Documents

United States v. Microsoft Corporation; Public Comments; Notice (MTC-00007630 - MTC-00012282)

Federal Register · Notice · May 3, 2002

MTC-00008466 From: Randy Hackney To: Microsoft ATR Date: 1/3/02 8:39pm Subject: Microsoft Settlement RE: Public comment period for the Tunney Act. … it's 60-day public comment period that started on Nov. 28.

United States v. VA Partners I, LLC, ValueAct Capital Master Fund, LP, and ValueAct Co-Invest International, LP; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Jul 25, 2016

Comments should be directed to Kathleen S. … Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States' responses to comments.

United States v. Citadel Communications Corporation, Triathlon Broadcasting Company, and Capstar Broadcasting Corporation

Federal Register · Notice · May 17, 1999

This obligation to provide notice is met under this section when a transaction is subject to the reporting and waiting period requirements of the Hart-Scott- Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, … During the sixty-day period, plaintiff will consider, and at the close of that period respond to, any comments received, and it will publish the comments and responses in the Federal Register. 5.

Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement; United States of America v. Chancellor Media Corp. and Kunz & Co.

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 3, 1998

The proposed Final Judgment is subject to approval by the Court after the expiration of the statutory 60-day public comment period and compliance with the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act. 15 U.S.C … Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments, and the responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court.

Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement: United States of America v. CBS Corporation, Infinity Broadcasting Corporation and Outdoor Systems, Inc.

Federal Register · Notice · Mar 17, 2000

The proposed Final Judgment is subject to approval by the Court after the expiration of the statutory 60-day public comment period and compliance with the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act. 15 U.S.C … Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments, and the responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court.

Public Comments and Plaintiff's Responses; United States v. Mercury PCS II, L.L.C.

Federal Register · Notice · Mar 19, 1999

Public comment was invited within the statutory sixty-day comment period. One comment was received, and the response thereto, are hereby published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. … The proposed Final Judgment was published in the Federal Register on November 25, 1998; the comment period terminated on January 25, 1999.

United States v. American Bar Association Civ. No. 95-1211 (CRR) (D.D.C.,); Response of the United States to Public Comments

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 12, 1995

Her comment was transmitted on October 16, two weeks after the close of the comment period. … The Act clearly does not require a full airing of Justice Department files but the Court cannot countenance plaintiff's claim that though Congress enacted sunshine legislation the courts may blandly (and

United States v. Bayer AG et al.; Response to Public Comments

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 4, 2019

Standard of Judicial Review The Clayton Act, as amended by the APPA, requires that proposed consent judgments in antitrust cases brought by the United States be subject to a 60-day comment period, after … These comments are beyond the purview of the Tunney Act.

United States v. Tele-Communications, Inc. and Liberty Media Corporation Comment and Response on Proposed Final Judgment

Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Aug 4, 1994

Tele-Communications, Inc. and Liberty Media Corporation Comment and Response on Proposed Final Judgment Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(a) and (b), the United … Comments.

U.S. v. US WEST, Inc. and Continental Cablevision, Inc.; Public Comments and Response on Proposed Final Judgment

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 24, 1997

In this case, the sixty-day comment period commenced on November 18, 1996, and terminated on January 16, 1997. … During this period, the United States received only one comment relating to the proposed Final Judgment.\1\ The United States herein responds to this comment.

United States of America v. BBA Aviation plc, et al.; Public Comment and Response on Proposed Final Judgment

Federal Register · Notice · Jun 6, 2016

The 60-day waiting period for public comments ended on April 12, 2016. … STANDARD OF JUDICIAL REVIEW The Tunney Act requires that proposed consent judgments in antitrust cases brought by the United States be subject to a 60-day public comment period, after which the court

United States v. U S West, Inc. & Continental Cablevision, Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Nov 18, 1996

Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments, and responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. … The APPA provides a period of at least sixty (60) days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the

United States v. Iron Mountain Inc. and Recall Holdings Ltd.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Apr 11, 2016

to a sixty-day comment period, after which the Court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1). … Unless such transaction is otherwise subject to the reporting and waiting period requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18a (the “HSR Act”), Defendants

United States, et al. v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, et al.; Response of Plaintiff United States to Public Comments on the Proposed Final Judgment

Federal Register · Notice · Nov 19, 2025

Bredar Response of Plaintiff United States to Public Comments on the Proposed Final Judgment Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h) (the “Tunney Act”), the United … The 173 public comments received in response are described below and attached as Exhibit A. 3 The 60-day period for public comment has now ended. 3  Individual commenters' street addresses

United States and New Jersey v. Waste Management, Inc. and Allied Waste Industries, Inc.; Public Comments and Plaintiff's Response

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 17, 2003

The 60-day comment period commenced on August 15, 2003, and terminated on October 14, 2003. … During the 60-day comment period, the United States received two public comments (attached as Appendix A). II. Response to Public Comments A.

Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement United States of America, State of New York, and State of Illinois v. Sony Corporation of America, LTM Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Loews Theatres, Cineplex Odeon Corporation, and J.E. Seagram Corp.

Federal Register · Notice · May 6, 1998

The proposed Final Judgment is subject to approval by the Court after the expiration of the statutory 60-day public comment period and compliance with the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C … Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments, and the responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court.

United States v. The Mathworks, Inc. and Wind River Systems, Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Oct 21, 2002

brought by the United States be subject to a 60 day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgments are “in the public interest.” … A “public interest” determination can be made properly on the basis of the Competitive Impact Statement and Response to Comments filed pursuant to the Tunney Act.

United States v. Imetal, DBK Minerals, Inc., English China Clays, PLC, and English China Clays, Inc.; Civil Action No. 99-1018 (GK)(D.D.C.); Response to Public Comments

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 7, 2000

Public comment was invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. … The 60-day comment period specified in 15 U.S.C. 16(b) ended on August 10, 1999.

United States of America v. Signature Flight Support Corporation and Hawker Beechcraft Services, Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Jul 17, 2008

Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States's responses to comments. … to a sixty-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).

Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement; United States of America v. Chancellor Media Corporation and Whiteco Industries, Inc.

Federal Register · Notice · Jan 15, 1999

The proposed Final Judgment is subject to approval by the Court after the expiration of the statutory 60-day public comment period and compliance with the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act. 15 U.S.C … Public comment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. Such comments, and the responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court.