Notice of Availability of the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Designation of Energy Corridors on Federal Land in the 11 Western States, Including Proposed Amendments to Selected Land Use Plans LLW0350000.L14300000.PN0000

Federal RegisterNov 28, 2008

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Notice of Availability of the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Designation of Energy Corridors on Federal Land in the 11 Western States, Including Proposed Amendments to Selected Land Use Plans LLW0350000.L14300000.PN0000

AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION:

Notice of availability.

SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Department of Energy (DOE) as co-lead agencies, and the U.S. Forest Service (FS) of the Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Department of Defense (DOD), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) of the Department of the Interior (DOI) as cooperating Federal Agencies (the Agencies) announce the availability of the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Designation of Energy Corridors on Federal Land in the 11 Western States (Final PEIS) (DOE/EIS-0386) that also proposes to amend 138 land use plans.

The Coeur d'Alene Tribe, the California Energy Commission (CEC), the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the State of Wyoming, and the Lincoln, Sweetwater, and Uinta counties and conservation districts in Wyoming are also cooperating agencies. The Department of Commerce (DOC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) are consulting agencies.

The Agencies prepared the Final PEIS pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321

et seq.

; the Council on Environmental Quality NEPA regulations, 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508; the DOE NEPA regulations, 10 CFR Part 1021; Compliance with Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements, 10 CFR Part 1022; the BLM planning regulations, 43 CFR subpart 1610; and applicable FS planning regulations.

Section 368 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005), Public Law 109-58, directs the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, and the Interior, in consultation with FERC, states, tribal or local units of governments, as appropriate; affected utility industries; and other interested persons to designate, under their respective authorities, corridors on Federal land in the 11 Western States for oil, gas, and hydrogen pipelines as well as electricity transmission and distribution facilities; perform any environmental reviews that may be required to complete the designation of such corridors; and incorporate the designated corridors into relevant agency land use and resource management plans or equivalent plans.

The 11 Western States are Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

DATES:

Copies of the Final PEIS were distributed beginning November 20, 2008 to Members of Congress, American Indian Tribal governments, state and local governments, other Federal agencies, and organizations and individuals who are known to have an interest in the Final PEIS.

The DOI, USDA and DOD would issue separate Records of Decision (ROD) to amend selected land use plans for the purpose of designating EPAct 2005 Section 368 corridors no sooner than 30 days after the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the Notice of Availability of the Final PEIS. BLM's ROD must also await a 60-day Governors' Consistency Review in accordance with 43 CFR 1610.3-2.

ADDRESSES:

Send written requests for compact discs (CD) or printed copies of the Final PEIS to: West-wide Energy Corridor Final PEIS, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Bldg. 900, Mailstop 4, Argonne, IL 60439; by toll-free fax: 1-866-542-5904; or order online at

http://corridoreis.anl.gov

.

The Final PEIS consists of a stand alone Summary, the PEIS Chapters (Volume 1-648 pages), the Appendices (Volume 2-564 pages), Maps (Volume 3-148 pages), and Comments and Responses (Volume 4-174 pages). The Final PEIS Volume 3 map atlas is printed on 11x17-inch paper. The CD version of the Final PEIS includes the map atlas in PDF format. The most powerful and flexible version of the map data is available on the project Web site (

http://corridoreis.anl.gov

). The Web site maps are available within a geographic information system (GIS) database that allows users to merge, enlarge, and view multiple map-data layers. Software and instructions to use the GIS data are user-friendly and available for free download on the Web site. The Final PEIS is available on the project Web site at

http://corridoreis.anl.gov

, on the DOE NEPA Web site at

http://www.gc.energy.gov/nepa

, and at the following reading room locations:

• The BLM state and field offices and FS regional offices in the 11 Western States, and

• The DOE Freedom of Information Act Office and Reading Room, Room 1E-190, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585; phone 202-586-3142.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For information on the Final PEIS, please contact Kate Winthrop, BLM, WO-350, MS 1000 LS, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240; by phone: 202-452-5051; or by e-mail:

kate_winthrop@blm.gov

.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Agencies prepared the Final PEIS to implement Section 368 of EPAct to designate preferred locations for future

oil, gas, and hydrogen pipelines as well as electricity transmission and distribution facilities and to incorporate the designated corridors into the relevant agencies' land use and resource management plans or equivalent plans. Section 368 directs the Agencies to take into account the need for upgraded and new infrastructure and to take actions to improve reliability, relieve congestion, and enhance the capability of the national grid to deliver energy. This action only pertains to the designation of corridors for potential facilities on Federal lands located within the 11 Western States.

