KICKAPOO TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
Tribal code
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
KICKAPOO TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
PRIORITY CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
Prepared for:
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
McLoud, Oklahoma
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Project No. 024-04726
Priority Climate Action Plan
January 2025
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2
1.1
CPRG and PCAP Overview ......................................................................................... 2
1.2
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma (KTO) ............................................................................. 2
1.3
Benefits to Low-Income and Disadvantaged Communities .......................................... 4
2. GHG Emissions Inventory .................................................................................................... 5
2.1
Overview ..................................................................................................................... 5
2.2
Data Sources and Methodology ................................................................................... 5
2.3
Results ........................................................................................................................ 9
3. GHG Reduction Priority Measures ......................................................................................12
3.1
Measure #1a: Transportation Sector...........................................................................12
3.2
Measure #1b: Transportation Sector...........................................................................16
3.3
Measure #2: Electric Power Sector .............................................................................20
References ...............................................................................................................................25
Appendices
Appendix A – GHG Emissions Inventory
Appendix B – Stakeholder and Public Engagement Summary
024-04726
ii
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Project No. 024-04726
Priority Climate Action Plan
January 2025
Executive Summary
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provided grant funding to the Kickapoo Tribe of
Oklahoma (KTO) to develop a Priority Climate Action Plan (PCAP) and a Comprehensive Climate Action
Plan (CCAP). The PCAP is to include proposed priority carbon reduction measures for submittal to the
EPA. The KTO hired Olsson to provide support in the development of the PCAP. As part of the PCAP
development, Olsson and KTO: reviewed regional documents and plans related to decarbonization;
conducted a greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory; developed a community engagement plan; conducted
stakeholder and public engagement; and evaluated measures for inclusion in the PCAP. Based upon
these activities, the KTO has developed the following measures for inclusion in the PCAP. Each measure
includes a rationale, GHG reduction, benefits analysis, authority to implement, workforce planning
analysis, and funding analysis. Supporting information is included for the GHG regional inventory, and
stakeholder and public engagement. The order in which these measures are listed is based on the largest
GHG contributors by sector:
1. Transportation Sector – (1) Upgrade government vehicle fleets, including public transit fleets, by
replacing internal combustion engines with low/no emission vehicles and expand electric vehicle
charging infrastructure to support battery electric vehicles; and (2) Incentivize eligible agencies
and individual automobile owners to purchase low/no emission vehicles and associated electric
vehicle charging infrastructure.
2. Transportation Sector – (1) Expand infrastructure such as bicycle facilities, transit stops,
sidewalks, and other active transportation supporting infrastructure; and (2) Update and adopt
building and zoning codes and policies/long-range plans to encourage walkable, bikeable, and
transit-oriented development.
3. Electric Power Sector – (1) Install renewable energy and energy storage systems on tribal
government-owned facilities; and (2) Develop distributed and community-scale renewable
energy generation, microgrids, and vehicle-to-grid infrastructure in disadvantaged communities,
including remote and rural regions.
The development of this plan positions the KTO to pursue additional funding opportunities, such as those
offered by the EPA and other federal funding sources. With the PCAP in place, the KTO can more
effectively apply for grants and financial support for clean energy and climate resilience projects, helping
to secure the resources needed to implement these priority initiatives and further the Tribe's sustainability
goals.
024-04726
1
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Project No. 024-04726
Priority Climate Action Plan
January 2025
1. Introduction
1.1
CPRG and PCAP Overview
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provided grant funding to the Kickapoo Tribe of
Oklahoma (KTO) to develop a Priority Climate Action Plan (PCAP) and a Comprehensive Climate Action
Plan (CCAP). The PCAP is to include proposed priority carbon reduction measures for submittal to the
EPA. The KTO hired Olsson to provide support in the development of the PCAP. Olsson’s support
included: project management; a review of regional documents and plans related to decarbonization;
conducting a greenhouse gas (GHG) approximation; developing a community engagement plan;
conducting stakeholder and public engagement; and evaluating measures for inclusion in the PCAP.
Based upon these activities, the KTO has developed the following measures for inclusion in the PCAP.
Supporting information is included for the GHG regional approximation, and stakeholder and public
engagement. The order in which these measures are listed is based on the largest GHG contributors and
KTO interest in implementing these measures.
1.2 Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma (KTO)
The KTO is a federally recognized Native American tribe with a rich cultural heritage and a commitment
to preserving their sovereignty and way of life. As shown in Figure 1, the KTO is located in central
Oklahoma, with its jurisdictional area encompassing portions of Lincoln, Pottawatomie, and Oklahoma
counties. As a sovereign nation, the KTO governs itself through a tribal council and elected officials who
oversee decisions regarding tribal affairs and programs.
The KTO is committed to enhancing the well-being of its members through a range of economic, cultural,
and community-focused initiatives. The tribe operates several primary entities, including, but not limited
to, the Kickapoo Housing Authority, Kickapoo Travel Plaza, Kickapoo Casino, and the Kickapoo Tribal
Health Center. These entities provide essential services and contribute to the economic stability of the
community. The Health Center offers comprehensive medical care, while the Casino and Travel Plaza
generate revenue that supports tribal programs and activities. Additionally, the Housing Authority plays
a crucial role in addressing the housing needs of tribal members.
The KTO also maintains an extensive fleet of about 87 vehicles to support its diverse operations, which
includes 21 trucks, 16 cars and SUVs, 18 equipment vehicles, and 32 medium-duty and heavy-duty
vehicles. These vehicles are primarily used for maintenance, transportation, public works, and other
024-04726
2
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Project No. 024-04726
Priority Climate Action Plan
January 2025
essential tribal operations, ensuring the efficient delivery of services and resources. Together, these
assets and initiatives underscore the KTO’s dedication to fostering economic growth, cultural
preservation, and community development.
Like many Indigenous communities, the KTO is deeply connected to the land and natural resources within
their jurisdiction. This connection underscores their vulnerability to climate change impacts, including
extreme weather events, alterations in ecosystems, and shifts in resource availability. To address these
challenges, the KTO actively participates in environmental initiatives, focusing on sustainability and the
protection of their cultural and natural heritage.
Figure 1. Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma (KTO) Territory boundaries within Oklahoma.
024-04726
3
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
The KTO's environmental efforts highlight their commitment to the well-being of their people and the
stewardship of their lands. These initiatives align with their broader goals of fostering economic growth,
preserving cultural traditions, and promoting a sustainable future for their community.
1.3 Benefits to Low-Income and Disadvantaged
Communities
Historically, the KTO signed several treaties with the United States government, often ceding large
portions of their traditional lands in exchange for various promises and guarantees. However, like many
other tribes, they have faced significant challenges related to land loss, forced relocation, and attempts
at assimilation.
Lands of Federally Recognized Tribes are often considered low-income and disadvantaged communities
(LIDACs) due to a variety of historical and contemporary factors. These factors include:
1. Historical Displacement and Dispossession: Indigenous peoples in the United States have
faced centuries of displacement, forced removal, and loss of their traditional lands due to
colonization and settler expansion.
2. Economic Marginalization: Many tribal communities have historically faced economic
marginalization, with limited access to resources and opportunities for economic development.
This has resulted in higher rates of poverty, unemployment, and limited infrastructure in many
tribal areas.
3. Limited Access to Services: Tribal communities often have limited access to essential services
such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure compared to non-tribal communities. This lack
of access can further perpetuate economic and social disparities.
4. Legal and Regulatory Challenges: Tribes face unique legal and regulatory challenges related
to land ownership, sovereignty, and jurisdiction. These challenges can create barriers to
economic development and investment in tribal lands.
5. Environmental Justice Concerns: Many tribal communities are disproportionately impacted by
environmental issues such as pollution, resource extraction, and climate change. These
environmental injustices can further exacerbate existing economic and social challenges.
024-04726
4
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Project No. 024-04726
Priority Climate Action Plan
January 2025
6. Cultural and Social Challenges: Tribal communities also face cultural and social challenges
related to preserving their languages, traditions, and identities in the face of ongoing pressures
from mainstream society.
Due to these factors, lands of Federally Recognized Tribes are often characterized as disadvantaged,
and efforts to address these disparities typically involve a combination of policy interventions, economic
development initiatives, and partnerships between tribal governments, the federal government, and other
stakeholders (GAO n.d.).
2. GHG Emissions Inventory
2.1 Overview
The KTO region includes portions of three (3) counties: Lincoln, Oklahoma, and Pottawatomie.
GHG emissions data are often collected and reported at various administrative levels, including national,
regional, state, county, and/or city levels and includes carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (NO2), methane
(CH4), and other various fluorinated gases (EPA n.d.a). Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) is a term for
describing various GHGs in a common unit. Some datasets provided emissions data directly in CO2e,
while others required conversion to account for their global warming potential (GWP) using the latest
guidelines from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report
(2021). The 100-year GWP values from this report are the most recent values to date (EPA n.d.d) and
were used to calculate the KTO emission approximations across all economic sectors.
