Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact Upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service; Seventh Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MB Docket No. 87-268; FCC 06-150]

Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact Upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service; Seventh Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION:

Proposed rule.

SUMMARY:

In this document, the Commission proposes a new DTV Table of Allotments (“DTV Table”), providing all eligible stations with channels for DTV operations after the DTV transition. The proposed DTV Table is based upon the tentative channel designations (“TCDs”) announced for eligible broadcast licensees and permittees (collectively, “licensees”) through the channel election process, along with our efforts to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure that broadcasters provide the best possible service to the public, including service to local communities. Once effective, the proposed DTV Table will guide stations in determining their build-out obligations. The proposed DTV Table will ultimately replace the existing DTV Table at the end of the DTV transition, when analog transmissions by full-power television broadcast licensees must cease.

DATES:

Comments for this proceeding are due on or before January 11, 2007; reply comments are due on or before February 12, 2007.

ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments, identified by MB Docket No. 87-268, by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal:

http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Federal Communications Commission's Web Site:

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/.

Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail:

FCC504@fcc.gov

or phone: 202-418-0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.

For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For additional information on this proceeding, contact Evan Baranoff,

Evan.Baranoff@fcc.gov

of the Media Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418-2120.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a summary of the

Commission's Seventh Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“Seventh FNPRM”)

, FCC 06-150, in docket MB Docket No. 87-268, adopted on October 10, 2006, and released on October 20, 2006. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., CY-A257, Washington DC, 20554. These documents will also be available via ECFS (

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/

). (Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) The complete text may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. To request this document in accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send an e-mail to

fcc504@fcc.gov

or call the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).

Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis

The

Seventh FNPRM

does not contain proposed information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information collection burden “for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,” pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).

Summary of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

I. Introduction

1. By this action, the Commission undertakes the final step in the channel election process established in its

Second Periodic Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television

(69 FR 59500, October 4, 2004) (“Second DTV Periodic Report and Order”) and begins the final stage of the transition of the nation's broadcast television system from analog to digital television (“DTV”). Specifically, in the

Seventh Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making (“Seventh FNPRM”

), the Commission proposes a new DTV Table of Allotments (“DTV Table”), providing all eligible stations with channels for DTV operations after the DTV transition.

2. In developing the proposed new allotments, the Commission has attempted to accommodate broadcasters' channel preferences as well as their replication and maximization service area certifications (made via FCC Form 381). Our proposed DTV Table is based upon the tentative channel designations (“TCDs”) announced for eligible broadcast licensees and permittees (collectively, “licensees”) through the channel election process, along with our efforts to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure that broadcasters provide the best possible service to the public, including service to local communities. Once effective, the proposed DTV Table will guide stations in determining their build-out obligations. The proposed DTV Table will ultimately replace the existing DTV Table at the end of the DTV transition, when analog transmissions by full-power television broadcast licensees must cease. The current DTV Table of Allotments is contained in 47 CFR 73.622(b). We note that, at the end of the transition, the current NTSC Table, contained in 47 CFR 73.606(b) will become obsolete. We will address any rule amendments necessitated by the end of analog service in a later proceeding. The current DTV Table will govern stations' DTV operations until the end of the DTV transition.

II. Background and Summary

A. The DTV Transition

3. The Commission established the existing DTV Table in the 1997

Sixth Report and Order

(62 FR 26684, May 14, 1997) as part of its DTV transition plan. In creating the existing DTV Table, the Commission sought to accommodate all eligible, full-service broadcasters with a second channel to provide DTV service in addition to their existing, analog service. Eligibility to receive a second channel for DTV operations was limited to existing broadcasters. In addition, the Commission initiated a process by which the amount of spectrum devoted to the television broadcast service would eventually be reduced. As a result, television broadcast operations will be limited to the “core spectrum” (

i.e.

, channels 2-51) after the end of the transition, enabling the recovery of a total of 108 MHz of spectrum (

i.e.

, channels 52-69). The “core spectrum” is comprised of low-VHF channels 2 to 4 (54-72 MHz) and 5 to 6 (76-88 MHZ), VHF channels 7 to 13 (174-216 MHz) and UHF channels 14-51 (470-698

MHz), but does not include TV channel 37 (608-614 MHz), which is used for radio astronomy research. In order to protect sensitive radio astronomy operations, TV Channel 37 is not used for NTSC or DTV service. Channels 60-69 (746-806 MHz) were reallocated for public safety and wireless communications services in 1998. Channels 52-59 were reallocated for new wireless services in 2001. Broadcast licensees must cease operations outside the core spectrum after February 17, 2009, thereby making that spectrum available for public safety and commercial wireless uses;

see

47 U.S.C. 337(e)(1) (“Any full-power television station licensee that holds a television broadcast license to operate between 698 and 806 megahertz may not operate at that frequency after February 17, 2009.”).

4. As required by statute, the second channel allotted in the existing DTV Table is for use during the DTV transition, after which each licensee must return to broadcasting on a single, six MHz channel. In practice, some licensees' ultimate DTV channels will be entirely different channels—not their NTSC channels or the channels allotted to them for DTV transmission during the transition. In specifying the second channels that broadcasters received for transitional use, the Commission attempted to enable stations to “replicate” the service area of their existing NTSC operations,

i.e.

, to provide DTV service to an area that is comparable to their existing NTSC service area. The existing DTV Table also was designed to minimize interference to both existing analog TV and new DTV service. The existing DTV Table, codified in 47 CFR 73.622(b), was developed using the policies adopted in the

Sixth Report and Order

and a computer allotment methodology. The details of each station's channel assignment under the existing DTV Table, including technical facilities and predicted service and interference information, were set forth in the initial Appendix B of the

Sixth Report and Order

(“initial Appendix B”).

B. The Channel Election Process

5. Broadcast licensees selected their ultimate (

i.e.

post-transition) DTV channel inside the core spectrum through the channel election process established by the Commission in the

Second DTV Periodic Report and Order.

Under this process, licensees elected their preferred post-transition channel during one of three rounds. Channel elections that could be approved, as well as “best available” channels selected by Commission staff, were locked in as TCDs and protected against new interference from subsequent channel elections with a strong presumption that a station's TCD would be its channel assignment proposed in the new DTV Table. Because the final channel allotments can be established only through a rulemaking proceeding, we propose the new DTV Table as an amendment to 47 CFR 73.622 in the

Seventh FNPRM

in the DTV docket.

6. The channel election process was designed to be carried out in seven steps, culminating in this rulemaking, the seventh and final step. In order to facilitate the selection of channels and the development of a final DTV Table, prior to the commencement of the first step of the channel election process, the Media Bureau announced a freeze on the filing of certain NTSC and DTV requests for allotment or service area changes.

7. The first step of the channel election process addressed preliminary matters and required all licensees to file a certification (via FCC Form 381) in order to define their post-transition facility. Licensees were required to file their certifications (via FCC Form 381) by November 5, 2004. Stations that did not submit certification forms by the deadline were evaluated based on replication facilities. In these certifications, licensees had to decide whether they would (1) Replicate their allotted facilities, (2) maximize to their currently authorized facilities, or (3) reduce to a currently authorized smaller facility. Many stations have applied for and been granted authorization to operate at facilities that are different from the facilities that were specified for their operation in the initial DTV Table and Appendix B, as amended in 1998. In most cases, the facilities allowed under these new authorizations allow stations to “maximize” their service coverage to reach a larger population than the facilities specified in the initial DTV Table.

8. The second step of the channel election process was the first round of channel elections, in which only in-core licensees—those with at least one in-core channel—could participate. In-core licensees that participated in round one filed their channel elections (via FCC Form 382) by February 10, 2005. First-round electors were not permitted to elect a channel that was not assigned to them unless rights to that channel were obtained through a negotiated channel agreement (“NCA”) with another licensee. At the close of the first round elections, the Commission announced 1,554 TCDs, which included channels elected through 25 NCAs. By Order released on June 8, 2005, the Media Bureau approved 25 NCAs for the first round and rejected 12 NCAs, sending those licensees to their contingent round one election or, if necessary, to round two.

9. In the third step, the Commission analyzed the interference conflicts arising out of the first round and offered licensees an opportunity to resolve them (via FCC Form 383). After reviewing the first round conflicts, the Commission announced an additional 159 TCDs, bringing the total number of TCDs to 1,713.

10. The fourth step of the channel election process was the second round of elections, in which the remaining licensees made their elections. Licensees that participated in this round filed their channel elections (via FCC Form 384) by October 31, 2005.

11. In the fifth step, the Commission analyzed the interference conflicts arising out of the second-round elections and announced 75 TCDs, which included channels elected through two NCAs. The Commission subsequently announced the consolidated total of first- and second-round TCDs to be 1,789.

12. The sixth step of the channel election process was the third and final round of elections, in which licensees without a TCD after rounds one and two, as well as certain other eligible licensees, filed a final channel election preference. Licensees with a TCD were eligible to seek an alternative designation in the third round if they received a TCD for a low-VHF channel (channels 2-6) or if their TCD was subject to international coordination issues which the Commission has been unable to resolve with the Canadian and Mexican governments. In the third round, we received seven channel elections from stations that did not have a TCD, 14 from stations that had a low-VHF TCD, and one from a station that had an international coordination issue. Licensees that participated in the third round filed their channel elections (via FCC Form 386) by May 26, 2006. At the close of the third round, the Commission announced 20 TCDs for eligible licensees, leaving only four eligible stations without a TCD. The four eligible stations without TCDs after the third round were: WABC-TV (New York, New York), WEDH-TV (Hartford, Connecticut), KTFK(TV) (Stockton, California), and KVIE(TV) (Sacramento, California). In the

Third Round TCD PN

, the Media Bureau said that the Commission would resolve these situations in a subsequent proceeding. We do so here in Section III.B.,

infra

, and include these final TCDs in our proposed new DTV Table.

III. Proposed DTV Table of Allotments

13. In the

Seventh FNPRM

, we now undertake the seventh and final step of the channel election process by proposing a new DTV Table. The proposed DTV Table includes a channel for each eligible broadcast television station and is set forth in the proposed rules. The specific technical facilities—effective radiated power (“ERP”), antenna height above average terrain (“antenna HAAT”), antenna radiation pattern, and geographic coordinates at which stations would be allowed to operate under this Table—are set forth in the Appendix. The Appendix also includes information on service area and population coverage.

14. We believe that our proposed new DTV Table achieves the goals set forth for the channel election process. First, the proposed new DTV Table provides all eligible stations with channels for DTV operations after the DTV transition. Second, we believe that our proposed new DTV Table is the result of informed decisions by licensees when making their channel elections and that licensees benefited from the clarity and transparency of the channel election process. Third, we believe our proposed new DTV Table recognizes industry expectations by protecting existing service and respecting investments already made, to the extent feasible. Finally, we believe the proposed new DTV Table reflects our efforts to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure the best possible DTV service to the public.

15. The channel assignments in the proposed DTV Table are primarily based on the TCDs previously announced through the channel election process; however, in order to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure the best possible DTV service to the public, in some cases Commission staff found it necessary to assign a different channel for post-transition operation in order to minimize interference and maximize the efficiency of broadcast allotments in the public interest. We estimate that more than 98 percent of licensees participating in the channel election process received a TCD for the channel they elected. Approximately 10 licensees requested that the Commission identify a “best available” channel for them. In addition, approximately 30 licensees did not file a channel election form when required. Each of these licensees was given a TCD either (1) On its in-core DTV channel, if it had one, or (2) on its in-core NTSC channel if it did not have an in-core DTV channel, and the NTSC channel did not cause impermissible interference to another station. The remaining stations generally were provided channels that would allow them to serve the full population the station would reach with its certified facilities. In several cases, however, it was necessary to provide stations with channels and facilities that would enable service to a population less than that which could be reached with their certified facilities. In those cases, stations were provided with facilities that would at least enable replication of their service coverage as set forth in the initial DTV Table. Such stations (upon demonstration that they cannot construct their full, authorized DTV facilities because doing so would cause impermissible interference) may file requests for alternative channel assignments, as discussed below in Section III.B.,

supra

paragraph 22.

16. We invite comment on our proposed new DTV Table. We seek comment on whether the channel assignments in the proposed DTV Table will serve the Commission's goals of promoting overall spectrum efficiency and ensuring the best possible DTV service to the public. We ask that licensees review the accuracy of their information contained in the proposed DTV Table and the Appendix, including whether it properly reflects any conflict-resolving amendments to their certifications, and comment on any inaccuracies or discrepancies. The proposed DTV Table will ultimately replace the existing DTV and NTSC Tables after the transition. We request comment on how best to time the adoption and effective date of the proposed DTV Table so that it is available for stations' reference and reliance in applying for construction permits or modifications needed to implement their post-transition facilities. We do not seek comment here on issues related to the DTV transition other than the channel assignments in the proposed DTV Table, as such issues will be addressed in a later proceeding.

A. Allotment Methodology and Evaluation of Interference Conflicts

17. In the

Second DTV Periodic Report and Order,

the Commission stated that the staff would evaluate channel elections after each channel election round in order to identify potential interference conflicts. Interference conflicts were found to exist only where licensees elected channels other than their current DTV channel, most often for stations that elected their NTSC channels. It was not necessary to determine the amount of interference caused by stations that elected their current DTV channel because operation on those channels would not result in new interference.

18. In developing the proposed DTV Table and the Appendix (which sets forth the channel assignment, operating facilities, and service information for individual stations), the staff used objective computer analysis to perform the engineering evaluations for determining station service coverage and interference. In performing these evaluations, the staff relied on the technical standards and methods set forth in 47 CFR 73.622(e) and 73.623(c), which (1) define the geographic service area of DTV stations, and (2) provide minimum interference technical criteria for modification of DTV allotments included in the initial DTV Table. Specifically, 47 CFR 73.622(e) defines a DTV station's service area as the geographic area within the station's noise-limited F(50,90) contour where its signal is predicted to exceed the noise-limited service level. The F(50,90) designator indicates that a specified field strength necessary for the provision of DTV service is expected to be available at 50 percent of the locations 90 percent of the time. A station's noise-limited contour is computed using its actual transmitter location, ERP, antenna HAAT, and antenna radiation pattern. 47 CFR 73.623(c) sets forth the thresholds of desired-to-undesired (D/U) ratio at which interference is considered to occur.

19. Consistent with 47 CFR 73.622(e) and 73.623(c), the staff used the procedure set forth in Office of Engineering and Technology's

OET Bulletin No. 69

to make predictions of service coverage and interference. This procedure uses the terrain-dependent Longley-Rice point-to-point propagation model for predicting the geographic areas and populations served by stations. Under the procedure in

OET Bulletin No. 69,

the predicted geographic area and population served by a TV station are reduced by any interference it receives from other stations. In these evaluations, the staff examined interference resulting from co-channel and first adjacent channel relationships in accordance with the interference criteria for DTV allotments specified in 47 CFR 73.623(c). The computer software used in this work is similar to that used in performing the service coverage and interference evaluations for the initial DTV Table and that the Media Bureau has used to evaluate requests for modification of DTV facilities and changes in channel allotments in the initial DTV Table. This software provides analysis of service

coverage and interference on both a cumulative and individual-station basis.

20. As indicated above, the staff used a database composed of TV station authorizations to which licensees certified as of November 5, 2004 (the “certification database”), including both analog and digital stations, in processing channel elections. The certification database was made available in tables attached to the Public Notice, “DTV Channel Election Information and First Round Election Filing Deadline.” This database was used to determine and evaluate existing DTV service populations, the benchmark amounts of existing interference, and the new interference that would result from specific channel elections. In deciding to rely on this database in the

Second DTV Periodic Report and Order,

the Commission indicated that basing stations' service evaluations on currently authorized facilities would more accurately reflect current service to viewers than the parameters specified for the initial DTV Table adopted in 1997, and amended in 1998, and would at the same time preserve the service areas of those stations that constructed and are operating in accordance with the DTV build-out schedules.

21. The Commission performed interference-conflict analyses in only two circumstances: (1) Where a station elected a channel that was different from its current DTV channel, and (2) to identify a “best available” channel. In doing so, the staff calculated values for the ERP and the directional antenna radiation pattern that would allow a station to match its coverage area based on its certified facilities or replication facilities, as appropriate. Calculations of new ERP and antenna patterns for stations' elected channels were performed in the same manner as those performed by the Commission to match DTV facilities to analog facilities. New interference to post-transition DTV operations was defined as interference beyond that caused by existing analog and DTV operations, as set forth in the certification database information. Evaluations of service coverage and interference conflicts were based only on the populations determined to be receiving service and new interference. The staff used population data from the year 2000 census. In performing conflict analyses, the staff applied the standard that an interference conflict exists when it was predicted that more than 0.1 percent new interference would be caused to another station. That is, the standard was that new interference was considered to constitute a conflict when that new interference affected more than 0.1 percent of the population predicted to be served by the station in the absence of that new interference.

