National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); Standard Flood Insurance Policy
Federal RegisterDec 16, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
44 CFR Part 61
RIN 3067-AD05
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); Standard Flood Insurance
Policy
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We (FEMA) are increasing the limit of liability under Coverage
D--Increased Cost of Compliance of the Standard Flood Insurance Policy
from $15,000 to $20,000. New information indicates an expected decrease
in annual claims, and based on this decrease, we believe the limit of
liability can be increased with no change in premium.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles M. Plaxico, Jr., Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, (202)
646-3422, (facsimile) (202)646-4327, or (email)
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 25, 1997, we published in the
Federal Register, 62 FR 8391, a final rule that adds Coverage D--
Increased Cost of Compliance (ICC) to the Standard Flood Insurance
Policy. We set the limit of liability for this coverage at $15,000. We
considered several issues in arriving at that figure.
First, the pricing for this coverage has to be actuarially sound
with premiums varying, to the extent possible, by risk. Second,
Sec. 555 of the National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994, which
[[Page 70192]]
mandates ICC coverage, sets a cap of $75 that we may charge for this
coverage. Third, our initial estimates were that the number of
policyholders receiving benefits under ICC coverage would be between
3400-3700 each year. Fourth, we considered the uncertainties associated
with the introduction of the product, especially since we had had no
direct experience with ICC coverage.
In making initial estimates of ICC claims, we had access to our
loss experience from 1978 through 1994. The latest experience period
for estimating ICC claims runs through 1998. Based on our additional
experience with flood losses--losses large enough to trigger community
declarations of substantial damage--we have decreased the number of
expected annual ICC claims to a range of 2700--2900. On this basis, we
are confident that the limit of liability for ICC coverage can be
increased from $15,000 to $20,000 (a 33% increase) with no change in
premium. The number of ICC claims actually filed since the introduction
of this coverage is small compared to the number that we expected based
on our flood claims filed under building coverage. We intend to
continue analyzing this discrepancy, make further adjustments in
premium charges, coverage amounts, or both as warranted, and to
continue our education efforts with policyholders and local officials
to make sure that they adequately understand the coverage.
Administrative Procedure Act Determination
We are publishing this final rule without opportunity for prior
public comment under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553.
This final rule is a rule of agency procedure or practice that is
excepted from the prior public comment requirements of Sec. 553(b). The
rule makes nonsubstantive, nonsignificant changes to 44 CFR part 61 by
conferring a benefit to flood insurance policyholders, increasing
coverage for the increased cost of compliance without an increase in
premium.
National Environmental Policy Act
The requirements of 44 CFR Part 10, Environmental Consideration,
categorically exclude this final rule. We have not prepared an
environmental impact assessment.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
This final rule is not a significant regulatory action within the
meaning of Sec. 2(f) of E.O. 12866 of September 30, 1993, 58 FR 51735,
but attempts to adhere to the regulatory principles set forth in E.O.
12866. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this final
rule under E.O. 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The final rule is not subject to the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rule involves no policies that have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, dated August 4, 1999. The rule
simply increases coverage for the increased cost of compliance from
$15,000 to $20,000 without an increase in premium. It involves no
preemption of State law nor does it limit State policymaking
discretion. In light of the purpose of the rule and the absence of
federalism implications, we have not consulted with State and local
officials during preparation of this rule.
I certify that the requirements of Executive Order 13132 have been
met in a meaningful and timely manner.
Executive Order 12778, Civil Justice Reform
This final rule meets the applicable standards of Sec. 2(b)(2) of
E.O. 12778.
Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking
We have sent this final rule to the Congress and to the General
Accounting Office under the Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking
Act, Pub. L. 104-121. The rule is not a ``major rule'' within the
meaning of that Act. It is an administrative action in support of
normal day-to-day activities that increases a benefit to policyholders
without increasing premiums. It does not result in nor is it likely to
result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more. It
will not result in a major increase in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or
geographic regions. It will not have ``significant adverse effects'' on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-
based enterprises. This final rule is exempt (1) from the requirements
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and (2) from the Paperwork Reduction
Act. The rule is not an unfunded Federal mandate within the meaning of
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-4. It does not
meet the $100,000,000 threshold of that Act, and any enforceable duties
are imposed as a condition of Federal assistance or a duty arising from
participation in a voluntary Federal program.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 61
Flood insurance.
Accordingly, we amend 44 CFR part 61 as follows:
PART 61--INSURANCE COVERAGE AND RATES
1. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 43 FR 41943, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127 of Mar. 31,
1979, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.
2. The first sentence of the second paragraph of Coverage D--
Increased Cost of Compliance in Article 4 of Appendix A(1) to Part 61
that begins ``The limit of liability * * *'' is revised to read as
follows:
Appendix A(1) to Part 61
* * * * *
Article 4
* * * * *
Coverage D--Increased Cost of Compliance
* * * * *
The limit of liability under this Coverage D (Increased Cost of
Compliance) is $20,000. * * *
* * * * *
2. The first sentence of the second paragraph of Coverage D--
Increased Cost of Compliance in Article 4 of Appendix A(2) to Part 61
that begins ``The limit of liability * * *'' is revised to read as
follows:
Appendix A(2) to Part 61
* * * * *
Article 4
* * * * *
Coverage D--Increased Cost of Compliance
* * * * *
The limit of liability under this Coverage D (Increased Cost of
Compliance) is $20,000. * * *
* * * * *
3. The first sentence of the second paragraph of Coverage D--
Increased Cost of Compliance in Article 4 of Appendix A(3) to Part 61
that begins ``The limit of liability * * *'' is revised to read as
follows:
Appendix A(3)--to Part 61
* * * * *
Article 4
* * * * *
[[Page 70193]]
Coverage D--Increased Cost of Compliance
* * * * *
The limit of liability under this Coverage D (Increased Cost of
Compliance) is $20,000. * * *
* * * * *
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.100, ``Flood
Insurance''; No. 83.516, ``Disaster Assistance'')
Dated: December 13, 1999.
Jo Ann Howard,
Administrator,
Federal Insurance Administration.
[FR Doc. 99-32657 Filed 12-15-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-03-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.