It is understood that there are inevitable uncertainties within the estimation process, but it is also
recognized that the KTO inventory approximations have been reinforced and compared with data from
multiple reliable data sources.
2.2 Data Sources and Methodology
Data sources used for the KTO GHG inventory include the EPA’s National Emissions Inventory (NEI),
the EPA’s Emissions and Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) Data Explorer, the U.S.
Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) State and Local Planning
for Energy (SLOPE) Data Viewer, and the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) National Land Cover
024-04726
5
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
Database (NLCD). Approximations were also based on the comparisons of Oklahoma’s statewide data
from the EPA’s GHG Inventory Data Explorer.
In total, six (6) sectors were chosen to represent overall GHG emissions inventory based on the EPA’s
recommendations (EPA n.d.b). GHG emissions data for each sector were obtained and calculated using
the following sources:
SECTOR
Transportation
SOURCES
2020 EPA NEI
•
Electric Power
County-level mobile on road and non-road GHG
emissions data
2020 DOE NREL SLOPE Data Viewer
•
County-level industrial, commercial, and residential
electric power use GHG emissions data
2022 EPA eGRID Data Explorer
•
Industrial
State-level electric power use conversion rate
o Pounds of CO2 per megawatt hour (MWh)
2020 DOE NREL SLOPE Data Viewer
•
County-level Industrial natural gas use GHG
emissions data
2020 EPA NEI
•
Commercial
Residential
Agriculture
2020 DOE NREL SLOPE Data Viewer
• County-level commercial natural gas use GHG
emissions data
2020 DOE NREL SLOPE Data Viewer
• County-level residential natural gas use GHG
emissions data
2021 USGS National Land Cover Database (NLCD)
•
024-04726
County-level industrial equipment GHG emissions
data
State- and county-level land cover data
o Cultivated crops
o Hay/pasture
6
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
2020 EPA GHG Inventory Data Explorer
•
State-level GHG emissions data from livestock,
crop cultivation, and fuel combustion in the
agricultural sector
GHG emissions data from the years 1990 through 2022 were utilized in data collection, but the years
2017 and 2020 were prioritized. Initially, the project team had hoped to utilize 2022 data, but found that
2022 data was not readily available for all sectors desired for consideration in the overall KTO GHG
inventory. From there, when comparing data from 2017 and 2020 it became clear that 2020 data was
notably comparable to other years, even within the transportation sector, taking into consideration the
COVID pandemic and its effects. The data from 2020 stands out as the most recent, readily available,
and relevant among recent years, which is why it was chosen to represent the KTO GHG inventory
baseline year for comparison purposes, among others.
Population data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s (USCB; 2020b) Quick Facts is available every 10 years,
with 2010 and 2020 giving the most recent data sets. The year 2020 was chosen to represent the KTO’s
population estimates. This is considered an estimate because KTO is comprised of three (3) partial
counties. Percentages of these counties within the KTO were estimated based on both land area derived
from the USGS NLCD and USCB (2020a) Census Blocks population data within the KTO.
For further information on the process for the KTO’s GHG Inventory evaluation and approximation, please
see Appendix A, GHG Emissions Inventory.
2.2.1 State Level Data
2.2.1.1 EPA GHG Inventory Data Explorer
The EPA (2020a) produces the official GHG Inventory for the U.S., a detailed report that comprehensively
documents the nation's GHG emissions. This data, available for 1990 through 2022, can be broken down
into statewide reports, which was done for Oklahoma. Each year’s inventory is an essential tool for
understanding the sources and trends of GHG emissions in the United States. The dataset for each state
includes emissions from economic sectors, including electric power, transportation, industry, agriculture,
commercial, and residential. State-level data from this source was used from the year 2020 to compare
and approximate regional emissions. Refer below to Figure 2.
024-04726
7
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
Figure 2. 2020 GHG emissions in Oklahoma by economic sector.
2.2.1.2 EPA eGRID Data Explorer
The EPA’s (2022) Emissions and Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) Data Explorer
conversions for the state of Oklahoma were used to calculate CO2e GHG emissions for the electric power
sector’s electricity use. The output emission rate provided by the eGRID Data Explorer calculates this by
dividing the total annual adjusted emissions by annual net generation to obtain pounds of CO2 per
megawatt hour (MWh).
2.2.2 County Level Data
2.2.2.1 EPA NEI
The NEI, maintained by the EPA (2020b), is a comprehensive database that provides emissions data
down to the county-level. The NEI compiles information on air pollutant emissions from various sources,
including industrial facilities, power plants, transportation, and other activities contributing to air pollution.
The data is sourced from industry- submitted emissions inventories, fuel usage reports, and other
relevant information. By detailing the types and quantities of pollutants released into the air, the NEI
serves as a critical tool for air quality management and regulatory decision-making.
For this analysis, the 2020 NEI provided the most recent transportation GHG emissions data for the
transportation sector and industrial equipment GHG emissions data for the industrial sector. The next
024-04726
8
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
data release, covering the year 2023, is under development and scheduled for publication in March 2026.
Figure 3 compares overall GHG emissions per person versus the transportation GHG emissions per
person based on the data collected through the 2020 NEI and estimated for the KTO.
Figure 3. GHG emissions per capita in the KTO for all economic sectors and for the transportation sector
only.
2.2.2.2 DOE NREL SLOPE Data Viewer
The SLOPE Data Viewer is a tool developed by the NREL, which falls under the purview of the U.S. DOE
(2020). This platform was used to collect net electricity and natural gas energy consumption data
available by state and county levels. County-level data was gathered and approximated for all three (3)
counties within the KTO. This data is modeled by NREL based on projected, business-as-usual electricity
and natural gas consumption and expenditures for residential, commercial, and industrial sectors using
baseline 2016 estimates. The years 2017 and 2020 were available for the collection of this information.
Following other data extractions for this GHG inventory for the KTO, 2020 proved most applicable.
2.3 Results
SECTOR
Transportation
024-04726
GHG EMISSIONS (METRIC TONS)
731,937 (36%)
9
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
Electric Power
648,045 (32%)
Industry
376,538 (19%)
Commercial
124,215 (5%)
Residential
107,659 (3%)
Agriculture
45,083 (2%)
The KTO GHG inventory emissions data was obtained from reliable sources, such as government
agencies or research institutions in cooperation with government agencies. Gathered data was converted
where necessary to create a baseline dataset of streamlined metrics for the year 2020. This dataset was
further adjusted to accurately depict the partial areas that the KTO encompasses within three (3) counties.
Approximately 2,033,477 metric tons of GHG emissions were estimated for the KTO. This approximate
amount was grouped by transportation, electric power, industry, agricultural, commercial, and residential
sectors. For a visual breakdown of GHG emissions percentages per economic sector, see Figure 4.
024-04726
10
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
Figure 4. Estimated GHG emissions in the KTO by economic sector.
The transportation sector accounts for approximately 36 percent or 731,937 metric tons of the region’s
GHG emissions. Emissions from transportation are mainly derived from burning fossil fuels for cars,
trucks, and trains (EPA n.d.b). Over 94 percent of the fuel used for transportation is petroleum-based,
including mainly gasoline and diesel (IPCC 2021). The transportation sector was slightly adjusted based
on GWP conversions and population data.
The electric power sector accounts for approximately 32 percent or 648,045 metric tons of the region’s
GHG emissions. This includes emissions from electricity production used by other end use sectors. In
2023, 60 percent of the country’s electricity came from burning fossil fuels, mostly natural gas and coal
(EIA 2024). Data for this sector includes emissions from industrial, commercial, and residential electricity
use. The electric power sector was slightly adjusted based on eGRID conversions and population data.
The industrial sector accounts for approximately 19 percent or 376,538 metric tons of the region’s GHG
emissions. Emissions from industry primarily come from burning fossil fuels for energy, as well as GHG
emissions from certain chemical reactions necessary to produce goods from raw materials (EPA n.d.b).
Data for this sector includes emissions from industrial natural gas use and industrial equipment found
within transportation datasets. The industrial sector was slightly adjusted based on GWP conversions
and population data.
The commercial sector accounts for about six (6) percent or 124,215 metric tons of the region’s GHG
emissions, while the residential sector accounts for about five (5) percent or 107,659 metric tons.
024-04726
11
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
Emissions from the commercial and residential sector include fossil fuels burned for heat, the use of
gases for refrigeration and cooling in buildings, and non-building specific emissions such as the handling
of waste (EPA n.d.b). Data for these sectors include emissions from commercial and residential natural
gas use. The commercial and residential sectors were also slightly adjusted based on population data.
The agricultural sector accounts for approximately two (2) percent or 45,083 metric tons of GHG
emissions. Emissions from the agricultural sector include those generated from livestock, agricultural
soils, crop production, and fossil fuel-fired farm equipment (EPA n.d.b). Data for this sector was calculated
based on land use data and state-level GHG emissions data within the agricultural sector.
