Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
580 results
0.92s
Federal Register · Notice · Sep 26, 2001
Comments should be directed to J. … The APPA provides a period of at least sixty (60) days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the
66 FR 49200Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Sep 16, 2022
The Tunney Act provides a period of at least 60 days preceding the effective date of a proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the proposed … All comments received during this period will be considered by the U.S.
87 FR 57028Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Apr 8, 2021
All comments received during this period will be considered by the U.S. … to a 60-day comment period, after which the Court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).
86 FR 18300Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Jan 16, 2014
to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. § 16(e)(1). … Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States' responses to comments.
79 FR 2885Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Jun 4, 2001
Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments and responses thereto will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. … The APPA provides a period of at least sixty (60) days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the
66 FR 29997Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Mar 26, 1999
Written comments should be directed to Roger W. … The APPA provides a period of at least sixty (60) days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the
64 FR 14758Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Jan 21, 2025
a period that included the full duration of the HSR Act's applicable waiting period. 28. … Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States' responses to comments.
90 FR 7159Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · May 25, 2023
The Tunney Act provides a period of at least 60 days preceding the effective date of a proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the proposed … All comments received during this period will be considered by the U.S.
88 FR 34030Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionPublic Comments and Response on Proposed Final Judgment in United States v. 3D Systems Corp., et al.
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 12, 2002
Finally, in this case, a second comment period is plainly unnecessary. … Air Force's Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV). “We made various flaps and aileron configurations to verify computer analyses.
67 FR 11123Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · May 17, 2016
For example, some ADMs prohibit a video programmer from licensing content to OVDs for an extended period of time after the content is first aired on traditional MVPDs—permanently blocking OVDs from being … to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).
81 FR 30550Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Jan 31, 2011
to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1). … Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States' responses to comments.
76 FR 5440Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States v. Apple, Inc., et al.; Public Comments and Response on Proposed Final Judgment
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 27, 2012
The sixty-day period for public comment (“Tunney Act period”) ended on June 25, 2012. … The United States received 868 comments during the Tunney Act period. 1 Nearly seventy of those comments favored the suit and settlement.
77 FR 44271Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Apr 5, 2011
The APPA provides a period of at least 60 days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the proposed … to a 60-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).
76 FR 18783Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Mar 18, 2002
decree and CIS, a public comment period, and so forth. … The 60-day public comment period began on November 28, 2001, and ended on January 28, 2002. 4 During that period, the United States received 32,329 public comments.
67 FR 12090Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Oct 13, 2010
to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1). … Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States' responses to comments.
75 FR 62858Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States v. Cargill, Incorporated; Public Comment and Plaintiff's Response
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 24, 2000
The 60-Day Comment Period Should Not Be Extended Conclusion United States Response to Public Comments Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b) (“AAPA”), plaintiff, the … I urge you to rethink your investigation of the Cargill/Continental sale and extend the comment period for a longer period so that more people can comment.
65 FR 15982Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States v. Microsoft Corporation; Addendum to Public Comments
Federal Register · Notice · May 9, 2002
Microsoft Corporation; Addendum to Public Comments The United States hereby publishes corrected versions of thirteen (13) of the Tunney Act public comments it received on the Revised Proposed Final … Bari To: Renata Hesse Date: 1/28/02 3:23pm Subject: Microsoft Settlement Dear Renata, Pursuant to the Tunney Act, attached please find our comments on the Revised Proposed Final Judgment.
67 FR 31373Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States v. Microsemi Corporation; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
Federal Register · Notice · Sep 1, 2009
Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States's responses to comments. … to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).
74 FR 45242Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 1, 2019
Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States' responses to comments. … subject to a 60-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. § 16(e)(1).
84 FR 1207Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Mar 10, 2009
Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h), public comment was invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. … period”).
74 FR 10279Justice DepartmentAntitrust Division
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.