22. In the

Second DTV Periodic Report and Order,

the Commission recognized that a special accommodation was necessary if a station with an out-of-core DTV channel elected to operate its post-transition DTV station on its in-core analog channel. The Commission's goal was to facilitate a station's election of its in-core analog channel if the station did not have an in-core DTV channel. To this end, the Commission recognized that the interference relationships between DTV-to-DTV and NTSC-to-DTV operations are such that a DTV station serving the same geographic area as its associated analog station would have a 1 dB greater interference impact on a co-channel DTV station than it would have had as an analog station and an 8 dB greater impact on an adjacent channel DTV station than it would have had as an analog station, assuming the same coverage and locations for all stations. Thus, DTV operation on a station's analog channel could result in new interference. Unlike a station that has its DTV channel inside the core, and therefore could avoid this new interference by electing its in-core DTV channel, a station with an out-of-core DTV channel by definition could not elect its DTV channel for post-transition use. A station that did not have an in-core analog channel could not make use of this special accommodation. The Commission stated that the 0.1 percent additional interference limit could be exceeded on a limited basis in order to afford these stations an improved opportunity to select their own NTSC channel. The Commission indicated that such allowance is justified because these licensees have only one in-core option available (

i.e.

, their NTSC channel) and may need this additional accommodation to be able to operate on their in-core channel after the end of the transition. In developing the proposed DTV Table, the staff allowed stations that were eligible to participate in the channel election process and that had either an out-of-core DTV channel or no DTV channel (

i.e.

, a singleton with only an in-core analog channel) to select their in-core NTSC channel for post-transition DTV operation if it would cause no more than 2.0 percent new interference to a protected DTV station. Any such stations that certified to their maximized facilities, however, would be permitted to use the 2.0 percent standard only to the extent that the predicted new interference also would not exceed the amount of interference that would have been caused by replication facilities. Where post-transition use of its NTSC channel by such a station was predicted to cause interference to a protected station in excess of 2.0 percent of the protected station's population coverage, the electing station was then made subject to the normal conflict-resolution procedures.

23. Where a station in round one or round two elected and received a TCD for a DTV channel that was not its current NTSC or DTV channel, the interference potential of that new channel was included in the service coverage and interference evaluations of subsequent elections. That is, new channels elected and tentatively designated in round one under approved NCAs were included in the service coverage and interference evaluations of channels elected in rounds two and three. Similarly, channels elected and tentatively designated in round two were included in the service coverage and interference evaluations in round three.

24. In cases where the licensee requested, or was given, a Commission-determined “best available” channel for its station, the staff used an ordered approach that balanced treatment of the station for which a channel was to be provided and other stations, as follows. The staff first analyzed the station's possible post-transition operation on each in-core channel. On each channel, the staff examined the interference impact and service coverage based on the station's certified facilities. If there was a channel or channels where the station could operate without causing new interference to another station and provide adequate service, the staff gave it a TCD on that channel. If there was more than one such channel, the staff generally chose the lowest channel that was outside of the low-VHF band. In cases where there was no channel that would allow the station to satisfy these criteria when operating at its certified maximized facilities, the staff re-examined the station's possible post-transition operation on each in-core channel at its replication facilities. The staff then selected a channel for the station that would result in the minimum amount of new interference to protected stations. In these cases, the objective was to achieve a balance that would minimize the amount of interference that the subject station would cause to and receive from other stations. In every “best available” channel determination, the interference that other stations would receive from the TCD was less than 2.0 percent.

B. Requests for Alternative Channel Assignments

25. At this stage in the DTV channel election process, we will consider requests for alternative channel assignments only from (1) licensees unable to construct full, authorized DTV facilities (The term “full, authorized DTV facilities” here refers to the original facilities certified by the licensee in its FCC Form 381. We will not preclude requests for alternative channel assignments from licensees that modified their certified facilities after receiving a conflict letter in the first and second channel election rounds.) on the TCDs that they requested and received because, in order to avoid causing impermissible interference to other TCDs and still obtain their preferred channel, they had to agree to construct facilities on their TCD that are smaller than those to which they had certified on FCC Form 381, (We will consider only engineering demonstrations here. Requests based on financial or other reasons will not be considered.) (2) licensees with international coordination issues which the Commission has been unable to resolve with the Canadian and Mexican governments, (3) licensees with TCDs for low-VHF channels (channels 2-6); and (4) new licensees and permittees that attained such status after the start of the channel election process and to which we assigned a TCD for post-transition DTV operations because their assigned NTSC or DTV channel was determined to cause impermissible interference to existing licensees. Licensees that want to change their DTV allotment, but which are not in any of these categories (

e.g.

, are technically able to construct their full, authorized DTV facilities on their existing TCD) may request a change in allotment only after the proposed DTV Table is finalized and must do so through the existing allotment procedures, as set forth in 47 CFR 1.420. Parties seeking alternative channel assignments consistent with this paragraph should file their requests in accordance with the filing procedures set forth in Section IV.D.,

infra.

26. In assessing proposed alternative channel assignments, we will also consider requests that include the consensual substitution of the TCD of another station that is not otherwise eligible to request an alternative channel assignment. We will consider such requests if it is demonstrated that the additional channel substitution is technically necessary to implement the eligible licensee's requested alternative channel assignment. We will review requests involving a channel substitution to assure compliance with the public interest and will reject any such request if it would require acceptance of a significant level of interference by, or result in a loss of service to, one or both of the requesting stations. Licensees unable to construct their full, authorized DTV facilities may also submit a technical showing that a modification of the licensee's pre-freeze authorized DTV facility—such as a change in transmitter site or an increase in power—would permit construction of their full, authorized DTV facilities with their present TCD or a substitute channel. Licensees requesting alternative channel assignments will be required to continue to protect the full, authorized DTV facilities of other licensees. We will continue to limit additional interference to DTV stations to 0.1 percent during this seventh and final stage of the DTV channel election process. Any request for an alternative channel assignment that causes excess interference must be accompanied by a request for a waiver of the 0.1 percent limit or the signed written consent of the affected licensee. We propose to grant waivers of the 0.1 percent limit where doing so would promote our overall spectrum efficiency objectives and ensure the best possible service to the public, including service to local communities.

27. At this time, we are continuing the freeze on requests for changing DTV channels within the DTV Table and on new DTV channels, as well as on the filing of modification applications by full-service television and Class A television stations. From our past experience when we adopted the initial DTV Table, we expect that we will receive alternative channel requests from a number of licensees, and that parties will file petitions for reconsideration of the Report and Order adopted in this proceeding. Thus, the importance of a stable database remains crucial until such time as the DTV Table is adopted and becomes final. However, we may grant waivers on a case-by-case basis in response to requests for alternative channel assignments. We will determine when it is appropriate to lift the freeze in a future proceeding.

C. Requests To Change Certified Facilities

28. By November 5, 2004, all DTV licensees were required to certify whether they would construct replication or maximization facilities. Forty-one stations did not timely file the appropriate form (FCC Form 381) and, therefore, were assigned replication facilities (or authorized NTSC facilities if they were a single-channel NTSC-only station). Of these stations, nine requested that we waive the freeze and filing deadlines to accept their untimely maximization certifications. Requests were filed on behalf of stations KFNB(TV), Caspar, Wyoming; KLWY(TV), Cheyenne, Wyoming; WCJB-TV, Gainesville, Florida; KOAA(TV), Pueblo, Colorado; KSCE(TV), El Paso, Texas; KOCE-TV, Huntington Beach, California; WLMB(TV), Toledo, Ohio; WGGN-TV, Sandusky, Ohio; and WLLA(TV), Kalamazoo, Michigan. We will permit these licensees to file comments proposing a change to their certification to specify maximized facilities for which they would have been allowed to certify. We are also aware that there are cases where a station already has constructed or received authorization to construct facilities on its TCD that provide service to areas that extend beyond that to which the station certified using FCC Form 381. Because the interference protection that we provide is limited to the area to which a station has certified, there is a possibility that stations serving or authorized to serve areas beyond their certified area could become subject to interference. If a licensee can demonstrate that the area served by its authorized or constructed facilities extends beyond the area to which it certified, it may file comments proposing to modify its certified facilities to match its authorized or constructed facilities.

29. Licensees requesting a modification of their certifications must either (1) submit an engineering analysis demonstrating that their proposed certified facilities would not result in interference in excess of 0.1 percent to any licensee's existing TCD or (2) submit the signed, written consent of every affected licensee. They will also be required to accept interference from any channel election already approved.

D. Resolution of TCDs Pending After Round Three

30. Our proposed DTV Table includes four proposed allotments that were unresolved when we announced TCDs for the third round. These channel designations represent challenging and difficult cases in crowded markets that necessitate waiver of the freeze or the interference standard in order to find appropriate channels for post-transition operation that will ensure the best possible service to the public and promote overall spectrum efficiency. We invite comment on these proposed channel allotments.

31.

New York, New York.

In the first round of the channel election process, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (“ABC”), the licensee of WABC-TV, channel 7, and permittee of WABC-DT, channel 45, New York, New York (WABC is the flagship station of the ABC Television Network and is the sole ABC network station serving the New York market. ABC was an early adopter of DTV technology, commencing operation with its full, authorized DTV facility at the World Trade Center in 2001), elected to use its analog channel 7 for digital operation at the end of the DTV transition. The Media Bureau sent ABC a first-round conflict letter because the elected NTSC channel was predicted to cause 2.8 percent new interference to the elected DTV channel of NCE station WNJB-DT, channel *8, New Brunswick, New Jersey. ABC was unable to resolve its conflict with The New Jersey Public Broadcasting Authority (“NJPBA”), the permittee of WNJB-DT, within the allotted timeframe. On August 15, 2005, ABC filed a request for a waiver of the 0.1 percent interference standard used to calculate first round interference conflicts in order to permit WABC to operate digitally on its current analog allotment at the end of the DTV transition.

32. In its emergency petition for waiver, ABC contends that the 2.8 percent new interference it is predicted to cause to WNJB is based on WNJB's maximized authorized facilities, which it has yet to build. ABC also argues that the viewers who would potentially be affected by this predicted new interference are either (1) outside the state of New Jersey, or (2) within the state but served by WNJB's sister station, WNJN, Montclair, New Jersey, which currently provides the same programming as WNJB (WNJB is a satellite station of WNJT, Trenton). In addition, ABC asserts that enforcement of the 0.1 percent new interference standard in this instance would impose an undue hardship on WABC by preventing it from replicating its current analog service area, thus resulting in a loss of over-the-air service to current WABC viewers. Further, ABC claims that post-transition operation on its digital channel 45 would result in losses of service due to interference from WOLF, Hazleton, Pennsylvania, and WEDH, Hartford, Connecticut.

33. WPIX, Inc., another VHF broadcaster in the New York market, joined in the waiver request in support of ABC. Educational Broadcasting Corporation, licensee of NCE station WNET, licensed to Newark, New Jersey, also filed in support of ABC's waiver request. NJPBA opposed ABC's request and contends that WABC's service on its digital channel 45 would not result in any loss of service area. ABC offered to pay for WNJB to install a directional antenna to eliminate most of the interference. NJPBA rejected ABC's engineering offer and proposed instead that WNJB relocate its digital transmission facility to the Empire State Building in New York City at no expense. The Media Bureau deferred action on ABC's first round channel election until the conclusion of the channel election process.

34. Subsequently, NJPBA indicated that it would be willing to co-locate its transmitting facilities at Four Times Square in New York City as a possible resolution to this issue. In response, ABC agreed not to object to WNJB-DT's move to Four Times Square provided there was favorable action on its election of channel 7 and related waiver request. Both parties recognized, however, that the current Commission freeze on major modification applications would prevent this resolution. Ultimately, NJPBA stated that if the freeze is waived so that WNJB-DT can apply to modify its facilities to co-locate at Four Times Square, then it would no longer object to WABC operating on channel 7. NJPBA also has asserted that the proposed co-location of WNJB-DT and WABC-DT in New York would have the additional benefit of reducing the amount of interference received by WABC-DT on channel 7 from WNJB-DT's currently authorized operations in New Jersey. This potential agreement remains pending between the parties.

35. According to ABC, WABC-DT will provide a DTV service area with a population of 19,324,895 operating on channel 7, approximately 300,000 more people than would receive such service on channel 45. ABC also contends that channel 7 is more capable of replicating WABC's pre-September 11, 2001 service area than channel 45. In addition, ABC states that WABC's operation on digital channel 45 would be subject to co-channel interference from operations on channel 45 in Pennsylvania and Connecticut, which would affect nearly half a million people. ABC predicts that its operation on channel 45 would result in a loss of service to nearly 500,000 people. ABC notes that television receivers are less tolerant of the co-channel interference among stations on channel 45 than of the adjacent channel interference potentially arising between WABC on channel 7 and WNJB on channel 8.

36. We conclude that the loss of service for WABC would affect current viewers of WABC, while the predicted loss of service for WNJB would affect areas outside of its current service area and primarily outside of the State of New Jersey. ABC also points out that WABC's move to UHF channel 45 would leave WPIX and WNET as the only New York City stations on VHF channels (channel 11 and 13, respectively), which could undermine a plan for digital VHF service in the New York market. ABC also argues that UHF channels provide inferior service to indoor antennas in urban areas in which buildings impede reception. We note, too, that WABC is a pioneer of digital service, having built full-power digital operations in 2001 and re-built them first at Four Times Square and then on the Empire State Building, with a back-up facility at Alpine Tower in New Jersey, after the September 11, 2001 loss of the World Trade Center. In contrast, WNJB has not built its digital facility and recently requested an extension of its STA beyond the July 1, 2006 “use-or-lose” deadline based on its status as a satellite station. Based on all the factors in the record, we believe that the public interest and the factors enumerated in the

Second DTV Periodic

favor granting WABC a TCD on channel 7 notwithstanding the predicted 2.8 percent interference to WNJB on channel 8. We find that WABC's continued transmission on channel 7 will benefit WABC's viewers, many of whom have relied on VHF antennas for decades. Allotting channel 7 to WABC provides the additional benefit of eliminating concerns about potential interference between WABC and WEDH-TV, a NCE station in Hartford, Connecticut (as discussed below in paragraphs 34-37, we propose to allot channel *45 to WEDH-TV, which elected that channel based on its pending swap application), and WOLF in Pennsylvania. Accordingly, we grant ABC's request for waiver of the 0.1 percent interference standard. We also note that NJPBA may apply in the future to modify WNJB-DT's facilities to move to Four Times Square for post-transition service. If that application is granted, WNJB's virtual collocation with WABC-DT and other New York market stations would be likely to reduce or eliminate the predicted interference to its digital operations on channel 8.

37.

Hartford and Norwich, Connecticut.

Connecticut Public Broadcasting, Inc. (“CPBI”) is the licensee of NCE stations WEDH-TV, channel *24, Hartford, Connecticut and WEDN, channel *53, Norwich, Connecticut. In the existing DTV Table, WEDH was assigned digital channel *32 and WEDN was assigned digital channel

*45. In 1999, CPBI filed an application to swap the digital channels between these two stations. This swap application has remained in a pending status. In 2004, CPBI filed a petition for rulemaking to substitute channel *9 as WEDN's digital channel, and the Media Bureau issued a

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

proposing the channel substitution.

38. The

Second DTV Periodic Report and Order

stated that, during the channel election process, we would protect channels proposed in outstanding rule makings where a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking had been issued, and that we would permit licensees to elect a channel if an NPRM had been issued with respect to a channel change. The

Second DTV Periodic Report and Order

did not specifically address how DTV channels in a pending swap application would be treated.

39. In the first round of the channel election, WEDH-TV elected channel *45 in reliance on the pending 1999 channel swap application, and WEDN elected channel *9 based on the related pending channel substitution rulemaking. Because these elections are based on matters that were pending before the commencement of the channel election process, the 2.0 percent standard set forth in 47 CFR 73.623(c)(2) applies. Our engineering study confirms that the channels elected by CPBI for its Hartford and Norwich stations comply with the 2.0 percent technical standard. Neither WEDH's digital facilities on channel *45 nor WEDN's digital operations on channel *9 would cause more than 2.0 percent interference to adjacent or co-channel stations. WEDN received a TCD for channel *9, but WEDH did not get a TCD for channel *45 due to the unresolved status of stations' channel elections in an adjacent market. WABC-TV in New York had elected its allotted digital channel 45 but contended that WEDH's operation on channel 45 at Hartford would result in a loss of WABC-DT service to approximately 300,000 viewers. WABC-TV preferred to elect its NTSC channel 7. In light of the pending inter-related issues concerning channel 45 in this congested area, we declined to approve TCDs for WABC or WEDH.