3. GHG Reduction Priority Measures
3.1 Measure #1a: Transportation Sector
The proposed measures for inclusion in the KTO PCAP are as follows:
•
Upgrade government vehicle fleets, including public transit fleets, by replacing internal
combustion engines with low/no emission vehicles and expand electric vehicle charging
infrastructure to support battery electric vehicles.
•
Incentivize eligible agencies and individual automobile owners to purchase low/no emission
vehicles and associated electric vehicle charging infrastructure.
3.1.1 Rationale for Measure
Approximately 36 percent of GHG emissions in the KTO are derived from the transportation sector.
Expanding opportunities for alternate transportation mode choices and promoting the electrification of
tribal vehicles provides greater options for the KTO as a government and for individual citizens, many of
whom will choose a cleaner mode for travel. The KTO stakeholders have expressed an interest in
pursuing the federally supported funding to transition government fleet vehicles to hybrid electric vehicles
(HEVs), plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and/or electric vehicles (EVs) and provide the necessary
infrastructure and maintenance training. There were concerns voiced about the feasibility of
implementation, long-term maintenance, and support, as well as vehicle limitations vs. tribal needs—
regarding the size and distance needed to traverse the territory and surrounding areas. Ultimately,
024-04726
12
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Project No. 024-04726
Priority Climate Action Plan
January 2025
stakeholders established consensus for transportation measures—as these measures are the most
directly controlled and implementable, at various scales, by the KTO.
Investments in equitable transportation infrastructure is a key pillar of both the Infrastructure Investment
and Jobs Act (IIJA) as well as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Multiple grant programs through the
Department of Transportation (DOT), such as the Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) Program (DOT
n.d.) and Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Program (DOT
2024), provide funding to support equitable access to community facilities and anchor institutions and
safer roads and streets that can incentivize the use of alternative modes of transportation. Further, federal
grant and tax credit programs can aid in the transition of commercial vehicles, heavy-duty trucks, and
school bus fleets to low or no emission vehicles. These, coupled with the Federal Highway
Administration’s EV charging infrastructure programs, can aid in the adoption and transition to low or no
emission vehicles. There are also opportunities for the development of a ridesharing and e-bike rebate
program targeted at LIDAC communities.
3.1.2 Quantified GHG Reduction
There is substantial opportunity to reduce overall emissions given that approximately 36 percent of the
KTO’s regional GHG emissions come from the transportation sector. Even a 10 percent shift to noemission vehicles could result in a 3.6 percent reduction in the region’s GHG emissions. While the KTO
understands that EVs would not currently be considered no-emission vehicles because utilities are not
completely decarbonized, renewable generation is increasing significantly, and the trend is expected to
continue in Oklahoma. For example, EVs purchased in the next five or so more years will trend towards
becoming no-emission vehicles in the future (OSU 2024). The KTO currently has a fleet of about 87
vehicles, which includes 21 trucks, 16 cars and SUVs, 18 equipment vehicles, and 32 medium-duty and
heavy-duty vehicles. This creates a significant opportunity for the KTO to decarbonize its fleet, while also
setting an example for citizens of the community to purchase low or no-emission vehicles.
3.1.3 Benefits Analysis
Reducing GHG emissions offers additional benefits, including reductions in co-pollutant emissions like
ozone and particulate matter (PM2.5), which positively impact public health by improving air quality.
Leading by example by prioritizing the purchase of EVs not only demonstrates a strong commitment to
sustainability but also serves as a powerful catalyst for inspiring broader societal change. By opting for
HEVs, PHEVs and/or EVs, individuals display their dedication to reducing GHG emissions, improving air
024-04726
13
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
quality, and mitigating climate change. These actions not only contribute to environmental preservation
but also provide tangible success stories that resonate with the general public.
Prioritizing EV purchases stimulates market demand, encourages innovation in the automotive industry,
and fosters the development of advanced technologies and infrastructure to support electric mobility. The
growth of charging infrastructure at tribal facilities plays a vital role in promoting community charging
access, supporting sustainable transportation options, fostering economic development, preserving
cultural values, and demonstrating leadership in environmental stewardship. By investing in EV
infrastructure, tribal communities contribute to a more sustainable future for their members and
surrounding populations.
The successful implementation of Measure #1a, funded by programs like CPRG, will directly benefit the
community by creating a wide range of job opportunities in planning, engineering, and construction. Roles
such as certified electricians, project managers, and compliance specialists will be in high demand,
driving local employment. Collaboration between local and state agencies and educational institutions
can expand apprenticeship opportunities, equipping members of the tribal community with the skills
needed to fill these positions. These efforts not only support clean transportation infrastructure, but also
strengthen the community by fostering economic growth and providing stable career pathways for the
local workforce.
3.1.4 Review of Authority to Implement
The KTO has the authority to purchase/ lease alternatively fueled government fleet vehicles (such as
HEVs, PEVs, and EVs) and install supporting charging infrastructure on government-owned facilities.
These actions can provide subsequent community benefits by providing access to public vehicle charging
at many of the tribal government-owned facilities which are located throughout the tribal region. Access
to public charging at tribal facilities would be fully defined by tribal authorities and could be developed in
a way which supports both fleet operations and encourages community EV adoption by addressing public
gaps in charging access. The KTO has the authority to receive federal funds and distribute those funds
in accordance with the associated federal government grant program requirements.
3.1.5 Workforce Planning Analysis
A targeted clean energy workforce development strategy for the KTO, focused on upgrading government
and public transit fleets to low- or no-emission vehicles and expanding EV charging infrastructure, can
leverage partnerships with institutions like Gordon Cooper Technology Center (GCTC). These
collaborations can provide advanced training programs and access to cutting-edge resources (GCTC
024-04726
14
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Project No. 024-04726
Priority Climate Action Plan
January 2025
n.d.), aligning workforce development with educational frameworks to cultivate a skilled and self-reliant
workforce ready to support the transition to sustainable transportation.
Key elements of this strategy include collaborating with clean energy and automotive companies to offer
hands-on training and internships, providing participants with practical experience in EV technology and
ensuring their skills match current industry demands. Establishing apprenticeship programs is also
crucial, enabling individuals to gain on-the-job experience in vehicle electrification and charging
infrastructure installation while earning professional credentials.
Implementation of Measure #1a requires a skilled workforce that has expertise in planning, engineering,
design, and development. Workers skilled in project management will be essential for successful
deployment of transportation programs that may come out of CPRG funding opportunities. Additionally,
experts in program and policy fields will play a significant role in strategies regarding incentive programs
or other promotional efforts for the adoption of EVs. Field services will be required for construction and
installation of many of these systems, including electricians that may be required to have specific
certifications, such as the Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Training Program (EVITP), to meet federal
requirements for components like charging stations (Electrification Coalition 2023). Additionally,
compliance and regulation experts will ensure implemented components meet necessary standards.
Discretionary grant programs established through the IIJA and the IRA dedicate merit review criteria to
workforce development activities connected with the proposed scope of work. Local and state agencies
should consider formalizing relationships with local and regional institutions of higher education, as well
the secondary education system, to expand youth and registered apprenticeships in the construction
trades to meet the merit scoring criteria and advance regional workforce development goals.
To further strengthen the workforce pipeline, outreach and educational programs targeting high school
students can emphasize career paths in clean energy and electric transportation. Initiatives such as
summer camps, workshops, and guest lectures from industry experts can spark early interest and
prepare the next generation for roles in developing and maintaining low-emission transportation systems.
3.1.6 Identification of Funding Mechanisms
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) and IRA collectively represent a significant federal commitment
to advancing the development and adoption of alternative energy vehicles in the United States. The BIL
allocates substantial funds for the expansion of EV charging infrastructure, which is critical in addressing
range anxiety and promoting EV adoption. It also includes provisions for upgrading public transportation
systems to incorporate cleaner, more sustainable vehicle technologies. Complementarily, the IRA
024-04726
15
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
introduces various incentives aimed at both manufacturers and consumers. These include tax credits for
businesses involved in the production of clean vehicles and subsidies for consumers purchasing electric
or hybrid vehicles. The act also focuses on enhancing domestic manufacturing capabilities for key
components of alternative energy vehicles, such as batteries, thereby reducing dependency on foreign
supply chains and creating jobs within the U.S. Both laws, through their funding and incentives,
demonstrate a strong federal initiative towards reducing GHG emissions and fostering a transition to a
more sustainable and resilient transportation sector powered by clean energy.
3.2 Measure #1b: Transportation Sector
The proposed measure for inclusion in the KTO PCAP is as follows:
•
Expand infrastructure such as bicycle facilities, transit stops, sidewalks, and other active
transportation supporting infrastructure.
•
Update and adopt building and zoning codes and policies/long-range plans to encourage
walkable, bikeable, and transit-oriented development.
