Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
3,648 results
0.15s
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 7, 1995
The proposed rule was published with a request for comments to be submitted by April 21, 1995. The Department received four written comments. … Since the commenters' assertions are not consistent with the requirements of the Act and Order, no change is being made in this final rule.
60 FR 29960Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceMilk in the Texas Marketing Area; Suspension of Certain Provisions of the Order
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 4, 1997
Two comments in opposition to the revised proposed suspension and in support of the continuance of the existing suspension, one comment in opposition to the proposed suspension, and one comment in support … A comment submitted by The Kroger Co.
62 FR 41810Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceSoybean Promotion and Research: Adjusting Representation on the United Soybean Board
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 8, 2021
Summary of Comments A proposed rule was published in the Federal Register (86 FR 19788) on April 15, 2021, with a 60-day comment period. USDA received 10 comments. … Leaving the Alabama seat at two would not be consistent with the Act and Order, which requires that at the end of each 3-year period, the Secretary review the volume of production of each unit and adjust
86 FR 61668Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFresh Bartlett Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Decreased Assessment Rate
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 1, 2000
The marketing agreement and order are effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the “Act.” … A 60-day comment period was provided for interested persons to respond to the interim final rule. The comment period ended on September 5, 2000, and no comments were received.
65 FR 65253Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 23, 2002
DATES: Comments must be received by September 23, 2002. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposal. … A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal.
67 FR 48051Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceTart Cherries Grown in the States of Michigan, et al.; Increased Assessment Rates
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 26, 2002
That rule provided a 15-day comment period which ended on April 1, 2002. No comments were received. … Further, this action was recommended at a public meeting and a 15-day comment period was provided for public input. No comments were received.
67 FR 20613Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceApricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Decreased Assessment Rate
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 19, 2005
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the “Act.” … A 60-day comment period was provided for interested persons to respond to the interim final rule. No comments were received during the comment period that ended on August 26, 2005.
70 FR 54833Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFederal Register · Rule · Sep 9, 2003
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments. … period and any comments received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
68 FR 53021Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceQuality Systems Verification Programs
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 7, 2005
A 30-day comment period is provided for interested persons to comment on this proposed rule. … This comment period is deemed appropriate in order to implement this rule, if adopted, as soon as possible so that program costs are covered by revenue.
70 FR 17611Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceGrapes Grown in a Designated Area of Southeastern California; Decreased Assessment Rate
Federal Register · Rule · May 9, 2018
A 30-day comment period ending April 2, 2018, was provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. One comment was received in support of the decreased assessment rate. … No changes will be made to the rule as proposed based on the comments received.
83 FR 21165Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 3, 2000
DATES: Comments must be received by July 18, 2000. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposal. … A 15-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal.
65 FR 41018Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceSweet Cherries Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Change in Pack Requirements
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 24, 1999
or periods. … period, and any comments received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
64 FR 33741Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceFederal Register · Rule · May 24, 2013
Comments and Responses On March 12, 2013, the Agency published a proposed rule with a 30-day comment period. … Raised Summary of Comments: Several commenters suggested that the Agency redefine the term “raised” to refer to the period of time encompassing a majority of an animal's life.
78 FR 31367Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServicePears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Modification of the Assessment Rate for Fresh Pears
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 24, 2013
A 10-day comment period ending January 14, 2013, was provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received. … Also, a 10-day comment period was provided for in the proposed rule, and no comments were received.
78 FR 24033Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceHoney Packers and Importers; Increased Assessment Rate
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 31, 2026
of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425) (Act). … A 30-day comment period ending April 8, 2026, was provided for interested parties to respond to the rule as proposed.
91 FR 55733Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceOlives Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rate
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 4, 2020
DATES: Comments must be received by April 3, 2020. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposed rule. … A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule.
85 FR 12757Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceAmendment to the Soybean Promotion and Research Rules and Regulations
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 18, 2003
A 30-day comment period is provided for interested persons. … For the aforementioned reasons, a 30-day comment period is deemed appropriate so that the proposed change, if adopted, can be implemented as soon as possible.
68 FR 36498Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceLivestock Mandatory Reporting: Confidentiality Guideline
Federal Register · Notice · Aug 7, 2001
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to John E. … SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 (Act) (Pub.
66 FR 41194Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceIncrease in Fees and Charges for Egg, Poultry, and Rabbit Grading
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 14, 1999
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 13, 1999. ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Douglas C. … Comments may be faxed to (202) 690-0941. State that your comments refer to Docket No. PY-99-004 and note the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register.
64 FR 37886Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing ServiceOlives Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 8, 2021
DATES: Comments must be received by May 24, 2021. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposed rule. … A 45-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule.
86 FR 18216Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing Service
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.