Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
580 results
0.47s
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 29, 2015
subject to a sixty-day comment period, after which the Court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1). … Statement, and any comments thereon, and the United States' responses to comments.
80 FR 81356Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States v. GS Caltex Corp. et al.; Proposed Final Judgments and Competitive Impact Statement
Federal Register · Notice · Nov 23, 2018
Army, Navy, Marine, and Air Force installations in Korea, known as PC&S contracts, in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. D. … subject to a 60-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. § 16(e)(1).
83 FR 60306Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States et al. v. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. and Perpetual Corporation
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 23, 2014
to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1). … Statement, and any comments thereon, and the United States' responses to comments.
79 FR 42817Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Jul 7, 2005
The sixty-day comment period specified in 15 U.S.C. 16(b) expired on May 5, 2005. 7. … 30-day time period.
70 FR 39336Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States v. Ecolab Inc., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
Federal Register · Notice · Apr 18, 2013
to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1). … Capclean H-101DW Capillary Cleaning Production Chemicals. Capclean H-102DW Capillary Cleaning Production Chemicals. Capclean W-202DW Capillary Cleaning Production Chemicals.
78 FR 23291Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States v. Jacor Communications, Inc. et al.; Proposed Modified Final Judgment
Federal Register · Notice · Sep 27, 1996
Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments, and responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. … Unless such transaction is otherwise subject to the reporting and waiting period requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18a (the ``HSR Act''), Jacor
61 FR 50872Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Sep 14, 2016
to a sixty-day comment period, after which the Court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1). … Statement, and any comments thereon, and the United States' responses to comments.
81 FR 63206Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Nov 13, 2014
All comments received during this period will be considered by the U.S. … to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).
79 FR 67448Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Apr 14, 2011
be subject to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1). … Unless such transaction is otherwise subject to the reporting and waiting period requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18a (the “HSR Act”), Stericycle
76 FR 21006Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Dec 30, 2013
to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. § 16(e)(1). … Statement, and any comments thereon, and the United States' responses to comments.
78 FR 79485Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · May 5, 2021
All comments received during this period will be considered by the U.S. … to a 60-day comment period, after which the Court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).
86 FR 23982Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Aug 2, 2012
to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1). … Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States's responses to comments.
77 FR 46186Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 1, 2010
Unless such transaction is otherwise subject to the reporting and waiting period requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18a (the “HSR Act”), Stericycle … to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).
75 FR 5120Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Aug 15, 2019
Statement, any comments thereon, and the United States' responses to comments. … All comments received during this period will be considered by the U.S.
84 FR 41738Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionPublic Comment and Response on Proposed Final Judgment
Federal Register · Notice · Apr 4, 2008
The 60-day period for public comments ended on February 20, 2008, and one comment was received as described below and attached hereto. I. … Summary of Public Comment and Response During the 60-day public comment period, the United States received only one comment, from the North Lamar County Citizens Association (“NLCCA”), relating primarily
73 FR 18564Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Apr 11, 1994
Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments, and responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. … Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, 555 Fourth Street, NW., room 9104, Washington, DC 20001, within the 60-day period provided by the Act.
Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Dec 15, 2005
At the conclusion of the sixty (60) day comment period, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia may enter the proposed consent decree upon finding that it serves the public interest. … The APPA provides a period of at least sixty (60) days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the
70 FR 74334Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Aug 16, 1996
Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments, and responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. … The APPA provides a period of at least sixty (60) days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the
61 FR 42652Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionUnited States v. Unilever N.V., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
Federal Register · Notice · May 13, 2011
All comments received during this period will be considered by the United States Department of Justice, which remains free to withdraw its consent to the proposed Final Judgment at any time before the … to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. § 16(e)(1).
76 FR 28080Justice DepartmentAntitrust DivisionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 1, 2019
Statement, any comments thereon, and the United States' responses to comments. … to a 60-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).
84 FR 1216Justice DepartmentAntitrust Division
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.