3.2.1 Rationale for Measure
The creation and/or expansion of infrastructure to support public transit, micro-mobility solutions (e.g.,
scooters, e-bikes), car sharing, bicycle-friendly paths, and pedestrian-focused routes offer diverse
alternatives to traditional modes while promoting cleaner, more sustainable travel options. Stakeholder
input highlighted that many individuals live 20 miles or more from tribal buildings where they work,
underscoring the importance of accessible and efficient transportation options for the community.
Measure #1b aims to decrease reliance on diesel-powered and gas-powered automobile trips, while
incentivizing the use of efficient, low-emission, and zero-emission transportation modes. Enhanced
infrastructure for public and non-motorized transit will reduce dependence on personal vehicles, fostering
healthier, more connected communities.
Measure #1b will focus on prioritizing infrastructure improvements such as safe access to transit buses
(preferably electric-powered or hybrid) in areas with demonstrated high demand, ensuring maximum
impact and alignment with the KTO's sustainability and mobility goals. Additionally, implementing welldesigned, people-centered active transportation infrastructure will encourage a shift toward alternative
modes of travel while enhancing safety for "vulnerable road users" (VRUs)—those who rely on nonmotorized or alternative transportation modes. Current industry design standards often prioritize
024-04726
16
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Project No. 024-04726
Priority Climate Action Plan
January 2025
automobiles, leaving VRUs at greater risk. Expanding active transportation infrastructure with thoughtful
planning and offering incentives for personal low- or zero-emission vehicles, such as e-bikes, will make
these sustainable travel options safer and more accessible for a broader segment of the tribal population.
3.2.2 Quantified GHG Reduction
There is substantial opportunity to reduce overall emissions given that approximately 36 percent of the
KTO’s regional GHG emissions are derived from the transportation sector. Measure #1b is one of two
key measures in the transportation sector designed to support the region’s net-zero emissions target by
2050. The creation and expansion of infrastructure supporting public transit, micro-mobility, car sharing,
bicycle-friendly paths, and pedestrian-focused routes directly contribute to GHG emissions reductions by
reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) from fossil fuel-powered automobiles. When individuals opt for
alternatives such as biking, walking, or using electric vehicles for short trips, it reduces the number of
VMT, which is the primary driver of transportation-related emissions. For example, replacing car trips with
cycling or walking eliminates tailpipe emissions, while the adoption of electric micro-mobility options
reduces reliance on gas-powered vehicles. As more people utilize these alternatives, the cumulative
reduction in VMT leads to a measurable decrease in GHG emissions, contributing to both local and
regional climate goals. Additionally, the promotion of public transit reduces the number of individual
vehicles on the road, further minimizing congestion and emissions, resulting in a cleaner and more
sustainable transportation system.
A compelling example of GHG emission reductions from an active transportation project in Oklahoma is
the MAPS 3 Trails Program in Oklahoma City (OKC). This program added over 80 miles of multi-use
trails throughout the city, encouraging walking, cycling, and other non-motorized transportation. By
providing safe and accessible active transportation options, the program has reduced VMT, which directly
impacts GHG emissions. OKC, with approximately 227,000 households according to the USCB's
American Community Survey (ACS), generates an estimated 2.3 million trips daily, based on typical trip
generation rates of 10 trips per household. Studies suggest that between 25 percent and 40 percent of
these trips are under two miles, which equates to roughly 575,000 to 920,000 short trips each day. If onequarter of these short trips were instead made by active transportation modes, such as walking or biking,
between 143,000 and 230,000 trips would be diverted from cars. Assuming an average trip length of one
mile, this would result in a reduction of between 52 and 84 million vehicle miles traveled per year. Given
that a typical car emits 0.81 pounds (0.0004 metric tons) of CO₂ per mile, this shift to active transportation
in OKC could reduce CO₂ emissions by between 19,051 and 30,844 metric tons annually (Plan OKC
2024; EPA 2024). This example highlights the significant impact that an active transportation program
024-04726
17
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Project No. 024-04726
Priority Climate Action Plan
January 2025
could have on reducing transportation-related emissions and promoting cleaner, more sustainable travel
options. While the population of OKC is much greater than that of the KTO, such outcomes demonstrate
the tangible emissions benefits that well-designed active transportation projects can deliver, reinforcing
their importance for the KTO’s efforts to transition toward sustainable mobility and reduce transportationrelated emissions.
3.2.3 Benefits Analysis
In addition to GHG reductions, other co-pollutant emission reductions would be realized for criteria and
hazardous air pollutants, including a resultant positive impact from reduced ozone and PM2.5 emissions,
and the associated health impacts of those emissions. New or expanded transportation infrastructure
projects that support public transit, micro-mobility solutions, car sharing, bicycles, and pedestrian modes
offer valuable opportunities to promote sustainable transportation options. Expanding infrastructure to
support public transit and non-motorized modes like walking and biking will increase access to
sustainable transportation, stimulate innovation, and foster the development of technologies and services
that make these options more accessible.
Active transit, such as walking and biking, if supported by safe infrastructure, can provide physical and
mental health benefits for individuals, further enhancing community well-being. The growth of bike lanes,
pedestrian-friendly streets, and transit hubs at tribal facilities will play a critical role in promoting
sustainable transportation while supporting economic development and enhancing quality of life. Leading
by example, such as prioritizing investment in infrastructure that facilitates these modes of travel,
demonstrates a commitment to reducing GHG emissions, improving air quality, and mitigating climate
change. These actions not only contribute to environmental preservation but also create tangible success
stories that resonate with the broader community, encouraging the adoption of cleaner transportation
alternatives.
The integration of workforce development strategies, supported by discretionary grants such as those
through the IIJA and IRA, presents a significant benefit to the community by creating new job
opportunities. Initiatives under Measure #1b will not only advance clean, active transportation
infrastructure but also stimulate regional employment growth in the construction trades. By formalizing
partnerships with local and regional educational institutions, these efforts can foster youth
apprenticeships and workforce training programs. This alignment with merit review criteria ensures a
skilled labor force, directly benefitting the community by expanding career pathways and supporting
economic development.
024-04726
18
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
3.2.4 Review of Authority to Implement
The KTO has the authority to develop and expand transportation infrastructure to support public transit,
micro-mobility solutions, car sharing, bicycles, and pedestrian modes. This includes the option to create
or enhance infrastructure that supports these alternative transportation modes and promote cleaner,
more sustainable travel options. The KTO has the authority to receive federal funds designated for
transportation infrastructure projects and distribute them according to the requirements of the respective
federal grant programs, ensuring that active transportation initiatives are prioritized and adequately
funded. Federal funds available under the Enhancement Program may be used for a maximum of 80
percent of the eligible project costs. Successful applicants must agree to provide a minimum of 20 percent
of the total project costs (ODOT n.d.). This funding can support the construction and maintenance of
necessary infrastructure to enhance transportation choices across the tribal region.
3.2.5 Workforce Planning Analysis
A comprehensive infrastructure expansion strategy for the KTO should focus on building partnerships
with institutions like GCTC to provide specialized training programs that support the development of
active transportation systems and transit-oriented communities (GCTC n.d.). These collaborations can
align workforce development with long-term urban planning goals, fostering a skilled workforce equipped
to implement and maintain sustainable infrastructure projects.
A crucial component of this strategy is the integration of hands-on training and internships in collaboration
with transportation and urban development companies. These partnerships would offer trainees realworld experience in designing, constructing, and managing bicycle facilities, transit stops, sidewalks, and
other active transportation infrastructure. Additionally, apprenticeship programs could provide on-the-job
training while participants earn credentials relevant to the fields of sustainable development and active
transportation.
To build a robust workforce pipeline, the KTO could implement outreach and educational initiatives
targeting high school students, emphasizing career opportunities in sustainable infrastructure and urban
planning. Programs such as summer workshops, design challenges, and guest lectures from industry
professionals can ignite early interest and prepare the next generation of professionals to advance
walkable, bikeable, and transit-oriented community development.
024-04726
19
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
3.2.6 Identification of Funding Mechanisms
The BIL and IRA demonstrate a strong federal commitment to advancing sustainable transportation,
particularly through active transportation initiatives. The BIL provides funding to expand public transit and
improve pedestrian, bicycle, and micro-mobility infrastructure, reducing reliance on fossil fuels, lowering
GHG emissions, and enhancing mobility options. It prioritizes safe, accessible pathways and transit
facilities to encourage walking, biking, and non-motorized travel.
The IRA complements these efforts with tax credits and subsidies for sustainable transportation projects,
such as integrating active transportation into community planning and transitioning public transit and
school buses to low- or zero-emission vehicles. It also supports domestic manufacturing for micromobility technologies, driving economic growth and job creation.
Together, the BIL and IRA offer a comprehensive approach to reducing emissions, improving air quality,
and fostering a sustainable, equitable transportation sector. Tribal nations like the KTO can leverage
these initiatives to build active transportation networks tailored to their needs. Programs such as the
DOT’s RCP Program (DOT n.d.a) and Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity
(RAISE) Program (DOT 2024) provide funding to enhance equitable access to facilities, anchor
institutions, and safer streets, while ridesharing initiatives and e-bike rebates for LIDAC communities
further promote inclusive, sustainable transportation solutions.
