Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, Sacramento Metropolitan and South Coast Air Quality Management District and San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

Federal RegisterMar 19, 1999

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 207-0136b; FRL-6239-9]

Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans;

California State Implementation Plan Revision, Sacramento Metropolitan

and South Coast Air Quality Management District and San Joaquin Valley

Unified Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan (SIP). This action is an administrative change

which revises the definitions in Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality

Management (SMAQMD), San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control

District (SJVUAPCD), and South Coast Air Quality Management District

(SCAQMD). The intended effect of approving this action is to

incorporate changes to the definitions for clarity and consistency and

to update the Exempt Compound list in SMAQMD, SJVUAPCD, and SCAQMD

rules to be consistent with the revised federal and state VOC

definitions.

The intended effect of proposing approval of this action is to

incorporate changes to the definition of VOC and to update the Exempt

Compound list in SMAQMD, SJVUAPCD, and SCAQMD rules to be consistent

with the revised federal and state VOC definitions. EPA is proposing

approval of these revisions to be incorporated into the California SIP

for the attainment of the national ambient air quality standards

(NAAQS) for ozone under title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

In the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, the EPA is

approving the state's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without

prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial

revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for

this approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse

comments are received, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and

all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final

rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second

comment period. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at

this time.

DATES: Written comments must be received by April 19, 1999.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to: Andrew Steckel, Chief,

Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.

Copies of the rule revisions and EPA's evaluation report of each

rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region 9 office

during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rule revisions

are also available for inspection at the following locations:

California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812.

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, 8411 Jackson

Rd., Sacramento, CA 95826

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, 1990 E.

Gettysburg Ave., Fresno, CA 93726

[[Page 13539]]

South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Dr.,

Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia G. Allen, Rulemaking Office

[Air-4], Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9,

75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901, Telephone: (415)

744-1189)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document concerns Sacramento

Metropolitan Air Quality Management Rule 101, General Provisions and

Definitions, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

Rule 1020, Definitions, and South Coast Air Quality Management District

Rule 1302, Definitions (New Source Review). These rules were submitted

by the California Air Resources Board to EPA on October 27, 1998

(Sacramento); May 18, 1998 (San Joaquin); and March 10, 1998 (South

Coast). For further information, please see the information provided in

the direct final action that is located in the rules section of this

Federal Register.

Dated: March 5, 1999.

Laura Yoshii,

Deputy Regional Administrator, Region IX.

[FR Doc. 99-6651 Filed 3-18-99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.