40. We believe the public interest would be served by allotting DTV channel *45 to Hartford as well as channel *9 to Norwich, which was tentatively designated after round one. According to CPBI, doing so will enable station WEDH-DT to increase service to an additional 1,275,810 people while reducing its operating costs and, similarly, enable WEDN to increase DTV service to an additional 1,029,678 people while reducing its operating costs. We also note that our proposal facilitates a successful resolution of the channel election process in a highly congested area of the country. For example, WABC-DT's contention that CPBI's proposed operation on channel 45 at Hartford would result in an increase in interference for approximately 300,000 viewers was factored into our conclusion, above, that the public interest would be served by allotting channel 7, rather than channel 45, as WABC-DT's post-transition digital channel. In particular, replacing WEDH's allotted DTV channel *32 with channel *45 eliminates potential interference from channel 33, which WCBS (New York) elected in round two. WCBS was predicted to cause 0.5 percent interference to WEDH (20,311 people) if it remained on channel 32. WCBS agreed to reduce its facilities to comply with the 0.1 percent standard, thus reducing service significantly. As a result of approving WEDH's TCD for channel *45, WCBS would no longer be required to reduce its facilities in this respect. Therefore, we have adjusted the proposed parameters for WCBS in the Appendix to describe their certified facility, rather than the reduced facility they had submitted to resolve the conflict with WEDH's operation on channel 32. In submitting its engineering to resolve the interference conflict in the second round, WCBS had also indicated its intention to withdraw the reduced facility in the event that WEDH would not be operating post-transition on channel 32. Moreover, since the communities of Hartford and Norwich are located within 400 kilometers of the U.S.-Canadian border, concurrence by the Canadian government was sought and has been obtained for the allotments on channels *45 and *9, respectively. The Commission permitted licensees subject to international coordination to certify to operate their post-transition DTV channel pursuant to a pending DTV application for maximized facilities that had not yet been authorized because of a pending international coordination issue. Accordingly, we propose to allot channel *45 to Hartford and channel *9 to Norwich, and these allotments are included in our proposed DTV Table. Both the application and rulemaking proceedings associated with the changes CPBI requested for its Hartford and Norwich stations are superseded by our actions herein, and parties that previously objected to the use of channels *45 and *9, as proposed in the swap application and channel substitution NPRM, may file comments in response to our proposal here.

41.

Stockton, California.

Telefutura Sacramento, LLC is the licensee of station KTFK(TV), NTSC channel 64 and KTFK-DT, DTV channel 62, Stockton, California. In the second round, Telefutura elected channel 26 as part of a NCA with other licensees in the region. The NCA was approved only in part, with Telefutura's election being rejected for violating the freeze. In the third round, Telefutura again elected channel 26 and proposed to move its transmitter site from Mount Diablo to the Walnut Grove antenna farm, which is closer to its community of license. This channel is acceptable under the 0.1 percent criterion that is applied in evaluating DTV channel elections in this proceeding. But in order to do so, Telefutura must modify its station's facilities to change its station's geographic coverage area, which would violate the freeze imposed in connection with the DTV channel election process.

42. Mount Diablo is located near the border between the San Francisco and Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto Designated Market Areas (DMAs), and KTFK and the other station on Mt. Diablo were required to elect channels which would not cause interference to stations in either market. Telefutura has submitted a comprehensive engineering analysis showing that, with the exception of low-VHF channels, only channel 14 is suitable for use on Mt. Diablo, and channel 14 was elected by the other Mt. Diablo licensee, pursuant to a NCA with Telefutura and other licensees in the region.

43. The proposed move to the Walnut Grove antenna farm will permit Telefutura to co-locate KTFK with the other stations in the Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto DMA. According to Telefutura, this move will provide new Telefutura network service to more than 440,000 viewers in KTFK's DMA. While viewers in the San Francisco DMA will lose KTFK service due to terrain blockage, these viewers receive the same network programming from KTFK's “sister” station, KFSF, Vallejo, California. In addition, the entire loss area is served by numerous other NTSC and DTV stations. Based on the record before us, and in order to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure the best possible DTV service to the public, we believe that the public interest would be served by waiving the freeze to permit modification of KTFK's certified facilities. We believe our proposal facilitates a successful resolution of the channel election process in a highly congested area.

Further, our proposal improves service to KTFK's community of license and the local area. In addition, our proposal will facilitate adoption of the final DTV Table and avoid the allotment of a low-VHF channel, which the Commission has long disfavored. The Commission has recognized in this proceeding that low-VHF channels are subject to technical penalties, including higher ambient noise levels and, in the case of channel 6, concerns of possible interference to and from FM radio service. Accordingly, we propose to allot channel 26 to Stockton as specified in our proposed DTV Table. Because we propose here to give Telefutura its desired TCD for channel 26, we dismiss as moot Telefutura's application for review of the denial of its second round channel election.

44.

Sacramento, California.

KVIE, Inc. is the licensee of NCE television station KVIE(TV), Sacramento, California. KVIE currently operates on NTSC channel *6 and was assigned out-of-core DTV channel *53. As a licensee with only one in-core channel, KVIE elected to release channel *6 and participate in the second round of elections. In that round, KVIE elected channel *9 as part of a NCA with five other licensees in the Bay Area, but elected channel *6 in response to the conflict letter it received. As a licensee with a low-VHF TCD, KVIE was permitted to seek an alternative TCD in the third round, and did so by again electing (via FCC Form 386) channel *9.

45. In its application, KVIE acknowledges that its proposal is predicted to cause 1.3 percent new interference to the TCD of DTV channel *9 for NCE station KIXE-TV, Redding, California. KVIE argues, however, that use of channel 6 would provide inferior service to its viewers, and that the public interest would be better served by Commission approval of KVIE's third round channel selection. KVIE argues that requiring it to operate on channel 6 post-transition “would frustrate the public interest because the use of a low-VHF band channel would not only prevent KVIE from providing the best possible digital service, but would also create a preclusive effect on NCE FM station operations in the area.” The Northern California Educational Television Association filed comments opposing KVIE's request, arguing that KVIE does not provide any evidence that channel 6 is inferior to channel 9, and that it is KVIE's responsibility to protect FM radio stations from interference. In the

Third Round TCD PN

, the Media Bureau said this case would be addressed in a subsequent proceeding.

46. As noted above, the Commission has long disfavored the use of channel 6 as a DTV allotment. When it adopted the initial DTV Table, the Commission sought to minimize the potential for interference between DTV and FM radio service by avoiding the use of channel 6 for DTV whenever possible, which resulted in only one channel 6 allotment in the initial DTV Table.

47. We conclude that the public interest would be served by waiving the 0.1 percent interference standard with respect to KIXE. Based on staff engineering analysis, we believe that, at most, 4,921 people within the KIXE contour (out of a total population of 375,342) would receive interference from KVIE's operation on DTV channel 9. Conversely, more than 4 million people residing within the KVIE service area will receive a superior DTV signal from KVIE on channel 9. Accordingly, we propose to allot channel *9 to Sacramento for post-transition DTV operations in our proposed DTV Table. KIXE elected its NTSC channel *9 as its TCD in the first round. KIXE may, if it wishes, file comments proposing to substitute its allotted DTV channel *18, or another channel, for its present TCD.

E. International Coordination

48.

Border Coordination.

Creating a new DTV Table has been a continuing cooperative North American effort, involving complex matters that require careful study and planning by parties on both sides of the negotiation. Under international arrangements with Canada and Mexico, the Commission must obtain concurrence by the Canadian government for any proposed allotments located within 400 kilometers of the U.S.-Canadian border, and by the Mexican government for any proposed allotments located within 275 kilometers of the U.S.-Mexican border. Our international negotiations are continuing in a cooperative manner and we do not believe these negotiations will delay stations' ability to construct their post-transition DTV facilities.

49. We announce here that Industry Canada has objected to the allotment of the TCDs for WBSF-DT, Bay City, Michigan and KAYU-DT, Spokane, Washington. Accordingly, while we include their TCD channels in our proposed DTV Table, we seek comment from these licensees concerning whether they are willing to reduce coverage on their TCD channel in order to address Canadian concerns. As indicated above, they may also request an alternative post-transition DTV channel allotment.

F. Treatment of New Licensees and Permittees and Pending Applications for New Stations

50. In the

Second DTV Periodic Report and Order

, the Commission stated that only Commission licensees and permittees were entitled to participate in the channel election process; applicants for new stations and petitioners for new allotments would not be allowed to make channel elections. The Commission noted that there were applications for approximately 50 new NTSC stations that were pending since before 1997. Several of these applications have since been granted after the start of the channel election process, resulting in new licensees and permittees that were not eligible to take part in the channel election process. Two of these permittees filed channel elections in round three; seven others, similarly situated, did not. In the

Third Round TCD PN

, we did not announce TCDs for these stations because they were authorized after the completion of the first round and, therefore, were not eligible to participate in the channel election process. Accordingly, at this time, we will accommodate these new licensees and permittees with TCDs in our proposed DTV Table.

51. For some of these new licensees and permittees, we have determined that their NTSC or DTV channel is appropriate for post-transition DTV operations. This group consists of: (1) WMBF-TV, channel 32, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; (2) KWKS, channel 19, Colby, Kansas; and (3) BPCT-960920KY, channel 47, Presque Isle, Maine. Thus, we have tentatively designated their current channel for post-transition DTV operations in our proposed DTV Table.

52. For others of these new licensees and permittees, we have determined that their NTSC or DTV channel is not appropriate for post-transition DTV operations because it would cause impermissible interference to a protected TCD. This group consists of: (1) WHRE, channel 21, Virginia Beach, Virginia; (2) KNIC-TV, channel 17, Blanco, Texas; (3) BPCDT-960920WX, channel 18, Mobile, Alabama; and (4) BPCT-960920WR, channel 29, Gainesville, Florida. DTV operation of the Virginia Beach, Virginia NTSC license on channel 21 (WHRE) would cause 28.9 percent new interference to the channel 20 TCD of WUND-TV, Edenton, North Carolina. DTV operation of the Blanco, Texas NTSC CP on channel 17 (KNIC-TV) would cause 0.8 percent new interference to the channel 16 TCD of KHCE-TV, San Antonio,

Texas. DTV operation of the Mobile, Alabama DTV CP on channel 18 (BPCDT-960920WX) would cause 0.4 percent new interference to the channel 18 TCD of WMAU-TV, Bude, Mississippi. DTV operation of the Gainesville, Florida, NTSC CP on channel 29, (BPCT-960920WR) would cause 0.6 percent new interference to the channel 29 TCD of WFTS-TV, Tampa, Florida. Thus, we have tentatively designated a “best available” channel for their post-transition DTV operations in our proposed DTV Table. We will allow these stations to request alternative channel assignments through the procedure discussed above in Section III.B.,

supra.

These stations may wish to propose an alternative channel that could be used both during the transition as well as post-transition.

53. We note that additional pending applications may be granted before an Order finalizing the DTV Table is adopted. To the extent possible, we will accommodate these future new permittees in our proposed DTV Table, consistent with the approach described above for existing new permittees. In order to provide interested parties with the opportunity to comment, the Media Bureau will issue public notices, to be published in the

Federal Register

, announcing TCDs for the new permittees that attain permittee status during the pendency of this rulemaking proceeding. If necessary, the Media Bureau is directed to establish a separate pleading cycle so that interested parties are given sufficient time to comment. Comments filed in response to such public notices will be incorporated into the record in this proceeding.

54. Applicants that receive a construction permit after the close of the comment period in this proceeding may either construct their analog facilities or apply to the Commission for permission to construct a digital facility on their analog channel. Such digital facilities are for operation during the transition. Such permittees may request authorization to continue their DTV operations on their NTSC channels after the transition. We anticipate that, in most instances, the same channel that was allotted in the NTSC Table will be allotted in the DTV Table. In the event that the NTSC channel is not suitable for DTV operations, such as if it would cause new interference in excess of 0.1 percent to another DTV station's operations on its allotted channel, we will determine a “best available” channel. Before the end of the transition, we will issue a NPRM to amend the DTV Table in order to allot a DTV channel for each remaining authorized facility that does not have an allotted DTV channel.

IV. Procedural Matters

A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

55. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (“RFA”) the Commission has prepared this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (“IRFA”) concerning the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules proposed in the

Seventh FNPRM

. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments indicated on the first page of the

Seventh FNPRM

. The Commission will send a copy of the

Seventh FNPRM

, including this IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA). In addition, the

Seventh FNPRM

and IRFA (or summaries thereof) will be published in the

Federal Register

.

Need for and Objectives of the Proposed Rules

56. The

Seventh FNPRM

proposes a new DTV Table of Allotments (“DTV Table”), providing all eligible broadcast television stations with channels for DTV operations after the DTV transition. The new DTV Table will affect all commercial and noncommercial broadcast television stations, including low power and TV translator stations.

57. The proposed new DTV Table is based on the tentative channel designations (“TCDs”) announced for eligible broadcast licensees through the channel election process, as well as on the Commission's efforts to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure the best possible service to the public, including service to local communities. During this election process, which was established by the

Second DTV Periodic Report and Order

, broadcast licensees selected their ultimate DTV channel inside the “core spectrum,” consisting of current television channels 2 through 51 (54-698 MHz). In developing the proposed new allotments, the Commission sought to accommodate broadcasters' channel preferences, as well as their replication and maximization service area certifications (made via FCC Form 381).

58. We believe our proposed new DTV Table achieves the goals set forth for the channel election process. First, the proposed new DTV Table provides all eligible stations with channels for DTV operations after the DTV transition. Second, we believe our proposed new DTV Table is the result of informed decisions by licensees when making their channel elections and that licensees benefited from the clarity and transparency of the channel election process. Third, we believe our proposed new DTV Table recognizes industry expectations by protecting existing service and respecting investments already made, to the extent feasible. Finally, we believe the proposed new DTV Table reflects our efforts to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure the best possible DTV service to the public.

Legal Basis

59. The authority for the action proposed in this rulemaking is contained in sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 5(c)(1), 7, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 316, 319, 324, 336, and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C 151, 154(i) and (j), 155(c)(1), 157, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 316, 319, 324, 336, and 337.

Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rules Will Apply

60. The RFA directs the Commission to provide a description of and, where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that will be affected by the proposed rules, if adopted. The RFA generally defines the term “small entity” as having the same meaning as the terms “small business,” small organization,” and “small government jurisdiction.” In addition, the term “small business” has the same meaning as the term “small business concern” under the Small Business Act. A small business concern is one which: (1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the SBA. The proposed rules, if adopted, in the

Seventh FNPRM,

will primarily affect television stations. A description of such small entities, as well as an estimate of the number of such small entities, is provided below.

61.

Television Broadcasting.

The proposed rules and policies apply to television broadcast licensees and potential licensees of television service. The SBA defines a television broadcast station as a small business if such station has no more than $13 million in annual receipts. Business concerns included in this industry are those “primarily engaged in broadcasting images together with sound.” According to Commission staff review of the BIA Publications, Inc. Master Access Television Analyzer Database (BIA) on

June 16, 2006, about 915 of the 1,305 commercial television stations (or about 70 percent) have revenues of $13 million or less and thus qualify as small entities under the SBA definition. We note, however, that, in assessing whether a business concern qualifies as small under the above definition, business (control) affiliations must be included. Our estimate, therefore, likely overstates the number of small entities that might be affected by our action, because the revenue figure on which it is based does not include or aggregate revenues from affiliated companies.

62. In addition, an element of the definition of “small business” is that the entity not be dominant in its field of operation. We are unable at this time to define or quantify the criteria that would establish whether a specific television station is dominant in its field of operation. Accordingly, the estimate of small businesses to which rules may apply do not exclude any television station from the definition of a small business on this basis and are therefore over-inclusive to that extent. Also as noted, an additional element of the definition of “small business” is that the entity must be independently owned and operated. We note that it is difficult at times to assess these criteria in the context of media entities and our estimates of small businesses to which they apply may be over-inclusive to this extent.

63.

Class A TV, LPTV, and TV translator stations.