In addition, Section 368 is intended to improve coordination among the Agencies to increase the efficiency of using designated corridors. In many areas of the United States, including the West, the infrastructure required to deliver energy has not always kept pace with growth in energy demand. The Agencies hope to improve the delivery of energy, while enhancing the electric transmission grid for the future, by establishing a coordinated network of Federal energy corridors on Federal lands in the West. The Final PEIS analyzes the environmental impacts of designating Federal energy corridors in 11 Western States and incorporating those designations into relevant agency land use and resource management plans or equivalent plans.

The Agencies are preparing this PEIS at the designation stage because they believe it is an appropriate time to examine environmental concerns at the programmatic level. Impacts that affect the quality of the environment will only occur after specific proposals are submitted, analyzed through the NEPA process, and approved by the land management agency. The Agencies expect that the PEIS will greatly assist subsequent site-specific analyses for individual project proposals by allowing the Agencies to incorporate this PEIS into those later analyses.

The Final PEIS analyzes a No Action Alternative and a Proposed Action. Under the No Action Alternative, Federal energy corridors would not be designated on Federal lands in the 11 Western States. The siting and development of future energy transport projects would continue under current agency procedures for granting rights-of-way (ROW). Under the Proposed Action, the Agencies would designate and incorporate identified Federal energy corridors that would consist of existing, locally designated Federal energy corridors together with additional, newly designated energy corridors located on Federal land into relevant land use and resource management plans. The Proposed Action is the Agencies' preferred alternative.

These energy corridors would comprise a comprehensive, coordinated network of preferred locations for future energy projects that could be developed to satisfy demand for energy. Under the Proposed Action, approximately 6,120 miles of Federal energy corridors would be designated on Federal lands within the 11 Western States as the preferred location for oil, natural gas, and hydrogen pipelines as well as electricity transmission and distribution lines. Environmental, engineering, and land use screening criteria were applied during the development of the Proposed Action to reduce potential environmental and land use conflicts. The energy corridors would typically be 3,500 feet wide, although the width may vary in certain areas due to environmental, topographic, or management constraints. The DOI, USDA and DOD would amend their respective land use or equivalent plans to incorporate the designated energy corridors; the amendments would be effective upon signing of the relevant agency's ROD.

The policies and Interagency Operating Procedures (IOPs) developed under the Proposed Action would establish minimum requirements for the management of future individual energy transport projects. The proposed policies identify management objectives and address the administration of energy transport development activities. The proposed IOPs identify required management procedures that would need to be incorporated into future project-specific energy transport development proposals. The Proposed Action would amend a total of 138 (93 BLM, 38 FS, 4 DOD, and 3 NPS) land use and equivalent plans in the 11 Western States. The proposed land use plan amendments would incorporate the programmatic energy transport development policies and IOPs set forth in the Final PEIS. The proposed land use plan amendments would facilitate preparation and consideration of future energy transport development ROW applications on DOI-, USDA-, and DOD-administered lands in these states, but would not eliminate the need for site-specific NEPA analysis of individual development proposals.

The Agencies propose to amend the following land use management plans, itemized in appendix A of the Final PEIS:

Land Use or Equivalent Plans Proposed for Amendment to Incorporate Epact Section 368 Energy Corridors on Federal Lands in the 11 Western States

State land use plan

Agency office(s)

Arizona

Apache-Sitgreaves NS LRMP

FS, Apache-Sitgreaves NF

Arizona Strip RMP

BLM, Arizona Strip FO

Coronado NF LRMP

FS, Coronado NF

Glen Canyon NRA GMP

NPS, Glen Canyon NRA

Kaibab NF LRMP

FS, Kaibab NF

Kingman RMP

BLM, Kingman FO

Lake Havasu RMP

BLM, Lake Havasu FO

Lower Gila North MFP

BLM, Hassayampa FO

Lower Gila South RMP

BLM, Hassayampa FO

Lower Sonoran RMP

BLM, Lower Sonoran FO

Phoenix RMP

BLM, Hassayampa FO

Prescott NF LRMP

FS, Prescott NF

Safford RMP

BLM, Safford FO

Tonto NF LRMP

FS, Tonto NF

Yuma Proving Ground INRMP

DOD, U.S. Army, Yuma Proving Ground

Yuma RMP

BLM, Yuma FO

California

Alturas RMP

BLM, Alturas FO

Angeles NF LRMP

FS, Angeles NF

Bishop RMP

BLM, Bishop FO

California Desert Conservation Area Plan

BLM, Barstow FO, El Centro FO, Lake Havasu FO, Needles FO, Ridgecrest FO, Palm Springs-South Coast FO

