Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
8,277 results
1.01s
Federal Register · Notice · Nov 20, 2000
After the public comment period concluded, Navy and the City decided to prepare separate final NEPA and CEQA documents. … Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7506 (1994), requires Federal agencies to review their proposed activities to ensure that these activities do not hamper local efforts to control air pollution
65 FR 69744Defense DepartmentNavy DepartmentFederal Register · Notice · Oct 22, 1999
Project modifications are now required to protect species recently listed under the Endangered Species Act and to meet conditions for water quality certification under the Clean Water Act. … A 30-day public review period will be provided for review and comment on the Final GRR-EIR/SEIS. 9.
64 FR 57076Defense DepartmentFederal Register · Notice · Jan 31, 1997
While the RWQCB did not provide comments on the FEIS, the RWQCB has reviewed the mitigation measures as part of the state water quality certification process under section 401 of Clean Water Act. … Pursuant to Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act, US EPA promulgated a final rule ``Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans'' (General Conformity rule)
62 FR 4733Defense DepartmentNavy DepartmentFederal Register · Notice · Sep 24, 2001
Construction and operation of the complex will result in an increase of air emissions; however, these emissions are below de minimus levels as identified in the Conformity regulations of the Clean Air … Act.
66 FR 48861Defense DepartmentNavy DepartmentFederal Register · Notice · Jun 2, 2023
For comments that cannot be addressed prior to the public review period, the comments will be included with the public review period comments and addressed at that time. … Further coordination with environmental agencies will be conducted under the NEPA, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the National
88 FR 36285Defense DepartmentEngineers CorpsFederal Register · Notice · Sep 28, 2015
Quality Certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act; and certification of state lands, easements and right of ways. 4. … A public meeting will be held during the public comment period for the Draft EIS. Written comments will be accepted at the meeting. Dated: September 17, 2015. Tori K.
80 FR 58232Defense DepartmentEngineers CorpsFederal Register · Notice · May 12, 1998
DATES: Written public comments must be submitted on or before June 11, 1998. … Written comments may be submitted to Dr. Robison at the same address.
63 FR 26160Defense DepartmentArmy DepartmentFederal Register · Notice · Feb 12, 1998
Therefore, the preferred alternative would be consistent with the requirements of NEPA and the Clean Water Act, is the least environmentally damaging, and is determined to be the environmentally preferred … The Marine Corps would mitigate for indirect impacts to non-Clean Water Act jurisdictional floodplain riparian habitat which would be isolated behind the levee by either restoring jurisdictional wetlands
63 FR 7131Defense DepartmentNavy DepartmentPrivacy Act of 1974; System of Records
Federal Register · Notice · Aug 30, 2000
To the Environmental Protection Agency for purposes of certifying that certain vehicles operating on the Pentagon Reservation and FOB2 are in compliance with Clean Air Act requirements. … To the Environmental Protection Agency for purposes of certifying that certain vehicles operating on the Pentagon Reservation and FOB2 are in compliance with Clean Air Act requirements.
65 FR 52706Defense DepartmentOffice of the SecretaryFederal Register · Notice · Apr 19, 2002
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed project must also address environmental impacts relative to the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act … After the public comment period ends, USACE will consider all comments received, revise the DEvR/DEIS as appropriate, and issue a Final Evaluation Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement.
67 FR 19428Defense DepartmentEngineers CorpsFederal Register · Notice · Dec 17, 1997
The Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA) regulations governing demolition and construction activities (Washington Clean Air Act RCW T. 70 Ch. 94) will ensure consistency with applicable air … Section 176 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7506, as amended, requires Federal agencies to review their activities to ensure that they do not hamper local efforts to control air pollution.
62 FR 66061Defense DepartmentNavy DepartmentRecord of Decision for the Disposal and Reuse of Naval Air Station Brunswick, ME
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 15, 2011
Full build-out of the Preferred Alternative is proposed to be implemented over a 20-year period. … In accordance with the Clean Water Act and MNRPA, wetland disturbance must be avoided by the developer where possible.
76 FR 8720Defense DepartmentNavy DepartmentFederal Register · Notice · Jul 16, 1998
A public comment period for the proposal will open on July 17, 1998 and will close on August 17, 1998. … consultation with the State of California under the Coastal Zone Management Act, Clean Water Act, and Clean Air Act.
63 FR 38393Defense DepartmentEngineers CorpsRecord of Decision for Realignment of Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Patuxent River, MD
Federal Register · Notice · Jan 26, 1995
The comment period for the FEIS expired 9 January 1995 and only one agency response has been received; and it was supportive in nature. … Although NAWCAD Patuxent River is located in an attainment area and the 1993 Clean Air Act General Conformity Rule does not apply, the EIS evaluated potential air quality impacts in neighboring Calvert
60 FR 5169Defense DepartmentNavy DepartmentUniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces-Phase II Batch Two
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 7, 2016
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline. The EPA and DoD are not obligated to accept or consider late comments. II. … Air Force.
81 FR 69753Environmental Protection AgencyDefense DepartmentFederal Register · Notice · Mar 2, 2005
The proposed project would require a number of Federal permits and approvals prior to implementation, including a Clean Water Act section 404 Permit, Clean Water Act section 401 Water Quality Certification … A public hearing will be held during the public comment period for the Draft EIS. Alex C. Dornstauder, Colonel, U.S. Army, District Engineer.
70 FR 10078Defense DepartmentEngineers CorpsFederal Register · Notice · Aug 14, 2013
Department of the Army (DA) authorization is required pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. … comments@millenniumbulkeiswa.gov by the closing date of the EIS scoping period, November 18, 2013.
78 FR 49484Defense DepartmentEngineers CorpsFederal Register · Notice · Oct 31, 2002
The document was prepared following a public review and comment period on the draft EIS, during which a public hearing was held in South River, New Jersey to provide stakeholders with an opportunity to … The General Conformity provisions relating to the Clean Air Act require a conformity demonstration for each pollutant where the total direct and indirect emissions from the Federal action exceed the corresponding
67 FR 66385Defense DepartmentEngineers CorpsFederal Register · Notice · Apr 2, 2019
and Clean Air Act coordination. … At that time, the USACE will provide a 45-day public review period for individuals and agencies to review and comment.
84 FR 12601Defense DepartmentEngineers CorpsFederal Register · Notice · Apr 19, 2013
The public review period ends on April 22, 2013. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period until May 7, 2013. … A copy of the Draft EIS (with the Draft Clean Air Act Conformity Determination) is available for electronic viewing or download at www.navyf35cwestcoasteis.com.
78 FR 23548Defense DepartmentNavy Department
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.