Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft-Manufactured Model CH-54B Helicopters

Federal RegisterApr 16, 1999

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 97-SW-59-AD]

Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft-Manufactured Model

CH-54B Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness

directive (AD) that is applicable to Sikorsky Aircraft-manufactured

Model CH-54B helicopters. This proposal would require initial and

recurring inspections and rework or replacement, if necessary, of the

second stage lower planetary plate (plate). This proposal is prompted

by two reports of cracked plates that have been found during overhaul

and inspections. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended

to prevent failure of the main gearbox plate due to fatigue cracking,

which could lead to failure of the main gearbox and subsequent loss of

control of the helicopter.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 15, 1999.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,

Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-SW-59-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663,

Fort Worth, Texas 76137. Comments may be inspected at this location

between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal

holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Uday Garadi, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,

Rotorcraft Directorate, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Fort Worth,

Texas 76193-0170, telephone (817) 222-5157, fax (817) 222-5959.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the

proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as

they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number

and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All

communications received on or before the closing date for comments,

specified above, will be considered before taking action on the

proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in

light of the comments received.

Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,

economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All

comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing

date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested

persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with

the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.

Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments

submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,

stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments

to Docket No. 97-SW-59-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and

returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request

to the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,

Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-SW-59-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663,

Fort Worth, Texas 76137.

Discussion

This notice proposes the adoption of a new AD that is applicable to

Sikorsky-

[[Page 18836]]

manufactured Model CH-54B helicopters. This proposal would require

initial and recurring inspections, and rework or replacement, if

necessary, of the plate. Cracks on the plate initiate at and radiate

from the lightening holes in the plate web due to fatigue. This

condition, if not corrected, could result in failure of the plate due

to fatigue cracking, which could lead to failure of the main gearbox

and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to

exist or develop on other Sikorsky Aircraft-manufactured Model CH-54B

helicopters of the same type design, the proposed AD would require a

daily inspection of main gearboxes containing a plate with more than

1,600 hours time-in-service (TIS) for main gearbox oil filter magnesium

contamination and, if magnesium contamination is discovered,

replacement of the main gearbox assembly. For main gearbox assemblies

containing a plate with more than 1,600 hours TIS, this AD also

requires an inspection of the plate within the next 100 hours TIS after

the effective date of this AD, and thereafter at intervals not to

exceed 200 hours TIS, and replacement of the plate if necessary. This

AD also requires, at the next overhaul of the main gearbox assembly,

inspection and rework of plates that are not cracked.

The FAA estimates that 4 helicopters of U.S. registry would be

affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 8 work

hours per helicopter to accomplish the borescope inspection, 1 work

hour to inspect the main gearbox oil filter pack, 140 work hours to

remove and replace the main gearbox assembly, if necessary, and 20 work

hours to rework the plate, and that the average labor rate is $60 per

work hour. Required parts will cost approximately $8,000 per

helicopter. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the

proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $67,760; $2,160 to

accomplish the initial inspections and $65,600 to replace the plate in

the main gearbox assembly in all 4 helicopters, if necessary. Daily

preflight inspections of the main gearbox oil filter pack will cost $60

per helicopter for each day flight is conducted.

The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct

effects on the States, on the relationship between the national

government and the States, or on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in

accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this

proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant

the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed

regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);

and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,

positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under

the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft

regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the

Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules

Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend

part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as

follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive

to read as follows:

Blue Bird Helicopters: Docket No. 97-SW-59-AD.

Applicability: CH-54B helicopters with main gearbox second stage

lower planetary plate (plate), part number (P/N) 6435-20516-101,

installed, certificated in any category.

Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the

preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been

otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the

requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified,

altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of

this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an

alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of

this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of

the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition

addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been

eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to

address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished

previously.

To prevent failure of the plate due to fatigue cracking, which

could lead to failure of the main gearbox and subsequent loss of

control of the helicopter, accomplish the following:

(a) For main gearbox assemblies containing plate, part number

(P/N) 6435-20516-101 with 1,600 or more hours time-in-service (TIS):

Note 2: If the TIS hours of the plate is not known, use the main

gearbox assembly's total operating time.

(1) Prior to the first flight of each day, inspect the main oil

filter for magnesium contamination. If magnesium contamination is

discovered, replace the main gearbox assembly.