China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station INRMP

DOD, U.S. Navy, China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station

Cleveland NF LRMP

FS, Cleveland NF

Eagle Lake RMP

BLM, Eagle Lake FO

Inyo NF LRMP

FS, Inyo NF

Klamath NF LRMP

FS, Klamath NF

Lassen NF LRMP

FS, Lassen NF

Modoc NF LRMP

FS, Modoc NF

Redding RMP

BLM, Redding FO

San Bernadino NF LRMP

FS, San Bernadino NF

Shasta-Trinity NF LRMP

FS, Shasta-Trinity NF

Sierra RMP

BLM, Folsom FO

Six Rivers NF LRMP

FS, Six Rivers NF

South Coast RMP

BLM, Palm Springs-South Coast FO

Surprise RMP

BLM, Surprise FO

Tahoe NF LRMP

FS, Tahoe NF

Toiyabe NF LRMP

FS,Toiyabe NF

Colorado

Arapaho-Roosevelt NF and Pawnee NG LRMP

FS, Arapaho-Roosevelt NF and Pawnee NG

Curecanti NCA GMP

NPS, Curecanti NRA

Glenwood Springs RMP

BLM, Glenwood Springs FO

Grand Junction RMP

BLM, Grand Junction FO

Grand Mesa-Uncompahgre-Gunnison NF LRMP

FS, Grand Mesa-Uncompahgre-Gunnison NF

Gunnison RMP

BLM, Gunnison FO

Kremmling RMP

BLM, Kremmling FO

Little Snake RMP

BLM, Little Snake FO

Routt NF LRMP

FS, Routt-Medicine Bow NF, Thunder Basin NG

Royal Gorge RMP

BLM, Royal Gorge FO

Pike-San Isabel NF LRMP

FS, Pike-San Isabel NF

San Juan NF LRMP

FS, San Juan NF

San Juan/San Miguel RMP

BLM, Dolores FO, Uncompahgre FO

Uncompahgre Basin RMP

BLM, Uncompahgre FO

White River RMP

BLM, White River FO

Idaho

Big Desert MFP

BLM, Upper Snake FO

Bruneau MFP

BLM, Bruneau FO

Caribou-Targhee NF LRMP

FS, Caribou-Targhee NF

Cassia RMP

BLM, Burley FO

Coeur d'Alene RMP

BLM, Coeur d'Alene FO

Idaho Panhandle NF LRMP

FS, Idaho Panhandle NF

Jarbidge RMP

BLM, Bruneau FO, Four Rivers FO, Jarbridge FO

Kuna MFP

BLM, Four Rivers FO

Medicine Lodge RMP

BLM, Upper Snake FO

Monument RMP

BLM, Burley FO, Shoshone FO

Pocatello RMP

BLM, Pocatello FO

Owyhee RMP

BLM, Four Rivers FO, Owyhee FO

Twin Falls MFP

BLM, Burley FO

Montana

Beaverhead-Deerlodge NF LRMP

FS, Beaverhead-Deerlodge NF

Billings RMP

BLM, Billings FO

Dillon RMP

BLM, Dillon FO

Garnet RMP

BLM, Missoula FO

Headwaters RMP

BLM, Butte FO

Lolo NF LRMP

FS, Lolo NF

Nevada

Black Rock-High Rock Emigrant Trail NCA RMP

BLM, Winnemucca FO

Carson City FO Consolidated RMP

BLM, Carson City FO

Elko RMP

BLM, Elko FO

Ely RMP

BLM, Ely FO

Hawthorne Army Depot INRMP

DOD, U.S. Army, Hawthorne AD

Humboldt NF LRMP

FS, Humboldt-Toiyabe NF

Lake Mead NRA GMP

NPS, Lake Mead NRA

Las Vegas RMP

BLM, Las Vegas FO

Nellis AFB Plan 126-4 INRMP

DOD, U.S. Air Force, Nellis AFB

Paradise-Denio MFP

BLM, Winnemucca FO

Sonoma Gerlach MFP

BLM, Winnemucca FO

Surprise RMP

BLM, Surprise FO

Toiyabe NF LRMP

FS, Humboldt-Toiyabe NF

Tonopah RMP

BLM, Battle Mountain FO

Wells RMP

BLM, Elko FO

New Mexico

Carlsbad RMP

BLM, Carlsbad FO

Farmington RMP

BLM, Farmington FO

