fontaine, Acting Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and Variances. 4. … Fontaine, Acting Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and Variances. MSHA will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S.
76 FR 2722Labor DepartmentMine Safety and Health AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Oct 31, 1997
on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). … Sufficient air must be provided to maintain the level of respirable dust at or below 2 milligrams per cubic meter of air and air quality must be maintained in accordance with MSHA standards.
62 FR 58994Labor DepartmentMine Safety and Health AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Jul 8, 2003
Administration Petitions for Modification The following parties have filed petitions to modify the application of existing safety standards under section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act … Request for Comments Persons interested in these petitions are encouraged to submit comments via e-mail to comments@msha.gov , or on a computer disk along with an original hard copy to the Office
68 FR 40701Labor DepartmentMine Safety and Health AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Nov 4, 2024
Any such comments or requests should be sent by the end of the scheduled comment period. … Management Relations Act of 1947; see 29 U.S.C. 141. 3.
89 FR 87600Labor DepartmentEmployee Benefits Security AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Feb 9, 2001
Administration Petitions for Modification The following parties have filed petitions to modify the application of existing safety standards under section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act … Request for Comments Persons interested in these petitions are encouraged to submit comments via e-mail to “comments@msha.gov,” or on a computer disk along with an original hard copy to the Office of
66 FR 9724Labor DepartmentMine Safety and Health AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Jun 27, 2003
Administration Petitions for Modification The following parties have filed petitions to modify the application of existing safety standards under section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act … Request for Comments Persons interested in these petitions are encouraged to submit comments via e-mail to comments@msha.gov , or on a computer disk along with an original hard copy to the Office
68 FR 38393Labor DepartmentMine Safety and Health AdministrationSubmission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 3, 1996
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request June 27, 1996. … Worker populations covered by the rule include workers at Superfund clean-sites and similar operations, workers at EPA permitted disposal sites, and emergency response workers at those sites, firefighters
61 FR 34873Labor DepartmentOffice of the SecretaryFederal Register · Notice · Sep 21, 2010
BLS has modified the description to reflect the sources listed in Section 203(b) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, with the exception of the qualification of hydropower. … clean energy flowing on the grid.
75 FR 57506Labor DepartmentLabor Statistics BureauImprove Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 30, 2022
OSHA is interested in comments on this certification. V. OMB Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 A. … The APA does not specify a minimum period for submitting comments. OSHA invites comment on all aspects of the proposed rule.
87 FR 18528Labor DepartmentOccupational Safety and Health AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Nov 21, 2014
Public comments on the ICR are invited. DATES: The OMB will consider all written comments that agency receives on or before December 22, 2014. … Commenters are encouraged, but not required, to send a courtesy copy of any comments by mail or courier to the U.S.
79 FR 69531Labor DepartmentOffice of the SecretaryFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Dec 15, 1994
The petitioner requests that evaluation points be established to monitor the air quantity and quality in the deteriorating area of the intake air course on a weekly basis instead of daily. … Request for Comments Persons interested in these petitions may furnish written comments.
Labor DepartmentMine Safety and Health Administration
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.