Oil and Gas Leasing; Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, White Pine and Nye Counties, Nevada
Federal RegisterApr 12, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Oil and Gas Leasing; Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, White Pine
and Nye Counties, Nevada
agency: USDA Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
action: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
summary: The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the
purposes of leasing National Forest System lands in the White Pine,
Grant and Quinn Mountain Ranges (White Pine and Nye Counties, Nevada)
for hydrocarbon exploration, development and production. This EIS will
be prepared by the Forest Service in cooperation with the Bureau of
Land Management, the Nevada Division of Minerals, and Nevada Division
of Wildlife.
dates: Written comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be
received by May 10, 1999 to ensure timely consideration.
addresses: Send written comments to: Monica J. Schwalbach, Assistant
Forest Supervisor, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, P.O. Box 539, Ely,
NV 89301.
for further information: Direct questions about the project and the
preparation of the EIS to Jim Winfrey, Project Team Leader, Humboldt-
Toiyabe National Forest, P.O. Box 539, Ely, NV 89301. Telephone 775-
3031.
supplementary information: Several proponents have requested portions
of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest be made available under the
Bureau of Land Management's Competitive Oil and Gas Lease Sale. The
Forest Service must complete an environmental analysis to determine if
the lands are suitable for leasing and to identify the necessary
conditions of approval prior to authorizing the BLM to offer these
lands.
The proposal would affect approximately 553,135 acres of National
Forest System lands. Preliminary internal scoping had identified
several issues which will be addressed in the analysis process. The
following list of issues is not intended to be all inclusive. Issues
identified by the members of the interdisciplinary team are. (1)
Threatened, endangered and sensitive species and other species of
concerning including Bonneville cutthroat trout, mountain plover, sage
grouse, bats, bighorn sheep, elk, and mule deer; (2) grazing; (3)
surface and groundwater and cumulative effects to watershed; (4)
heritage resources; (5) grazing; (6) noxious weeds; (7) roadless areas;
(8) recreation opportunities; (9) visual, noise and air quality; (10)
economic and social impacts; and (11) safety. These issues, and others
identified during the scoping process will be used to develop
alternatives to the proposed action. In addition, the No Action
alternative will be considered in the analysis.
Public participation is important during the EIS scoping process.
As part of the scoping process, the Forest Service is seeking
information and comments from Federal, State, County and local agencies
and other individuals or organizations who may be interested in or
affected by the proposed actions. This input will be used in
preparation of the draft EIS and final EIS.
Several government agencies will be invited to participate in this
project as cooperating or participating agencies. These agencies
include, but are not limited to, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Nevada
Division of Environmental Protection, Nevada Division of Wildlife, and
Nevada Division of Minerals.
The Forest Service is the lead agency for this project and Monica
J. Schwalbach, Assistant Forest Supervisor is the responsible official.
She will make the decision to determine which lands are suitable for
leasing and any stipulations which should be included in a lease
agreement. Applicable laws, Forest Service regulations and the Humboldt
National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (1986) will be taken
into account throughout the analysis.
The Draft EIS is expected to be filed with the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and be available for review in October, 1999.
At that time, EPA will publish a Notice of Availability of the Draft
EIS in the Federal Register. The comment period on the Draft EIS will
be at least 45 days from the date the EPA's Notice of Availability
appears in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
the draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to
the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft environmental impact stage but that
are not raised until after completion of the final environmental impact
statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v.
Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages,
Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this
proposed action participate by the close of the 45 day comment period
so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the
Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final EIS. To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as specific as possible. It is also
helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft
EIS. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft EIS or the
merits of the alternatives formulated or discussed in the statement.
Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Monica J. Schwalbach,
Assistant Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc 99-8960 Filed 4-9-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.