(2) Within the next 100 hours TIS after the effective date of

this AD, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 200 hours TIS,

conduct a borescope inspection of the plate for cracks in the area

of the nine lightening holes (see Figure 1). If a crack is found,

replace the plate with an airworthy plate. The plate, P/N 6435-

20516-101, is part of the main gearbox second stage planetary set

(P/N 6435-20514-041), which is a serialized matched set, and must be

replaced as a set.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

[[Page 18837]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16AP99.009

[[Page 18838]]

(b) At the next overhaul of the main gearbox assembly, inspect

and rework the plate, P/N 6435-20516-101, as follows:

(1) Fluorescent magnetic particle inspect the plate per ASTM

E1444 in circumferential and longitudinal directions using a wet

continuous method. Pay particular attention to the area around the

nine 1.750-inch diameter lightening holes.

(2) If a crack is found, the plate is unairworthy. Replace it

with an airworthy plate.

(3) If no crack is found, rework the plate as follows, ensuring

that all plate surfaces are free of any crack, scratch, dent, or

corrosion.

(i) Measuring from the center of each 1.750-inch diameter

lightening hole, machine 0.015/0.020 inch from the radius of the

hole (see Figure 2). Machined surface roughness shall not exceed 63

microinches AA rating.

[[Page 18839]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16AP99.010

BILLING CODE 4910-13-C

[[Page 18840]]

(ii) Apply a 0.030/0.050-inch radius on the top and bottom edge

of each hole.

(4) Fluorescent magnetic particle inspect the reworked areas per

ASTM E1444 in circumferential and longitudinal directions using a

wet continuous method.

(5) If a crack is found, the plate is unairworthy. Replace it

with an airworthy plate.

(6) If no crack is found, rework the plate as follows:

(i) Remove the protective finish from the specified areas on the

top and bottom of the plate as follows:

(A) Mask the top and bottom of the plate leaving exposed a 3.20-

inch minimum circumferential band centered on 13.75-inch diameter of

plate (see Figure 2). Mask the area to protect the thrust washer and

the surrounding areas from vapor blast.

(B) Using a vapor blast machine, remove the protective finish

from the exposed circumferential band on the top and bottom of the

plate. Use No. 220 aluminum oxide grit at a pressure of 80-90 pounds

per square inch.

(ii) Shot peen the specified areas on the plate by remasking the

top and bottom of the plate leaving exposed the 3.20-inch minimum

circumferential band centered on 13.75-inch diameter of the plate.

Mask the area to protect the thrust washer and the surrounding areas

from the shot peening process.

(iii) Shot peen the inside diameter of the lightening holes and

the upper and lower surfaces of the plate in the 3.20-inch minimum

circumferential band to 0.008 to 0.012A intensity, ensuring 200%

coverage per MIL-S-13165C or latest revision. Use cast steel shot,

size 170. Use a tracer dye inspection method.

Note 3: Overspray is permitted to allow a feathering application

during the peening process from the peened surface to the non-peened

surface.

(iv) Finish the reworked surfaces as follows:

(A) Clean the surfaces thoroughly with acetone (Fed. Spec O-A-

51, or equivalent).

(B) Apply Presto black or blueing touchup solution to the

reworked surfaces with cotton swabs. The solution temperature must

be between 21 deg. C and 49 deg. C (70 deg. F to 120 deg. F). Keep

the surfaces wet for about three minutes to get a uniform dark

color.

(C) Rinse the surface in cold running water and dry with forced

air.

Note 4: A hot water rinse may be used after the cold water rinse

to speed up drying time.

(D) Using steel wool, Grade 00 or finer, rub the surfaces

lightly. Polish with a soft cloth and then coat with a preservative

oil (MIL-C-15074).

(v) Identify the reworked plate by stamping the number of this

AD after the part number. Use a low-stress depth-controlled

impression-stamp with full fillet depth of no more than 0.003 inch

(see Figure 2). Marking must be such that it cannot be construed as

part of the part number.

(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the

compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager, Rotorcraft Certification Office,

FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests

through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or

comment and then send it to the Manager, Rotorcraft Certification

Office.

Note 5: Information concerning the existence of approved

alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Rotorcraft Certification Office.

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with

sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14

CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter to a location where

the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 2, 1999.

Larry M. Kelly,

Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 99-9513 Filed 4-15-99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.