Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal RegisterMar 18, 2009
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project:
National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program: Phase VI—NEW.
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center of Mental Health Services is responsible for the national evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program (Children's Mental Health Initiative—CMHI) that will collect data on child mental health outcomes, family life, and service system development and performance. Data will be collected on 26 service systems, and approximately 5,541 children and families.
Data collection for this evaluation will be conducted over a five-year period. Child and family outcomes of interest will be collected at intake and during subsequent follow-up sessions at six-month intervals. The length of time that individual families will participate in the study ranges from 12 to 24 months depending upon when they enter the evaluation. The outcome measures include the following: Child symptomatology and functioning, family functioning, satisfaction, and caregiver strain. The core of service system data will be collected every 18-24 months throughout the 5-year evaluation period, with a sustainability survey conducted in years 3 and 5. Service utilization and cost data will be tracked and submitted to the national evaluation every six months using two tools: The Flex Fund Tool and the Services and Costs Data Tool to estimate average cost of treatment per child, distribution of costs, and allocation of costs across service categories. Service delivery and system variables of interest include the following: Maturity of system of care development in funded system of care communities, adherence to the system of care program model, and client service experience. We will also conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the CMHI's data driven technical assistance; this component of the evaluation will employ a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative data to provide a comprehensive assessment of the continuous quality improvement (CQI) process in funded system of care
communities. Specifically, data will be gathered through three complementary activities: A baseline survey of key constituents in all funded communities; a subsequent monitoring survey administered every two years to the same constituents; and biennial case studies of four selected communities.
In addition, the evaluation will include three special studies: (1) The sector specific assessment and quasi-experimental comparison study will examine in more detail the outcomes and service experience of children from multiple child-serving sectors and, through child-level matching, compare these outcomes with those not receiving system of care services; (2) The Alumni Network Study will examine the effectiveness of the system of care Alumni Network Web site by evaluating end-user satisfaction and usability of the Web site and will also assess the collaboration between communities via a Web-based Networking and Collaboration Survey that will measure the nature and extent of the interaction between communities; (3) The Study of State Strategies for Sustainability will examine the State's role in sustaining communities after Federal funding ceases and describe effective strategies for sustaining funded systems of care. A short version of the sustainability survey developed for this evaluation will be used to gather this information.
Internet-based technology such as Web-based surveys and data entry and management tools will be used in this evaluation. The measures of the national evaluation address the national outcome measures for mental health programs as currently established by SAMHSA.
The average annual respondent burden is estimated below. The estimate reflects the average number of respondents in each respondent category, the average number of responses per respondent per year, the average length of time it will take to complete each response, and the total average annual burden for each category of respondent, and for all categories of respondents combined.
Instrument
Respondent
Number of
respondents
Total average number of
responses per respondent
Hours per response
Total
burden hours
5-Year
average
annual burden hours
System-of-care Assessment
Interview Guides A-I, L-R
Key site informants
546
3
1.0
1,638
328
Child and Family Outcome Study
Caregiver Information Questionnaire (CIQ-IC)