The proposed rules and policies also apply to licensees of Class A TV stations, low power television (LPTV) stations, and TV translator stations, as well as to potential licensees in these television services. The same SBA definition that applies to television broadcast licensees would apply to these stations. The SBA defines a television broadcast station as a small business if such station has no more than $13 million in annual receipts. Currently, there are approximately 589 licensed Class A stations, 2,157 licensed LPTV stations, and 4,549 licensed TV translators. Given the nature of these services, we will presume that all of these licensees qualify as small entities under the SBA definition. We note, however, that under the SBA's definition, revenue of affiliates that are not LPTV stations should be aggregated with the LPTV station revenues in determining whether a concern is small. Our estimate may thus overstate the number of small entities since the revenue figure on which it is based does not include or aggregate revenues from non-LPTV affiliated companies. We do not have data on revenues of TV translator or TV booster stations, but virtually all of these entities are also likely to have revenues of less than $13 million and thus may be categorized as small, except to the extent that revenues of affiliated non-translator or booster entities should be considered.

Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other Compliance Requirements

64. The proposals set forth in the

Seventh FNPRM

would involve no changes to reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements beyond what is already required under the current regulations.

Steps Taken to Minimize Significant Impact on Small Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered

65. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach, which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1) The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to small entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities; (3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small entities.

66. The proposed new DTV Table provides all eligible broadcast television stations—large and small alike—with channels for post-transition DTV operations. Small broadcasters, just like large ones, benefited from participating in the channel election process. The proposed new DTV Table is the result of informed decisions by licensees when making their channel elections and licensees benefited from the clarity and transparency of the channel election process. Moreover, the proposed new DTV Table recognizes industry expectations by protecting existing service and respecting investments already made, to the extent feasible. The TCDs announced primarily were based on the channels elected by licensees. We estimate that more than 98 percent of licensees participating in the channel election process received a TCD for the channel they elected. The

Seventh FNPRM

invites comment from broadcasters, including small broadcasters, on the proposed new DTV Table.

67. In addition, the

Seventh FNPRM

provides an opportunity for certain licensees demonstrating special circumstances to request alternative channel assignments. The Commission will consider requests for alternative channel assignments only from (1) licensees who demonstrate that they cannot construct their full, authorized DTV facilities (The term “full, authorized DTV facilities” here refers to the original facilities certified by the licensee in its FCC Form 381. We will not preclude requests for alternative channel assignments from licensees that modified their certified facilities after receiving a conflict letter in the first and second channel election rounds.) with their present TCD because doing so would cause unacceptable interference to protected TCDs (We will consider only engineering demonstrations here. Requests based on financial or other reasons will not be considered.), (2) licensees with international coordination issues which the Commission has been unable to resolve with the Canadian and Mexican governments, (3) licensees with TCDs for low-VHF channels (channels 2-6); and (4) new licensees and permittees that attained such status after the start of the channel election process and to which we assigned a TCD for post-transition DTV operations because their assigned NTSC channel was determined to cause impermissible interference to existing licensees. Licensees that want to change their DTV allotment, but which are not in any of these categories (

e.g.

, are technically able to construct their full, authorized DTV facilities on their existing TCD) may request a change in allotment only after the proposed DTV Table is finalized and must do so through the existing allotment procedures, as set forth in 47 CFR 1.420. We believe small broadcasters with special circumstances will benefit from this opportunity. We also seek comment from small broadcasters on whether additional measures need to be taken in order to facilitate small broadcasters' transition to their ultimate DTV channel.

Federal Rules Which Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict with the Commission's Proposals

68. None.

B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis

69. The

Seventh FNPRM

has been analyzed with respect to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (“PRA”), and does not contain proposed information collection requirements. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified “information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,” pursuant to

the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002.

C.

Ex Parte

Rules

70.

Permit-But-Disclose.

This proceeding will be treated as a “permit-but-disclose” proceeding subject to the “permit-but-disclose” requirements under 47 CFR 1.1206(b).

Ex parte

presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral

ex parte

presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Additional rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in 47 CFR 1.1206(b).

D. Filing Requirements

71.

Comments and Replies.

Pursuant to 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) The Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (“ECFS”), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies.

72.

Electronic Filers:

Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS:

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/

or the Federal eRulemaking Portal:

http://www.regulations.gov.

Filers should follow the instructions provided on the Web site for submitting comments. For ECFS filers, if multiple docket or rulemaking numbers appear in the caption of this proceeding, filers must transmit one electronic copy of the comments for each docket or rulemaking number referenced in the caption. In completing the transmittal screen, filers should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions, filers should send an e-mail to

ecfs@fcc.gov

, and include the following words in the body of the message, “get form.” A sample form and directions will be sent in response.

73.

Paper Filers:

Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although we continue to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.

• The Commission's contractor will receive hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at 236 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building.

• Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.

• U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington DC 20554.

74.

Availability of Documents.

Comments, reply comments, and

ex parte

submissions will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. These documents will also be available via ECFS. Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.

75.

Accessibility Information.

To request information in accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send an e-mail to

fcc504@fcc.gov

or call the FCC's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This document can also be downloaded in Word and Portable Document Format (PDF) at:

http://www.fcc.gov.

76.

Additional Information.

For additional information on this proceeding, contact Evan Baranoff,

Evan.Baranoff@fcc.go

v, or Eloise Gore,

Eloise.Gore@fcc.gov

, of the Media Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418-2120; Nazifa Sawez,

Nazifa.Sawez@fcc.go

v, of the Media Bureau, Video Division, (202) 418-1600; or Alan Stillwell,

Alan.Stillwell@fcc.gov

, of the Office of Engineering and Technology, (202) 418-2470.

V. Ordering Clauses

77. Accordingly,

it is ordered

that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 7, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 316, 319, 324, 336, and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C 151, 154(i) and (j), 157, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 316, 319, 324, 336, and 337 that

notice is hereby given

of the proposals and tentative conclusions described in the

Seventh FNPRM

, including the proposed DTV Table of Allotment and amendments to part 73 of the Commission's rules, as set forth in the proposed rules.

78.

It is further ordere

d that the Reference Information Center, Consumer Information Bureau, shall send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Digital television, Radio.

Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene H. Dortch,

Secretary.

Proposed Rule Changes

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as follows:

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

Authority:

47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336 and 339.

2. Section 73.622 is amended by adding new paragraph (i) to read as follows:

§ 73.622

Digital television table of allotments.

(i) Post-Transition Table of DTV Allotments.

Community

Channel No.

