Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
404 results
0.22s
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 12, 2008
However, DoD will consider comments from small entities concerning the affected DFARS subparts in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments should cite DFARS Case 2008-D004. C. … The Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force will specify delegations and levels of authority for actions under the Act and the Executive Order in departmental supplements or agency acquisition guidance
73 FR 46814Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Rule · Jul 20, 2023
Restriction on Acquisition of Air Circuit Breakers. … U.S.C. 1707 does not require publication for public comment.
88 FR 46906Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Rule · Jun 5, 2020
Regulatory Flexibility Act Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are not required to be given for this rule under 41 U.S.C. 1707(a)(1) (see section III. of this … Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
85 FR 34533Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Rule · Feb 26, 2016
Regulatory Flexibility Act A final regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., and is summarized as follows: This final … Paperwork Reduction Act The rule contains information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35);
81 FR 9783Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 11, 2011
DATES: Comment date: Interested parties should submit comments in writing to the address shown below on or before March 14, 2011. … Act), $150,000 or less
76 FR 7782Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Rule · Oct 25, 2023
A discussion of the comment is provided, as follows: A. Summary of Significant Changes No changes are made to the final rule as a result of public comments. B. … Analysis of Public Comment Comment: A respondent provided comments with overall support of the rule and stated it would save money and reduce the need for supplies and preventative maintenance on
88 FR 73240Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Rule · Feb 24, 2012
Based on the comments received, DoD published a second proposed rule on December 3, 2010 (75 FR 75550). The public comment period closed January 10, 2011. … The public comment period ended on July 18, 2011. Comments were received from 14 respondents in response to the interim rule.
77 FR 11355Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Shipping Instructions (DFARS Case 2011-D052)
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 29, 2012
No respondents submitted public comments in response to the proposed rule. II. … Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
77 FR 39140Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 25, 2016
Select the link “Submit a Comment” that corresponds with “DFARS Case 2016-D009.” Follow the instructions provided at the “Submit a Comment” screen. … • 225.7006 (air circuit breakers for naval vessels). • 225.7010 (certain naval vessel components). II.
81 FR 17053Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Rule · Jan 31, 2023
Select “Comment” and follow the instructions to submit a comment. Please include your name, company name (if any), and “DFARS Case 2022-D009” on any attached documents. … , Submission of Federal Rules under the Congressional Review Act, to the U.S.
88 FR 6600Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Shipping Instructions (DFARS Case 2011-D052)
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 30, 2012
Select the link “Submit a Comment” that corresponds with “DFARS Case 2011-D052.” Follow the instructions provided at the “Submit a Comment” screen. … Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD does not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C
77 FR 4637Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 5, 2012
Select the link “Submit a Comment” that corresponds with “DFARS Case 2011-D056.” Follow the instructions provided at the “Submit a Comment” screen. … —Add DFARS provision 252.225-7037, Evaluation of Offers for Air Circuit Breakers.
77 FR 20598Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Transportation (DFARS Case 2003-D028)
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 20, 2010
Public Comments No public comments were received in response to the proposed rule. C. … Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does not impose any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
75 FR 51416Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 17, 2010
Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act … Interested parties must submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2009-D023) in correspondence. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act (Pub.
75 FR 56961Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 22, 2023
Select “Comment” and follow the instructions to submit a comment. Please include “DFARS Case 2021-D021” on any attached documents. ○ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. … Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
88 FR 17360Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Rule · Mar 24, 2010
Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this rule. … This final rule does not constitute a significant DFARS revision within the meaning of FAR 1.501 and public comment is not required in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 418b(a). C.
75 FR 14095Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 28, 2014
Select the link “Submit a Comment” that corresponds with “Docket No. DARS 2014-0011.” Follow the instructions provided at the “Submit a Comment” screen. … For appeals not subject to the Contract Disputes Act, the contractor should refer to the Disputes clause in its contract for the time period in which it must file a notice of appeal.
79 FR 11374Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Rule · Nov 8, 2007
(OFPP Act), 41 U.S.C. 431. … The comment period on the proposed rule ended on August 1, 2007. DoD received comments from 41 respondents. Of these respondents, 34 support the rule and 7 oppose it.
72 FR 63113Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemFederal Register · Rule · Jul 21, 2014
Claims are required to be certified by the Contract Disputes Act, not the Board's Rules. The Board considers this proposed change unnecessary. Comment 4: Rule 1(c). … Response: The Contract Disputes Act establishes time periods within which decisions should be rendered for expedited and accelerated appeals. No such time period is established for other appeals.
79 FR 42214Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations SystemDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Government; Property (DFARS Case 2009-D008)
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 19, 2011
The public comment period for the proposed rule closed February 1, 2011. Comments were received from three respondents. … Comment: A respondent stated that the proposed changes do a good job of cleaning up and consolidating the plant clearance process and that the new PGI for DFARS Case 2009-D008 also looks good.
76 FR 52139Defense DepartmentDefense Acquisition Regulations System
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.