Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
3,648 results
0.24s
Irish Potatoes Grown in Colorado; Decreased Assessment Rate for Area No. 2
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 24, 2014
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or before January 21, 2014. No comments were received. … Chapter 35); and the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
79 FR 9986Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 24, 1997
A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons the opportunity to respond to the proposal, including any regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small businesses. … All written comments received within the comment period will be considered before a final determination is made on this matter.
62 FR 67297Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFederal Register · Rule · Apr 25, 2013
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or before October 29, 2012. No comments were received. … Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
78 FR 24333Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFederal Register · Rule · Feb 14, 2006
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the “Act.” … A 30 day comment period ending January 9, 2006, was provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received.
71 FR 7673Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFederal Register · Rule · Mar 6, 2001
Applicability Date: This interim final rule applies during the period July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2001. … period in which to respond, and all comments timely received will be considered prior to finalization of this action.
66 FR 13396Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceProcessed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Referendum Procedures
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 8, 2010
period. … The proposed rule provided a 60-day comment period ending on June 8, 2009. No comments were received by the deadline.
75 FR 6089Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceRegulatory Flexibility Act: Plan for Periodic Review of Regulations
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 4, 2002
. # L&RRS-01-01] Regulatory Flexibility Act: Plan for Periodic Review of Regulations AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Schedule for review of agency regulations. … At that time, a contact person will be identified to whom comments may be submitted concerning the review.
67 FR 525Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceAlmonds Grown in California; Amendments to the Marketing Order
Federal Register · Rule · May 7, 2024
A 60-day comment period ending June 26, 2023, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposals. AMS received one comment during the comment period. … The comment supported the proposed amendments.
89 FR 37965Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceNectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rates
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 26, 2004
The marketing agreements and orders are effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the “Act.” … A 60-day comment period was provided for interested persons to respond to the interim final rule. The comment period ended on October 15, 2004, and no comments were received.
69 FR 68755Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceWashington Apricots; Termination of Marketing Order
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 27, 2023
A 60-day comment period was provided to allow interested persons an opportunity to respond to the proposed termination of the Order. … One comment was received in support of termination.
88 FR 41471Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 16, 2015
DATES: Comments must be received by March 31, 2015. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposal. … A 15-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule.
80 FR 13502Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFederal Register · Rule · Apr 19, 2021
A 30-day comment period ending January 15, 2021, was provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. … Accordingly, no changes will be made to the rule as proposed, based on the comment received.
86 FR 20253Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceBeef Promotion and Research; Reapportionment
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 25, 2014
In considering reapportionment, the Board reviewed cattle inventories for the period of January 1, 2011, 2012, and 2013 as well as cattle, beef, and beef product import data for the period of January 1 … A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal.
79 FR 16236Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServicePlant Variety Protection Office, Supplemental Fees
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 11, 2005
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments. … A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons the opportunity to respond to the proposal, including any regulatory and informational impact of this action on organizations considered
70 FR 1835Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceVidalia Onions Grown in Georgia; Change in Assessment Requirements
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 21, 2005
That rule provided for a 60-day comment period which ended January 25, 2005. One comment was received. … The commenter also stated that assessments were not equitably collected. USDA disagrees with these assertions.
70 FR 20693Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceOlives Grown in California; Establish Procedures To Meet Via Electronic Communications
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 16, 2018
DATES: Comments must be received by December 17, 2018. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposed rule. … A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule.
83 FR 57691Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFederal Register · Rule · Jul 16, 2014
A 60-day comment period ending June 6, 2014, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received. … In addition, a 60-day comment period was provided for in the proposed rule. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987 Dates, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
79 FR 41415Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceOlives Grown in California; Revisions to Handling Requirements
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jan 31, 2000
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the “Act.” … A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal.
65 FR 4573Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceTomatoes Grown in Florida; Proposed Amendments to the Marketing Order No. 966 and Referendum Order
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 21, 2020
A proposed rule soliciting comments on the proposed amendments was issued on September 23, 2019 and published in the Federal Register on October 1, 2019 (84 FR 52044). No comments were received. … A 60-day comment period ending December 2, 2019, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal.
85 FR 10096Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceAlmonds Grown in California; Final Rule Revising Quality Control Provisions
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Mar 22, 1994
That rule provided a 30-day comment period which ended January 5, 1994. Two comments were received within the prescribed time period, and one comment was received late. … After consideration of the Board's recommendation, the comments received, and other relevant information, it is found that this final rule will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing Service
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.