3.3 Measure #2: Electric Power Sector
The proposed measures for inclusion in the KTO PCAP are as follows:
•
Install renewable energy and energy storage systems on tribal government-owned facilities.
•
Develop distributed and community-scale renewable energy generation, microgrids, and
vehicle-to-grid infrastructure in disadvantaged communities, including remote and rural
regions.
3.3.1 Rationale for Measure
Approximately 32 percent of GHG emissions in the KTO are derived from the electric power sector.
During stakeholder engagement for the PCAP planning process, the KTO described ongoing, planned,
or potential activities that could gain a critical path forward with grant funding, such as CPRG. Utility
portfolios in the KTO consist primarily of fossil fuels and as such there is an opportunity for government
024-04726
20
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Project No. 024-04726
Priority Climate Action Plan
January 2025
entities to drive decarbonization efforts in the energy sector. A detailed documentation of public and
stakeholder engagement activities and input is provided in Appendix B, Stakeholder and Public
Engagement Summary.
As part of these efforts, a solar feasibility study is currently underway to explore renewable energy options
and assess the potential for solar projects to support the transition to cleaner energy sources. Both the
IIJA and the IRA provide substantial funding for green energy project deployment (The White House
2023). Programs such as the Department of Energy’s Grid Innovation Program (DOE n.d.) provide grant
support for developing and advancing clean energy generation and storage projects on both public
facilities and homes in LIDAC communities. These programs present opportunities to integrate workforce
development efforts such as skills training and educational partnerships, which will benefit LIDAC
populations, support the long-term maintenance of infrastructure investments, encourage local
management of such resources, and enhance system resilience.
In addition, the IRA’s direct pay provisions provide tribal governments with the ability to benefit from some
clean energy tax credits. Tribal governments that elect to use the direct pay provisions essentially are
reimbursed part of the cost of building a clean energy project or purchasing new clean energy vehicles
for non-personal use. Grant programs, coupled with the IRA’s direct pay provisions, allow green and
renewable energy projects more feasibility without pursuing traditional debt financing mechanisms (EPA
n.d.c).
3.3.2 Quantified GHG Reduction
Given that approximately 32 percent of the regional inventory is from the electric power sector, there is
the potential for implementation of a regional energy innovation program to have a significant impact in
reducing GHG emissions. Distributed power generation could significantly reduce the region’s GHG
emissions. As an example, Google’s Project Sunroof tool estimates that McLoud’s solar rooftop potential
could reduce annual CO2 emissions by 57,900 metric tons per year (Google 2019). While it may not be
feasible or cost-effective to cover all rooftops with solar, such an analysis demonstrates the large potential
upside with the comprehensive implementation of a program such as the one envisioned by this measure.
If 33 percent of current energy use could be replaced by zero carbon energy sources, the impact would
be an overall reduction of regional GHG emissions of almost 11 percent. The GHG emissions reduction
is largely dependent upon the amount of funding that is available for implementation of the components
contained within this measure. While a 33 percent reduction in GHG emissions in the energy sector
cannot be realized solely with CPRG funding, implementation of specific projects to provide solar
generation at government facilities, develop some solar generation on the KTO lands, and develop
024-04726
21
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
distributed solar on commercial/residential properties will significantly reduce GHG emissions and can
be a catalyst for implementing other such projects both by the KTO and by other government entities and
individuals.
3.3.3 Benefits Analysis
In addition to GHG reductions, Measure #2 initiatives yield significant co-benefits by reducing emissions
of criteria pollutants such as ozone precursors and PM2.5. These pollutants are linked to serious public
health risks, including respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses. Transitioning to sustainable energy will
lead to improved air quality, with associated health benefits that further justify these investments. Cleaner
air reduces healthcare costs and enhances overall community well-being, creating a compelling case for
prioritizing Measure #2.
The installation of renewable energy and energy storage systems on tribal-owned facilities provides a
pathway to transition toward cleaner energy sources and increased energy independence. By utilizing
solar, wind, and other renewable technologies, these projects can reduce GHG emissions and enhance
energy resilience. The integration of energy storage systems ensures a stable supply of electricity by
mitigating fluctuations in renewable energy generation, thus supporting grid reliability. Furthermore, these
initiatives can lower operational costs for tribal facilities through reduced energy expenditures while
demonstrating leadership in sustainable energy practices.
Investing in distributed and community-scale renewable energy projects also promotes energy
independence and resilience, especially in disadvantaged communities in remote and rural areas. These
localized energy systems reduce reliance on centralized power grids and enhance energy security. The
development of microgrids and vehicle-to-grid infrastructure enhances energy access and reliability,
especially during emergencies. Prioritizing these investments in underserved areas can address
historical inequities, reduce energy poverty, and support economic development through job creation and
skill-building opportunities in renewable energy sectors.
Successful implementation of Measure #2 initiatives will provide significant community benefits by
creating a skilled and diverse workforce, offering new job opportunities in planning, engineering, design,
and project management. By partnering with local and regional educational institutions, these initiatives
can foster youth apprenticeships and training programs in clean energy trades. This approach will
address current workforce needs, create long-term employment opportunities, advance regional
employment goals, and contribute to the sustained success of clean energy and transportation
infrastructure projects, all while enhancing energy independence for KTO.
024-04726
22
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Project No. 024-04726
Priority Climate Action Plan
January 2025
3.3.4 Review of Authority to Implement
The KTO has the authority to implement renewable energy, energy storage systems, and electric utility
infrastructure within its government-owned facilities. Additionally, an energy innovation program could
provide incentives to various entities and individual property owners or users. The KTO also has the
authority to receive federal funds and distribute them in compliance with the requirements of associated
federal grant programs.
3.3.5 Workforce Planning Analysis
A targeted clean energy workforce development strategy for the KTO, built on partnerships with
institutions like GCTC, can provide access to advanced training programs and cutting-edge resources
(GCTC n.d.). By aligning workforce development with educational frameworks, these collaborations will
foster a skilled and self-reliant workforce ready to tackle the challenges of sustainable development and
innovation.
A key component of this strategy would be collaborating with clean energy companies to offer hands-on
training and internships. These opportunities provide students with real-world experience and ensure
their skills align with current industry demands. Additionally, developing apprenticeship programs is
another critical aspect, enabling participants to gain practical, on-the-job experience while earning
professional credentials.
To further strengthen the workforce pipeline further, the strategy should include outreach and educational
programs targeting high school students and emphasizing clean energy career paths. Initiatives such as
summer camps, workshops, and guest lectures from industry professionals can spark early interest and
inspire the next generation to pursue careers in clean energy.
The renewable energy industry requires a diverse range of skills and expertise to design, develop, and
operate these clean energy systems. Professionals in fields such as engineering, project management,
environmental science, and technical expertise are in high demand. Additionally, organizations
overseeing program implementation will have procurement and oversight responsibilities, while field
services will be essential for the construction, installation, operation, and maintenance of these systems.
Overall, implementation of this measure is anticipated to result in an increased demand for workers,
thereby enhancing workforce development and training efforts, which will positively impact the KTO’s
economy. There are 54 programs across the IIJA and IRA that provide for green workforce development
that include recruiting, training, and hiring workers (Kane, Tomer, and Singer 2023). The IRA also
024-04726
23
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
includes tax credits and other rebate programs to support energy-related workforce development
activities. Through the IRA’s direct pay provision, the Department of the Treasury can provide tiered tax
credits to tribal entities that include workforce development activities such as registered apprenticeships
and meeting prevailing wage requirements, in their renewable energy projects.
3.3.6 Identification of Funding Mechanisms
The federal government has facilitated substantial investments that are pivotal in supporting businesses
and local authorities in the transition to clean energy economies. This allocation of funds, unprecedented
in recent history, is accessible through various programs tailored for Tribal communities and Native
populations as part of the “Investing In America” Agenda. Notably, these include $13 billion from the BIL
and an additional $700 million from the IRA. Tribes and Tribal entities are also eligible to apply for other
discretionary funding programs through both BIL and IRA.
024-04726
24
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
References
Electrification Coalition. 2023. “Preparing the Workforce for EV Charging: Electric Vehicle Infrastructure
Training
Program
(EVITP)
Factsheet.”
June
1,
2023.
https://
electrificationcoalition.org/resource/preparing-the-workforce-for-ev-charging-electric-vehicleinfrastructure-training-program-evitp-factsheet/.
Google. 2019. “Project Sunroof.” Accessed on December 12, 2024. https://sunroof.withgoogle.com/.
Gordon Cooper Technology Center (GCTC). n.d. “Workforce and Career Training: Workforce and
Economic
Development.”
Accessed
on
December
12,
2024.
https://www.gctech.edu/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=1385450&type=d&pREC_ID=2335579.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2021. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation,
and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S.
Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B.
Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New
York, NY, USA, 3056 pp., doi:10.1017/9781009325844.