Mimbres RMP

BLM, Las Cruces DO

Rio Puerco RMP

BLM, Rio Puerco FO

Roswell RMP

BLM, Roswell FO

Socorro RMP

BLM, Socorro FO

White Sands RMP

BLM, Las Cruces DO

Oregon

Andrews-Steens RMP

BLM, Andrews FO

Baker RMP

BLM, Baker FO

Brothers-Lapine RMP

BLM, Central Oregon FO, Deschutes FO

Deschutes NF LRMP

FS, Deschutes NF

Eugene RMP

BLM, Upper Willamette FO

Fremont NF LRMP

FS, Fremont-Winema NFs

Klamath Falls RMP

BLM, Klamath Falls FO

Lakeview RMP

BLM, Lakeview FO

Medford RMP

BLM, Ashland FO, Butte Falls FO, Glendale FO

Mt. Hood NF LRMP

FS, Mt. Hood NF

Roseburg RMP

BLM, South River FO, Swiftwater FO, Upper Willamette FO

Salem RMP

BLM, Cascades FO, Tillamook FO

Southeastern Oregon RMP

BLM, Jordan FO, Malheur FO

Three Rivers RMP

BLM, Three Rivers FO

Two Rivers RMP

BLM, Deschutes FO

Upper Deschutes RMP

BLM, Deschutes FO

Winema NF LRMP

FS, Fremont-Winema NF

Utah

Cedar-Beaver-Garfield-Antimony RMP

BLM, Cedar City FO

Dixie NF LRMP

FS, Dixie NF

Fishlake NF LRMP

FS, Fishlake NF

Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Management Plan

BLM, Grand Staircase-Escalante NM FO

House Range RMP

BLM, Fillmore FO

Kanab RMP

BLM, Kanab FO

Moab RMP

BLM, Moab FO

Pinyon MFP

BLM, Cedar City FO

Pony Express RMP

BLM, Salt Lake FO

Price RMP

BLM, Price FO

Richfield RMP

BLM, Richfield FO

St. George (Dixie) RMP

BLM, St. George FO

San Juan RMP

BLM, Monticello FO

Uinta NF LRMP

FS, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache NF

Vernal RMP

BLM, Vernal FO

Warm Springs RMP

BLM, Fillmore FO

Wasatch-Cache NF LRMP

FS, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache NF

Washington

Mount Baker-Snoqualmie NF LRMP

FS, Mount Baker-Snoqualmie NF

Spokane RMP

BLM, Wenatchee FO

Wenatchee NF LRMP

FS, Wenatchee NF

Wyoming

Ashley NF LRMP

FS, Ashley NF

Casper RMP

BLM, Casper FO

Cody RMP

BLM, Cody FO

Grass Creek RMP

BLM, Worland FO

Great Divide RMP

BLM, Rawlins FO

Green River RMP

BLM, Rock Springs FO

Kemmerer RMP

BLM, Kemmerer FO

Lander RMP

BLM, Lander FO.

Medicine Bow NF LRMP

FS, Routt-Medicine Bow NF, Thunder Basin NG

Washakie RMP

BLM, Worland FO

AFB = Air Force Base; BLM = Bureau of Land Management; CBGA = Cedar-Beaver-Garfield-Antimony; CCCP = Complex Comprehensive Conservation Plan; DO = district office; DOD = Department of Defense; FO = field office; FS = Forest Service; GMP = General Management Plan; INRMP = Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan; LMP = Land Management Plan; LRMP = Land and Resource Management Plan; MFP = Management Framework Plan; NCA = National Conservation Area; NF = National Forest; NM = National Monument; NG = National Grassland; NPS = National Park Service; NRA = National Recreation Area; RAMP= Recreation Area Management Plan; RFP= Revised Forest Plan, RMP = Resource Management Plan.

