Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, Sacramento Metropolitan and South Coast Air Quality Management District and San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District
Federal RegisterMar 19, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[CA 207-0136b; FRL-6239-9]
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans;
California State Implementation Plan Revision, Sacramento Metropolitan
and South Coast Air Quality Management District and San Joaquin Valley
Unified Air Pollution Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This action is an administrative change
which revises the definitions in Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality
Management (SMAQMD), San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control
District (SJVUAPCD), and South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD). The intended effect of approving this action is to
incorporate changes to the definitions for clarity and consistency and
to update the Exempt Compound list in SMAQMD, SJVUAPCD, and SCAQMD
rules to be consistent with the revised federal and state VOC
definitions.
The intended effect of proposing approval of this action is to
incorporate changes to the definition of VOC and to update the Exempt
Compound list in SMAQMD, SJVUAPCD, and SCAQMD rules to be consistent
with the revised federal and state VOC definitions. EPA is proposing
approval of these revisions to be incorporated into the California SIP
for the attainment of the national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS) for ozone under title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
In the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, the EPA is
approving the state's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without
prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial
revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for
this approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse
comments are received, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final
rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at
this time.
DATES: Written comments must be received by April 19, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to: Andrew Steckel, Chief,
Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
Copies of the rule revisions and EPA's evaluation report of each
rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region 9 office
during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rule revisions
are also available for inspection at the following locations:
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule
Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812.
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, 8411 Jackson
Rd., Sacramento, CA 95826
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, 1990 E.
Gettysburg Ave., Fresno, CA 93726
[[Page 13539]]
South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Dr.,
Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia G. Allen, Rulemaking Office
[Air-4], Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9,
75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901, Telephone: (415)
744-1189)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document concerns Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management Rule 101, General Provisions and
Definitions, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District
Rule 1020, Definitions, and South Coast Air Quality Management District
Rule 1302, Definitions (New Source Review). These rules were submitted
by the California Air Resources Board to EPA on October 27, 1998
(Sacramento); May 18, 1998 (San Joaquin); and March 10, 1998 (South
Coast). For further information, please see the information provided in
the direct final action that is located in the rules section of this
Federal Register.
Dated: March 5, 1999.
Laura Yoshii,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 99-6651 Filed 3-18-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.