Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
580 results
0.45s
Federal Register · Notice · Jan 10, 2020
All comments received during this period will be considered by the U.S. … to a 60-day comment period, after which the Court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).
85 FR 1329Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Dec 16, 2008
Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States's responses to comments. … to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).
73 FR 76383Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Nov 29, 1999
The 60-period for comments expired on October 18, 1999. The United States received six comments on the proposed Revised Final Judgment. … Notification of the 60-day comment period regarding the consent decree and Revised Final Judgment was published in the Federal Register on August 18, 1999.
64 FR 66647Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Nov 28, 2003
Public comment was invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. … The 60-day period for public comments, during which two comments were received as described below, expired on July 23, 2003. 1 1 On September 22, 2003, the Federal Communications Commission
68 FR 66854Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionAgency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
Federal Register · Notice · Apr 15, 1999
submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the emergency review procedures of the Paperwork Reduction Act … During the first 60 days of this same review period, a regular review of this information collection is also being undertaken.
64 FR 18635Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionPublic Comments and Response on Proposed Final Judgment United States v. Raytheon Company, et al.
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 9, 1997
Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)(h), the United States of America hereby publishes below the comments received on the proposed Final Judgment in United States v. … The Complaint alleges that the acquisition violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.
62 FR 52773Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · May 9, 1997
for public comment provided by the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. … The sixty day public comment period terminated on April 25, 1997.
62 FR 25653Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 2, 1996
In this case, the sixty-day comment period commenced on August 24, 1995, and terminated on October 23, 1995. … Legal Standards Under the Tunney Act The Tunney Act provides that proposed consent judgments in antitrust cases brought by the United States are subject to a 60-day period during which written comments
61 FR 3970Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Mar 21, 2016
The 60-day period for public comments ended on January 25, 2016. The United States received one comment, which is described below and attached hereto as Exhibit 1. II. … Standard of Judicial Review The Tunney Act requires that proposed consent judgments in antitrust cases brought by the United States be subject to a 60-day public comment period, after which the court
81 FR 15124Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States v. General Electric Co., et al.; Proposed Termination of Final Decree
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Nov 16, 1994
The conduct was charged as violating the Sherman Act of 1890. … Such comments must be received within the sixty day period established by court order, and will be filed with the court by the United States. Comments should be addressed to J.
Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 28, 2019
All comments received during this period will be considered by the United States Department of Justice, which remains free to withdraw its consent to the proposed Final Judgment at any time before the … subject to a 60-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. § 16(e)(1).
84 FR 6824Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Apr 9, 1998
Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments and responses thereto will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. … The APPA provides a period of at least 60 days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the proposed
63 FR 17454Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States v. Apple, Inc., et al.; Public Comments and Response on Proposed Final Judgment
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 4, 2013
Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h) (“APPA” or “Tunney Act”), the United States hereby responds to the single public comment received regarding the proposed Final Judgment as to Defendants … The sixty-day period for public comment ended on April 28, 2013.
78 FR 33437Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Sep 21, 2005
The APPA provides a period of at least sixty days preceding the effective date of the proposed Amended Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding … All comments received during this period will be considered by the Department of Justice, which remains free to withdraw its consent to the proposed Amended Final Judgment at any time prior to the Court's
70 FR 55415Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States versus Greyhound Lines, Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 12, 1995
Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments and responses thereto will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. … The APPA provides a period of at least 60 days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the proposed
60 FR 53202Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionProposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
Federal Register · Notice · Sep 20, 2005
comment period. … The APPA provides a period of at least 60 days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the proposed
70 FR 55167Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Mar 7, 2018
All comments received during this period will be considered by the U.S. Department of Justice. The comments and the response of the United States will be filed with the Court. … to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. § 16(e)(1).
83 FR 9750Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Mar 4, 1997
Public comment on the proposed Final Judgment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. … may submit written comments to Gail Kursh, Chief; Health Care Task Force; Department of Justice; Antitrust Division; 325 7th Street, N.W.; Room 404; Washington, D.C. 20530, within the 60-day period provided
62 FR 9807Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · May 29, 2014
All comments received during this period will be considered by the U.S. … to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the Proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. § 16(e)(1).
79 FR 30881Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Sep 26, 1995
Interested persons may submit to the Government comments regarding the proposed termination of the Final Judgment. … Such comments must be received within the sixty-day (60) period established by Court order, and will be filed with the Court by the Government. Comments should be addressed to Craig W.
60 FR 49632Justice DepartmentAntitrust Division
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.