ALABAMA

Anniston

9

Bessemer

18

Birmingham

*10, 13, 30, 36, 50

Demopolis

*19

Dothan

21, 36

Dozier

*10

Florence

14, 20, *22

Gadsden

26, 45

Gulf Shores

25

Homewood

28

Huntsville

19, *24, 32, 41, 49

Louisville

*44

Mobile

9, 15, 20, 23, 27, *41

Montgomery

12, 16, *27, 32, 46

Mount Cheaha

*7

Opelika

47

Ozark

33

Selma

29, 42

Troy

48

Tuscaloosa

23, 33

Tuskegee

22

ALASKA

Anchorage

5, *8, 10, 12, 20, *26, 28, 32

Bethel

*3

Fairbanks

7, *9, 11, 18

Juneau

*10, 11

Ketchikan

13

North Pole

4

Sitka

2

ARIZONA

Douglas

36

Flagstaff

2, 13, 18, 32

Green Valley

46

Holbrook

*11

Kingman

19

Mesa

12

Phoenix

*8, 10, 15, 17, 20, 24, 26, 33, 39, 49

Prescott

7

Sierra Vista

44

Tolleson

51

Tucson

9, 19, 23, 25,*28, *30, 32, 40

Yuma

11, 16

ARKANSAS

Arkadelphia

*13

Camden

49

El Dorado

*12, 27, 43

Eureka Springs

34

Fayetteville

*9, 15

Fort Smith

18, 21, 27

Harrison

31

Hot Springs

26

Jonesboro

8, *20, 48

Little Rock

*7, 12, 22, 30, 32, *36, 44

Mountain View

*13

Pine Bluff

24, 39

Rogers

50

Springdale

39

CALIFORNIA

Anaheim

32

Arcata

22

Avalon

47

Bakersfield

10, 25, 33, 45

Barstow

44

Bishop

20

Calipatria

36

Ceres

*15

Chico

24, 43

Clovis

43

Concord

14

Corona

39

Cotati

*23

El Centro

9, 22

Eureka

3, *11, 17, 28

Fort Bragg

8

Fresno

7, 30, 34, 38, *40

Hanford

20

Huntington Beach

*48

Long Beach

18

Los Angeles

7, 9, 11, 13, *28, 31, 34, 36, *41, 42, 43

Merced

11

Modesto

18

Monterey

31, 32

Novato

47

Oakland

44

Ontario

29

Oxnard

24

Palm Springs

42, 46

Paradise

20

Porterville

48

Rancho Palos Verdes

51

Redding

7, *9

Riverside

45

Sacramento

*9, 10, 21, 35, 40, 48

Salinas

8, 13

San Bernardino

*26, 38,

San Diego

8, 10, 18, 19, *30, 40

San Francisco

7, 19, 27, 29, *30, *33, 38, 39, 45, 51

San Jose

12, 36, 41, 49, *50

San Luis Obispo

15, 34

San Mateo

*43

Sanger

36

Santa Ana

23

Santa Barbara

21, 27

Santa Maria

19

Santa Rosa

32

Stockton

25, 26, 46

Twentynine Palms

23

Vallejo

34

Ventura

49

Visalia

28, *50

Watsonville

*25

COLORADO

Boulder

15

Broomfield

*38

Castle Rock

46

Colorado Springs

10, 22, 24

Denver

7, 9, *18, 19, 32, 34, 35, *40, 43, 51

Durango

15, *20, 33

Fort Collins

21

Glenwood Springs

23

Grand Junction

2, 7, 12, 15, *18

Longmont

29

Montrose

13

Pueblo

*8, 42

Steamboat Springs

10

Sterling

23

CONNECTICUT

Bridgeport

42, *49

Hartford

31, 33, *45, 46

New Britain

35

New Haven

*6, 10, 39

New London

26

Norwich

*9

Waterbury

20

DELAWARE

Seaford

*44

Wilmington

*12, 31

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Washington

7, 9, *27, *33, 35, 36, 48, 50

FLORIDA

Boca Raton

*40

Bradenton

42

Cape Coral

35

Clearwater

21

Clermont

17

Cocoa

*30, 51

Daytona Beach

11, 49

Destin

48

Fort Lauderdale

30

Fort Myers

9, 15, *31

Fort Pierce

34, *38

Fort Walton Beach

40, 49, 50

Gainesville

9, 16, *36

High Springs

28

Hollywood

47

Jacksonville

*7, 13, 19, 32, 34, 42, *44

Key West

3, 8

Lake Worth

36

Lakeland

19

Leesburg

40, *46

Live Oak

48

Marianna

51

Melbourne

43, 48

Miami

7, 10, *18, 19, *20, 22, 23, 31, 32, 35, 46

Naples

41, 45

New Smyrna Beach

*33

Ocala

31

Orange Park

10

Orlando

22, *23, 26, 27, 39, 41

Palm Beach

49

Panama City

7, 9, 13, *38

Panama City Beach

47

Pensacola

17, *31, 34, 45

Sarasota

24

St. Petersburg

10, 38, 44

Stuart

44

Tallahassee

24, 27, *32, 40

Tampa

7, 12, *13, 29, *34, 47

Tequesta

16

Tice

33

Venice

25

West Palm Beach

12, 13, *27, 28

GEORGIA

Albany

10, 12

Athens

*8, 48

Atlanta

10, 19, 20, *21, 25, 27, 39, *41, 43

Augusta

12, 30, 42, 51

Bainbridge

49

Baxley

35

Brunswick

24

Chatsworth

*33

Cochran

*7

Columbus

9, 15, *23, 35, 49

Cordele

51

Dalton

16

Dawson

*8

Macon

13, 16, 40, 45

Monroe

44

Pelham

*6

Perry

32

Rome

51

Savannah

*9, 11, 22, 39

Thomasville

46

Toccoa

24

Valdosta

43

Waycross

*8

Wrens

*6

HAWAII

Hilo

9, 11, 13, 22, 23

Honolulu

8, 9, *10, *11, 19, 23, 27, 31, 33, 35, 40, *43

Kailua

50

Kailua Kona

25

Kaneohe

41

Wailuku

7, *10, 12, 16, 21, 24

Waimanalo

38

IDAHO

Boise

7, *21, 28, 39

Caldwell

10

Coeur D'alene

*45

Filer

*18

Idaho Falls

8, 20, 36

Lewiston

32

Moscow

*12

Nampa

12, 24

Pocatello

15, *17, 23, 31

Sun Valley

32

Twin Falls

11, *22, 34

ILLINOIS

Aurora

50

Bloomington

28

Carbondale

*8

Champaign

41, 48

Charleston

*50

Chicago

7, 11, 19, *21, 27, 29, 31, 43, 45, *47

Decatur

18, 22

East St. Louis

47

Freeport

23

Harrisburg

34

Jacksonville

*15

Joliet

38

LaSalle

10

Macomb

*21

Marion

17

Moline

*23, 38

Mount Vernon

21

Olney

*19

Peoria

19, 25, 30, 39, *46

Quincy

10, 32, *34

Rock Island

4

Rockford

13, 16, 42

Springfield

13, 42, 44

Urbana

*9, 26

INDIANA

Angola

12

Bloomington

*14, 27, 42, 48

Elkhart

28

Evansville

*9, 25, 28, 45, 46

Fort Wayne

19, 24, 31, 36, *40

Gary

*17, 51

Hammond

36

Indianapolis

9, 13, 16, *21, 25, *44, 45

Kokomo

29

Lafayette

11

Marion

32

Muncie

23

Richmond

39

Salem

51

South Bend

22, *35, 42, 48

Terre Haute

10, 36, 39

Vincennes

*22

IOWA

Ames

5, 23, *34

Burlington

41

Cedar Rapids

9, 27, 47, 51

Council Bluffs

*33

Davenport

*34, 36, 49

Des Moines

8, *11, 13, 16, 31

Dubuque

43

Fort Dodge

*25

Iowa City

*12, 25

Mason City

*18, 42

Newton

39

Ottumwa

15

Red Oak

*35

Sioux City

9, *28, 39, 41, 44

Waterloo

7, 22, *35

KANSAS

Colby

17, 19

Dodge City

*21

Ensign

6

Garden City

11, 13

Goodland

10

Great Bend

22

Hays

7, *16

Hoisington

14

Hutchinson

*8, 12, 35

Lakin

*8

Lawrence

41

Pittsburg

7, 14

Salina

17

Topeka

*11, 13, 27, 49

Wichita

10, 26, 31, 45

KENTUCKY

Ashland

*26, 44

Beattyville

7

Bowling Green

13, 16, *18, *48

Campbellsville

19

Covington

*24

Danville

4

Elizabethtown

*43

Harlan

51

Hazard

12, *16

Lexington

13, 39, 40, *42

Louisville

8, 11, *17, 26, *38, 47, 49

Madisonville

20, *42

Morehead

*15, 21

Murray

*36

Newport

29

Owensboro

30

Owenton

*44

Paducah

32, 41, 49

Pikeville

*24

Somerset

*14

LOUISIANA

Alexandria

*26, 31, 35, 41

Baton Rouge

9, 13, *25, 34, 45

Columbia

11

Hammond

42

Lafayette

10, 16, *23, 28

Lake Charles

7, *20, 30

Minden

21

Monroe

8, *13

New Iberia

50

New Orleans

8, *11, 15, 21, 26, *31, 36, 43, 50

Shreveport

17, *25, 28, 34, 44

Slidell

24

West Monroe

36, 38

MAINE

Augusta

*10

Bangor

2, 7, 19

Biddeford

*45

Calais

*10

Lewiston

35

Orono

*9

Poland Spring

8

Portland

38, 43, 44

Presque Isle

8, *10, 47

Waterville

23

MARYLAND

Annapolis

*42

Baltimore

11, 13, *29, 38, 40, 41, 46,

Frederick

*28

Hagerstown

26, 39, *44

Oakland

*36

Salisbury

21, *28, 47

MASSACHUSETTS

Adams

36

Boston

7, *19, 20, 30, 31, 32, 39, *43

Cambridge

41

Lawrence

18

Marlborough

27

New Bedford

22, 49

Norwell

10

Pittsfield

13

Springfield

11, *22, 40

Vineyard Haven

40

Worcester

29, *47

MICHIGAN

Alpena

11, *24

Ann Arbor

31

Bad Axe

*15

Battle Creek

20, 44

Bay City

22, 46

Cadillac

9, *17, 47

Calumet

5

Cheboygan

35

Detroit

7, 14, 21, 41, *43, 44, 45

East Lansing

*40

Escanaba

48

Flint

12, 16, *28

Grand Rapids

7, *11, 13, 19

Iron Mountain

8

Ishpeming

10

Jackson

34

Kalamazoo

*5, 8, 45

Lansing

36, 38, 51

Manistee

*21

Marquette

*13, 19, 35

Mount Clemens

39

Mount Pleasant

*26

Muskegon

24

Onondaga

10

Saginaw

30, 48

Sault Ste. Marie

8, 10

Traverse City

7, 29

University Center

*18

MINNESOTA

Alexandria

7, 42

Appleton

*10

Austin

*20, 36

Bemidji

*9, 26

Brainerd

*28

Chisholm

11

Crookston

*16

Duluth

*8, 10, 17, 33

Hibbing

13, *31

Mankato

12

Minneapolis

9, 11, 22, 29, 32, 45

Redwood Falls

27

Rochester

10, 46

St. Cloud

40

St. Paul

*26, *34, 35

Thief River Falls

10

Walker

12

Worthington

*15

MISSISSIPPI

Biloxi

13, *16

Booneville

*12

Bude

*18

Columbus

35, *43

Greenville

15

Greenwood

*25, 32

Gulfport

48

Hattiesburg

22

Holly Springs

41

Houston

45

Jackson

7, 12, *20, 21, 41

Laurel

28

Magee

34

Meridian

11, 24, 31, *44

Mississippi State

*10

Natchez

49

Oxford

*36

Tupelo

8

Vicksburg

35

West Point

16

MISSOURI

Cape Girardeau

12, 22

Columbia

8, 17

Hannibal

7

Jefferson City

12, 20

Joplin

*25, 43, 46

Kansas City

9, *18, 24, 31, 34, 42, 47, 51

Kirksville

33

Poplar Bluff

15

Sedalia

15

Springfield

10, 19, *23, 28, 44

St. Joseph

7, 21

St. Louis

14, 24, 26, 31, 35, *39, 43

MONTANA

Billings

10, 11, 18

Bozeman

*8, 13

Butte

5, 6, 19, 24

Glendive

10

Great Falls

7, 8, 26, 45

Hardin

22

Havre

9

Helena

12, 29

Kalispell

9

Lewistown

13

Miles City

3

Missoula

7, *11, 13, 17, 23

NEBRASKA

Alliance

*13

Bassett

*7

Grand Island

11, 19

Hastings

5, *28

Hayes Center

18

Kearney

36

Lexington

*26

Lincoln

8, 10, *12, 51

McCook

12

Merriman

*12

Norfolk

*19

North Platte

2, *9

Omaha

15, *17, 20, 22, 43, 45

Scottsbluff

7, 17, 29

Superior

34

NEVADA

Elko

10

Ely

3, 27

Goldfield

50

Henderson

9

Las Vegas

2, 7, *11, 13, 16, 22, 29

Laughlin

32

Paradise

40

Reno

7, 9, 13, *15, 20, 26, 44

Tonopah

9

Winnemucca

7

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Concord

33

Derry

35

Durham

*11

Keene

*49

Littleton

*48

Manchester

9

Merrimack

34

NEW JERSEY

Atlantic City

44, 49

Burlington

27

Camden

*22

Linden

36

Montclair

*51

New Brunswick

*8

Newark

13, 41

Newton

18

Paterson

40

Secaucus

38

Trenton

*43

Vineland

29

West Milford

*29

Wildwood

36

NEW MEXICO

Albuquerque

7, 13, *17, 22, 24, 26, *35, 42, 45

Carlsbad

19, 25

Clovis

20

Farmington

8, 12

Hobbs

29

Las Cruces

*23, 47

Portales

*32

Roswell

8, 10, 21, 27

Santa Fe

*9, 10, 27, 29

Silver City

10, 12

NEW YORK

Albany

7, 12, 26

Amsterdam

50

Batavia

23

Bath

14

Binghamton

7, 8, 34, *42

Buffalo

14, 32, 33, 34, 38, 39, *43

Carthage

7

Corning

*30, 48

Elmira

18, 36

Garden City

*21

Ithaca

20

Jamestown

26

Kingston

48

New York

7, 11, *24, 28, 31, 33, 44

North Pole

14

Norwood

*23

Plattsburgh

*38

Poughkeepsie

27

Riverhead

47

Rochester

10, 13, *16, 28, 45

Saranac Lake

40

Schenectady

6, *34, 43

Smithtown

23

Springville

7

Syracuse

15, 17, 19, 24, *25, 44, 47

Utica

27, 29, 30

Watertown

21, *41

NORTH CAROLINA

Asheville

13, *25, 45

Belmont

47

Burlington

14

Chapel Hill

*25

Charlotte

*11, 22, 23, 27, 34

Concord

*44

Durham

11, 28

Edenton

*20

Fayetteville

36, 38

Goldsboro

17

Greensboro

33, 43, 51

Greenville

10, 14, *23, 51

Hickory

40

High Point

8

Jacksonville

*19, 34

Kannapolis

50

Lexington

19

Linville

*17

Lumberton

*31

Manteo

9

Morehead City

8

New Bern

12

Raleigh

27, 48, 49

Roanoke Rapids

*36

Rocky Mount

15

Washington

32

Wilmington

*29, 30, 44, 46

Wilson

42

Winston Salem

29, 31, *32

NORTH DAKOTA

Bismarck

12, 16, *22, 26, 31

Devils Lake

8, *25

Dickinson

7, *9, 19

Ellendale

*20

Fargo

*13, 19, 21, 44

Grand Forks

*15, 27

Jamestown

7

Minot

10, 13, 14, 24, *40

Pembina

12

Valley City

38

Williston

8, 14, *51

OHIO

Akron

23, 30, *50

Alliance

*45

Athens

*27

Bowling Green

*27

Cambridge

*35

Canton

39, 47

Chillicothe

46

Cincinnati

10, 12, 33, *34, 35

Cleveland

8, 15, 17, *26, 34

Columbus

13, 14, 21, 36, *38

Dayton

*16, 30, 41, 50, 51

Lima

8, 47

Lorain

28

Mansfield

12

Newark

24

Oxford

*28

Portsmouth

17, *43

Sandusky

42

Shaker Heights

10

Springfield

26

Steubenville

9

Toledo

5, 11, 13, *29, 46, 49

Youngstown

20, 36, 41

Zanesville

40

OKLAHOMA

Ada

26

Bartlesville

17

Cheyenne

*8

Claremore

*36

Eufaula

*31

Lawton

11

Muskogee

20

Norman

46

Oklahoma City

7, 9, *13, 15, 24, 27, 33, 40, 50, 51

Okmulgee

28

Shawnee

29

Tulsa

8, 10, *11, 22, 42, 45, 47, 49

Woodward

35

OREGON

Bend

*11, 21

Coos Bay

11, 22

Corvallis

*7

Eugene

9, 13, 17, *29, 31

Grants Pass

30

Klamath Falls

13, 29, *33

La Grande

*13, 29

Medford

5, *8, 10, 12, 26

Pendleton

11

Portland

8, *10, 12, 24, 40, 43

Roseburg

18, 19, 45

Salem

22, 33

PENNSYLVANIA

Allentown

*39, 46

Altoona

24, 32, 46

Bethlehem

9

Clearfield

*15

Erie

12, 16, 22, 24, *50

Greensburg

50

Harrisburg

10, 21, *36

Hazleton

45

Jeannette

49

Johnstown

8, 34

Lancaster

8, 23

Philadelphia

6, 17, 26, 32, 34, *35, 42

Pittsburgh

*13, 25, 38, 42, 43, 48, 51

Reading

25

Red Lion

30

Scranton

13, 32, 38, *41, 49

Wilkes Barre

11

Williamsport

29

York

47

RHODE ISLAND

Block Island

17

Providence

12, 13, *21, 51

SOUTH CAROLINA

Allendale

*33

Anderson

14

Beaufort

*44

Charleston

*7, 24, 34, 36, 47, 50

Columbia

8, 10, 17, *32, 47, 48

Conway

*9

Florence

13, 16, 21, *45

Georgetown

*38

Greenville

*9, 16, 21, 36

Greenwood

*18

Hardeeville

28

Myrtle Beach

18, 32

Rock Hill

15, 39

Spartanburg

7, 43

Sumter

*28, 39

SOUTH DAKOTA

Aberdeen

9, *17

Brookings

*8

Eagle Butte

*13

Florence

3

Huron

12

Lead

10, 29

Lowry

*11

Martin

*8

Mitchell

26

Pierre

*10, 19

Rapid City

2, 16, 18, 21, *26

Reliance

13

Sioux Falls

7, 11, 13, *24, 36, 47

Vermillion

*34

TENNESSEE

Chattanooga

9, 12, 13, *29, 40

Cleveland

42

Cookeville

*22, 36

Crossville

20

Greeneville

38

Hendersonville

51

Jackson

39, 43

Jellico

23

Johnson City

11

Kingsport

19

Knoxville

7, 10, *17, 26, 30, 34

Lebanon

44

Lexington

*47

Memphis

5, *10, 13, *14, 25, 28, *29, 31, 51

Murfreesboro

38

Nashville

5, *8, 10, 15, 21, 23, 27,

Sneedville

*41

Tazewell

48

TEXAS

Abilene

15, 24, 29

Alvin

36

Amarillo

7, *8, 10, 15, 19

Arlington

42

Austin

7, 21, *22, 33, 43, 49

Baytown

41

Beaumont

12, 21, *33

Belton

46

Big Spring

33

Blanco

18

Borger

31

Brownsville

24

Bryan

28, 50

College Station

*12

Conroe

32, 42

Corpus Christi

8, 10, 13, *23, 27, 38

Dallas

8, *14, 32, 35, 36, 40, 45

Decatur

30

Del Rio

28

Denton

*43

Eagle Pass

18

El Paso

7, 9, *13, 15, 18, 25, *39, 51

Farwell

18

Fort Worth

9, 11, 18, 41

Fredericksburg

5

Galveston

*23, 48

Garland

23

Greenville

46

Harlingen

31, *34, 38

Houston

*8, 11, 13, 19, *24, 26, 35, 38, 44

Irving

48

Jacksonville

22

Katy

47

Kerrville

32

Killeen

13

Lake Dallas

39

Laredo

8, 13, 19

Llano

27

Longview

31, 38

Lubbock

11, 16, 27, 35, *39, 40

Lufkin

9

Mcallen

49

Midland

18, 26

Nacogdoches

18

Odessa

7, 9, 23, 30, *38, 42

Port Arthur

40

Rio Grande City

20

Rosenberg

45

San Angelo

11, 16, 19

San Antonio

*9, 12, *16, 30, 38, 39, 41, 48,

Sherman

12

Snyder

17

Sweetwater

20

Temple

9

Texarkana

15

Tyler

7

Uvalde

26

Victoria

11, 15

Waco

10, *20, 26, 44

Weslaco

13

Wichita Falls

15, 22, 28

Wolfforth

22

UTAH

Cedar City

14

Logan

12

Ogden

24, *36, 48

Price

11

Provo

29, 32, *44

Richfield

*19

Salt Lake City

13, 20, 34, 38, 40, *42, 46

St. George

9, *18

Vernal

16

VERMONT

Burlington

13, 22, *32, 43

Hartford

25

Rutland

*9

St. Johnsbury

*18

Windsor

*24

VIRGINIA

Arlington

15

Ashland

47

Bristol

5

Charlottesville

19, 32, *46

Danville

24

Fairfax

*24

Front Royal

*21

Goldvein

*30

Grundy

49

Hampton

13

Hampton Norfolk

*16

Harrisonburg

49

Lynchburg

13, 20

Manassas

34

Marion

*42

Norfolk

33, 40, 46

Norton

*32

Petersburg

22

Portsmouth

31, 50

Richmond

12, 25, 26, *42, *44

Roanoke

*3, 17, 18, 30, 36

Staunton

*11

Virginia Beach

23, 29

WASHINGTON

Bellevue

33, 50

Bellingham

19, 35

Centralia

*19

Everett

31

Kennewick

44

Pasco

18

Pullman

*10, 24

Richland

26, *38

Seattle

*9, 25, 38, 39, 44, 48

Spokane

7, *8, 13, 20, 28, 34, 36

Tacoma

11, 13, 14, *27, *42

Vancouver

30

Walla Walla

9

Yakima

14, 16, *21, 33

WEST VIRGINIA

Bluefield

40, 46

Charleston

19, 39, 41

Clarksburg

10, 12

Grandview

*10

Huntington

13, 23, *34

Lewisburg

8

Martinsburg

12

Morgantown

*33

Oak Hill

4

Parkersburg

49

Weston

5

Wheeling

7

WISCONSIN

Antigo

46

Appleton

27

Chippewa Falls

49

Crandon

12

Eagle River

28

Eau Claire

13, 15

Fond Du Lac

44

Green Bay

11, 23, 39, 41, *42

Janesville

32

Kenosha

40

La Crosse

8, 14, 17, *30

Madison

11, 19, *20, 26, 50

Mayville

43

Menomonie

*27

Milwaukee

*8, 18, 22, 25, 28, 33, 34, *35, 46

Park Falls

*36

Racine

48

Rhinelander

16

Superior

19

Suring

21

Wausau

7, 9, *24

Wittenberg

50

WYOMING

Casper

*6, 12, 14, 17, 20

Cheyenne

11, 27, 30

Jackson

2, 11

Lander

7, *8

Laramie

*8

Rawlins

9

Riverton

10

Rock Springs

23

Sheridan

7, 13

GUAM

Agana

8, 12

Tamuning

14

PUERTO RICO

Aguada

50

Aguadilla

12, 17, *34

Arecibo

14, 46

Bayamon

30

Caguas

11, *48

Carolina

51

Fajardo

13, *16, 33

Guayama

45

Humacao

49

Mayaguez

22, 23, 29, 35

Naranjito

18

Ponce

7, 9, 15, 19, *25, 47

San Juan

21, 27, 28, 31, 32, *43

San Sebastian

39

Yauco

41

VIRGIN ISLANDS

Charlotte Amalie

17, 43, *44

Christiansted

15, 20, 23

Note:

The following Appendix will not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.

Appendix—Proposed DTV Table of Allotments Information

The table in this appendix presents the Commission's proposals for assigning the DTV channel allotments to individual broadcast television stations for post-transition DTV operations. It sets forth the proposed technical facilities—effective radiated power, antenna height above average terrain, and antenna identification code—and transmitter site for which each TV station would be authorized on its post-transition channel. The table also provides information on stations' predicted service coverage and the percentage of their service population that would be affected by interference received from other DTV stations. The channels proposed for assignment to stations here are the same as those the Commission is proposing to include in the new DTV Table of Allotments (DTV Table), which, if adopted, would be codified in 47 CFR 73.622(i).

The table includes a proposed DTV channel assignment for all television stations that are eligible under the qualifying criteria, set forth in the

Second DTV Periodic Report and Order

and reiterated in the discussion above. The proposed technical facilities parameters, which were also used for calculation of the tabulated engineering information, were developed in the three-round channel election process that the Commission conducted to create the proposed DTV Table. These technical facilities data are also available in an EXCEL format at

http://www.fcc.gov/dtv.

Data Elements

Facility ID:

A five-digit code for identification of TV or DTV stations associated with channel allotments. A unique code is assigned to each station at the time the Commission first receives an application for a construction permit for that station and does not change, even where the license for the station changes ownership or major changes are made to the station, such as a change of channel or community.

City and State:

The city and State to which the channel is allotted and the station is licensed to serve.

NTSC Channel:

The station's current analog (NTSC) channel. This field is left blank in the case of stations that are only licensed to operate digital television service. If a station currently operates only an analog channel, that analog channel will appear in this field. Note: Stations must cease analog operations at the end of the DTV transition on February 17, 2009.

See

47 U.S.C. 309(j)(14)(A).

DTV Channel:

The channel proposed for the station's post-transition DTV operation.

DTV Power:

The effective radiated power (ERP) proposed for the station's post-transition DTV operation. This value is the ERP specified for the station's post-transition operation in the channel election process and, accordingly, may be the station's: (1) Currently authorized ERP, (2) 1997 service replication ERP, (3) other allowable value to which it agreed to operate to resolve a conflict or as part of a negotiated agreement in the channel election process; or (4) in cases where a station's proposed DTV channel is not its current DTV channel, a value determined by the Commission that will enable the station to provide coverage of the station's service area as specified in the channel election process. The value shown is the maximum, over a set of uniformly spaced compass directions, of the ERP values used in determining the station's specified noise-limited DTV service contour. This value is used in the calculations of service and interference also shown herein.

In cases where the TV Engineering Database indicated employment of a directional antenna, the ERP in each specific direction was determined through linear interpolation of the relative field values describing the directional pattern. (The directional pattern stored in the FCC computer database provides relative field values at 10 degree intervals and may include additional values in special directions. The result of linear interpolation of these relative field values is squared and multiplied by the overall maximum ERP listed for the station in the TV Engineering Database to find the ERP in a specific direction.)

