Documents

United States and New Jersey v. Waste Management, Inc. and Allied Waste Industries, Inc.; Public Comments and Plaintiff's Response

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 17, 2003

The 60-day comment period commenced on August 15, 2003, and terminated on October 14, 2003. … During the 60-day comment period, the United States received two public comments (attached as Appendix A). II. Response to Public Comments A.

United States of America v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al.; Public Comment and Response on Proposed Final Judgment

Federal Register · Notice · Aug 23, 2016

The 60-day period for public comments ended on July 18, 2016. The United States received one comment, which is described below and attached as Exhibit 1. II. … STANDARD OF JUDICIAL REVIEW The Tunney Act requires that proposed consent judgments in antitrust cases brought by the United States be subject to a 60-day public comment period, after which the court

Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement United States of America, State of New York, and State of Illinois v. Sony Corporation of America, LTM Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Loews Theatres, Cineplex Odeon Corporation, and J.E. Seagram Corp.

Federal Register · Notice · May 6, 1998

The proposed Final Judgment is subject to approval by the Court after the expiration of the statutory 60-day public comment period and compliance with the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C … Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments, and the responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court.

United States v. Bemis Company, Inc., et al.; Public Comments and Response on Proposed Final Judgment

Federal Register · Notice · Jun 14, 2010

The 60-day period for public comments ended on May 15, 2010; three comments were received as described below and attached hereto. I. … Summary of Public Comments and the United States's Response During the 60-day comment period, the United States received comments from three individuals: (1) A Concerned Menasha Citizen (unsigned); (2

United States v. The Mathworks, Inc. and Wind River Systems, Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Oct 21, 2002

brought by the United States be subject to a 60 day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgments are “in the public interest.” … A “public interest” determination can be made properly on the basis of the Competitive Impact Statement and Response to Comments filed pursuant to the Tunney Act.

United States of America v. Signature Flight Support Corporation and Hawker Beechcraft Services, Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Jul 17, 2008

Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States's responses to comments. … to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).

United States v. Fiat S.p.A., Fiat Acquisition Corporation, New Holland N.V., New Holland, North America, Inc., and Case Corporation, Civil Action No. 99-02927(JR) (D.D.C.); Response to Public Comments

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 25, 2000

Public comment was invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. … The 60-day comment period specified in 15 U.S.C. § 16(b) ended on February 5, 2000.

United States v. Lucasfilm Ltd.; Public Comments and Response on Proposed Final Judgment

Federal Register · Notice · Apr 28, 2011

Act”), the United States hereby responds to the public comments received regarding the proposed Final Judgment in this case. … Summary of Public Comments and the United States' Response During the 60-day comment period, the United States received three comments, which are attached hereto in the Appendix to this Response.

United States v. DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC, et al.; Public Comment and Response on Proposed Final Judgment

Federal Register · Notice · Aug 25, 2017

SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENT AND RESPONSE OF THE UNITED STATES During the 60-day public comment period, the United States received one comment, from Joe Macera. Mr. … STANDARD OF JUDICIAL REVIEW The Clayton Act, as amended by the APPA, requires that proposed consent judgments in antitrust cases brought by the United States be subject to a sixty-day comment period

United States of America v. Harsco Corporation, Pandrol Jackson Limited, and Pandrol Jackson Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Nov 26, 1999

Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments and response thereto will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. … Comments should be directed to J.

United States v. Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 30, 2016

to a sixty-day comment period, after which the Court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1). … Unless such transaction is otherwise subject to the reporting and waiting period requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18a (the “HSR Act”): (1)

United States v. Tom Paige Catering, Inc. and Valley Foods Inc., Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 30, 1997

Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments, and responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. … As provided by the APPA (15 U.S.C. 16), any person wishing to comment upon the proposed judgment may, for a sixty-day (60) period subsequent to the publishing of this document in the Federal Register,

United States et al. v. Constellation Energy Corporation, Inc. et al. Response of Plaintiff United States to Public Comments on the Proposed Final Judgment

Federal Register · Notice · Apr 24, 2026

The single public comment received in response is described below and attached as Exhibit A. The 60-day period for public comment has now ended. II. … Standard of Judicial Review The Clayton Act, as amended by the Tunney Act, requires that proposed consent judgments in antitrust cases brought by the United States are subject to a 60-day comment period

United States v. General Electric Company & Instrumentarium OYJ

Federal Register · Notice · Nov 12, 2003

The Tunney Act provides a period of at least 60 days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the proposed … Standard of Review Under the Tunney Act for the Proposed Final Judgment The Tunney Act requires that proposed consent judgments in antitrust cases brought by the United States be subject to a 60-day comment

United States of America v. Playmobil USA, Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 22, 1995

Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments and responses to them will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. … The APPA provides a period of at least 60 days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the proposed

United States v. Suiza Foods Corp. and Broughton Foods Co.; Public Comments and Response

Federal Register · Notice · Aug 5, 1999

.; Public Comments and Response Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h), that Public Comments and Plaintiff's Response have been filed with … The 60-day period to submit public comments expired on July 16, 1999. As of the date of the filing of this Response, the United States had received only one public comment.

United States v. Odyssey Investment Partners Fund V, LP et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Jun 8, 2020

Statement, comments thereon, and the United States' responses to comments. … All comments received during this period will be considered by the U.S.

United States v.Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA/NV, et al. Public Comments and Response on Proposed Final Judgment

Federal Register · Notice · Sep 24, 2013

. 1 (Doc. 42). 1  Commenter Steven Uhr has submitted 18 exhibits in support of his Tunney Act comment. … Summary of Public Comments and the United States's Response During the 60-day public comment period, the United States received comments from the following individuals and entities: • Steven Uhr, a Minnesota

United States v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.; Complaint, Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 24, 2006

The APPA provides a period of at least sixty days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the proposed … All comments received during this period will be considered by the Department of Justice, which remains free to withdraw its consent to the proposed Final Judgment at any time prior to the Court's entry

United States v. Graftech International Ltd., Et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 7, 2010

to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1). … Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States's responses to comments.