Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
370 results
0.33s
Agency decision · Agency decision
The respondent appealed, arguing that he was not allowed an opportunity to contest the motion to terminate proceedings and that, contrary to the comments in the order, he was opposed to termination. … II 1996), for being inadmissible under section 212(a)(6) of the Act, because he can prove that he has been “physically present in the United States continuously for the 2year period immediately prior to
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
STATUTORY LEGAL STANDARD Section 241(a)(19) of the Act provides for the deportation of aliens who— during the period beginning on March 23, 1933, and ending on May 8, '1945, under the direction of, or … Typical is General Stahlecker's comment just cited that they sought to eliminate all those who tried to hide their Communist beliefs.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewCite as 25 I&N Dec. 721 (BIA 2012)
Agency decision · Agency decision
We need not decide here, however, whether we are obliged to follow the approaches in circuits, such as the Third and Fifth, that may diverge from ours. 8 We decline to comment further on Aguila Montes … He or she repeatedly follows a person or engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts over a period of time intentionally placing or attempting to place another person in reasonable fear of
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewCite as 24 I&N Dec. 646 (BIA 2008)
Agency decision · Agency decision
Alternatively, if the alien wishes to pursue reopening and remains in the United States to do so, he or she risks expiration of the statutory period and ineligibility for adjustment of status, the underlying … given no authority to compel the DHS to admit or parole such aliens into the United States. 9 When the Attorney General proposed amendments to the Board’s motions rules in response to the IIRIRA, several commentators
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
A medical professional might also have commented, in detail, on the severity of the illness alleged. … See section 242B(e)(1) of the Act; see also sections 242B(e)(2)-(4) of the Act; cf. section 242B(a) of the Act (requiring only written, but not oral, notice).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Moreover, although the BHRHA purportedly based its opinion on the Department of State's annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, it fails to comment on highly relevant information set forth in … It might be useful in regard to this issue to point out that the violence in Punjab has occurred during a period when many other communal and separatist conflicts have occurred, none of which had anything
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewCite as 24 I&N Dec. 710 (A.G. 2009)
Agency decision · Agency decision
Coldebella, Acting General Counsel; David A. … The Act and its implementing regulations merely permit an alien to hire “such counsel” as “he shall choose,” section 292 of the Act; accord section 240(b)(4)(A) of the Act; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.16(b) (2008)
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
We stated above that we would comment on two contentions of counsel. … Quoting from the decision in the Keil case: At the hearing before this court witnesses were called, and testified that they knew petitioner and his wife over the period of time from August 1953, 727
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
upon which his deportation is being sought”); Matter of Siffre, 14 I&N Dec. 444 439 Interim Decision #3373 (BIA 1973) (involving a “remained longer” charge brought during the respondent’s authorized period … U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, comment (n.2).” United States v. Young, 990 F.2d 469, 472 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 901 (1993). 451 Interim Decision #3373 actual violence.” Id. at 1147.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewCite as 23 I&N Dec. 9 (BIA 2001)*
Agency decision · Agency decision
Rather, sections 321 and 322(a)(2) of the IIRIRA extended the “aggravated felony” definition to some misdemeanors mainly by reducing the periods of imprisonment necessary for certain crimes to be treated … Thus, the rule of lenity is inapposite unless a statutory ambiguity looms, and a statute is not ambiguous for this purpose simply because some courts or commentators have questioned its proper interpretation
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.