Where a station's ERP was determined by the Commission, it was calculated using the following methodology. First, the distance to the station's noise-limited DTV contour (or Grade B contour for stations that do not have a DTV channel) was determined in each of 360 uniformly spaced compass directions starting from true north. This determination was made using information in the engineering database, including directional antenna data, and using terrain elevation data at points separated by 3 arc-seconds of longitude and latitude. FCC curves (47 CFR 73.699) were applied in the usual way, as described in 47 CFR 73.684, to find this noise-limited contour distance, with the exception that dipole factor considerations were applied to the field strength contour specified in 47 CFR 73.683 for UHF channels.

The station's proposed post-transition DTV ERP was then calculated by a further application of FCC curves, with noise-limited DTV coverage defined as the presence of field strengths of 28 dBu, 36 dBu, and 41 dBu as set forth in 47 CFR 73.622(e), respectively for low-VHF, high-VHF and UHF, at 50 percent of locations and 90 percent of the time. The family of FCC propagation curves for predicting field strength at 50 percent of locations 90 percent of the time is found by the formula F(50, 90) = F(50, 50)−[F(50, 10)−F(50, 50)]. That is, the F(50, 90) value is lower than F(50, 50) by the same amount that F(50, 10) exceeds F(50, 50). At UHF, the precise value 41 dBu was applied for channel 38; and the value used for other UHF channels is 41 dBu plus a dipole factor modification. This results in reception on channel 14 needing 2.3 dB less, and channel 69 needing 2.3 dB more, than the 41 dBu for channel 38. The dipole factor modification used in ERP calculations is equal to 20 times log10 of the ratio of the center frequency of the UHF channel of interest to the center frequency of channel 38.

In general, these computations of a station's DTV power on a new channel to match the distance to its noise-limited contour result in ERP values, which vary with azimuth. For example, the azimuthal ERP pattern that replicates for a UHF channel, the noise-limited contour of an omnidirectional VHF operation will be somewhat different because terrain has a different effect on propagation in the two bands. Thus, the procedure described here effectively derives a new directional antenna pattern wherever necessary for a precise match according to FCC curves.

Finally, the ERP specified for a station's new UHF DTV channel was limited so that it does not exceed 1 megawatt. This was done by scaling the azimuthal power pattern rather than by truncation. For example, if replication by FCC curves as described above requires an ERP of 1.2 megawatts, the power pattern is reduced by a factor of 1.2 in all directions. The azimuthal pattern is used in subsequent service and interference calculations for the station.

Antenna Height:

The height of the station's transmitting antenna above average terrain, that is, antenna height above average terrain (antenna HAAT). In general, the antenna HAAT value shown for each station is the same as that specified for the station in the channel election process. This value represents the height of the radiation center of the station whose service area is being replicated, above terrain averaged from 3.2 to 16.1 kilometers (2 to 10 miles) from the station's transmitter site, over 8 evenly spaced radials. In computations of service coverage and interference, the value of antenna HAAT was determined every 5 degrees directly from the terrain elevation data, and by linear interpolation for compass directions in between.

Antenna ID:

A six digit number that identifies the radiation pattern for the station's transmitting antenna that is stored in the Commission's Consolidated Database System (CDBS). In cases where a station's proposed post-transition channel is the same as its currently assigned DTV channel, the station's antenna pattern is the same as its certified facilities antenna. In other cases, such as where a station chose its analog channel or a different channel, or where the Commission's staff selected a “best available” channel for the station's post-transition operation, the antenna pattern for the station was developed by our computer software to allow the station to replicate the coverage area reached by operation at its certified facilities on its proposed channel (

i.e.

, the station's TCD from the channel election process); or the station has indicated that it would use a particular antenna for its post-transition operation in the channel election process, the station's antenna pattern is the same as specified in Schedule B of FCC Forms 383 and 385. These antenna patterns are used in the calculation of service area and interference. The CDBS can be accessed on the Internet at

http://www.fcc.gov/mb/cdbs.html.

Transmitter Latitude:

The geographic latitude coordinates of the station's transmitter location.

Transmitter Longitude:

The geographic longitude coordinates of the station's transmitter location.

Service Area, Service Population, and Percent Interference Received:

Under the heading “DIGITAL TELEVISION SERVICE AFTER THE TRANSITION,” prospective conditions are evaluated in terms of both area and population. The values tabulated under this heading are net values: service area is the area where the desired signal is above the DTV noise threshold, less the area where service receives predicted interference from other DTV stations. Similarly, the number of people served is the population receiving an adequate signal relative to noise excluding people in areas with predicted interference. The level of interference received to a station's service is calculated based on desired-to-undesired (D/U) ratios, and these levels must be above certain threshold values for acceptable service. The percent interference received value is the percentage of the station's otherwise noise-limited service area that is affected by predicted interference from other DTV stations. The threshold values used to prepare the interference estimates in this appendix are those set forth in 47 CFR 73.623(c). The procedure used to identify areas of service and interference is that specified in

OET Bulletin No. 69. See

OET Bulletin No. 69, Longley-Rice Methodology for Evaluating TV Coverage and Interference, February 6, 2004 (“

OET Bulletin No. 69

”), available at

http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet69/oet69.pdf

.

Facility ID

State

City

NTSC

Chan

DTV

Chan

ERP (kW)

HAAT (m)

Antenna ID

Latitude (DDMMSS)

Longitude (DDDMMSS)

Area (sq km)

Population (thousand)