This list represents the most current plans. This list differs in some particulars from the list in the Draft PEIS, Vol. 2. Since planning is dynamic and there may also be further changes in the locations of specific corridors, the individual agency Records of Decision may also include changes in this list.

The Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Designation of Energy Corridors on Federal Land in the 11 Western States (Draft PEIS) was made available for public review and comment from November 16, 2007, to February 14, 2008. The Draft PEIS was posted on the project Web site at

http://corridoreis.anl.gov,

the DOE NEPA Web site at

http://www.gc.energy.gov/nepa,

and provided, on request, as a CD or printed document. Notice was provided to more than 2,200 individuals and organizations who registered on the project Web site to receive information about the PEIS. Approximately 14,000 individuals and organizations commented on the Draft PEIS, providing more than 3,500 substantive comments. About 57 percent of the comment documents were received via the project Web site, 21 percent were submitted by regular mail, and 22 percent were submitted at the public hearings, as oral statements, written submissions, or both.

Volume IV of the Final PEIS contains the public comments on the Draft PEIS and the agencies' responses. Public comments addressed a broad range of issues. Nearly 35 percent of the comments addressed various topics related to the alternatives presented in the PEIS, 20 percent commented on the purpose and need, and 17 percent commented on corridor location. Nearly 5 percent of the comments were concerned with ecological issues, approximately 4 percent raised concerns about multiple impact areas, 4 percent addressed cumulative impacts, and slightly more than 2 percent dealt with tribal issues.

The remaining comments were divided among a number of topics, each comprising less than 2 percent of the total. The topics (listed in decreasing order) include general impacts, land use, water resources, health and safety, cultural resources, maps, visual resources, socioeconomics, regulations, air quality, environmental justice, and noise.

Public and internal agency review comments on the Draft PEIS were incorporated into the Final PEIS. Public comments resulted in changes to the text and modifications to corridor segments. These changes have improved the analysis and clarified the discussion of important issues but did not significantly modify the Proposed Action or proposed land use plan amendments. The Final PEIS contains a number of modifications to corridor segments in response to public and agency comments. These changes are detailed in appendix K of the Final PEIS.

Government-to-government consultation regarding potential energy transport development and land use plan amendments on DOI-, USDA-, and DOD-administered lands was conducted with federally recognized Tribes whose interests might be directly and substantially affected. The Tribes contacted are listed in appendix C of the Final PEIS.

In addition, the Agencies have initiated activities to coordinate and consult with the governors of each of the 11 Western States addressed in the PEIS and with State agencies. Prior to the Agencies' issuance of their respective RODs, the governor of each state has the opportunity to identify any inconsistencies between the proposed land use plan amendments and State or local plans and to provide recommendations, in writing, during the 60-day consistency review period required by the BLM land use planning regulations (43 CFR 1610.3-2).

The DOI Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management (AS/LM) is the responsible official for publishing the proposed plan amendments affecting public lands. The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and its implementing regulations provide land use planning authority to the Secretary, which has been delegated to this Assistant Secretary. Because any decision regarding these plan amendments is being made by the AS/LM, it is the final decision for the DOI. This decision is not subject to administrative review (protest) under the BLM (DOI) land use planning regulations (43 CFR 1610.5-2).

The USDA Under Secretary of Natural Resources and Environment is the responsible official for publishing the proposed plan amendments on National Forest System lands. The Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 as amended by the National Forest Management Act of 1976, and their implementing regulations provide land use planning authority to the Secretary, as delegated to this Under Secretary. Because any decision regarding these plan amendments is being made by the Under Secretary, Natural Resources and Environment, it is the final decision for the Department of Agriculture. This decision is not subject to administrative review (objection) under the FS or Departmental regulations (36 CFR 219.13(a)(2)).

Copies of the Final PEIS have been sent to the Environmental Protection Agency, DOI Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, DOI Library, and the governors' offices in each of the 11 Western States covered by this PEIS. Copies of the Final PEIS are available at the BLM state offices and FS regional offices in the 11 Western States, DOE Headquarters Reading Room, the BLM Washington, DC, Public Affairs office and the FS Washington, DC, offices. Those interested may also review the Final PEIS and proposed land use plan amendments online at

http://corridoreis.anl.gov.

Michael D. Nedd,

Assistant Director, Minerals and Realty Management, Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior.

[FR Doc. E8-28279 Filed 11-26-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-84-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.