Kane, Joseph W., Adie Tomer, and Anna Singer. 2023. “Research: Unlocking New Federal Infrastructure
Funding
to
Drive
Green
Workforce
Development.”
October
12,
2023.
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/unlocking-new-federal-infrastructure-funding-to-drive-greenworkforce-development/.
Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT). n.d. “Transportation Enhancement Program.”
Accessed on December 19, 2024. https://www.odot.org/projmgmt/enhance_prog/index.htm
Oklahoma State University (OSU). 2024. “The Future of Transportation: Maximizing Oklahoma’s
Potential in the EV Supply Chain.” OSU Wes Watkins Center for International Trade Development,
School of Global Studies and Partnerships. https://global.okstate.edu/partnerships/citd/sitefiles/docs/citdevsupplychainreport2024.pdf.
Plan
Oklahoma
City
(Plan
OKC).
2024.
“Topic:
Sidewalks
and
Trails.”
https://planokc.org/topics/sidewalks-trails/.
U.S. Census Bureau (USCB). 2020a. “American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates Detailed
Tables:
B01003
Total
Population.”
https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDT1Y2023.B01003?q=Population%20Total&g=010XX00US.
024-04726
25
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
USCB. 2020b. “Quick Facts.” https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/ PST045223.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 2020. “Net Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption,” National
Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), State and Local Planning for Energy (SLOPE). Accessed on
December 12, 2024. https://maps.nrel.gov/slope.
DOE. n.d. “Grid Innovation Program.” Grid Deployment Office. Accessed on December 13, 2024.
https://www.energy.gov/gdo/grid-innovation-program.
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). 2024. “Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability
and
Equity
(RAISE)
Grant
Program.”
Last
updated
November
1,
2024.
https://www.transportation.gov/RAISEgrants.
DOT. n.d. “Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods Grant Program.” Last updated on September
20, 2023. https://www.transportation.gov/grants/rcnprogram/about-rcp.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2024. “Electricity Explained: Electricity in the United
States.” Last updated on March 26, 2024. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricityin-the-us.php.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2024. “Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator.” Last
updated on November 19, 2024. https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalenciescalculator.
EPA. 2022. “Emissions and Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) Data Explorer.”
https://www.epa .gov/egrid/data-explorer.
EPA.
2020a.
“Greenhouse
Gas
Inventory
Data
Explorer.”
https://cfpub.epa.gov/ghgdata/
inventoryexplorer/.
EPA. 2020b. “National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Data Retrieval Tool.” https://awsedap.epa
.gov/public/single/?appid=20230c40-026d-494e-903f-3f112761a208&sheet=5d3fdda7-14bc-4284a9bb-cfd856b9348d&opt=ctxmenu,currsel.
EPA.
n.d.a.
“Overview
of
Greenhouse
Gases.”
Accessed
on
December
12,
2024.
https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases.
EPA. n.d.b. "Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Last updated on October 22, 2024.
https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions.
024-04726
26
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
Priority Climate Action Plan
Project No. 024-04726
January 2025
EPA. n.d.c. “Summary of Inflation Reduction Act Provisions Related to Renewable Energy.” Last updated
on October 3, 2024. https://www.epa.gov/green-power-markets/summary-inflation-reduction-actprovisions-related-renewable-energy.
EPA. n.d.d. “Understanding Global Warming Potentials.” Last updated on August 8, 2024.
https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials.
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). n.d. “Tribal and Native American Issues.” Accessed
December 12, 2024. https://www.gao.gov/tribal-and-native-american-issues.
The White House. 2023. “Building a Clean Energy Economy: A Guidebook to the Inflation Reduction
Act’s
Investments
in
Clean
Energy
and
Climate
Action.”
January
2023.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Inflation-Reduction-Act-Guidebook.pdf.
024-04726
27
Appendix A
GHG Emissions Inventory
December 2024
2020
Summary
Economic Sector
Industrial
2020 DOE NREL SLOPE
% of KTO based on Geography
Industrial Natural Gas
2020 EPA NEI
% of KTO based on Geography
Industrial Equipment
Transportation
2020 EPA NEI
% of KTO based on Geography
Electric Power
2020 DOE NREL SLOPE
% of KTO based on Geography
Industrial, Commercial, and Residential Electricity
EPA eGRID conversions - output emissions rate
Agriculture
2020 EPA GHG IDE
USGS NLCD (Croplands and Pastures)
Emissions/acre based on OK emissions in Ag Sector
Commercial
2020 DOE NREL SLOPE
% of KTO based on Geography
Commercial Natural Gas
Residential
2020 DOE NREL SLOPE
% of KTO based on Geography
Residential Natural Gas
Total
Overall Emissions per capita
Transportation Emissions per capita
Sector is x% of Sector is x% of
GHG Emissions
KTO's
OK's
emissions
(metric tons) emissions
376,538
19%
35%
731,937
36%
22%
648,045
32%
20%
45,083
2%
15%
124,215
6%
5%
107,659
5%
3%
2,033,477
42.87
15.43
Page 1 of 17
December 2024
Page 2 of 17
December 2024
Page 3 of 17
December 2024
Page 4 of 17
December 2024
Page 5 of 17
December 2024
Page 6 of 17
December 2024
Page 7 of 17
December 2024
Page 8 of 17
December 2024
Page 9 of 17
December 2024
Page 10 of 17
December 2024
Page 11 of 17
December 2024
Page 12 of 17
December 2024
Page 13 of 17
December 2024
Page 14 of 17
December 2024
Page 15 of 17
December 2024
Page 16 of 17
December 2024
Page 17 of 17
Appendix B
Stakeholder and Public Engagement Summary
INTRODUCTION
Climate Pollution Reduction Grants Program
The Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma (KTO) received a federal grant from the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) for environmental projects to reduce carbon emissions and enhance
sustainability. This grant is part of the Climate Pollution Reduction Grant (CPRG) Program and
is divided into planning and implementation. The Kickapoo Tribe received a planning grant
and hired Olsson as a consultant to lead the process, divided into two phases.
Phase One: The Priority Climate Action Plan (PCAP) was conducted in the Fall of 2024
to analyze current greenhouse gas emissions within the KTO jurisdiction in contrast to
US and Oklahoma figures, develop priority measures, and engage stakeholders.
Phase Two: Comprehensive Climate Action Plan (CCAP) conducted in the Winter and
Spring of 2025 to delve deeper into developing proposed greenhouse gas-reducing
measures, engage stakeholders and the public, and understand the landscape of the
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma and their needs.
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PLAN
Olsson developed a public engagement plan (PEP) for the PCAP process as the first
deliverable for the engagement process to guide public and stakeholder participation efforts.
The PEP was continuously updated throughout the PCAP process and will continue to be
revised throughout the larger project's CCAP and Status Report phases.
The PEP included general guidelines for the engagement process, a list of public engagement
spectrums being utilized, and a detailed schedule of engagement tactics and coordination tasks.
To view the entire PEP, see the Public Engagement Plan, which is as follows.
Phase One: Priority Climate Action Plan (PCAP)
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SPECTRUM LEVEL(S)
Inform, Consult, and Involve
PHASE ONE SUMMARY
•
The established Stakeholder Committee will serve in an advisory capacity to KTO in
developing the PCAP.
•
Multiple engagement tactics will be used to complete the activities, including two virtual
stakeholder meetings and the initial development of a project webpage.
GENERAL TIMEFRAME
October 1, 2024 through January 10, 2025.
SCHEDULE OF ENGAGEMENT TACTICS (ET) AND COORDINATION
TASKS (CT)
STATUS
x
x
TYPE
CT
CT
TASK + DESCRIPTION
Kickoff Meeting. Olsson will schedule and host a
virtual initial project kickoff meeting with KTO to
discuss the project scope, timeline, and make team
introductions.
Weekly Coordination Meetings. Olsson will
schedule, host, and prepare weekly virtual
coordination meetings.
LEAD
PARTY
DATE
Olsson
10/01/2024
4:00 PM 4:45 PM
Olsson
Thursdays
at 3pm
Olsson
10/17/24
KTO
10/17/24
KTO Weekly CPRG check-in
Public & Stakeholder Engagement Plan. Olsson
will develop and provide a Public and Stakeholder
x
CT
Engagement Plan to be reviewed by KTO and
discussed at the weekly coordination meeting.
Stakeholder Identification. KTO will create the first
draft of the stakeholder committee member list.
Olsson will review and provide comments. KTO will
x
CT
finalize the member list and gather individual contact
information for each stakeholder. KTO will be
responsible for communicating with the Stakeholder
Committee.
x
10/17/24
Weekly Coordination Meeting.
x
CT
Project Webpage Draft Content #1. Olsson will
coordinate with KTO to prepare material for the client-
Olsson
10/24/24
created project website/webpage, up to two (2) times.
KTO will create and manage the project
website/webpage.