Percent interference received

21488

AK

ANCHORAGE

5

5

45

277

74343

612010

1493046

45353

348

0

804

AK

ANCHORAGE

7

8

50

240

67898

612522

1495220

26532

317

0

10173

AK

ANCHORAGE

2

10

21

240

67943

612522

1495220

22841

317

0

13815

AK

ANCHORAGE

13

12

41

240

65931

612522

1495220

25379

317

0

35655

AK

ANCHORAGE

4

20

234

55

74791

611311

1495324

10885

302

0

83503

AK

ANCHORAGE

9

26

1000

212

74792

610402

1494436

23703

323

0

49632

AK

ANCHORAGE

11

28

52

61

64802

611133

1495401

7946

296

0

25221

AK

ANCHORAGE

33

32

50

33

74793

610957

1494102

8943

287

0

4983

AK

BETHEL

4

3

1

61

74794

604733

1614622

10324

9

0

64597

AK

FAIRBANKS

7

7

3.2

214

74449

645520

1474255

11355

82

0

69315

AK

FAIRBANKS

9

9

3.2

152

74463

645442

1474638

6623

81

0

49621

AK

FAIRBANKS

11

11

3.2

1

74991

645036

1474248

5673

82

0

13813

AK

FAIRBANKS

2

18

60

33

74795

645042

1474252

6901

82

0

8651

AK

JUNEAU

3

10

0.748

1

581804

1342521

3982

30

0

13814

AK

JUNEAU

8

11

3

33

74796

581806

1342629

5513

30

0

60520

AK

KETCHIKAN

4

13

3.2

1

29997

552059

1314012

4355

15

0

20015

AK

NORTH POLE

4

4

1

5

74432

644532

1471926

6293

82

0

60519

AK

SITKA

13

2

1

1

570301

1352004

6898

8

0

56642

AL

ANNISTON

40

9

15.6

359

39744

333624

862503

24554

1437

6.6

71325

AL

BESSEMER

17

18

350

675

44013

332851

872403

37533

1549

1.4

717

AL

BIRMINGHAM

10

10

3

426

332904

864825

22745

1363

4.9

74173

AL

BIRMINGHAM

13

13

16.9

408

75054

332926

864748

31517

1646

1.9

5360

AL

BIRMINGHAM

42

30

1000

426

43265

332904

864825

31006

1687

0.4

16820

AL

BIRMINGHAM

68

36

885

406

68103

332904

864825

28264

1553

1.1

71221

AL

BIRMINGHAM

6

50

1000

420

74797

332919

864758

33118

1692

0.9

720

AL

DEMOPOLIS

41

19

1000

324

60739

322145

875204

26322

330

6.5

43846

AL

DOTHAN

18

21

1000

223

311425

851843

24804

451

0

4152

AL

DOTHAN

4

36

995

573

305510

854428

43948

886

0.4

714

AL

DOZIER

2

10

3.2

393

74361

313316

862332

23623

353

8.7

65128

AL

FLORENCE

15

14

1000

431

66619

350009

870809

30313

1112

0

6816

AL

FLORENCE

26

20

50

230

74798

343438

874657

15572

355

1.7

715

AL

FLORENCE

36

22

556

202

343441

874702

20778

544

0.2

1002

AL

GADSDEN

60

26

150

315

29932

334853

862655

17740

1379

0.2

73312

AL

GADSDEN

44

45

225

309

43164

335327

862813

17701

1357

0.1

83943

AL

GULF SHORES

55

25

64.5

308

74787

303640

873626

15544

932

0

74138

AL

HOMEWOOD

21

28

1000

409

29634

332904

864825

31285

1678

1

48693

AL

HUNTSVILLE

19

19

40.7

514

344419

863156

23609

992

2.2

713

AL

HUNTSVILLE

25

24

396

340

344413

863145

27052

1092

0.7

57292

AL

HUNTSVILLE

31

32

50

546

74799

344415

863202

24520

1018

0.4

28119

AL

HUNTSVILLE

54

41

400

518

43864

344412

863159

29827

1213

1

591

AL

HUNTSVILLE

48

49

41

552

344239

863207

22282

936

0.8

710

AL

LOUISVILLE

43

44

925

262

59887

314304

852603

18777

337

0.1

4143

AL

MOBILE

10

9

29

381

304117

874754

34970

1203

0

11906

AL

MOBILE

15

15

510

558

74580

303640

873627

35605

1284

0.5

60827

AL

MOBILE

21

20

500

436

42051

303518

873316

27240

1215

0

83740

AL

MOBILE

23

337

574

75124

303645

873843

38025

1283

0

73187

AL

MOBILE

5

27

1000

581

74800

304120

874949

45411

1406

0.3

721

AL

MOBILE

42

41

199

185

303933

875333

16297

912

0.1

13993

AL

MONTGOMERY

12

12

24.9

507

74369

315828

860944

31615

788

0.5

73642

AL

MONTGOMERY

20

16

1000

518

29552

315828

860944

37695

829

1.3

706

AL

MONTGOMERY

26

27

568

176

322255

861733

18017

549

3.7

72307

AL

MONTGOMERY

32

32

199

545

75049

320830

864443

28414

579

0.6

60829

AL

MONTGOMERY

45

46

500

308

28430

322413

861147

21909

641

0.3

711

AL

MOUNT CHEAHA

7

7

19

610

74635

332907

854833

40921

2236

2.9

11113

AL

OPELIKA

66

47

136

539

74487

321916

844728

24321

662

1.3

32851

AL

OZARK

34

33

15

151

68078

311228

853649

8868

244

0

84802

AL

SELMA

29

29

1000

408

32810

323227

865033

26729

620

5.9

701

AL

SELMA

8

42

787

507

320858

864651

38739

722

0.1

62207

AL

TROY

67

48

50

345

30182

320336

855701

14891

479

2

77496

AL

TUSCALOOSA

23

23

50

266

74752

330315

873257

13651

355

0.1

21258

AL

TUSCALOOSA

33

33

160

625

70330

332848

872550

30995

1357

0.5

68427

AL

TUSKEGEE

22

22

100

325

74464

320336

855702

17779

532

0.4

2768

AR

ARKADELPHIA

9

13

7.3

320

335426

930646

22157

299

16.9

86534

AR

CAMDEN

49

49

68.1

175

74782

331619

924212

13417

146

0.5

92872

AR

EL DORADO

12

6

541

65573

330441

921341

19618

362

19.4

35692

AR

EL DORADO

10

27

734

605

74801

330441

921341

43603

631

5.5

84164

AR

EL DORADO

43

43

206

530

74776

330441

921341

26259

446

0.1

81593

AR

EUREKA SPRINGS

34

34

87.1

213

75069

362630

935825

12963

442

0.1

2767

AR

FAYETTEVILLE

13

9

19

501

354853

940141

35150

889

1.5

60354

AR

FAYETTEVILLE

29

15

180

266

360057

940459

19569

560

3.5

66469

AR

FORT SMITH

5

18

550

286

354949

940924

25959

736

0.2

60353

AR

FORT SMITH

40

21

325

602

350415

944043

33811

525

7.4

29560

AR

FORT SMITH

24

27

200

305

41354

354236

940815

19242

627

0.7

78314

AR

HARRISON

31

31

191

339

75064

364218

930345

18376

533

2.8

608

AR

HOT SPRINGS

26

26

66.4

258

74370

342221

930247

13726

250

0.1

13988

AR

JONESBORO

8

8

18

531

74348

355322

905608

39540

689

0.2

2769

AR

JONESBORO

19

20

50

310

355414

904614

18806

312

0

2784

AR

JONESBORO

48

48

982

295

75036

353616

903118

24784

1386

0

2770

AR

LITTLE ROCK

2

7

8.06

548

74338

342631

921303

30372

952

0

2787

AR

LITTLE ROCK

11

12

55

519

344757

922959

41233

1110

2.4

33543

AR

LITTLE ROCK

7

22

750

574

342824

921210

43307

1087

0.3

11951

AR

LITTLE ROCK

16

30

1000

449

40344

344757

922929

32289

1043

0

33440

AR

LITTLE ROCK

4

32

1000

503

74802

344757

922959

39177

1098

0.6

58267

AR

LITTLE ROCK

36

36

50

394

74768

344756

922945

16626

809

0.2

37005

AR

LITTLE ROCK

42

44

1000

485

59098

344745

922944

31868

1038

0.5

2777

AR

MOUNTAIN VIEW

6

13

4.05

407

66439

354847

921724

20292

260

14.5

607

AR

PINE BLUFF

25

24

725

356

40413

343155

920241

24562

845

0

41212

AR

PINE BLUFF

38

39

1000

590

40345

342631

921303

34162

1006

0

29557

AR

ROGERS

51

50

1000

267

362447

935716

23556

643

0

67347

AR

SPRINGDALE

57

39

316

114

40726

361107

941749

12789

422

0.1

81441

AZ

DOUGLAS

3

36

1000

9

74708

312208

1093145

10673

34

0

24749

AZ

FLAGSTAFF

2

2

7.25

465

74450

345806

1113028

33788

270

0.2

41517

AZ

FLAGSTAFF

13

13

19.6

474

74998

345805

1113029

29913

203

0

74149

AZ

FLAGSTAFF

4

18

726

487

74804

345804

1113030

34193

227

0

35104

AZ

FLAGSTAFF

9

32

1000

343

345806

1113029

32388

215

0.8

63927

AZ

GREEN VALLEY

46

46

70.8

1095

74581

322454

1104256

26056

802

0

81458

AZ

HOLBROOK

11

11

3.2

54

74722

345505

1100825

8819

16

0

24753

AZ

KINGMAN

6

19

1000

585

74805

350157

1142156

30420

175

0

35486

AZ

MESA

12

12

22

543

74517

332000

1120348

33724

3236

0

2728

AZ

PHOENIX

8

8

30.7

527

75007

332000

1120349

35929

3239

0

35587

AZ

PHOENIX

10

10

22.2

558

74488

332003

1120343

34519

3236

0

59440

AZ

PHOENIX

15

15

218

509

74636

332000

1120346

28668

3229

0

41223

AZ

PHOENIX

5

17

1000

507

67336

332002

1120340

31756

3237

0

67868

AZ

PHOENIX

21

20

500

489

332002

1120342

30913

3232

0

40993

AZ

PHOENIX

3

24

1000

501

43557

332001

1120345

31415

3234

0

68886

AZ

PHOENIX

45

26

1000

517

33195

332001

1120332

32353

3237

0

35705

AZ

PHOENIX

33

33

196

510

74503

332000

1120346

22493

3226

0

83491

AZ

PHOENIX

39

39

50

491

332001

1120344

18695

3211

0

7143

AZ

PHOENIX

61

49

531

497

43560

332002

1120344

24945

3227

0

35811

AZ

PRESCOTT

7

7

3.2

850

74984

344115

1120701

24427

266

0.6

35095

AZ

SIERRA VISTA

58

44

1000

319

65401

314532

1104803

18972

893

0

26655

AZ

TOLLESON

51

51

197

546

74584

332003

1120338

25018

3227

0

36918

AZ

TUCSON

9

9

9.23

1134

74508

322454

1104259

39703

999

0.1

11908

AZ

TUCSON

18

19

480

1123

59934

322456

1104250

37731

924

0.1

25735

AZ

TUCSON

4

23

405

1123

68106

322456

1104250

35035

914

0.2

44052

AZ

TUCSON

11

25

480

1123

64314

322456

1104250

35738

911

0.2

2722

AZ

TUCSON

27

28

50

178

42999

321253

1110021

8550

831

0

2731

AZ

TUCSON

6

30

668

1092

322455

1104251

45415

983

0

48663

AZ

TUCSON

13

32

108

1123

43979

322456

1104250

25638

807

0.7

30601

AZ

TUCSON

40

40

396

621

74564

321456

1110658

22249

933

0

74449

AZ

YUMA

11

11

22.3

468

74556

330310

1144940

34281

326

0

33639

AZ

YUMA

13

16

510

475

74806

330317

1144934

28310

324

0

24518

CA

ANAHEIM

56

32

1000

937

68180

341335

1180358

38204

15487

0.1

8263

CA

ARCATA

23

22

50

510

74807

404336

1235818

20016

120

0

29234

CA

AVALON

54

47

350

937

66764

341337

1180357

31305

14729

0

40878

CA

BAKERSFIELD

23

10

4.6

1128

74808

352714

1183537

23144

841

0

34459

CA

BAKERSFIELD

17

25

135

405

44570

352617

1184422

18738

698

0

4148

CA

BAKERSFIELD

29

33

110

1128

27939

352711

1183525

24592

992

0

7700

CA

BAKERSFIELD

45

45

210

387

74619

352620

1184424

16819

697

0

63865

CA

BARSTOW

64

44

1000

596

343634

1171711

27479

1578

0

83825

CA

BISHOP

20

20

50

928

74744

372443

1181106

16923

23

0

40517

CA

CALIPATRIA

54

36

155

476

75040

330302

1144938

20044

318

0

4939

CA

CERES

23

15

15

172

372934

1211329

11340

1202

0

33745

CA

CHICO

24

24

331

537

74518

401531

1220524

28699

422

0

24508

CA

CHICO

12

43

1000

396

74809

395730

1214248

25916

597

1.5

23302

CA

CLOVIS

43

43

283

642

75024

364446

1191657

31884

1452

0.1

21533

CA

CONCORD

42

14

50

856

74701

375334

1215353

31816

8599

0

19783

CA

CORONA

52

39

54

912

41582

341247

1180341

21865

14174

0

57945

CA

COTATI

22

23

110

628

68181

382054

1223438

23262

4471

0

51208

CA

EL CENTRO

9

9

19.5

414

75031

330319

1144944

31675

325

0

36170

CA

EL CENTRO

7

22

1000

477

36690

330302

1144938

33276

325

0

53382

CA

EUREKA

3

3

8.39

503

74390

404352

1235706

35110

149

0

55435

CA

EUREKA

13

11

40

550

404338

1235817

39817

149

0

42640

CA

EUREKA

6

17

30

550

44483

404339

1235817

17975

118

0

58618

CA

EUREKA

29

28

119

381

28858

404336

1235826

15820

121

0

8378

CA

FORT BRAGG

8

8

44.9

733

74379

394138

1233443

38724

143

0.2

67494

CA

FRESNO

53

7

38

560

29423

370423

1192552

33624

1631

0.2

8620

CA

FRESNO

30

30

182

614

74349

370437

1192601

22938

1437

0.1

56034

CA

FRESNO

47

34

185

577

44959

370414

1192531

24853

1422

0.1

35594

CA

FRESNO

24

38

528

601

74391

370419

1192549

30409

1541

0.1

69733

CA

FRESNO

18

40

250

698

67432

364445

1191651

29501

1441

0

34439

CA

HANFORD

21

20

350

580

29793

370422

1192550

28070

1509

0

4328

CA

HUNTINGTON BEACH

50

48

855

921

64663

341337

1180357

36556

15107

0.3

35608

CA

LONG BEACH

18

18

111

889

75204

341250

1180340

19277

14109

2.8

282

CA

LOS ANGELES

7

7

11.2

978

74603

341337

1180358

37220

15572

0.1

21422

CA

LOS ANGELES

9

9

12

951

69629

341338

1180400

34447

15439

0

22208

CA

LOS ANGELES

11

11

40.2

902

74702

341329

1180348

40526

15807

0.1

33742

CA

LOS ANGELES

13

13

14.1

899

74704

341342

1180402

36927

15505

0

13058

CA

LOS ANGELES

28

28

107

913

70604

341326

1180343

21994

14312

1.9

35670

CA

LOS ANGELES

5

31

1000

954

32823

341336

1180356

42312

15543

0.2

35123

CA

LOS ANGELES

34

34

392

956

74509

341336

1180359

31607

15014

0

47906

CA

LOS ANGELES

4

36

711

984

74810

341332

1180352

41039

15464

0

38430

CA

LOS ANGELES

58

41

162

901

41475

341326

1180345

22054

13992

1

26231

CA

LOS ANGELES

22

42

486

892

42167

341247

1180341

24664

14427

1.1

9628

CA

LOS ANGELES

2

43

300

947

69117

341338

1180400

31477

14811

0.5

58608

CA

MERCED

51

11

58

575

75200

370419

1192549

35621

1691

0

58609

CA

MODESTO

19

18

500

555

36726

380707

1204327

29812

3331

0

35611

CA

MONTEREY

67

31

50

701

29629

364523

1213005

14541

1065

42.1

26249

CA

MONTEREY

46

32

46

758

44481

363205

1213714

16387

761

9

49153

CA

NOVATO

68

47

1000

402

28688

380900

1223531

15940

5258

3

35703

CA

OAKLAND

2

44

811

433

74637

374519

1222706

23016

6336

0

60549

CA

ONTARIO

46

29

400

937

68117

341336

1180359

32827

14946

1.2

56384

CA

OXNARD

63

24

85

533

40843

341949

1190124

16906

2413

38.5

25577

CA

PALM SPRINGS

42

42

50

219

72090

335158

1162602

7335

372

4.4

16749

CA

PALM SPRINGS

36

46

50

207

74811

335200

1162556

7220

371

0

58605

CA

PARADISE

30

20

661

448

27908

395750

1214238

23929

576

0

35512

CA

PORTERVILLE

61

48

197

804

38116

361714

1185017

27708

1741

0

55083

CA

RANCHO PALOS VERDES

44

51

1000

937

65079

341335

1180357

33638

15007

0

8291

CA

REDDING

7

7

11.6

1106

74504

403610

1223900

38353

371

0.1

47285

CA

REDDING

9

9

9.69

1097

74412

403609

1223901

37993

370

1.4

22161

CA

RIVERSIDE

62

45

670

907

74510

341250

1180340

31637

15069

0

35855

CA

SACRAMENTO

6

9

19.2

567

74604

381618

1213018

33919

5291

13.9

25048

CA

SACRAMENTO

10

10

16.6

595

74695

381424

1213003

37093

6313

0

51499

CA

SACRAMENTO

31

21

850

581

381554

1212924

39963

6384

0

33875

CA

SACRAMENTO

3

35

1000

591

74812

381552

1212922

37892

5069

17.4

10205

CA

SACRAMENTO

40

40

765

581

70334

381618

1213018

31502

4587

4.2

52953

CA

SACRAMENTO

29

48

1000

489

44981

381554

1212924

30324

4218

1.1

19653

CA

SALINAS

8

8

19.2

736

70343

364523

1213005

28847

2561

14.8

14867

CA

SALINAS

35

13

19.8

720

44925

364522

1213006

23793

1122

49.2

58795

CA

SAN BERNARDINO

24

26

440

529

335757

1171705

20478

13150

0

58978

CA

SAN BERNARDINO

30

38

1000

909

46152

341246

1180341

23334

14423

0

42122

CA

SAN DIEGO

8

8

5.42

208

74621

325016

1171456

18230

2929

0

40876

CA

SAN DIEGO

10

10

11

205

74985

325020

1171456

19575

2948

0.7

10238

CA

SAN DIEGO

51

18

355

576

39587

324150

1165604

29082

2910

3.5

58827

CA

SAN DIEGO

69

19

323

598

65036

324147

1165607

29443

3106

0.2

6124

CA

SAN DIEGO

15

30

350

567

33507

324153

1165603

27819

3013

0.3

35277

CA

SAN DIEGO

39

40

370

563

68010

324148

1165606

26970

2968

0.3

34470

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

7

7

21

509

74465

374520

1222705

32516

6516

7.3

51189

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

20

19

383

418

19024

374519

1222706

22989

6360

1

37511

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

26

27

500

403

67202

374112

1222603

21218

6116

1.8

25452

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

5

29

1000

506

74813

374520

1222705

36742

7115

0

35500

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

9

30

709

509

74814

374520

1222705

33396

6579

4.7

43095

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

32

33

50

491

74815

374520

1222705

16151

5924

0.1

65526

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

4

38

712

446

74655

374519

1222706

23056

6322

1.7

71586

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

38

39

1000

428

29544

374519

1222706

24293

6266

4

69619

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

44

45

206

491

74816

374520

1222705

16434

5799

2.1

33778

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

14

51

476

701

28493

372957

1215216

19534

6377

0.1

35280

CA

SAN JOSE

11

12

103

377

64426

374107

1222601

36145

6703

0.1

34564

CA

SAN JOSE

36

36

740

668

74585

372917

1215159

28572

6601

4.5

22644

CA

SAN JOSE

65

41

1000

418

60706

374115

1222601

23495

6250

3.3

64987

CA

SAN JOSE

48

49

257

688

38067

372957

1215216

21071

6083

1.5

35663

CA

SAN JOSE

54

50

290

662

34197

372917

1215159

16608

6021

1.7

19654

CA

SAN LUIS OBISPO

6

15

1000

515

28386

352137

1203918

30360

439

0

12930

CA

SAN LUIS OBISPO

33

34

82

441

44369

352138

1203921

18410

410

0.2

58912

CA

SAN MATEO

60

43

536

428

44617

374519

1222706

20821

6089

2.4

59013

CA

SANGER

59

36

372

600

43974

370437

1192601

27078

1440

0

67884

CA

SANTA ANA

40

23

50

881

74817

341327

1180344

22547

13672

6

12144

CA

SANTA BARBARA

38

21

1000

923

33205

343128

1195735

36089

1343

0

60637

CA

SANTA BARBARA

3

27

699

917

74818

343132

1195728

42071

1298

2.1

63165

CA

SANTA MARIA

12

19

188

591

74819

345437

1201108

26167

413

0

34440

CA

SANTA ROSA

50

32

19.9

928

72086

384010

1223752

18189

742

4.5

56550

CA

STOCKTON

13

25

1000

594

32519

381424

1213003

39491

6024

7.9

20871

CA

STOCKTON

64

26

425

599

71124

381424

1213003

27821

4135

4.8

10242

CA

STOCKTON

58

46

600

580

381554

1212924

33050

4788

9.9