Caregiver
5,541
1
0.4
2,032
406
Caregiver Information Questionnaire Follow-up (CIQ-FC)
Caregiver
5,541
4
0.3
6,280
1,256
Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ)
Caregiver
5,541
5
0.2
4,627
925
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)/ Child Behavior Checklist 1
1/2
-5/6-18
Caregiver
5,541
5
0.3
9,226
1,845
Education Questionnaire—Revised (EQ-R)
Caregiver
5,541
5
0.3
9,226
1,845
Living Situations Questionnaire (LSQ)
Caregiver
5,541
5
0.1
2,300
460
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale-Second Edition, Parent Rating Scale (BERS-2C)
Caregiver
4,931
5
0.2
4,117
823
Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS)
Caregiver
4,931
5
0.1
2,046
409
Parenting Stress Index (PSI)
Caregiver
1,528
5
0.1
637
127
Deveraux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA)
Caregiver
1,528
5
0.1
637
127
Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale—Second Edition, Parent Rating Scale (PBERS)
Caregiver
1,528
5
0.1
764
153
Delinquency Survey—Revised (DS-R)
Youth
3,452
5
0.1
2,301
460
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale—Second Edition, Youth Rating Scale (BERS-2Y)
Youth
3,452
5
0.2
2,882
576
Gain-Quick Substance Related Issues
Youth
3,452
5
0.1
1,433
287
Substance Use Survey—Revised (SUS-R)
Youth
3,452
5
0.1
1,726
345
Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scales (RCMAS)
Youth
3,452
5
0.1
863
173
Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale—Second Edition (RADS-2)
Youth
3,452
5
0.1
863
173
Youth information Questionnaire—Baseline (YIQ-I)
Youth
3,452
1
0.3
863
173
Youth information Questionnaire—Follow-up (YIQ-F)
Youth
3,452
4
0.3
3,452
690
Service Experience Study
Multi-Sector Service Contacts—Revised—Intake (MSSC-R-I)
Caregiver
5,541
1
0.3
1,385
277
Multi-Sector Service Contacts—Revised—Follow-up (MSSC-R-F)
Caregiver
5,541
4
0.3
5,541
1,108
Cultural Competence and Service Provision Questionnaire—Revised (CCSP-R)
Caregiver
5,541
4
0.1
2,955
591
Youth Services Survey—Family (YSS-F)
Caregiver
5,541
4
0.1
2,593
519
Youth Services Survey (YSS)
Youth
3,452
4
0.1
1,146
229
Juvenile Justice Study
Delinquency Survey—Revised—JJ Addendum (DS-R-JJ)
Youth
405
5
0.0
68
14
Court Representative Questionnaire
Court representatives
212
5
0.2
177
35
Electronic Data Transfer of Juvenile Justice Records
Key site personnel
212
5
0.0
35
7
Education Study
Teacher Questionnaire
Teacher
212
5
0.3
265
53
School Administrator Questionnaire
School administrators
212
5
0.2
177
35
Electronic Data Transfer of Education Records
Key site personnel
212
5
0.0
35
7
Child Welfare Study
Child Welfare Sector Study Questionnaire—Intake (CWSQ-I)
Care coordinators
487
1
0.5
244
49
Child Welfare Sector Study Questionnaire—Follow-up (CWSQ-F)
Care coordinators
487
4
0.5
974
195
Sustainability Study
Sustainability Survey: Brief Form
Project Director
79
2
0.2
26
5
Sustainability Survey
Providers
180
2
0.8
270
54
Sustainability Survey
Caregiver
60
2
0.8
90
18
CQI Effectiveness Evaluation
CQI Baseline Survey, Web-based
Key site personnel
208
1
0.5
104
21
CQI Monitoring Survey, Web-based
Key site personnel
208
2
0.5
208
42
Local Focus Group Guide
Key site personnel
30
2
1.0
60
12
National Focus Group Guide
National TA providers
20
2
1.0
40
8
Alumni Networking Study
Networking and Collaboration Survey
Key site personnel
236
4
0.5
472
94
Alumni Network Satisfaction Survey
Key site personnel, nat'l TA providers, Branch staff
458
3
0.3
344
69
Services and Costs Study
Flex Funds Data Dictionary/Tool
Local programming staff compiling/entering administrative data on children/youth
1,306
3
0.0
129
26
Services and Costs Data Dictionary/Data Entry Application
Local evaluator, staff at partner agencies, and programming staff compiling/entering service and cost records on children/youth
5,541
100
0.1
27,705
5,541
Respondent
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses/
respondent
Average
burden/
response
Total average annual burden
Caregiver
5,541
0.9
2.2
10,891
Youth
3,452
0.9
1.0
3,119
Provider/Administrator
546
10.5
1.1
6,580
Total
9,539
20,591
Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, Room 7-1044, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 and e-mail her a copy at
summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov
. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice.
March 11, 2009.
Elaine Parry,
Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E9-5803 Filed 3-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.