Weekly Coordination Meeting.
x
10/24/24
Prep Meeting for Virtual Stakeholder Workshop
#1. Prior to Virtual Stakeholder Workshop #1, Olsson
x
CT
will meet virtually with KTO and lead a meeting to
discuss the draft plan for Virtual Stakeholder
Workshop #1. The purpose of this prep meeting is to
Olsson
10/24/24
gather KTO feedback on the program for Virtual
Stakeholder Workshop #1.
x
Weekly Coordination Meeting.
10/31/24
x
Weekly Coordination Meeting.
11/7/24
x
Weekly Coordination Meeting.
11/14/24
Virtual Stakeholder Workshop #1. Olsson will host
a two-hour virtual Stakeholder Workshop #1, staffed
x
ET
with three Olsson team members and KTO staff.
The meeting will focus on educating the
Reschedul
stakeholders on the purpose of the project, the
11/4/24
due to
timeline, and anticipated outcomes. This meeting
will also include a presentation on previous
ed from
Olsson
recommendations from existing related plans, if
applicable. Olsson will organize and facilitate a
weather
11/15/24
10am-
prioritization/ranking exercise to begin the
prioritization process for the PCAP. KTO will be
12pm
responsible for inviting the Stakeholder Committee.
This meeting will be recorded.
Prep Meeting for Virtual Stakeholder Workshop
#2. Prior to Stakeholder Committee Meeting #2,
Olsson will meet virtually with KTO and lead a
x
CT
meeting to discuss the draft plan for Virtual
Olsson
11/21/24
Olsson
11/29/24
Stakeholder Workshop #2. The purpose of this prep
meeting is to gather KTO feedback on the program
for Virtual Stakeholder Workshop #2.
Stakeholder Workshop #1 Summary Deliverable.
Olsson will prepare a concise summary of the
CT
process and findings from Stakeholder Committee
Meeting #1. This deliverable will be an appendix to
the PCAP.
x
x
12/5/24
Weekly Coordination Meeting.
ET
Virtual Stakeholder Workshop #2. Olsson will host
a two-hour virtual Stakeholder Workshop #2, staffed
Olsson
12/10/24
1pm-3pm
with three Olsson team members and KTO staff. It
will include a presentation of the draft prioritized
PCAP measures by KTO and Olsson and will
include commenting exercises to gather feedback
on the draft prioritized PCAP measures. For the
identified priorities, stakeholders will be asked to
help brainstorm workforce needs, barriers to
implementation, information necessary to perform
GHG and co-pollutant emission reduction or
sequestration, and benefits analysis. This meeting
will be recorded.
12/12/24
Weekly Coordination Meeting.
Stakeholder Workshop #2 Summary Deliverable.
Olsson will prepare a concise summary of the
CT
process and findings from Stakeholder Committee
Meeting #2. This deliverable will be an appendix to
Olsson
12/18/24
the PCAP.
12/19/24
Weekly Coordination Meeting.
Project Webpage Draft Content #2. Olsson will
CT
coordinate with KTO to prepare material for the
client-created project website/webpage, up to two
Olsson
12/30/24
Olsson
12/30/24
(2) times. KTO will create and manage the project
website/webpage.
Engagement Summary. (Complete for Phase 100 CT
PCAP). Olsson will finalize the complete
engagement summary for the PCAP phase,
including a summary of Virtual Stakeholder
Workshops #1 & #2.
STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE
In coordination with the consultant team, KTO identified potential members for the stakeholder
committee. These members were identified, in part, because of their eligibility to participate in
the CPRG implementation grant process and/or their ability to implement the identified priority
action items. KTO worked to ensure representation from a variety of sectors. Email invitations
were extended to the identified stakeholders to join the committee. The following table lists the
invited stakeholder committee.
Category
Organization
Contact
Chairman of the Business Committee
KTO
Darwin Kaskaske
Vice-Chairperson of the Business Committee
KTO
Marlon Frye
Treasurer of the Business Committee
KTO
Martine Mahtapene
Councilperson of the Business Committee
KTO
Evel Green
Secretary of the Business Committee
KTO
Patricia Gonzales
Executive Director
KTO
Mindi Kee
Environmental Department
KTO
Rebekah Bussen
Environmental Department
KTO
Rachel Harley
Environmental Department
KTO
Kara Davis
Environmental Department
KTO
Darren Shields
Planning & Engagement
Olsson
Michelle Queen
Environmental Sciences
Olsson
Julianne Whitaker
Environmental Infrastructure
Olsson
Nick Steinke
Planning & Engagement
Olsson
Lauren Hildreth
Planning & Engagement
Olsson
Stacey Roach
Environmental Sciences
Olsson
Katrina Wille
Business Development
Olsson
Craig Parrish
Project Partners
City / County Representatives
Lincoln County Commissioner
Lee Doolen
Pottawatomie County Commissioner
Melissa Dennis
Transportation
Transportation
ODOT
Bart Vleugels
Tribal Driveways
KTO
Susan Tiger
AARP Livable Community Transportation
AARP
Mashell Sourjohn
Oklahoma Baptist University
Dr. Heath A. Thomas
Education and Training
Gordon Cooper Technology Center
Julie McCormick
Tribal Education Dept
KTO
Ramona Wahpepah
Tribal Education Dept
KTO
Jennifer Onzawah
KTO Health Director
KTHC
Wayne Irion
Tribal Human Resources
KTO
Martha Hernandez
Education/Health
Local College
University of Oklahoma
State College/University
Dept of Geography and Env.
Laurel Smith
School Board/District
McLoud Public Schools
Rhonda Hockenbury
McLoud Public Schools
Melanne Greenwood
Housing Authority of the KTO
HAKTO
Judy Shed
Realty Property and UNTIY Coordinator
KTO
Anya Mottern
Community & Human Services
POGO
Lindsay Goodson
KTO Casino
Randy Dougan
KTO
Tracy Qualls
KTO
Dana Deere
KTO
Jeffery Hairston
Director of Tax Commission
KTO
Nathan Christmon
Finance
KTO
Sam Caruso
School Board/District
Community Partners
Industry-Energy
Tribal Utility Superintendent
Building/Construction
Economic Development
Natural Resources
Natural Resources
Grants
Planning and Grants
Additional Stakeholders
MARKETING AND OUTREACH EFFORTS
Marketing and outreach tools during the PCAP phase included email newsletters and a project
webpage that provided general information about the CPRG program, the PCAP process, and
the purpose of the planning effort. The PCAP outreach efforts were targeted at the stakeholders
committee, while the CCAP engagement will have a greater reach into the KTO community and
beyond.
Project Webpage
KTO hosted and updated a project webpage on the Department of Environmental Programs
website. The page included information regarding Climate Pollution Reduction Grants and
planning phases, public and stakeholder outreach, greenhouse gas emissions information, and
additional resources.
PHASE ONE: PRIORITY CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (PCAP)
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Stakeholder Committee Meeting #1 Summary (PCAP)
To assist in creating the PCAP portion of the KTO CPRG Plan, a virtual stakeholder committee
meeting was held on November 15, 2024, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. via Microsoft Teams to
educate and connect stakeholders with specific interests and influence on the project and
gather input on topics and measures. Due to inclement weather affecting Oklahoma, the
meeting was rescheduled from the original date of November 4, 2024.
Stakeholders were identified by KTO, as previously described in the Stakeholder Committee
section, and invited via email to attend. Attendees included representatives from tribal, nonprofit, and other government sectors. For a complete list of meeting attendees, see PCAP
Stakeholder Committee Meeting #1 Attendees. Representatives from KTO and the
consultant team facilitated the meeting. The meeting goals and agenda were shared with
participants prior to the meeting:
Goals
•
Educate stakeholders on the purpose of the project, timeline, and anticipated outcomes
•
•
•
Share info on recent notice of funding opportunities for implementation
Overview of Greenhouse Gas Emissions statistics
Obtain feedback from the stakeholders on priority categories moving forward
Agenda
•
•
•
•
•
Housekeeping + Introductions
PCAP Purpose, Coordination, and Activities
o Overview of CPRG Program and Priority/Comprehensive Climate Action Plans
o Description of KTO CPRG Grant Activity
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions by sector in U.S., Oklahoma, Kickapoo Reservation
Example Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures by sector
Next Steps
o Events / Deliverables:
December 10, 2024 – Virtual Stakeholder Meeting #2 (1PM-3PM)
January 31, 2025 - CCAP
PAP Stakeholder Committee Meeting #1 Attendees
Mashell Sourjohn, AARP
Anja Mottern, KTO Realty Property and UNTIY Coordinator
Jeff Hairston, KTO Planning and Grants
Susan Tiger, KTO Tribal Driveways
Wayne C. Irion, KTO Health Director
Sam Caruso, KTO Finance
Julie McCormick, Gordon Cooper Technology Center
Rachel Harley, KTO Environmental Department
Suhaila Nease
Darren Shields, KTO
Rebekah Bussen, KTO
Lauren Hildreth, Olsson
Julianne Whitaker, Olsson
Nick Steinke, Olsson
Stacey Roach, Olsson
Katrina Wille, Olsson
Stakeholder Meeting #1 Discussion
For most attendees of the first stakeholder meeting, this was their first introduction to the CPRG
process and the PCAP phase. Below are summaries of the comments from attendees.