16729

CA

TWENTYNINE PALMS

23

150

784

36709

340217

1164847

20828

1929

44.4

51429

CA

VALLEJO

66

34

150

419

39592

374519

1222706

17332

5881

3.2

14000

CA

VENTURA

57

49

1000

937

65163

341335

1180357

34722

15066

0

51488

CA

VISALIA

26

28

219

763

28096

364002

1185242

30550

1433

0

16950

CA

VISALIA

49

50

185

834

361714

1185017

31085

1753

0

8214

CA

WATSONVILLE

25

25

81.1

699

70678

364522

1213004

17432

1895

7.1

57219

CO

BOULDER

14

15

200

351

66988

394017

1051306

21679

2934

0

22685

CO

BROOMFIELD

12

38

1000

730

38280

394055

1052949

31357

2941

0

37101

CO

CASTLE ROCK

53

46

300

178

30026

392557

1043918

13108

2332

0

35037

CO

COLORADO SPRINGS

11

10

20.1

725

20589

384441

1045141

29268

959

54

35991

CO

COLORADO SPRINGS

21

22

51

641

44318

384443

1045140

22342

1109

0

52579

CO

COLORADO SPRINGS

13

24

459

652

74820

384445

1045138

30518

2149

0

40875

CO

DENVER

7

7

37.4

295

74403

394350

1051353

24932

2899

2

23074

CO

DENVER

9

9

39.6

318

74392

394350

1051353

25732

2925

1.8

14040

CO

DENVER

6

18

1000

292

74821

394349

1051500

25306

2939

0.4

68581

CO

DENVER

20

19

1000

295

44187

394350

1051353

24975

2948

0.3

126

CO

DENVER

31

32

1000

314

30041

394345

1051412

23205

2875

0

35883

CO

DENVER

2

34

1000

318

394358

1051408

26818

2981

0.2

47903

CO

DENVER

4

35

1000

373

44452

394351

1051354

25932

2957

0.2

20476

CO

DENVER

41

40

74.8

344

393559

1051235

17700

2624

0

68695

CO

DENVER

59

43

145

356

74822

394024

1051303

17371

2700

0.4

24514

CO

DENVER

50

51

900

233

36173

394358

1051408

19718

2711

0

48589

CO

DURANGO

6

15

46

90

44437

371546

1075358

8794

91

0

84224

CO

DURANGO

20

46

130

65291

371546

1075358

7843

65

0

82613

CO

DURANGO

33

33

50

122

75068

371546

1075345

6607

54

0

125

CO

FORT COLLINS

22

21

1000

233

403832

1044905

25510

1284

0

70578

CO

GLENWOOD SPRINGS

3

23

879

771

74823

392505

1072201

26213

110

0

70596

CO

GRAND JUNCTION

5

2

1

−23

74824

390515

1083356

8618

129

0

52593

CO

GRAND JUNCTION

8

7

9.7

829

74825

390255

1081506

31964

185

0

24766

CO

GRAND JUNCTION

11

12

10.8

429

74826

390400

1084441

21114

141

0.4

31597

CO

GRAND JUNCTION

4

15

71.5

422

74827

390356

1084452

12523

131

0

14042

CO

GRAND JUNCTION

18

18

51.2

883

74404

390314

1081513

19336

121

0

38375

CO

LONGMONT

25

29

650

358

68107

400557

1045348

24325

2840

0

70579

CO

MONTROSE

10

13

3.2

24

74828

383102

1075112

8771

58

1.1

69170

CO

PUEBLO

8

8

20.3

727

74992

384444

1045139

29601

900

56.5

59014

CO

PUEBLO

5

42

1000

396

74829

382225

1043327

28419

745

0.1

20373

CO

STEAMBOAT SPRINGS

24

10

0.481

175

44199

402743

1065057

6228

29

0

63158

CO

STERLING

3

23

599

204

403457

1030156

21554

73

0

70493

CT

BRIDGEPORT

43

42

1000

156

412143

730648

18425

5544

2.5

13594

CT

BRIDGEPORT

49

49

50

222

74586

411643

731108

10597

3792

3.3

147

CT

HARTFORD

61

31

380

506

66902

414213

724957

23488

3645

16.3

53115

CT

HARTFORD

3

33

1000

289

44846

414630

724820

21115

3536

16.1

13602

CT

HARTFORD

24

45

465

505

65933

414213

724957

26781

4223

1.4

3072

CT

HARTFORD

18

46

217

269

414630

724804

16467

3302

7.6

74170

CT

NEW BRITAIN

30

35

250

434

65777

414202

724957

24350

4252

3.8

13595

CT

NEW HAVEN

65

6

0.4

88

411942

725425

9116

2740

9.2

74109

CT

NEW HAVEN

8

10

20.5

342

65037

412522

725706

25655

6252

11.5

33081

CT

NEW HAVEN

59

39

170

301

46284

412522

725706

17709

4376

2.9

51980

CT

NEW LONDON

26

26

76

363

74505

412504

721155

18595

3357

0.7

13607

CT

NORWICH

53

9

3.2

192

75021

413114

721003

11997

1198

29.8

14050

CT

WATERBURY

20

20

58.5

515

74364

414213

724957

21645

3935

9.5

1051

DC

WASHINGTON

7

7

15

254

74539

385701

770447

22232

7053

0.2

65593

DC

WASHINGTON

9

9

17

254

74506

385701

770447

22544

7075

0.3

65670

DC

WASHINGTON

26

27

90

254

66360

385701

770447

16074

6626

1.6

27772

DC

WASHINGTON

32

33

100

254

385701

770447

17550

6781

0.1

51567

DC

WASHINGTON

20

35

500

254

385701

770447

21882

7046

0.2

22207

DC

WASHINGTON

5

36

1000

235

74830

385721

770457

22214

7092

0.8

47904

DC

WASHINGTON

4

48

1000

237

74831

385624

770454

22223

7074

0.1

30576

DC

WASHINGTON

50

50

123

253

75050

385744

770136

17031

6767

0.1

72335

DE

SEAFORD

64

44

98

196

66096

383915

753642

11086

465

7.4

72338

DE

WILMINGTON

12

12

9.9

294

74622

400230

751424

21656

7752

1.6

51984

DE

WILMINGTON

61

31

200

374

39302

400230

751411

18478

6836

9.5

51349

FL

BOCA RATON

63

40

524

311

75025

255934

801027

20929

4837

0

6601

FL

BRADENTON

66

42

210

476

274910

821539

28906

3722

1

70649

FL

CAPE CORAL

36

35

930

404

67859

264742

814805

28363

1378

1.1

11125

FL

CLEARWATER

22

21

1000

409

32885

274910

821539

26800

3503

0.1

53465

FL

CLERMONT

18

17

1000

472

38022

283512

810458

36917

3225

0.1

6744

FL

COCOA

68

30

182

491

38429

283635

810335

26292

2631

0

24582

FL

COCOA

52

51

155

285

74832

281826

805448

14303

1971

0

25738

FL

DAYTONA BEACH

2

11

54.9

511

41527

283635

810335

43816

3125

4.4

131

FL

DAYTONA BEACH

26

49

150

459

285516

811909

25951

2645

0.1

81669

FL

DESTIN

48

1000

318

65951

305952

864313

23444

743

1.5

64971

FL

FORT LAUDERDALE

51

30

329

304

74587

255908

801137

20553

4770

0.2

22093

FL

FORT MYERS

11

9

20

451

264801

814548

37693

1562

0

71085

FL

FORT MYERS

20

15

1000

454

59198

264921

814554

36098

1643

0

62388

FL

FORT MYERS

30

31

50

293

74833

264854

814544

17120

943

0.1

35575

FL

FORT PIERCE

34

34

522

438

75041

270719

802320

28293

2144

0

29715

FL

FORT PIERCE

21

38

700

303

30704

270132

801043

22697

2117

0

31570

FL

FORT WALTON BEACH

53

40

33.5

219

29918

302409

865935

11996

581

0

54938

FL

FORT WALTON BEACH

58

49

50

59

74834

302343

863011

3785

163

12

6554

FL

FORT WALTON BEACH

35

50

1000

221

302346

865913

21954

689

0

83965

FL

GAINESVILLE

29

9

3.2

278

75127

293747

823425

18457

501

1.7

16993

FL

GAINESVILLE

20

16

91

287

74835

293211

822400

16264

707

0

69440

FL

GAINESVILLE

5

36

1000

263

294234

822340

26470

1150

0

7727

FL

HIGH SPRINGS

53

28

104

278

74836

293747

823424

13480

562

0

60536

FL

HOLLYWOOD

69

47

575

297

43915

255909

801137

21946

4801

0

73130

FL

JACKSONVILLE

7

7

16.2

288

74527

301651

813412

25919

1314

0.5

65046

FL

JACKSONVILLE

12

13

25

310

301624

813313

31176

1381

1.6

35576

FL

JACKSONVILLE

47

19

1000

291

42083

301651

813412

27268

1345

0.3

11909

FL

JACKSONVILLE

30

32

1000

291

42562

301651

813412

25771

1324

0.2

29712

FL

JACKSONVILLE

17

34

1000

283

29378

301636

813347

24697

1308

0

53116

FL

JACKSONVILLE

4

42

976

294

41583

301624

813313

26562

1329

0

29719

FL

JACKSONVILLE

59

44

1000

300

41428

301651

813412

24847

1311

0

72053

FL

KEY WEST

22

3

1

62

74837

243318

814807

9983

45

0

27387

FL

KEY WEST

8

8

3.2

33

74365

243419

814425

5713

45

0

27290

FL

LAKE WORTH

67

36

1000

385

43353

263520

801244

28708

4345

12.9

53819

FL

LAKELAND

32

19

1000

458

274910

821539

41503

4346

1.7

60018

FL

LEESBURG

55

40

1000

514

32830

283511

810458

37198

3155

0.2

9881

FL

LEESBURG

45

46

1000

472

59171

283512

810458

31806

3050

0.2

22245

FL

LIVE OAK

57

48

1000

597

304051

835821

44034

970

0

81594

FL

MARIANNA

51

51

50

254

74785

303042

852917

13673

278

0

5802

FL

MELBOURNE

43

43

1000

300

74433

281822

805445

23789

2340

0.3

67602

FL

MELBOURNE

56

48

1000

456

67869

280537

810728

31239

2955

3.5

63840

FL

MIAMI

7

7

14.3

293

74968

255749

801244

28101

4869

0

53113

FL

MIAMI

10

10

30

294

74350

255759

801244

27703

4931

0

13456

FL

MIAMI

2

18

1000

309

30258

255730

801244

26169

4906

0

10203

FL

MIAMI

39

19

1000

252

32748

255807

801320

21088

4813

0.2

66358

FL

MIAMI

17

20

625

301

42558

255846

801146

23263

4880

0

47902

FL

MIAMI

4

22

1000

298

255807

801320

31232

4922

0

73230

FL

MIAMI

23

23

485

257

74466

255807

801320

18379

4714

0

63154

FL

MIAMI

6

31

1000

311

255807

801320

30510

4920

0

12497

FL

MIAMI

33

32

1000

263

41330

255802

801234

21017

4771

0

48608

FL

MIAMI

35

35

242

282

74993

255909

801137

18162

4564

2.8

67971

FL

MIAMI

45

46

500

308

36387

255934

801027

19031

4815

0

19183

FL

NAPLES

26

41

1000

454

59197

264921

814554

32033

1491

2

61504

FL

NAPLES

46

45

1000

456

33429

264708

814740

28232

1369

0.4

12171

FL

NEW SMYRNA BEACH

15

33

308

491

59744

283635

810335

28477

2677

0.1

70651

FL

OCALA

51

31

500

259

39152

292132

821943

19210

910

0.2

11893

FL

ORANGE PARK

25

10

12

298

301624

813313

26958

1318

0.9

41225

FL

ORLANDO

35

22

1000

392

28032

283613

810511

34755

2981

0.2

12855

FL

ORLANDO

24

23

950

380

40155

283608

810537

32898

2991

0

71293

FL

ORLANDO

6

26

547

516

71980

283635

810335

35732

2960

0.2

55454

FL

ORLANDO

27

27

247

477

74371

283407

810316

32237

2872

0

72076

FL

ORLANDO

9

39

1000

492

283407

810316

40585

3220

0.2

54940

FL

ORLANDO

65

41

1000

515

283635

810335

40291

3165

2.7

11123

FL

PALM BEACH

61

49

800

125

44853

264547

801219

13671

2395

0

73136

FL

PANAMA CITY

7

7

52

244

74969

302600

852451

25857

372

0.4

2942

FL

PANAMA CITY

28

9

2.3

142

67964

302342

853202

12161

238

2.4

66398

FL

PANAMA CITY

13

13

35.5

405

74426

302108

852328

32536

721

0.1

6093

FL

PANAMA CITY

56

38

49.2

137

302202

855528

12069

275

0

4354

FL

PANAMA CITY BEACH

46

47

50

59

74838

301059

854642

5037

154

0

71363

FL

PENSACOLA

3

17

1000

579

303645

873843

47474

1408

0

17611

FL

PENSACOLA

23

31

1000

549

38343

303640

873626

33337

1253

0.1

10894

FL

PENSACOLA

33

34

1000

415

33836

303735

873850

27979

1210

0

41210

FL

PENSACOLA

44

45

1000

457

42957

303516

873313

28956

1244

0

61251

FL

SARASOTA

40

24

116

233

74588

273321

822149

15298

2563

12

11290

FL

ST. PETERSBURG

10

10

18.5

440

74467

281104

824539

31248

3396

0.2

4108

FL

ST. PETERSBURG

38

38

1000

438

70212

275032

821546

30498

3664

0.1

74112

FL

ST. PETERSBURG

44

44

463

452

74681

275052

821548

32518

3887

0.8

83929

FL

STUART

44

773

80

74682

264337

800448

14826

2240

0

82735

FL

TALLAHASSEE

24

24

39

65784

302940

842503

5308

304

0

41065

FL

TALLAHASSEE

27

27

1000

487

74451

304006

835810

41970

951

0.1

21801

FL

TALLAHASSEE

11

32

938

237

302131

843638

25384

516

0

66908

FL

TALLAHASSEE

40

40

1000

600

70213

304051

835821

38440

784

0.1

64592

FL

TAMPA

8

7

19

465

275032

821545

37899

4257

0.6

68569

FL

TAMPA

13

12

72.3

436

17613

274908

821426

42687

4205

6.6

21808

FL

TAMPA

3

13

17.1

473

75058

274948

821559

36363

4123

1.2

64588

FL

TAMPA

28

29

987

475

67821

275032

821545

38497

4186

0

69338

FL

TAMPA

16

34

475

453

275052

821548

32898

3939

2

60559

FL

TAMPA

50

47

500

317

59290

275032

821545

22988

3453

0.3

51988

FL

TEQUESTA

25

16

1000

454

29425

270717

802342

33467

2807

0.9

71580

FL

TICE

49

33

1000

429

32880

264708

814741

27350

1275

0.4

16788

FL

VENICE

62

25

750

472

39529

274910

821539

32426

3786

0.1

59443

FL

WEST PALM BEACH

5

12

13.4

387

74623

263520

801243

29999

4818

0

52527

FL

WEST PALM BEACH

12

13

29.5

291

39117

263518

801230

28983

4782

0

61084

FL

WEST PALM BEACH

42

27

400

440

44609

263437

801432

26429

4992

0

39736

FL

WEST PALM BEACH

29

28

630

458

38600

263437

801432

31715

5137

0

70713

GA

ALBANY

10

10

18.2

272

74405

311952

835144

24614

626

1.2

70815

GA

ALBANY

31

12

60

287

38373

311952

835143

28865

746

0.7

23948

GA

ATHENS

8

8

15.6

305

74366

334818

840840

24589

4507

0.5

48813

GA

ATHENS

34

48

1000

310

334826

842022

27603

4694

0.1

51163

GA

ATLANTA

11

10

80

303

334524

841955

34627

4867

0.6

72120

GA

ATLANTA

46

19

1000

329

334826

842022

32016

4822

0.1

64033

GA

ATLANTA

17

20

1000

310

334826

842022

30474

4766

0.5

4190

GA

ATLANTA

30

21

50

334

74839

334535

842007

17636

4101

4.3

22819

GA

ATLANTA

36

25

500

332

334826

842022

26868

4612

2

70689

GA

ATLANTA

5

27

1000

332

334751

842002

30601

4773

0.6

23960

GA

ATLANTA

2

39

1000

301

65852

334551

842142

27454

4618

0.1

13206

GA

ATLANTA

57

41

165

319

340359

842717

20717

4373

0.5

6900

GA

ATLANTA

69

43

1000

335

334440

842136

29770

4733

0.1

73937

GA

AUGUSTA

12

12

20.2

485

74489

332429

815036

37025

1357

0.6

70699

GA

AUGUSTA

26

30

400

483

332420

815001

34939

1259

0.2

27140

GA

AUGUSTA

6

42

1000

507

332420

815001

40539

1454

0

3228

GA

AUGUSTA

54

51

37

363

67958

332500

815006

16372

615

0.1

23486

GA

BAINBRIDGE

49

49

190

410

75042

303901

841213

20059

513

12.2

69446

GA

BAXLEY

34

35

650

454

320335

812043

36067

827

0

71236

GA

BRUNSWICK

21

24

650

403

40210

304917

814413

29871

1299

0

23942

GA

CHATSWORTH

18

33

426

537

32774

344506

844254

27892

2790

0.9

23935

GA

COCHRAN

29

7

22

369

322811

831517

32941

784

1.7

595

GA

COLUMBUS

9

9

1

503

70342

321925

844646

22435

642

4.7

3359

GA

COLUMBUS

3

15

1000

449

321925

844646

39856

1110

11.7

23918

GA

COLUMBUS

28

23

250

462

33233

325108

844204

27159

1332

0.1

37179

GA

COLUMBUS

38

35

50

399

74840

322728

845308

21298

660

0

12472

GA

COLUMBUS

54

49

500

312

67961

322739

845243

20626

649

0.7

63867

GA

CORDELE

55

51

200

109

315335

834818

14405

356

0.3

60825

GA

DALTON

23

16

300

447

28422

345707

852258

25162

1180

2.9

23930

GA

DAWSON

25

8

6

313

44505

315615

843315

19618

471

21

46991

GA

MACON

13

13

30

238

324510

833332

27301

820

4.2

58262

GA

MACON

24

16

1000

226

29738

324458

833335

21895

689

0.3

43847

GA

MACON

41

40

50

237

74841

324512

833346

15033

537

0

24618

GA

MACON

64

45

1000

223

60980

324551

833332

19160

655

0.8

68058

GA

MONROE

63

44

700

303

334441

842136

25422

4531

0.2

23917

GA

PELHAM

14

6

3.8

474

74339

304013

835626

30535

844

0

54728

GA

PERRY

58

32

50

247

74842

324509

833335

15647

553

0

51969

GA

ROME

14

51

1000

622

32746

341848

843855

35465

5192

0.4

23947

GA

SAVANNAH

9

9

9.72

293

74979

320848

813705

22960

682

0.1

590

GA

SAVANNAH

11

11

14.8

420

74380

320314

812101

28682

752

0

37174

GA

SAVANNAH

22

22

166

436

74457

320330

812020

25120

667

0

48662

GA

SAVANNAH

3

39

1000

442

320331

811755

37667

832

0.1

31590

GA

THOMASVILLE

6

46

1000

619

304013

835626

45196

972

0.1

63329

GA

TOCCOA

32

24

600

209

343644

832205

20917

1161

1.8

28155

GA

VALDOSTA

44

43

50

253

40583

311018

832157

13316

328

0

23929

GA

WAYCROSS

8

8

20

286

74351

311317

823424

28648

426

5.7

23937

GA

WRENS

20

6

30

436

74332

331533

821709

25555

782

0

36914

HI

HILO

9

9

3.2

33

74970

194300

1550813

10655

79

0

4146

HI

HILO

11

11

3.35

33

74440

194357

1550404

5336

78

0

64544

HI

HILO

13

13

3.73

1

74413

194357

1550404

6703

79

0

34846

HI

HILO

2

22

8

1

44792

194351

1550411

1638

64

0.5

37103

HI

HILO

14

23

35

33

28420

194300

1550813

7064

78

0

4144

HI

HONOLULU

2

8

7.2

1

211746

1575036

11570

817

0

36917

HI

HONOLULU

9

9

7

33

74971

211746

1575036

10027

826

0

51241

HI

HONOLULU

38

10

3.2

580

74540

212345

1580558

23366

775

9.9

26431

HI

HONOLULU

11

11

3.2

637

74414

212403

1580610

22771

862

0

34527

HI

HONOLULU

20

19

60.7

606

43104

212351

1580600

16294

788

0

34445

HI

HONOLULU

5

23

1000

629

74843

212403

1580610

31295

852

0.4

3246

HI

HONOLULU

26

27

262

580

45219

212345

1580558

14530

829

0

36846

HI

HONOLULU

14

31

50

33

28782

211849

1575143

6227

746

0

65395

HI

HONOLULU

32

33

50

33

74844

211849

1575143

5067

758

0

34867

HI

HONOLULU

13

35

550

33

74845

211709

1575019

10827

780

0

64548

HI

HONOLULU

4

40

85

1

68040

211737

1575034

4992

767

1.4

27425

HI

HONOLULU

44

43

6.46

577

212345

1580558

14133

764

0

83180

HI

KAILUA

50

50

50

632

74783

211949

1574524

25899

841

0

664

HI

KAILUA KONA

6

25

700

871

66907

194316

1555515

42674

64

3.4

77483

HI

KANEOHE

66

41

297

632

211949

1574524

37079

778

8.5

4145

HI

WAILUKU

7

7

3.69

1809

74519

204241

1561526

44292

146

0

26428

HI

WAILUKU

10

10

3.2

1811

74479

204240

1561534

41901

131

2.2

64551

HI

WAILUKU

12

12

3.94

1664

75008

204216

1561635

30905

139

0

34859

HI

WAILUKU

15

16

50

1723

74846

204234

1561554

27836

135

0

37105

HI

WAILUKU

21

21

53.1

1298

75029

204058

1561907

28579

146

0

36920

HI

WAILUKU

3

24

72.4

1814

204241

1561535

48946

137

9.2

89714

HI

WAIMANALO

56

38

50

632

74789

211949

1574524

27066

843

0

8661

IA

AMES

5

5

3.91

613

74683

414947

933656