Darren Shields (KTO) and Nick Steinke (Olsson) discussed the two priority sectors of
transportation and power, particularly around vehicle dependency of Tribal employees
and lack of public transit opportunity. Darren expressed the possibility of park and ride or
carpooling initiatives.
Darren Shields also discussed an active solar feasibility study and the desire to invest
in solar infrastructure, on ground level or mounted on buildings. The study will provide
recommendations.
Rebekah Bussen (KTO) also discussed individual vehicle usage as a large obstacle
and main emission producer. She asked to hear from other stakeholders about what
programs they think would make an impact, such as commute incentives, composting,
and hybrid or electric vehicles.
Julie McCormick (Gordon Cooper Technology Center) is part of a partner advisory
committee with Shawnee Public Schools. They currently have four electric school buses
and will receive four more through a grant, totaling eight. They are working with a
company that specifically produces electric buses and wondered if she could provide
some information or contacts, and if that company would be interested in conversations
with the tribe.
Julie also shared that the grant Shawnee Public Schools received is in two
phases, and they are currently in phase one. It’s called the Recharge Grant,
provided by the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences division. John Wiles, the
transportation director at Shawnee, initiated this effort for the district.
Darren and Rebekah responded positively, saying they would connect with
Julie.
Julie commented that OG&E is working to enable electric buses to supply power to
buildings during crises. The second phase of their grant focuses on developing this
capability, ensuring safe energy transmission from bus batteries to buildings without
causing damage. She sees this aligning with KTO’s grant interests as well.
Stakeholder Committee Meeting #2 Summary (PCAP)
To continue the development of the PCAP , a second virtual stakeholder committee meeting
was held on December 10, 2024, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. via Microsoft Teams to gather
additional information about PCAP priority industries and feasible measures.
Additional stakeholders were identified by KTO, including those previously described in
Stakeholder Committee, and invited via email to attend. For a complete list of meeting
attendees, see PCAP Stakeholder Committee Meeting #2 Attendees. Representatives from
KTO and the consultant team facilitated the meeting. The meeting goals and agenda were
shared with participants prior to the meeting:
Goals
•
•
•
•
[Recap] Virtual Stakeholder Meeting #1 – project purpose, timeline, anticipated
outcomes, engagement results, etc.
Share recent stakeholder outreach efforts and results
Share preliminary analysis of GHG inventory in KTO
Obtain feedback from the stakeholders on a list of proposed measures for the PCAP
Agenda
•
•
•
•
•
Housekeeping + Introductions
[Recap] Overview of PCAP Purpose, Coordination and Activities
o Purpose
o Overview of CPRG Program
o Priority/Comprehensive Climate Action Plans
o Description of KTO CPRG Grant Activity
o Stakeholder Engagement
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis
o Basics of Climate Change + What is a GHG?
o Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector in the U.S., Oklahoma, KTO
o Recent Stakeholder Outreach Efforts
Proposed Priority Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures for KTO
o Review Priority Action Plan Measures + key elements of NOFO for each
o [Discuss] Review proposed measures and identify implementation partners
Next Steps
o Plan Approval Process
o Events / Deliverables:
December 31, 2024 - KTO PCAP to EPA
January 1 – July 30, 2025 – CCAP
PAP Stakeholder Committee Meeting #2 Attendees
Anja Mottern, KTO Realty Property and UNTIY Coordinator
Jeff Hairston, KTO Planning and Grants
Sam Caruso, KTO Finance
Julie McCormick, Gordon Cooper Technology Center
Darren Shields, KTO
Rebekah Bussen, KTO
Lauren Hildreth, Olsson
Julianne Whitaker, Olsson
Nick Steinke, Olsson
Stacey Roach, Olsson
Katrina Wille, Olsson
Stakeholder Meeting #2 Discussion
Below are summaries of the comments from attendees.
Darren Shields (KTO) requested that Sam Caruso (KTO Finance Director) share his
thoughts.
Sam responded that considering how these initiatives could apply to the tribe,
transportation stands out due to the high vehicle usage without any greenhouse
initiatives and the tribe should develop a plan for this. While wind turbines aren’t feasible,
solar energy and panels are viable options. He asked Jeff Harrison (KTO Planning
and Grants) to discuss solar initiatives and ways to reduce greenhouse gases using
solar energy.
Jeff responded that they have been working with Olsson on a solar feasibility study (also
mentioned by Darren in the first stakeholder meeting). Nick Steinke (Olsson) confirmed
that the study should be available in January 2025. Jeff said that there are 15 buildings
on campus, and they’re considering solar panels for some, especially the Health Center
offices due to their suitable roof lines, and potentially the casino. They are waiting for
Olsson's suggestions and the final plan before proceeding. He is also uncertain about
available grants for tribal entities to support these initiatives.
Nick Steinke (Olsson) expressed that Olsson is as part of developing the priority climate action
plan it includes measures for the electric power sector and renewable energy assets. The solar
feasibility study will identify feasible and cost-effective locations. The (CPRG) plan and (Solar
Feasibility) study, together, will create a strong case for securing funding and set KTO up for
success. Nick also said that funding strategists at Olsson have assisted other similar projects
(Muscogee Creek Nation and NWA Regional Planning Commission) and could help KTO
identify funding mechanisms.
Sam Caruso (KTO Finance Director) followed up that transportation is a major focus due to its
significant greenhouse emissions, as highlighted by Katrina (Olsson). It’s crucial to include this
in our overall plan. Additionally, he believes the Kickapoo Tribe’s agricultural practices should
be examined for ways to reduce greenhouse gases. Collaborating with the agricultural
department to develop a plan makes sense. Sam asked if Darren had any updates on
transportation initiatives or other relevant activities.
Darren replied that for the commercial fleet, it’s unclear what types of vehicles the tribe
has or their greenhouse gas contributions. Gradually transitioning to hybrid or electric
vehicles is one approach and adopting policies for new buildings to include electrical
hookups is another. He expressed that this is just the beginning, and Rebekah might
have more to add, particularly about the Highway 102 expansion.
Rebekah Bussen (KTO) agreed that, yes, transportation is a major contributor to
greenhouse gas emissions. One project she is pursuing is to add a multimodal bike and
walking lanes along Highway 102 to connect campuses and reduce vehicle use. She
also thinks transitioning to hybrid or electric fleet vehicles is important. Encouraging
employees to make eco-friendly choices, like carpooling or using electric vehicles, is
crucial. Rebekah added that stakeholder input on feasible policies to reduce emissions,
including work-from-home days and carpooling initiatives, is needed.
Nick Steinke (Olsson) followed up that transitioning to electric vehicles (EVs) should be
gradual, focusing on older fleet vehicles first. An EV Readiness Plan can help phase in
changes over the next 5-20 years. He also commented that while electric is the future,
current reliance on fossil fuels means hybrids might be more efficient now, particularly in
rural areas or where the EV grid system will take longer to develop. Nick also
commented that a hybrid vehicle (like his) that gets 50 miles to the gallon on gas actually
has a lower greenhouse gas footprint (in Lincoln) than an electric car does because the
power generation comes mainly from fossil fuel. The goal is to gradually update the fleet
without needing to switch all vehicles at once and potentially have a diversified fleet of
hybrid and full electric vehicles.
Jeff Hairston (KTO Planning and Grants) asked about the other vehicles KTO has for
programs such as education, daycare, head start, and nutrition and the regular routes these
vehicles take, potentially multiple times per day. He wondered if there’s an opportunity to
combine regular, daily trips using one vehicle to multiple stops, potentially even buses that
serve these programs. Could these vehicles or buses be upgraded to EV or hybrid, moving
away from diesel.
Darren responded that the Health Center has 43 vehicles that are for a variety of
purposes including maintenance, diabetes services, and other services.
Jeff commented on the number of vehicles in the full tribe’s fleet that could be
inventoried and part of a plan to upgrade. Jeff also expressed concern for vehicles
traversing Eagle Pass, wondering if EVs would be able to handle the trip, but that there
are regular trips made. It might be a route to look at for a higher efficiency vehicle.
Julie McCormick (Gordon Cooper Technology Center) shared that some public school
partners are interested in electric school buses (also discussed during the first stakeholder
meeting), but current models don’t last long enough for their routes. They need buses with
double the current range. There’s also a challenge in finding mechanics trained for various
electric vehicle brands, as each requires specialized training. She explained that general
training and certifications are provided for the vehicle/bus purchased, but specific brand
knowledge is limited. Electricians are increasingly taking jobs in transportation due to their
electrical expertise, showing the intermingling of these professions. Julie said that workforce
training and development around EVs will also be needed.
KTO PRIORITY CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
January 2025
Olsson Project No. 024-04726
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.